2025-2026 Season — Page 8 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 351 | Sports Academy VBC 16-Premier | 2144 | 29-24 | 55% | 16 | CA |
| 352 | Skyline 12-Royal | 2144 | 40-14 | 73% | 12 | TX |
| 353 | KC Power 15-2 | 2143 | 48-15 | 75% | 15 | KS |
| 354 | 501 Volley 16-1 national | 2143 | 55-13 | 81% | 16 | AR |
| 355 | VAQUERAS 16-F freddy | 2143 | 36-2 | 95% | 16 | PR |
| 356 | MVA 12-Julio | 2143 | 54-7 | 89% | 12 | FL |
| 357 | Countdown 15-1 elite | 2143 | 43-26 | 62% | 15 | FL |
| 358 | NPJ Salem 16 National | 2142 | 54-34 | 61% | 16 | OR |
| 359 | OT 13-O tj | 2142 | 43-24 | 64% | 13 | FL |
| 360 | 360 17-Kaos black | 2141 | 46-7 | 84% | 17 | TX |
| 361 | EMV 13-Black chris | 2141 | 41-15 | 73% | 13 | TX |
| 362 | Vision 15-Blue | 2141 | 43-24 | 64% | 15 | CA |
| 363 | AJV 14-Adidas | 2141 | 34-28 | 55% | 14 | TX |
| 364 | Omni 14-N1 | 2141 | 70-18 | 80% | 14 | AZ |
| 365 | UEPA 16-D | 2140 | 47-14 | 77% | 16 | TX |
| 366 | Tsunami 16-1e casey | 2139 | 54-15 | 78% | 16 | GA |
| 367 | Northern Lights 16-2 | 2139 | 61-22 | 73% | 16 | MN |
| 368 | Momentum 14-Gold | 2139 | 64-29 | 69% | 14 | FL |
| 369 | No Coast 15-Wave | 2138 | 50-15 | 77% | 15 | MO |
| 370 | NOLA Jessica/Gavin 14 | 2138 | 55-5 | 92% | 14 | |
| 371 | MVVC 14-Red | 2138 | 46-27 | 63% | 14 | CA |
| 372 | OT 15-O christian | 2137 | 53-32 | 62% | 15 | FL |
| 373 | TI Elite 16.1 | 2137 | 54-30 | 64% | 16 | |
| 374 | Kokoro Volleyball 17-1 | 2136 | 44-29 | 60% | 17 | MN |
| 375 | HP Illinois 14-National | 2136 | 33-23 | 59% | 14 | IL |
| 376 | TopFlight 16-National bl | 2136 | 25-15 | 63% | 16 | NV |
| 377 | Top Select 16 Elite | 2135 | 54-34 | 61% | 16 | FL |
| 378 | Actyve 16-Navy | 2135 | 41-34 | 55% | 16 | CA |
| 379 | Kali 11-F jose | 2135 | 20-1 | 95% | 11 | PR |
| 380 | Vision 18 Gold | 2134 | 33-21 | 61% | 18 | CA |
| 381 | Arete 17-Navy telos | 2134 | 46-18 | 71% | 17 | TX |
| 382 | GVA 14-Pink | 2134 | 22-0 | 100% | 14 | PR |
| 383 | Metro VBC 16-Travel | 2134 | 7-1 | 88% | 16 | DC |
| 384 | Premier Nebraska 14-Black | 2133 | 38-15 | 72% | 14 | NE |
| 385 | Boiler Jrs 16-O gold | 2132 | 54-38 | 59% | 16 | IN |
| 386 | Circle City 12-Purple | 2132 | 63-14 | 82% | 12 | IN |
| 387 | UNITED 12-Evren/quillan | 2132 | 10-6 | 63% | 12 | CA |
| 388 | Elevation 17-Chicas | 2132 | 40-26 | 61% | 17 | OH |
| 389 | Boss CLE 16-1 | 2131 | 42-30 | 58% | 16 | OH |
| 390 | EXCEL 13-National red | 2130 | 36-25 | 59% | 13 | TX |
| 391 | TAV Houston 15-Black | 2130 | 50-34 | 60% | 15 | TX |
| 392 | SASVBC G 16 KEVIN | 2130 | 34-13 | 72% | 16 | HI |
| 393 | Northern Lights 17-2 | 2130 | 67-20 | 77% | 17 | MN |
| 394 | 1United 11-N blue | 2130 | 45-4 | 92% | 11 | TX |
| 395 | Tri-State Elite 14-Blue | 2129 | 37-26 | 59% | 14 | OH |
| 396 | Northeast 17-1 | 2129 | 44-24 | 65% | 17 | CT |
| 397 | Titanas 12-1 | 2129 | 7-6 | 54% | 12 | PR |
| 398 | Premier Nebraska 18-1 | 2129 | 7-2 | 78% | 18 | NE |
| 399 | KNVBC 13-Hype black | 2128 | 40-11 | 78% | 13 | KS |
| 400 | CIA 15-Black | 2128 | 53-12 | 82% | 15 | IA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.