2025-2026 Season — Page 16 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is MADFROG 15-N green with a 2441 Elo rating and 62-9 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 751 | Absolute 12-Black | 1985 | 37-11 | 77% | 12 | CA |
| 752 | OK Charge 17-Ua tulsa | 1985 | 27-15 | 64% | 17 | OK |
| 753 | ATHENA VB 18-1 gold national | 1985 | 28-20 | 58% | 18 | OR |
| 754 | 305VBC 14-E ruben | 1984 | 42-20 | 68% | 14 | FL |
| 755 | TXP 16-Black alonso | 1984 | 38-14 | 72% | 16 | TX |
| 756 | Arete 16-Navy telos | 1984 | 17-3 | 85% | 16 | TX |
| 757 | PowerPlex 16-Nelson | 1984 | 45-12 | 79% | 16 | IA |
| 758 | SC Rockstar LOVB 17-Melissa | 1984 | 21-17 | 55% | 17 | CA |
| 759 | SC Rockstar 12-Tiffany | 1984 | 38-17 | 69% | 12 | CA |
| 760 | ACAD 16-Red | 1984 | 39-15 | 72% | 16 | NY |
| 761 | Monon 15-1o fang | 1984 | 37-32 | 54% | 15 | IN |
| 762 | LOVB 18-Amir | 1984 | 22-7 | 76% | 18 | MI |
| 763 | Circle City 14-Black | 1983 | 42-22 | 66% | 14 | IN |
| 764 | Jupiter Elite 15-E | 1983 | 37-23 | 62% | 15 | FL |
| 765 | CNVKC Mizuno 17-Coach ib | 1983 | 35-9 | 80% | 17 | MO |
| 766 | Big Sky 15-1 | 1983 | 33-20 | 59% | 15 | MT |
| 767 | Sports Academy VBC 16-Premier | 1982 | 13-19 | 41% | 16 | |
| 768 | Tampa North 14-Black | 1982 | 38-12 | 76% | 14 | FL |
| 769 | Blue Royals 16-Emerald | 1982 | 48-12 | 80% | 16 | WA |
| 770 | Jax Skyline 16-Royal | 1982 | 41-31 | 57% | 16 | FL |
| 771 | EXCEL 15-National red | 1982 | 28-28 | 49% | 15 | TX |
| 772 | Adversity 17-Prpl adidas | 1982 | 23-18 | 56% | 17 | IL |
| 773 | Mizuno CNVBC 18-Sammie | 1982 | 34-13 | 72% | 18 | MO |
| 774 | Alamo 14-Elite 1 | 1981 | 45-23 | 65% | 14 | TX |
| 775 | CUVC 18-Open | 1981 | 42-17 | 71% | 18 | NC |
| 776 | Elevation 18 Peak | 1981 | 26-11 | 70% | 18 | CO |
| 777 | WI Juniors 14-1 | 1980 | 53-12 | 82% | 14 | WI |
| 778 | SG Elite 15 Roshambo | 1980 | 30-15 | 67% | 15 | CA |
| 779 | 501 Volley 16-1 national | 1980 | 45-12 | 79% | 16 | AR |
| 780 | Epic United 13 Elite | 1980 | 26-8 | 76% | 13 | IN |
| 781 | HJV 17 PREMIER | 1980 | 42-14 | 75% | 17 | TX |
| 782 | EAVC 17-1 | 1980 | 7-8 | 47% | 17 | UT |
| 783 | KIVA 14-White | 1979 | 40-21 | 66% | 14 | KY |
| 784 | 360 17-Hp elite | 1979 | 38-15 | 70% | 17 | TX |
| 785 | Next Level 16-1 | 1979 | 7-1 | 88% | 16 | CA |
| 786 | Epic United 16 Elite | 1979 | 35-10 | 78% | 16 | IN |
| 787 | FaR Out 16 Gold | 1979 | 40-12 | 77% | 16 | MI |
| 788 | Alliance 16-Molten | 1979 | 44-18 | 71% | 16 | TN |
| 789 | No Coast 14-Pacific | 1978 | 38-13 | 75% | 14 | MO |
| 790 | VA Juniors 15-Elite | 1978 | 60-9 | 87% | 15 | VA |
| 791 | Metro 15 National | 1978 | 41-16 | 71% | 15 | DC |
| 792 | CVC 15-Black | 1978 | 28-28 | 50% | 15 | OH |
| 793 | Boltz 16-Desert aces | 1978 | 45-23 | 66% | 16 | AZ |
| 794 | Club V 17-Prodigy silver | 1978 | 39-21 | 65% | 17 | UT |
| 795 | UEPA 18-D | 1978 | 47-7 | 85% | 18 | TX |
| 796 | WAVE 18 Darrell | 1978 | 31-21 | 60% | 18 | CA |
| 797 | FIELDHOUSE VBC 12-Ikaika marcus | 1978 | 7-1 | 88% | 12 | |
| 798 | SC Rockstar 14-Nicole | 1977 | 27-18 | 60% | 14 | CA |
| 799 | MKE Sting 13-Black | 1977 | 44-22 | 67% | 13 | WI |
| 800 | 1st Alliance 17-Black | 1977 | 22-10 | 69% | 17 | IL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings increase when teams win and decrease when they lose. The amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team.
New Rating = Old Rating + K × (Actual Score - Expected Score). K-factor: 32. Actual Score: 1 for win, 0.5 for tie, 0 for loss. Expected Score is calculated based on rating difference. The system processes all matches chronologically to ensure accurate historical progression.
Tracks each team across all their participations. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for ranking. Aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Applies filters to show relevant divisions and gender categories.