Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 8 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
351 VAQUERAS 16-F freddy 2145 36-2 95% 16 PR
352 Vision 15-Blue 2145 43-24 64% 15 CA
353 NPJ Salem 16 National 2145 54-34 61% 16 OR
354 AJV 14-Adidas 2144 34-28 55% 14 TX
355 Tsunami 16-1e casey 2144 54-15 78% 16 GA
356 Skyline 12-Royal 2143 40-14 73% 12 TX
357 GJ 12 PREMIER 2143 49-11 82% 12 FL
358 KIVA 15-White 2143 49-33 60% 15 KY
359 MVA 12-Julio 2143 54-7 89% 12 FL
360 EMV 13-Black chris 2142 41-15 73% 13 TX
361 Omni 14-N1 2142 70-18 80% 14 AZ
362 Wisconsin Elite 15-Elite 2142 60-14 81% 15 WI
363 GVA 14-Pink 2142 22-0 100% 14 PR
364 OT 13-O tj 2142 43-24 64% 13 FL
365 AZ Sky 18 Gold 2141 46-22 68% 18 AZ
366 MVVC 14-Red 2141 46-27 63% 14 CA
367 AP 14-Adidas 2140 49-25 66% 14 TX
368 Sports Academy VBC 16-Premier 2140 29-24 55% 16 CA
369 No Coast 15-Wave 2140 50-15 77% 15 MO
370 UEPA 16-D 2140 47-14 77% 16 TX
371 Actyve 16-Navy 2139 41-34 55% 16 CA
372 Premier Nebraska 14-Black 2139 38-15 72% 14 NE
373 Momentum 14-Gold 2139 64-29 69% 14 FL
374 Kali 11-F jose 2138 20-1 95% 11 PR
375 TopFlight 16-National bl 2138 25-15 63% 16 NV
376 360 17-Kaos black 2137 46-7 84% 17 TX
377 Arete 17-Navy telos 2136 46-18 71% 17 TX
378 1United 12-N blue 2135 52-12 81% 12 TX
379 TI Elite 16.1 2135 54-30 64% 16 IN
380 Vision 18 Gold 2135 33-21 61% 18 CA
381 EXCEL 13-National red 2135 36-25 59% 13 TX
382 Top Select 16 Elite 2135 54-34 61% 16 FL
383 NorthEast Volleyball Club 17-1 2135 44-24 65% 17 CT
384 TAV 14-Black (NT) 2134 33-24 58% 14 TX
385 HP Illinois 14-National 2134 33-23 59% 14 MO
386 TAV Houston 15-Black 2134 50-34 60% 15 TX
387 Boss CLE 16-1 2134 42-30 58% 16 OH
388 CoJrs 17-Kevin 2133 50-21 70% 17 CO
389 Boiler Jrs 16-O gold 2133 54-38 59% 16 IN
390 Tri-State Elite 14-Blue 2132 37-26 59% 14 KY
391 Elevation 17-Chicas 2132 40-26 61% 17 OH
392 Michigan Volleyball Academy 16 MVA - Rise Academy 61 2132 31-17 65% 16 MI
393 CIA 15-Black 2131 53-12 82% 15 IA
394 Northern Lights 17-2 2131 71-22 76% 17 MN
395 1United 11-N blue 2130 45-4 92% 11 TX
396 CUVC 16 Open 2129 43-37 54% 16 NC
397 OT 17-J john 2129 42-36 54% 17 FL
398 SASVBC G 16 KEVIN 2129 34-13 72% 16 HI
399 A5 18-Boba 2128 62-8 89% 18 GA
400 OT 16-J will 2128 36-27 57% 16 FL
← Previous1234567891011Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.