2025-2026 Season — Page 16 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 751 | L2 Volleyball Club 17-Westside | 2034 | 9-0 | 100% | 17 | MI |
| 752 | CUVC 14 Open | 2034 | 32-36 | 47% | 14 | NC |
| 753 | VVA 14-Oliveira | 2034 | 39-24 | 62% | 14 | CA |
| 754 | TI Elite 18.1 | 2034 | 29-17 | 63% | 18 | IN |
| 755 | CJV 17-Mizuno | 2033 | 38-28 | 58% | 17 | NC |
| 756 | Madtown 16-1 national | 2033 | 39-23 | 63% | 16 | WI |
| 757 | TOVC 15-1 | 2033 | 10-0 | 100% | 15 | PR |
| 758 | SC Legends 13-Elite | 2033 | 39-22 | 64% | 13 | CA |
| 759 | MVA 16-Pedro | 2033 | 60-24 | 71% | 16 | FL |
| 760 | San Gabriel Elite Volleyball Club 12-Roshambo | 2033 | 34-18 | 65% | 12 | CA |
| 761 | Cincy Crush 16-1 | 2032 | 48-20 | 71% | 16 | OH |
| 762 | OT 14-T cici | 2032 | 55-19 | 74% | 14 | FL |
| 763 | Top Select 14-Top blue | 2032 | 54-23 | 70% | 14 | FL |
| 764 | SC Rockstar 12-Tiffany | 2032 | 44-21 | 68% | 12 | CA |
| 765 | CSVC 16-Black | 2032 | 53-26 | 67% | 16 | NC |
| 766 | Leaside 17-Sparks | 2032 | 17-7 | 71% | 17 | ON |
| 767 | NKYVC 13-1 tsunami | 2031 | 37-29 | 56% | 13 | KY |
| 768 | ATHENA VB 17-1 gold national | 2031 | 43-24 | 64% | 17 | OR |
| 769 | H Skyline 17-Black | 2030 | 44-22 | 67% | 17 | TX |
| 770 | KIVA 12-White | 2030 | 66-21 | 76% | 12 | KY |
| 771 | LIVEWIRE 14 Prime | 2030 | 59-26 | 69% | 14 | AZ |
| 772 | OK Charge 14-Ua tulsa | 2030 | 57-14 | 80% | 14 | OK |
| 773 | Sky High Adidas 14 Elite | 2030 | 37-25 | 60% | 14 | IL |
| 774 | APV 14-1 | 2030 | 9-0 | 100% | 14 | TX |
| 775 | Madison 18-Bekah | 2029 | 26-9 | 74% | 18 | UT |
| 776 | HP Illinois 15 National | 2029 | 47-21 | 68% | 15 | MO |
| 777 | Club One AZ 17Platinum | 2029 | 49-34 | 59% | 17 | AZ |
| 778 | Blue Ridge 16-Blue | 2029 | 46-17 | 73% | 16 | VA |
| 779 | 575 16-Lpe danny | 2028 | 53-29 | 65% | 16 | GA |
| 780 | TAV 15-Black sean | 2028 | 42-21 | 65% | 15 | TX |
| 781 | Metro Volleyball Club 18-Travel | 2028 | 42-29 | 59% | 18 | DC |
| 782 | Seal Beach 17-Black | 2028 | 52-19 | 73% | 17 | CA |
| 783 | MVP 16-Blue | 2028 | 60-23 | 72% | 16 | WI |
| 784 | Premier 16-Black alan | 2027 | 51-10 | 81% | 16 | TX |
| 785 | Dallas Skyline 14-Black | 2027 | 34-14 | 71% | 14 | TX |
| 786 | TAV Houston 12-Black | 2027 | 35-17 | 67% | 12 | TX |
| 787 | KIVA 15-Black | 2027 | 69-22 | 76% | 15 | KY |
| 788 | GP 12 National | 2027 | 73-12 | 86% | 12 | FL |
| 789 | Adversity 17-Prpl adidas | 2027 | 37-22 | 63% | 17 | IL |
| 790 | OVA 17-Black | 2027 | 55-29 | 65% | 17 | FL |
| 791 | HJV 16-Premier | 2027 | 44-36 | 55% | 16 | TX |
| 792 | Apex 17-Girls | 2027 | 40-21 | 66% | 17 | SC |
| 793 | 407 13-Orange | 2027 | 53-20 | 73% | 13 | FL |
| 794 | Blue Ridge Volleyball Association 14-Blue | 2026 | 47-18 | 72% | 14 | VA |
| 795 | Pursuit 16-National | 2026 | 43-21 | 67% | 16 | MO |
| 796 | Academy 16-O yeti | 2026 | 48-43 | 53% | 16 | IN |
| 797 | Aspire NW 14-1 empire | 2026 | 32-14 | 70% | 14 | OR |
| 798 | COAST 17-2 bela | 2026 | 35-20 | 64% | 17 | CA |
| 799 | HP 17-1 | 2026 | 35-30 | 54% | 17 | MI |
| 800 | COAST 12-1 katie | 2025 | 36-19 | 65% | 12 | CA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.