Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 19 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
901 WSRVC 12-Henriksen/kugler 2005 11-0 100% 12 WY
902 MAVS KC 12 National 2005 34-13 72% 12 KS
903 Rockwood Thunder 17-Navy 2005 44-27 62% 17 MO
904 SG Elite 13 Roshambo 2005 33-17 66% 13 CA
905 Stars 13 Anna 2005 70-10 88% 13 SC
906 Michigan Volleyball Academy 17 MVA - Rise Academy 71 2005 29-21 58% 17 MI
907 PEAK 18-1 elite 2004 19-13 59% 18 OK
908 FTLUTD Fusion 16-Cuba 2004 5-7 42% 16 FL
909 Epic United 17-Elite 2003 38-9 81% 17 IL
910 Sanford Sports 16-Red 2003 51-20 72% 16 SD
911 Metro VBC 14-Pink 2003 43-21 67% 14 IN
912 Vaqueras 15-F julio 2003 31-14 69% 15 PR
913 ECVC 15-Black 2003 42-19 69% 15 VA
914 NPJ Salem 17 National 2002 48-36 57% 17 OR
915 Elevation 14-Medina 2002 38-21 64% 14 OH
916 Adversity G18 Adidas 2002 29-20 59% 18 IL
917 Epic United 13 Elite 2002 40-12 77% 13 IL
918 RVC 16-Shauna 2002 40-8 83% 16 KY
919 A5 West 14 Joe 2001 51-19 73% 14 GA
920 AP) Austin Performance 16-Adidas 2001 4-4 50% 16 NV
921 LAV 15-National black 2001 38-23 62% 15 AL
922 Dallas Skyline 16-Black 2001 25-19 57% 16 TX
923 UNION 17-Black 2000 40-38 51% 17 IN
924 Surfside Volleyball Club 17-Pv elite 2000 43-18 70% 17 CA
925 Mem Metro 17-Elite blk 2000 57-17 77% 17 TN
926 Webfoot 17-Elite 2000 41-25 62% 17 OR
927 Victory 15-National black 2000 35-18 63% 15 TX
928 MARIN 15-Black 2000 34-25 58% 15 CA
929 CSDP Volleyball Club 14-1 2000 22-15 59% 14 MO
930 SMASH 17 2000 26-10 72% 17 MA
931 Tampa North 14-Black 2000 42-17 71% 14 FL
932 GP 16 National 1999 56-42 57% 16 FL
933 MAVS KC 17-National 1999 29-20 59% 17 KS
934 KC Power 16-2 1999 43-17 72% 16 KS
935 AVA TX 16 Adidas 1999 37-30 55% 16 TX
936 TVC 17-Black 1999 41-22 65% 17 OH
937 MVA 17 Freideman 1999 51-32 61% 17 FL
938 VQ 14-1 1998 11-6 65% 14 PR
939 A5 18 Scott 1998 53-15 78% 18 GA
940 Ultimate VBC 15-Gold 1998 5-3 63% 15 IL
941 Tribe 14-Elite navy 1998 42-23 65% 14 FL
942 Actyve 13-Navy 1998 30-21 59% 13 CA
943 TAMPA UNITED VBA 12-Black 1998 51-15 77% 12 FL
944 FH 13-Ikaika-toa 1998 31-15 66% 13 TX
945 MDJRS 12 Elite 1998 66-14 83% 12 MD
946 HNLV 16-1 1998 19-6 76% 16 HI
947 LAV 16-National black 1998 41-19 68% 16 AL
948 Summit 14-National blue 1997 46-12 78% 14 TX
949 Monon 12-1o tigers 1997 46-22 68% 12 IN
950 Kokoro Volleyball 17-1 1997 65-57 53% 17 MN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.