2025-2026 Season — Page 20 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 951 | Monon 13-1o cardinals | 1997 | 41-34 | 55% | 13 | IN |
| 952 | Sunshine 16 LA | 1997 | 38-37 | 51% | 16 | CA |
| 953 | Tribe 14-Elite navy | 1997 | 42-23 | 65% | 14 | FL |
| 954 | SC Rockstar 17-Adidas | 1997 | 40-35 | 53% | 17 | CA |
| 955 | Vegas Aces 12-Ren | 1997 | 40-13 | 75% | 12 | NV |
| 956 | ATOMIC 16-Smack premier | 1996 | 54-28 | 66% | 16 | MI |
| 957 | ATHENA VB 18-1 gold national | 1996 | 31-24 | 56% | 18 | OR |
| 958 | GP 16 National | 1996 | 56-42 | 57% | 16 | FL |
| 959 | Ozark Juniors 14 Premier | 1996 | 60-17 | 78% | 14 | AR |
| 960 | VQ 14-1 | 1996 | 11-6 | 65% | 14 | PR |
| 961 | LV 13-Avoli | 1996 | 54-14 | 79% | 13 | TX |
| 962 | DaKine 15-National pink | 1996 | 48-21 | 70% | 15 | WA |
| 963 | SynergyForce 13-1 natl | 1996 | 40-28 | 59% | 13 | CA |
| 964 | Madtown 14-1 national | 1995 | 43-18 | 70% | 14 | WI |
| 965 | NO NAME 18 Sarah | 1995 | 23-14 | 62% | 18 | FL |
| 966 | Triangle 18-Black | 1995 | 36-26 | 58% | 18 | NC |
| 967 | Iowa Select 17-Mizuno | 1995 | 43-26 | 61% | 17 | IA |
| 968 | Miami Hype 16-Prime1 | 1995 | 32-39 | 45% | 16 | FL |
| 969 | Dallas Skyline 15-Black | 1994 | 41-16 | 72% | 15 | TX |
| 970 | HJV 17 PREMIER | 1994 | 50-22 | 69% | 17 | TX |
| 971 | Rhythm 16 Christina | 1994 | 37-25 | 59% | 16 | TN |
| 972 | Tribe 12-Elite cardinal | 1994 | 44-25 | 64% | 12 | FL |
| 973 | Club V 15-Prodigy stephanie | 1994 | 22-16 | 58% | 15 | UT |
| 974 | Ultimate VBC 15-Gold | 1994 | 5-3 | 63% | 15 | IL |
| 975 | HNLV 16-1 | 1994 | 19-6 | 76% | 16 | |
| 976 | CSDP Volleyball Club 14-1 | 1993 | 22-15 | 59% | 14 | |
| 977 | Blue Royals 14 Opal | 1993 | 50-16 | 76% | 14 | WA |
| 978 | Kokoro Volleyball 16-1 | 1993 | 46-23 | 67% | 16 | MN |
| 979 | KC Power 16-2 | 1993 | 43-17 | 72% | 16 | KS |
| 980 | AVA TX 16 Adidas | 1993 | 37-30 | 55% | 16 | TX |
| 981 | EVA 15-Elite | 1993 | 60-12 | 82% | 15 | AR |
| 982 | MARIN 15-Black | 1993 | 34-25 | 58% | 15 | CA |
| 983 | Piedmont VBC 16 FLY | 1993 | 34-27 | 56% | 16 | NC |
| 984 | A5 18 Scott | 1993 | 53-15 | 78% | 18 | GA |
| 985 | ATOMIC 17-Smack premier | 1992 | 53-31 | 63% | 17 | MI |
| 986 | Zona VBC 14-Black | 1992 | 40-18 | 69% | 14 | AZ |
| 987 | Illini Elite 15 Cardinal | 1991 | 39-31 | 56% | 15 | IL |
| 988 | 414 16-Elite | 1991 | 59-19 | 76% | 16 | WI |
| 989 | LAV 16-National black | 1991 | 41-19 | 68% | 16 | AL |
| 990 | NE Elite 17-1 | 1991 | 37-20 | 65% | 17 | NE |
| 991 | TAMPA UNITED VBA 12-Black | 1991 | 51-15 | 77% | 12 | FL |
| 992 | Shockwave 15-Black | 1991 | 25-16 | 61% | 15 | KS |
| 993 | NE Elite 15-Apex | 1991 | 20-26 | 43% | 15 | NE |
| 994 | CUVC 18-Open | 1990 | 42-17 | 71% | 18 | NC |
| 995 | MKE Sting 16-Black | 1990 | 46-27 | 63% | 16 | WI |
| 996 | Academy West 13-National | 1990 | 34-29 | 54% | 13 | CA |
| 997 | MIDTN Volleyball 14-Black | 1990 | 42-9 | 82% | 14 | TN |
| 998 | LOVB 18-Amir | 1990 | 22-7 | 76% | 18 | MI |
| 999 | K2 17-Jota | 1990 | 16-12 | 57% | 17 | TN |
| 1000 | TAMPA UNITED VBA 13-Black | 1989 | 49-20 | 71% | 13 | FL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.