Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 13 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
601 L2 15-1 2068 44-21 68% 15 MI
602 Big Sky 13-1 2067 57-7 85% 13 MT
603 360 Volleyball Club 17 17 HP Elite 2067 9-6 60% 17 TX
604 VOLT 16-1 2066 39-20 66% 16 ND
605 A5 16-Erika 2066 69-25 73% 16 GA
606 HNL Volleyball 14-Black 2066 6-3 67% 14 HI
607 Rockwood Thunder 13-Elite 2066 56-18 76% 13 MO
608 Invasion 13-Black 2066 37-21 64% 13 MO
609 MVA 15-Julio 2065 66-31 68% 15 FL
610 TXP 12-Black alonso 2065 50-12 81% 12 TX
611 FEVA 16-Elyse 2065 51-20 72% 16 FL
612 NIVA 15-PURPLE 2065 74-24 76% 15 IN
613 TAV Houston 17-Black branden 2065 6-2 75% 17 TX
614 Peak VA 17-Black 2065 42-27 61% 17 TX
615 TX STORM 18-Smack 2065 41-4 91% 18 TX
616 UNION 15-Black 2065 42-38 53% 15 IN
617 APV 15-National black 2065 45-15 75% 15 TX
618 SPVB 15 Elite 2064 24-31 44% 15 IL
619 DYNASTY 11-Black 2064 46-7 87% 11 KS
620 UEPA 15-D 2064 42-14 74% 15 TX
621 Rockwood Thunder 15-Navy 2063 48-20 71% 15 MO
622 NIVA 17-PURPLE 2063 71-26 73% 17 IN
623 575 18-Lpe danny 2063 35-21 63% 18 GA
624 EXCEL 18-National red 2063 34-21 61% 18 TX
625 Academy 15-O venom 2063 40-42 49% 15 IN
626 M2 Volleyball 17-E1 2063 60-23 72% 17 GA
627 H Skyline 12-Royal 2062 40-9 82% 12 TX
628 MAVA 17-Select 2062 53-28 65% 17 KY
629 Kairos 17 Beta 2061 48-19 72% 17 SD
630 Club Sol 15-Teal 2061 48-27 64% 15 UT
631 Munciana In 15 Vipers 2061 54-20 73% 15 IN
632 Aspire 18 Alpha 2061 42-26 62% 18 AZ
633 SWMNVB 16-1 2061 40-10 80% 16 MN
634 Drive Nation 15-Red 2061 21-25 46% 15 TX
635 WD Nation 17-Blue 2060 49-17 74% 17 LA
636 Illini Elite 18 Cardinal 2060 18-9 67% 18 IL
637 Ne Jrs 17-Black 2060 30-16 65% 17 NE
638 KIVA 17-Red 2059 37-32 54% 17 KY
639 Idaho ONE 15-Elite 2059 56-28 67% 15 ID
640 SCVB 16 Riley 2059 39-21 65% 16 CA
641 MAVA 15-Select (GA) 2058 8-1 89% 15 GA
642 BRUSA 15 Courtney 2058 33-16 67% 15 CA
643 TX LEGACY 14-Elite 2058 58-16 78% 14 TX
644 MKE Sting 14-White 2058 73-21 78% 14 WI
645 North Point 16-Pali 2058 40-14 71% 16 TX
646 Academy 18 Diamond 2058 25-25 50% 18 NC
647 Sky High Adidas 15 Elite 2058 33-29 53% 15 IL
648 Six Pack 17 2058 55-17 76% 17 IA
649 Academy 13 Diamond 2058 33-28 54% 13 NC
650 Miami Hype 15-Prime1 2058 62-26 70% 15 FL
← Previous12345678910111213141516Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.