Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 13 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is MADFROG 15-N green with a 2441 Elo rating and 62-9 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
601 SC Elite 15-Blue-jake 2013 35-14 71% 15
602 WSRVC 12-Henriksen/kugler 2013 11-0 100% 12
603 I AM VBC 13-Red 2013 54-12 82% 13 WI
604 Alamo 15-Premier 2012 48-23 67% 15 TX
605 OT 16-J will 2012 29-24 55% 16 FL
606 Dal Skyline 16-Royal-jimmy 2012 5-3 63% 16 TX
607 ATHENA VB 17-1 gold national 2012 25-15 63% 17 OR
608 Six Pack 17 2012 47-14 77% 17 IA
609 BORINQUEN COQUI 12-1f 2012 26-5 84% 12 PR
610 Ne Jrs 17-Black 2012 13-6 68% 17
611 Rancho Valley 16-Premier 2011 8-7 53% 16
612 Aspire NW 14-1 empire 2011 26-10 72% 14 WA
613 DYNASTY 11-Black 2011 34-4 89% 11 KS
614 OPU 12-1 2011 43-10 81% 12 FL
615 SNVF 14-Blizzard 2010 42-18 70% 14
616 Stars 13 Anna 2010 50-7 88% 13 SC
617 CSVC 16-Black 2010 37-24 61% 16
618 Iowa Rockets 17-R 2009 47-18 72% 17 IA
619 Metro 18 Travel 2009 42-29 59% 18 DC
620 HPSTL 13-Orange 2009 48-15 75% 13 MO
621 Tribe 13-Elite cardinal 2009 33-15 69% 13 FL
622 Madtown 14-1 national 2008 35-11 76% 14 WI
623 BRVA 15-1 2008 28-8 78% 15 VA
624 TAV 15-Black sean 2008 42-21 65% 15 TX
625 Munciana In 15 Vipers 2008 44-14 76% 15 IN
626 Colorado Juniors 16-Sherri 2008 14-2 88% 16 CO
627 Northern Lights 13-1 2008 42-17 71% 13 MN
628 864 Elite 14-Mellie 2008 41-11 79% 14 SC
629 ECVC 15-Black 2008 35-12 74% 15 VA
630 RVC 16 National 2007 54-13 81% 16 VA
631 Boiler Jrs 16-O gold 2007 43-31 58% 16 IN
632 SA Force 16 Darkside 2007 51-14 78% 16 TX
633 Legacy 17-2 adidas 2007 33-22 60% 17 MI
634 Tri-State Elite 18-Blue 2007 31-17 65% 18 OH
635 Momentum 14-Gold 2006 32-16 67% 14 FL
636 DYNASTY 18-Black 2006 29-19 60% 18 KS
637 MOD Elite 15-Blue 2006 28-13 68% 15 IL
638 OT 18-T tony 2006 19-5 79% 18 FL
639 HOU STELLAR 16 ELITE 2005 41-18 69% 16 TX
640 VCNebraska 15-Elite 2005 14-9 61% 15 NE
641 Ozark Juniors 13 Premier 2005 34-19 64% 13 AR
642 Pohaku 13-1 2005 23-9 72% 13 KS
643 Peak VA 17-Black 2005 37-22 63% 17 TX
644 A5 12-La 2005 26-23 53% 12 GA
645 1st Alliance 12-1 2005 32-8 80% 12 IL
646 Skyline 14-Royal josh 2005 22-7 76% 14 TX
647 Big Sky 14-1 2004 44-19 68% 14 MT
648 Boss CLE 16-1 2004 33-24 58% 16 OH
649 Miami Hype 15-Prime1 2004 52-21 71% 15 FL
650 Triangle 14-Black 2003 27-26 51% 14 NC
← Previous12345678910111213141516Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings increase when teams win and decrease when they lose. The amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team.

Rating Calculation

New Rating = Old Rating + K × (Actual Score - Expected Score). K-factor: 32. Actual Score: 1 for win, 0.5 for tie, 0 for loss. Expected Score is calculated based on rating difference. The system processes all matches chronologically to ensure accurate historical progression.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for ranking. Aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Applies filters to show relevant divisions and gender categories.