2025-2026 Season — Page 19 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 901 | Top Select 11-Elite | 2004 | 66-9 | 88% | 11 | FL |
| 902 | FH 13-Ikaika-toa | 2004 | 31-15 | 66% | 13 | TX |
| 903 | VAQUE 13-1 | 2004 | 8-1 | 89% | 13 | |
| 904 | FTLUTD Fusion 16-Cuba | 2004 | 5-7 | 42% | 16 | FL |
| 905 | SWMNVB 15-1 | 2003 | 45-6 | 88% | 15 | |
| 906 | DYNASTY 14-Blue | 2003 | 38-26 | 59% | 14 | KS |
| 907 | ECVC 14-Black | 2003 | 41-18 | 69% | 14 | VA |
| 908 | MAVS KC 12 National | 2003 | 34-13 | 72% | 12 | KS |
| 909 | Alamo 17 Premier | 2003 | 50-27 | 65% | 17 | TX |
| 910 | Colorado Juniors 16-Sherri | 2003 | 19-3 | 86% | 16 | CO |
| 911 | TVC 17-Black | 2003 | 41-22 | 65% | 17 | OH |
| 912 | Elevation 14-Medina | 2003 | 38-21 | 64% | 14 | OH |
| 913 | Shockwave 16-Black | 2003 | 28-18 | 61% | 16 | KS |
| 914 | Tampa North 14-Black | 2003 | 42-17 | 71% | 14 | FL |
| 915 | Tsunami 18-1e dun | 2003 | 49-11 | 82% | 18 | GA |
| 916 | RVC 16-Shauna | 2003 | 40-8 | 83% | 16 | OH |
| 917 | Arete Athletics 15-Navy telos | 2003 | 6-2 | 75% | 15 | |
| 918 | CJV 17-Mizuno | 2002 | 38-28 | 58% | 17 | NC |
| 919 | HOU STELLAR 17 ELITE | 2002 | 41-22 | 65% | 17 | TX |
| 920 | Monon 12-1o tigers | 2002 | 46-22 | 68% | 12 | IN |
| 921 | TX STORM 14 SMACK | 2002 | 49-15 | 77% | 14 | TX |
| 922 | Rockwood Thunder 17-Navy | 2002 | 44-27 | 62% | 17 | MO |
| 923 | Metro VBC 17-Pink | 2002 | 31-32 | 49% | 17 | IN |
| 924 | FH 15-Ikaika-daniel | 2002 | 32-24 | 54% | 15 | TX |
| 925 | ACAD 16-Red | 2002 | 43-20 | 68% | 16 | NY |
| 926 | Epic United 13 Elite | 2001 | 40-12 | 77% | 13 | IN |
| 927 | SG Elite 13 Roshambo | 2001 | 33-17 | 66% | 13 | CA |
| 928 | MAVS KC 17-National | 2001 | 29-20 | 59% | 17 | KS |
| 929 | Northeast 18-1 | 2001 | 47-21 | 69% | 18 | CT |
| 930 | Epic United 17-Elite | 2001 | 38-9 | 81% | 17 | IN |
| 931 | ASHOK 16-1 | 2001 | 24-13 | 65% | 16 | |
| 932 | Mem Metro 17-Elite blk | 2000 | 57-17 | 77% | 17 | TN |
| 933 | UNION 17-Black | 2000 | 40-38 | 51% | 17 | CA |
| 934 | Adversity G18 Adidas | 2000 | 29-20 | 59% | 18 | IL |
| 935 | ECVC 15-Black | 2000 | 42-19 | 69% | 15 | VA |
| 936 | Dallas Skyline 16-Black | 2000 | 25-19 | 57% | 16 | TX |
| 937 | CMVBC 17-1 | 2000 | 21-6 | 78% | 17 | MO |
| 938 | CJV 15 Mizuno | 1999 | 36-29 | 55% | 15 | NC |
| 939 | EliteVBTC 17-Black | 1999 | 44-31 | 59% | 17 | OH |
| 940 | NOVA Juniors 17-S navy | 1999 | 41-20 | 67% | 17 | OH |
| 941 | Synergy 15 Titanium | 1999 | 54-18 | 75% | 15 | CA |
| 942 | Revelstoke - MVC 15 | 1998 | 13-3 | 81% | 15 | |
| 943 | ESVBC 16-Thunder natl | 1998 | 39-13 | 75% | 16 | MD |
| 944 | FaR Out 18 Gold | 1998 | 40-12 | 77% | 18 | MI |
| 945 | Sanford Sports 16-Red | 1998 | 51-20 | 72% | 16 | SD |
| 946 | FH 17-1 ikaika andy | 1998 | 16-7 | 70% | 17 | TX |
| 947 | Surfside 17-Pv elite | 1998 | 43-18 | 70% | 17 | CA |
| 948 | Mintonette Sports 13-1 | 1998 | 31-28 | 53% | 13 | OH |
| 949 | Summit 14-National blue | 1998 | 46-12 | 78% | 14 | TX |
| 950 | Circle City 17-Black | 1997 | 53-26 | 67% | 17 | IN |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.