Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 11 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
501 Ka Ulukoa 16 Larry 2094 55-13 81% 16 HI
502 CoJrs 16-Sherri 2094 42-28 60% 16 CO
503 915 15-Hill 2094 58-21 73% 15 TX
504 ARIZONA STORM 12-Thunder 2094 57-11 84% 12 AZ
505 Elevate 14 Julia 2094 52-6 90% 14 SC
506 Absolute 15-Black 2093 40-28 59% 15 CA
507 Stars 18 Helle 2092 51-17 75% 18 SC
508 MiElite 18 Mizuno 2092 29-24 55% 18 MI
509 CPA 17-Benson 2092 42-30 58% 17 WA
510 MJVA 16-Elite black 2092 48-14 77% 16 TN
511 Apex 16-National navy 2091 14-18 44% 16 MO
512 SC Rockstsar 15-Carlos 2091 7-1 88% 15 MN
513 VEVA Impact 14-Black 2090 48-21 70% 14 PA
514 OMNI 14-National 2090 51-25 67% 14 CA
515 Colorado Juniors 13-Tammy 2090 49-22 69% 13 CO
516 Premier Nebraska 13 Gold 2090 31-18 63% 13 NE
517 SynergyForce 16-1 natl 2090 51-31 62% 16 CA
518 CLUB LEGACY 15-Alpha 2088 30-10 75% 15 NE
519 Vegas Aces 13 REN 2088 32-18 64% 13 NV
520 OT 18-O tj 2088 37-17 69% 18 FL
521 SF TREMORS 16-Wolverines 2088 49-28 64% 16 CA
522 KIVA 15-Red 2088 42-31 58% 15 KY
523 Amarillo Xtreme 13-Shock 2087 34-6 85% 13 TX
524 SC Rockstar 14-Nicole 2087 36-25 59% 14 CA
525 SASVBC G 15 RANDY 2087 77-16 83% 15 HI
526 EliteVBTC 15-Black 2086 40-31 56% 15 OH
527 SA Juniors 15-Adidas 2086 60-17 78% 15 TX
528 PJVBC 14 National 2086 70-17 80% 14 WA
529 SA Juniors 13-Adidas 2086 59-13 82% 13 TX
530 Adversity 17-Adidas 2085 34-26 57% 17 IL
531 HPSTL 15 Royal 2085 31-35 46% 15 MO
532 Maunalani 15-Rise 2085 48-18 73% 15 HI
533 OVA 13-Black 2084 66-16 80% 13 FL
534 KEVC 15-1 2084 49-5 91% 15 MN
535 SG Elite 15 Roshambo 2084 36-18 67% 15 CA
536 Florida's Sports Coast Elite 15-Blue 2084 62-16 79% 15 FL
537 CSVC 17-Black 2084 52-25 68% 17 NC
538 Alliance 16-Molten 2083 57-21 73% 16 TN
539 Absolute 14-Pink 2082 44-25 64% 14 CA
540 SOSVBC 15-N artem 2082 19-7 73% 15 NY
541 Alamo 13-Premier 2082 49-25 66% 13 TX
542 Hive 17-Gold 2082 58-17 77% 17 UT
543 FaR Out 17-Black 2082 52-20 72% 17 MI
544 Jax Skyline 17 Royal 2082 57-27 68% 17 FL
545 Vision 12 Gold 2081 45-18 71% 12 CA
546 H Skyline 14-Black 2081 39-24 62% 14 TX
547 Illini Elite 16 Cardinal 2081 40-32 56% 16 IL
548 Madfrog 13-N black 2080 38-12 76% 13 TX
549 PVA 13 ELITE 2080 27-28 49% 13 MO
550 Elevate Athletics 17-Nike kekoa 2079 7-1 88% 17 UT
← Previous1234567891011121314Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.