Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 13 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
601 FEVA 16-Elyse 2069 51-20 72% 16 FL
602 Vision 16 Gold 2068 42-36 54% 16 CA
603 NIVA 15-PURPLE 2068 74-24 76% 15 IN
604 MAVA 17-Select 2067 53-28 65% 17 KY
605 MJVA 16-Elite black 2067 48-14 77% 16 TN
606 NIVA 17-PURPLE 2067 71-26 73% 17 IN
607 Rockwood Thunder 18 Elite 2067 48-20 71% 18 MO
608 Sky High Adidas 15 Elite 2066 33-29 53% 15 IL
609 WI Juniors 14-1 2066 73-15 83% 14 WI
610 1st Alliance 18 Silver 2066 32-10 76% 18 IL
611 VOLT 16-1 2066 39-20 66% 16 ND
612 Arete 15-Navy telos 2066 33-31 51% 15 TX
613 MVVC 15-Red 2066 46-28 62% 15 CA
614 VAQUE 14-1 2065 7-1 88% 14
615 ATHENA VB 14-1 gold national 2065 42-24 64% 14 OR
616 Dal Skyline 17-Royal-ping 2065 25-31 45% 17 TX
617 Drive Nation 15-Red 2065 21-25 46% 15 TX
618 Alamo 15-Premier 2065 53-27 65% 15 TX
619 A5 16-Erika 2065 69-25 73% 16 GA
620 PEAK 15-1 elite 2065 32-16 67% 15 AZ
621 Rockwood Thunder 13-Elite 2065 56-18 76% 13 MO
622 SoCal Legends 13-Elite 2065 18-8 69% 13 CA
623 DNVB 15-Red 2065 8-2 80% 15
624 Big Sky 13-1 2064 57-7 85% 13 MT
625 575 18-Lpe danny 2064 35-21 63% 18 GA
626 Academy 13 Diamond 2064 33-28 54% 13 NC
627 H Skyline 12-Royal 2064 40-9 82% 12 TX
628 Club Fusion 14-1 national 2063 43-11 80% 14 IL
629 HNL Volleyball 14-Black 2063 6-3 67% 14 HI
630 DYNASTY 11-Black 2063 46-7 87% 11 KS
631 Topeka Saints 16 Gold 2063 22-14 61% 16 KS
632 AVC 13-1 (NT) 2063 33-4 89% 13 TX
633 Aspire 18 Alpha 2062 42-26 62% 18 AB
634 Peak VA 17-Black 2062 42-27 61% 17 TX
635 Kairos 17 Beta 2062 48-19 72% 17 SD
636 MVA 15-Julio 2062 66-31 68% 15 FL
637 SG Elite 15 Roshambo 2061 36-18 67% 15 CA
638 1st Alliance 16-Black 2061 45-22 67% 16 IL
639 Top Select 13 Elite 2061 54-30 64% 13 FL
640 KIVA 17-Red 2061 37-32 54% 17 KY
641 HOU STELLAR 12-Elite 2061 39-10 80% 12 TX
642 SPVB 15 Elite 2060 24-31 44% 15 IL
643 Synergy 16-Plutonium 2060 51-21 71% 16 CA
644 UNION 15-Black 2060 42-38 53% 15 CA
645 Academy West 16-National 2060 61-27 69% 16 CA
646 WD Nation 17-Blue 2060 49-17 74% 17 LA
647 Momentous 17-Dan 2060 6-3 67% 17 CA
648 Iowa Rockets 17-R 2059 55-26 67% 17 IA
649 Munciana In 15 Vipers 2059 54-20 73% 15 IN
650 SA Juniors 17-Adidas 2059 43-34 56% 17 TX
← Previous12345678910111213141516Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.