Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 16 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
751 L2 Volleyball Club 17-Westside 2034 9-0 100% 17 MI
752 CUVC 14 Open 2034 32-36 47% 14 NC
753 VVA 14-Oliveira 2034 39-24 62% 14 CA
754 TI Elite 18.1 2034 29-17 63% 18 IN
755 CJV 17-Mizuno 2033 38-28 58% 17 NC
756 Madtown 16-1 national 2033 39-23 63% 16 WI
757 TOVC 15-1 2033 10-0 100% 15 PR
758 SC Legends 13-Elite 2033 39-22 64% 13 CA
759 MVA 16-Pedro 2033 60-24 71% 16 FL
760 San Gabriel Elite Volleyball Club 12-Roshambo 2033 34-18 65% 12 CA
761 Cincy Crush 16-1 2032 48-20 71% 16 OH
762 OT 14-T cici 2032 55-19 74% 14 FL
763 Top Select 14-Top blue 2032 54-23 70% 14 FL
764 SC Rockstar 12-Tiffany 2032 44-21 68% 12 CA
765 CSVC 16-Black 2032 53-26 67% 16 NC
766 Leaside 17-Sparks 2032 17-7 71% 17 ON
767 NKYVC 13-1 tsunami 2031 37-29 56% 13 KY
768 ATHENA VB 17-1 gold national 2031 43-24 64% 17 OR
769 H Skyline 17-Black 2030 44-22 67% 17 TX
770 KIVA 12-White 2030 66-21 76% 12 KY
771 LIVEWIRE 14 Prime 2030 59-26 69% 14 AZ
772 OK Charge 14-Ua tulsa 2030 57-14 80% 14 OK
773 Sky High Adidas 14 Elite 2030 37-25 60% 14 IL
774 APV 14-1 2030 9-0 100% 14 TX
775 Madison 18-Bekah 2029 26-9 74% 18 UT
776 HP Illinois 15 National 2029 47-21 68% 15 MO
777 Club One AZ 17Platinum 2029 49-34 59% 17 AZ
778 Blue Ridge 16-Blue 2029 46-17 73% 16 VA
779 575 16-Lpe danny 2028 53-29 65% 16 GA
780 TAV 15-Black sean 2028 42-21 65% 15 TX
781 Metro Volleyball Club 18-Travel 2028 42-29 59% 18 DC
782 Seal Beach 17-Black 2028 52-19 73% 17 CA
783 MVP 16-Blue 2028 60-23 72% 16 WI
784 Premier 16-Black alan 2027 51-10 81% 16 TX
785 Dallas Skyline 14-Black 2027 34-14 71% 14 TX
786 TAV Houston 12-Black 2027 35-17 67% 12 TX
787 KIVA 15-Black 2027 69-22 76% 15 KY
788 GP 12 National 2027 73-12 86% 12 FL
789 Adversity 17-Prpl adidas 2027 37-22 63% 17 IL
790 OVA 17-Black 2027 55-29 65% 17 FL
791 HJV 16-Premier 2027 44-36 55% 16 TX
792 Apex 17-Girls 2027 40-21 66% 17 SC
793 407 13-Orange 2027 53-20 73% 13 FL
794 Blue Ridge Volleyball Association 14-Blue 2026 47-18 72% 14 VA
795 Pursuit 16-National 2026 43-21 67% 16 MO
796 Academy 16-O yeti 2026 48-43 53% 16 IN
797 Aspire NW 14-1 empire 2026 32-14 70% 14 OR
798 COAST 17-2 bela 2026 35-20 64% 17 CA
799 HP 17-1 2026 35-30 54% 17 MI
800 COAST 12-1 katie 2025 36-19 65% 12 CA
← Previous12345678910111213141516171819Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.