Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 16 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
751 GJ 16 ADIDAS 2034 46-22 68% 16 FL
752 OT 14-T cici 2034 55-19 74% 14 FL
753 1st Alliance 15-Black 2034 44-19 70% 15 IL
754 SG Elite 12-Roshambo 2034 34-18 65% 12 CA
755 305VBC 14-E ruben 2034 51-26 66% 14 FL
756 Salty 17-S 2034 35-19 65% 17 TX
757 Madison 18-Bekah 2034 26-9 74% 18 CA
758 ATHENA VB 17-1 gold national 2033 43-24 64% 17 OR
759 1W 17-1 elite 2033 52-19 73% 17 WI
760 Academy 16-O yeti 2033 48-43 53% 16 IN
761 SC Rockstar 12-Tiffany 2033 44-21 68% 12 CA
762 OPU 12-1 2033 49-14 78% 12 FL
763 TI Elite 18.1 2033 29-17 63% 18
764 A5 West 15-Joe 2032 50-22 69% 15 GA
765 Momentous VBC 16-Antonette 2032 10-9 53% 16 CA
766 SA Juniors 16 Adidas 2032 53-22 71% 16 TX
767 AVC CLE 18-Red 2031 33-31 52% 18 OH
768 STVA 15-1 cristian 2031 56-28 67% 15 TX
769 VVA 14-Oliveira 2031 39-24 62% 14 CA
770 Kairos 13 Alpha 2031 42-19 69% 13 SD
771 APV 14-1 2031 9-0 100% 14 TX
772 TOVC 15-1 2031 10-0 100% 15 CA
773 FH 14-Ikaika-adam/annette 2031 6-1 86% 14 TX
774 MVA 16-Pedro 2030 60-24 71% 16 FL
775 Top Select 14-Top blue 2030 54-23 70% 14 FL
776 Skyline 11-Royal 2030 43-10 80% 11 TX
777 COAST 17-2 bela 2029 35-20 64% 17 CA
778 Adversity 17-Prpl adidas 2029 37-22 63% 17 IL
779 Bakersfield 15-Judy 2029 15-4 79% 15 CA
780 Club One AZ 17Platinum 2028 49-34 59% 17 AZ
781 NKYVC 13-1 tsunami 2028 37-29 56% 13 KY
782 Pursuit 16-National 2028 43-21 67% 16 MO
783 Seal Beach 17-Black 2028 52-19 73% 17 CA
784 407 13-Orange 2028 53-20 73% 13 FL
785 H Skyline 17-Black 2027 44-22 67% 17 TX
786 LIVEWIRE 14 Prime 2027 59-26 69% 14 AZ
787 CUVC 14 Open 2027 32-36 47% 14 NC
788 CSVC 16-Black 2027 53-26 67% 16 NC
789 KIVA 15-Black 2027 69-22 76% 15 KY
790 OT 13-T patty 2027 52-20 72% 13 FL
791 Aspire NW 14-1 empire 2026 32-14 70% 14 WA
792 Madtown 16-1 national 2026 39-23 63% 16 WI
793 GP 12 National 2026 73-12 86% 12 FL
794 Metro 18 Travel 2026 42-29 59% 18 DC
795 OVA 17-Black 2026 55-29 65% 17 FL
796 VC United 17-1 elite 2026 22-20 52% 17 IL
797 Northern Lights 16-B 2026 60-21 74% 16 MN
798 COAST 12-1 katie 2026 36-19 65% 12 CA
799 NYC Juniors 14-National 2026 51-17 73% 14 NY
800 Cincy Crush 16-1 2025 48-20 71% 16 OH
← Previous12345678910111213141516171819Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.