Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 8 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
351 Sports Academy VBC 16-Premier 2144 29-24 55% 16 CA
352 Skyline 12-Royal 2144 40-14 73% 12 TX
353 KC Power 15-2 2143 48-15 75% 15 KS
354 501 Volley 16-1 national 2143 55-13 81% 16 AR
355 VAQUERAS 16-F freddy 2143 36-2 95% 16 PR
356 MVA 12-Julio 2143 54-7 89% 12 FL
357 Countdown 15-1 elite 2143 43-26 62% 15 FL
358 NPJ Salem 16 National 2142 54-34 61% 16 OR
359 OT 13-O tj 2142 43-24 64% 13 FL
360 360 17-Kaos black 2141 46-7 84% 17 TX
361 EMV 13-Black chris 2141 41-15 73% 13 TX
362 Vision 15-Blue 2141 43-24 64% 15 CA
363 AJV 14-Adidas 2141 34-28 55% 14 TX
364 Omni 14-N1 2141 70-18 80% 14 AZ
365 UEPA 16-D 2140 47-14 77% 16 TX
366 Tsunami 16-1e casey 2139 54-15 78% 16 GA
367 Northern Lights 16-2 2139 61-22 73% 16 MN
368 Momentum 14-Gold 2139 64-29 69% 14 FL
369 No Coast 15-Wave 2138 50-15 77% 15 MO
370 NOLA Jessica/Gavin 14 2138 55-5 92% 14
371 MVVC 14-Red 2138 46-27 63% 14 CA
372 OT 15-O christian 2137 53-32 62% 15 FL
373 TI Elite 16.1 2137 54-30 64% 16
374 Kokoro Volleyball 17-1 2136 44-29 60% 17 MN
375 HP Illinois 14-National 2136 33-23 59% 14 IL
376 TopFlight 16-National bl 2136 25-15 63% 16 NV
377 Top Select 16 Elite 2135 54-34 61% 16 FL
378 Actyve 16-Navy 2135 41-34 55% 16 CA
379 Kali 11-F jose 2135 20-1 95% 11 PR
380 Vision 18 Gold 2134 33-21 61% 18 CA
381 Arete 17-Navy telos 2134 46-18 71% 17 TX
382 GVA 14-Pink 2134 22-0 100% 14 PR
383 Metro VBC 16-Travel 2134 7-1 88% 16 DC
384 Premier Nebraska 14-Black 2133 38-15 72% 14 NE
385 Boiler Jrs 16-O gold 2132 54-38 59% 16 IN
386 Circle City 12-Purple 2132 63-14 82% 12 IN
387 UNITED 12-Evren/quillan 2132 10-6 63% 12 CA
388 Elevation 17-Chicas 2132 40-26 61% 17 OH
389 Boss CLE 16-1 2131 42-30 58% 16 OH
390 EXCEL 13-National red 2130 36-25 59% 13 TX
391 TAV Houston 15-Black 2130 50-34 60% 15 TX
392 SASVBC G 16 KEVIN 2130 34-13 72% 16 HI
393 Northern Lights 17-2 2130 67-20 77% 17 MN
394 1United 11-N blue 2130 45-4 92% 11 TX
395 Tri-State Elite 14-Blue 2129 37-26 59% 14 OH
396 Northeast 17-1 2129 44-24 65% 17 CT
397 Titanas 12-1 2129 7-6 54% 12 PR
398 Premier Nebraska 18-1 2129 7-2 78% 18 NE
399 KNVBC 13-Hype black 2128 40-11 78% 13 KS
400 CIA 15-Black 2128 53-12 82% 15 IA
← Previous1234567891011Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.