2025-2026 Season — Page 16 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 751 | GJ 16 ADIDAS | 2034 | 46-22 | 68% | 16 | FL |
| 752 | OT 14-T cici | 2034 | 55-19 | 74% | 14 | FL |
| 753 | 1st Alliance 15-Black | 2034 | 44-19 | 70% | 15 | IL |
| 754 | SG Elite 12-Roshambo | 2034 | 34-18 | 65% | 12 | CA |
| 755 | 305VBC 14-E ruben | 2034 | 51-26 | 66% | 14 | FL |
| 756 | Salty 17-S | 2034 | 35-19 | 65% | 17 | TX |
| 757 | Madison 18-Bekah | 2034 | 26-9 | 74% | 18 | CA |
| 758 | ATHENA VB 17-1 gold national | 2033 | 43-24 | 64% | 17 | OR |
| 759 | 1W 17-1 elite | 2033 | 52-19 | 73% | 17 | WI |
| 760 | Academy 16-O yeti | 2033 | 48-43 | 53% | 16 | IN |
| 761 | SC Rockstar 12-Tiffany | 2033 | 44-21 | 68% | 12 | CA |
| 762 | OPU 12-1 | 2033 | 49-14 | 78% | 12 | FL |
| 763 | TI Elite 18.1 | 2033 | 29-17 | 63% | 18 | |
| 764 | A5 West 15-Joe | 2032 | 50-22 | 69% | 15 | GA |
| 765 | Momentous VBC 16-Antonette | 2032 | 10-9 | 53% | 16 | CA |
| 766 | SA Juniors 16 Adidas | 2032 | 53-22 | 71% | 16 | TX |
| 767 | AVC CLE 18-Red | 2031 | 33-31 | 52% | 18 | OH |
| 768 | STVA 15-1 cristian | 2031 | 56-28 | 67% | 15 | TX |
| 769 | VVA 14-Oliveira | 2031 | 39-24 | 62% | 14 | CA |
| 770 | Kairos 13 Alpha | 2031 | 42-19 | 69% | 13 | SD |
| 771 | APV 14-1 | 2031 | 9-0 | 100% | 14 | TX |
| 772 | TOVC 15-1 | 2031 | 10-0 | 100% | 15 | CA |
| 773 | FH 14-Ikaika-adam/annette | 2031 | 6-1 | 86% | 14 | TX |
| 774 | MVA 16-Pedro | 2030 | 60-24 | 71% | 16 | FL |
| 775 | Top Select 14-Top blue | 2030 | 54-23 | 70% | 14 | FL |
| 776 | Skyline 11-Royal | 2030 | 43-10 | 80% | 11 | TX |
| 777 | COAST 17-2 bela | 2029 | 35-20 | 64% | 17 | CA |
| 778 | Adversity 17-Prpl adidas | 2029 | 37-22 | 63% | 17 | IL |
| 779 | Bakersfield 15-Judy | 2029 | 15-4 | 79% | 15 | CA |
| 780 | Club One AZ 17Platinum | 2028 | 49-34 | 59% | 17 | AZ |
| 781 | NKYVC 13-1 tsunami | 2028 | 37-29 | 56% | 13 | KY |
| 782 | Pursuit 16-National | 2028 | 43-21 | 67% | 16 | MO |
| 783 | Seal Beach 17-Black | 2028 | 52-19 | 73% | 17 | CA |
| 784 | 407 13-Orange | 2028 | 53-20 | 73% | 13 | FL |
| 785 | H Skyline 17-Black | 2027 | 44-22 | 67% | 17 | TX |
| 786 | LIVEWIRE 14 Prime | 2027 | 59-26 | 69% | 14 | AZ |
| 787 | CUVC 14 Open | 2027 | 32-36 | 47% | 14 | NC |
| 788 | CSVC 16-Black | 2027 | 53-26 | 67% | 16 | NC |
| 789 | KIVA 15-Black | 2027 | 69-22 | 76% | 15 | KY |
| 790 | OT 13-T patty | 2027 | 52-20 | 72% | 13 | FL |
| 791 | Aspire NW 14-1 empire | 2026 | 32-14 | 70% | 14 | WA |
| 792 | Madtown 16-1 national | 2026 | 39-23 | 63% | 16 | WI |
| 793 | GP 12 National | 2026 | 73-12 | 86% | 12 | FL |
| 794 | Metro 18 Travel | 2026 | 42-29 | 59% | 18 | DC |
| 795 | OVA 17-Black | 2026 | 55-29 | 65% | 17 | FL |
| 796 | VC United 17-1 elite | 2026 | 22-20 | 52% | 17 | IL |
| 797 | Northern Lights 16-B | 2026 | 60-21 | 74% | 16 | MN |
| 798 | COAST 12-1 katie | 2026 | 36-19 | 65% | 12 | CA |
| 799 | NYC Juniors 14-National | 2026 | 51-17 | 73% | 14 | NY |
| 800 | Cincy Crush 16-1 | 2025 | 48-20 | 71% | 16 | OH |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.