2025-2026 Season — Page 8 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 351 | VAQUERAS 16-F freddy | 2145 | 36-2 | 95% | 16 | PR |
| 352 | Vision 15-Blue | 2145 | 43-24 | 64% | 15 | CA |
| 353 | NPJ Salem 16 National | 2145 | 54-34 | 61% | 16 | OR |
| 354 | AJV 14-Adidas | 2144 | 34-28 | 55% | 14 | TX |
| 355 | Tsunami 16-1e casey | 2144 | 54-15 | 78% | 16 | GA |
| 356 | Skyline 12-Royal | 2143 | 40-14 | 73% | 12 | TX |
| 357 | GJ 12 PREMIER | 2143 | 49-11 | 82% | 12 | FL |
| 358 | KIVA 15-White | 2143 | 49-33 | 60% | 15 | KY |
| 359 | MVA 12-Julio | 2143 | 54-7 | 89% | 12 | FL |
| 360 | EMV 13-Black chris | 2142 | 41-15 | 73% | 13 | TX |
| 361 | Omni 14-N1 | 2142 | 70-18 | 80% | 14 | AZ |
| 362 | Wisconsin Elite 15-Elite | 2142 | 60-14 | 81% | 15 | WI |
| 363 | GVA 14-Pink | 2142 | 22-0 | 100% | 14 | PR |
| 364 | OT 13-O tj | 2142 | 43-24 | 64% | 13 | FL |
| 365 | AZ Sky 18 Gold | 2141 | 46-22 | 68% | 18 | AZ |
| 366 | MVVC 14-Red | 2141 | 46-27 | 63% | 14 | CA |
| 367 | AP 14-Adidas | 2140 | 49-25 | 66% | 14 | TX |
| 368 | Sports Academy VBC 16-Premier | 2140 | 29-24 | 55% | 16 | CA |
| 369 | No Coast 15-Wave | 2140 | 50-15 | 77% | 15 | MO |
| 370 | UEPA 16-D | 2140 | 47-14 | 77% | 16 | TX |
| 371 | Actyve 16-Navy | 2139 | 41-34 | 55% | 16 | CA |
| 372 | Premier Nebraska 14-Black | 2139 | 38-15 | 72% | 14 | NE |
| 373 | Momentum 14-Gold | 2139 | 64-29 | 69% | 14 | FL |
| 374 | Kali 11-F jose | 2138 | 20-1 | 95% | 11 | PR |
| 375 | TopFlight 16-National bl | 2138 | 25-15 | 63% | 16 | NV |
| 376 | 360 17-Kaos black | 2137 | 46-7 | 84% | 17 | TX |
| 377 | Arete 17-Navy telos | 2136 | 46-18 | 71% | 17 | TX |
| 378 | 1United 12-N blue | 2135 | 52-12 | 81% | 12 | TX |
| 379 | TI Elite 16.1 | 2135 | 54-30 | 64% | 16 | IN |
| 380 | Vision 18 Gold | 2135 | 33-21 | 61% | 18 | CA |
| 381 | EXCEL 13-National red | 2135 | 36-25 | 59% | 13 | TX |
| 382 | Top Select 16 Elite | 2135 | 54-34 | 61% | 16 | FL |
| 383 | NorthEast Volleyball Club 17-1 | 2135 | 44-24 | 65% | 17 | CT |
| 384 | TAV 14-Black (NT) | 2134 | 33-24 | 58% | 14 | TX |
| 385 | HP Illinois 14-National | 2134 | 33-23 | 59% | 14 | MO |
| 386 | TAV Houston 15-Black | 2134 | 50-34 | 60% | 15 | TX |
| 387 | Boss CLE 16-1 | 2134 | 42-30 | 58% | 16 | OH |
| 388 | CoJrs 17-Kevin | 2133 | 50-21 | 70% | 17 | CO |
| 389 | Boiler Jrs 16-O gold | 2133 | 54-38 | 59% | 16 | IN |
| 390 | Tri-State Elite 14-Blue | 2132 | 37-26 | 59% | 14 | KY |
| 391 | Elevation 17-Chicas | 2132 | 40-26 | 61% | 17 | OH |
| 392 | Michigan Volleyball Academy 16 MVA - Rise Academy 61 | 2132 | 31-17 | 65% | 16 | MI |
| 393 | CIA 15-Black | 2131 | 53-12 | 82% | 15 | IA |
| 394 | Northern Lights 17-2 | 2131 | 71-22 | 76% | 17 | MN |
| 395 | 1United 11-N blue | 2130 | 45-4 | 92% | 11 | TX |
| 396 | CUVC 16 Open | 2129 | 43-37 | 54% | 16 | NC |
| 397 | OT 17-J john | 2129 | 42-36 | 54% | 17 | FL |
| 398 | SASVBC G 16 KEVIN | 2129 | 34-13 | 72% | 16 | HI |
| 399 | A5 18-Boba | 2128 | 62-8 | 89% | 18 | GA |
| 400 | OT 16-J will | 2128 | 36-27 | 57% | 16 | FL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.