Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 11 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
501 OPU 17-1 2096 47-11 81% 17 FL
502 AZ REV 13-Premier 2095 51-32 61% 13 AZ
503 915 15-Hill 2095 58-21 73% 15 TX
504 Northern Lights 15-2 2095 68-20 77% 15 MN
505 Northern Lights 13-1 2095 45-23 66% 13 MN
506 NOLA Alyx/Jenna 16 2095 47-12 80% 16
507 CPA 17-Benson 2094 42-30 58% 17 WA
508 Tstreet 12-Curtis 2094 36-18 67% 12 CA
509 Mintonette Sports 16-1 2094 43-35 55% 16 OH
510 NorStar 16-1 2093 56-25 69% 16 CA
511 APV 14-National black 2092 43-16 72% 14 TX
512 Cangrejeras Santurce 18 2092 10-5 67% 18 PR
513 1st Alliance 13-1 2092 32-22 59% 13 IL
514 SF TREMORS 16-Wolverines 2092 49-28 64% 16 CA
515 WAVE 13-Tammy 2092 32-24 57% 13 CA
516 ARIZONA STORM 12-Thunder 2091 57-11 84% 12 AZ
517 NORCO 18-Black 2091 35-15 70% 18 CO
518 Stars 18 Helle 2091 51-17 75% 18 SC
519 VEVA Impact 14-Black 2089 48-21 70% 14 PA
520 SA Juniors 13-Adidas 2089 59-13 82% 13 TX
521 Sunshine 15 Pacific 2089 49-34 59% 15 CA
522 Ka Ulukoa 16 Larry 2089 55-13 81% 16 HI
523 SC Rockstar 14-Nicole 2088 36-25 59% 14 CA
524 EliteVBTC 15-Black 2087 40-31 56% 15 OH
525 MiElite 18 Mizuno 2087 29-24 55% 18 MI
526 SC Rockstsar 15-Carlos 2087 7-1 88% 15
527 PJVBC 14 National 2086 70-17 80% 14 WA
528 Jax Skyline 17 Royal 2086 57-27 68% 17 FL
529 OMNI 14-National 2085 51-25 67% 14 CA
530 Absolute 14-Pink 2085 44-25 64% 14 CA
531 OVA 13-Black 2085 66-16 80% 13 FL
532 KIVA 15-Red 2084 42-31 58% 15 KY
533 FaR Out 17-Black 2084 52-20 72% 17 MI
534 HPSTL 15 Royal 2084 31-35 46% 15 MO
535 Vegas Aces 13 REN 2083 32-18 64% 13 NV
536 Alliance 16-Molten 2082 57-21 73% 16 TN
537 GP 17 National 2082 63-35 64% 17 FL
538 OT 18-O tj 2082 37-17 69% 18 FL
539 PVA 13 ELITE 2082 27-28 49% 13 MO
540 Hive 17-Gold 2082 58-17 77% 17 UT
541 Amarillo Xtreme 13-Shock 2082 34-6 85% 13 TX
542 Alliance 18 REN 2081 41-12 77% 18 TN
543 Boiler Jrs 11-E gold 2081 62-11 85% 11 IN
544 1st Alliance 16-White 2081 49-17 74% 16 IL
545 Absolute 15-Black 2081 40-28 59% 15 CA
546 Madfrog 13-N black 2080 38-12 76% 13 TX
547 TAV Houston 17-Black branden 2080 6-2 75% 17 TX
548 AZ Storm Elite VBC 12-Thunder 2080 7-0 100% 12
549 SynergyForce 16-1 natl 2079 51-31 62% 16 CA
550 SASVBC G 15 RANDY 2079 77-16 83% 15 HI
← Previous1234567891011121314Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.