2025-2026 Season — Page 11 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 501 | Ka Ulukoa 16 Larry | 2094 | 55-13 | 81% | 16 | HI |
| 502 | CoJrs 16-Sherri | 2094 | 42-28 | 60% | 16 | CO |
| 503 | 915 15-Hill | 2094 | 58-21 | 73% | 15 | TX |
| 504 | ARIZONA STORM 12-Thunder | 2094 | 57-11 | 84% | 12 | AZ |
| 505 | Elevate 14 Julia | 2094 | 52-6 | 90% | 14 | SC |
| 506 | Absolute 15-Black | 2093 | 40-28 | 59% | 15 | CA |
| 507 | Stars 18 Helle | 2092 | 51-17 | 75% | 18 | SC |
| 508 | MiElite 18 Mizuno | 2092 | 29-24 | 55% | 18 | MI |
| 509 | CPA 17-Benson | 2092 | 42-30 | 58% | 17 | WA |
| 510 | MJVA 16-Elite black | 2092 | 48-14 | 77% | 16 | TN |
| 511 | Apex 16-National navy | 2091 | 14-18 | 44% | 16 | MO |
| 512 | SC Rockstsar 15-Carlos | 2091 | 7-1 | 88% | 15 | MN |
| 513 | VEVA Impact 14-Black | 2090 | 48-21 | 70% | 14 | PA |
| 514 | OMNI 14-National | 2090 | 51-25 | 67% | 14 | CA |
| 515 | Colorado Juniors 13-Tammy | 2090 | 49-22 | 69% | 13 | CO |
| 516 | Premier Nebraska 13 Gold | 2090 | 31-18 | 63% | 13 | NE |
| 517 | SynergyForce 16-1 natl | 2090 | 51-31 | 62% | 16 | CA |
| 518 | CLUB LEGACY 15-Alpha | 2088 | 30-10 | 75% | 15 | NE |
| 519 | Vegas Aces 13 REN | 2088 | 32-18 | 64% | 13 | NV |
| 520 | OT 18-O tj | 2088 | 37-17 | 69% | 18 | FL |
| 521 | SF TREMORS 16-Wolverines | 2088 | 49-28 | 64% | 16 | CA |
| 522 | KIVA 15-Red | 2088 | 42-31 | 58% | 15 | KY |
| 523 | Amarillo Xtreme 13-Shock | 2087 | 34-6 | 85% | 13 | TX |
| 524 | SC Rockstar 14-Nicole | 2087 | 36-25 | 59% | 14 | CA |
| 525 | SASVBC G 15 RANDY | 2087 | 77-16 | 83% | 15 | HI |
| 526 | EliteVBTC 15-Black | 2086 | 40-31 | 56% | 15 | OH |
| 527 | SA Juniors 15-Adidas | 2086 | 60-17 | 78% | 15 | TX |
| 528 | PJVBC 14 National | 2086 | 70-17 | 80% | 14 | WA |
| 529 | SA Juniors 13-Adidas | 2086 | 59-13 | 82% | 13 | TX |
| 530 | Adversity 17-Adidas | 2085 | 34-26 | 57% | 17 | IL |
| 531 | HPSTL 15 Royal | 2085 | 31-35 | 46% | 15 | MO |
| 532 | Maunalani 15-Rise | 2085 | 48-18 | 73% | 15 | HI |
| 533 | OVA 13-Black | 2084 | 66-16 | 80% | 13 | FL |
| 534 | KEVC 15-1 | 2084 | 49-5 | 91% | 15 | MN |
| 535 | SG Elite 15 Roshambo | 2084 | 36-18 | 67% | 15 | CA |
| 536 | Florida's Sports Coast Elite 15-Blue | 2084 | 62-16 | 79% | 15 | FL |
| 537 | CSVC 17-Black | 2084 | 52-25 | 68% | 17 | NC |
| 538 | Alliance 16-Molten | 2083 | 57-21 | 73% | 16 | TN |
| 539 | Absolute 14-Pink | 2082 | 44-25 | 64% | 14 | CA |
| 540 | SOSVBC 15-N artem | 2082 | 19-7 | 73% | 15 | NY |
| 541 | Alamo 13-Premier | 2082 | 49-25 | 66% | 13 | TX |
| 542 | Hive 17-Gold | 2082 | 58-17 | 77% | 17 | UT |
| 543 | FaR Out 17-Black | 2082 | 52-20 | 72% | 17 | MI |
| 544 | Jax Skyline 17 Royal | 2082 | 57-27 | 68% | 17 | FL |
| 545 | Vision 12 Gold | 2081 | 45-18 | 71% | 12 | CA |
| 546 | H Skyline 14-Black | 2081 | 39-24 | 62% | 14 | TX |
| 547 | Illini Elite 16 Cardinal | 2081 | 40-32 | 56% | 16 | IL |
| 548 | Madfrog 13-N black | 2080 | 38-12 | 76% | 13 | TX |
| 549 | PVA 13 ELITE | 2080 | 27-28 | 49% | 13 | MO |
| 550 | Elevate Athletics 17-Nike kekoa | 2079 | 7-1 | 88% | 17 | UT |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.