2025-2026 Season — Page 13 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 601 | L2 15-1 | 2068 | 44-21 | 68% | 15 | MI |
| 602 | Big Sky 13-1 | 2067 | 57-7 | 85% | 13 | MT |
| 603 | 360 Volleyball Club 17 17 HP Elite | 2067 | 9-6 | 60% | 17 | TX |
| 604 | VOLT 16-1 | 2066 | 39-20 | 66% | 16 | ND |
| 605 | A5 16-Erika | 2066 | 69-25 | 73% | 16 | GA |
| 606 | HNL Volleyball 14-Black | 2066 | 6-3 | 67% | 14 | HI |
| 607 | Rockwood Thunder 13-Elite | 2066 | 56-18 | 76% | 13 | MO |
| 608 | Invasion 13-Black | 2066 | 37-21 | 64% | 13 | MO |
| 609 | MVA 15-Julio | 2065 | 66-31 | 68% | 15 | FL |
| 610 | TXP 12-Black alonso | 2065 | 50-12 | 81% | 12 | TX |
| 611 | FEVA 16-Elyse | 2065 | 51-20 | 72% | 16 | FL |
| 612 | NIVA 15-PURPLE | 2065 | 74-24 | 76% | 15 | IN |
| 613 | TAV Houston 17-Black branden | 2065 | 6-2 | 75% | 17 | TX |
| 614 | Peak VA 17-Black | 2065 | 42-27 | 61% | 17 | TX |
| 615 | TX STORM 18-Smack | 2065 | 41-4 | 91% | 18 | TX |
| 616 | UNION 15-Black | 2065 | 42-38 | 53% | 15 | IN |
| 617 | APV 15-National black | 2065 | 45-15 | 75% | 15 | TX |
| 618 | SPVB 15 Elite | 2064 | 24-31 | 44% | 15 | IL |
| 619 | DYNASTY 11-Black | 2064 | 46-7 | 87% | 11 | KS |
| 620 | UEPA 15-D | 2064 | 42-14 | 74% | 15 | TX |
| 621 | Rockwood Thunder 15-Navy | 2063 | 48-20 | 71% | 15 | MO |
| 622 | NIVA 17-PURPLE | 2063 | 71-26 | 73% | 17 | IN |
| 623 | 575 18-Lpe danny | 2063 | 35-21 | 63% | 18 | GA |
| 624 | EXCEL 18-National red | 2063 | 34-21 | 61% | 18 | TX |
| 625 | Academy 15-O venom | 2063 | 40-42 | 49% | 15 | IN |
| 626 | M2 Volleyball 17-E1 | 2063 | 60-23 | 72% | 17 | GA |
| 627 | H Skyline 12-Royal | 2062 | 40-9 | 82% | 12 | TX |
| 628 | MAVA 17-Select | 2062 | 53-28 | 65% | 17 | KY |
| 629 | Kairos 17 Beta | 2061 | 48-19 | 72% | 17 | SD |
| 630 | Club Sol 15-Teal | 2061 | 48-27 | 64% | 15 | UT |
| 631 | Munciana In 15 Vipers | 2061 | 54-20 | 73% | 15 | IN |
| 632 | Aspire 18 Alpha | 2061 | 42-26 | 62% | 18 | AZ |
| 633 | SWMNVB 16-1 | 2061 | 40-10 | 80% | 16 | MN |
| 634 | Drive Nation 15-Red | 2061 | 21-25 | 46% | 15 | TX |
| 635 | WD Nation 17-Blue | 2060 | 49-17 | 74% | 17 | LA |
| 636 | Illini Elite 18 Cardinal | 2060 | 18-9 | 67% | 18 | IL |
| 637 | Ne Jrs 17-Black | 2060 | 30-16 | 65% | 17 | NE |
| 638 | KIVA 17-Red | 2059 | 37-32 | 54% | 17 | KY |
| 639 | Idaho ONE 15-Elite | 2059 | 56-28 | 67% | 15 | ID |
| 640 | SCVB 16 Riley | 2059 | 39-21 | 65% | 16 | CA |
| 641 | MAVA 15-Select (GA) | 2058 | 8-1 | 89% | 15 | GA |
| 642 | BRUSA 15 Courtney | 2058 | 33-16 | 67% | 15 | CA |
| 643 | TX LEGACY 14-Elite | 2058 | 58-16 | 78% | 14 | TX |
| 644 | MKE Sting 14-White | 2058 | 73-21 | 78% | 14 | WI |
| 645 | North Point 16-Pali | 2058 | 40-14 | 71% | 16 | TX |
| 646 | Academy 18 Diamond | 2058 | 25-25 | 50% | 18 | NC |
| 647 | Sky High Adidas 15 Elite | 2058 | 33-29 | 53% | 15 | IL |
| 648 | Six Pack 17 | 2058 | 55-17 | 76% | 17 | IA |
| 649 | Academy 13 Diamond | 2058 | 33-28 | 54% | 13 | NC |
| 650 | Miami Hype 15-Prime1 | 2058 | 62-26 | 70% | 15 | FL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.