2025-2026 Season — Page 20 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 951 | ATOMIC 16-Smack premier | 1997 | 54-28 | 66% | 16 | AZ |
| 952 | HPSTL 12-Orange | 1997 | 54-16 | 76% | 12 | MO |
| 953 | Sunshine 16 LA | 1997 | 38-37 | 51% | 16 | CA |
| 954 | NE Elite 17-1 | 1997 | 37-20 | 65% | 17 | NE |
| 955 | CoJrs 16-Bri | 1996 | 50-25 | 67% | 16 | CO |
| 956 | HJV 17 PREMIER | 1996 | 50-22 | 69% | 17 | TX |
| 957 | 414 16-Elite | 1996 | 59-19 | 76% | 16 | WI |
| 958 | EVA 15-Elite | 1996 | 60-12 | 82% | 15 | AR |
| 959 | ESVBC 16-Thunder natl | 1996 | 39-13 | 75% | 16 | IA |
| 960 | Rhythm 16 Christina | 1996 | 37-25 | 59% | 16 | TN |
| 961 | Circle City 17-Black | 1995 | 53-26 | 67% | 17 | IN |
| 962 | K2 17-Jota | 1995 | 16-12 | 57% | 17 | TN |
| 963 | SynergyForce 13-1 natl | 1995 | 40-28 | 59% | 13 | CA |
| 964 | ATOMIC 17-Smack premier | 1995 | 53-31 | 63% | 17 | AZ |
| 965 | 360 15-Hp elite | 1995 | 44-17 | 71% | 15 | TX |
| 966 | LV 13-Avoli | 1995 | 54-14 | 79% | 13 | TX |
| 967 | Vegas Aces Volleyball 12-Ren | 1995 | 40-13 | 75% | 12 | NV |
| 968 | Blue Ridge Volleyball Association 13-Blue | 1994 | 40-8 | 82% | 13 | VA |
| 969 | Top Select 11-Elite | 1994 | 66-9 | 88% | 11 | FL |
| 970 | NorthEast Volleyball Club 15-1 | 1994 | 44-29 | 60% | 15 | CT |
| 971 | Pgh Elite 14-Elite | 1994 | 41-19 | 68% | 14 | PA |
| 972 | Idaho ONE 12-Elite | 1994 | 53-20 | 73% | 12 | ID |
| 973 | Zona VBC 14-Black | 1994 | 40-18 | 69% | 14 | AZ |
| 974 | EliteVBTC 17-Black | 1994 | 44-31 | 59% | 17 | OH |
| 975 | SC Rockstar 17-Adidas | 1994 | 40-35 | 53% | 17 | CA |
| 976 | NO NAME 18 Sarah | 1993 | 23-14 | 62% | 18 | FL |
| 977 | Elevate VBC 14-Blue | 1993 | 42-17 | 70% | 14 | TX |
| 978 | Ozark Juniors 14 Premier | 1992 | 60-17 | 78% | 14 | AR |
| 979 | Dallas Skyline 15-Black | 1992 | 41-16 | 72% | 15 | TX |
| 980 | Monon 13-1o cardinals | 1992 | 41-34 | 55% | 13 | IN |
| 981 | MARIN 13-Black | 1992 | 41-27 | 60% | 13 | CA |
| 982 | Tribe 12-Elite cardinal | 1992 | 44-25 | 64% | 12 | FL |
| 983 | Blue Royals 14 Opal | 1992 | 50-16 | 76% | 14 | WA |
| 984 | CUVC 18-Open | 1992 | 42-17 | 71% | 18 | NC |
| 985 | Mizuno CNVBC 18-Sammie | 1992 | 34-13 | 72% | 18 | MO |
| 986 | Miami Hype 16-Prime1 | 1991 | 32-39 | 45% | 16 | FL |
| 987 | Illini Elite 15 Cardinal | 1991 | 39-31 | 56% | 15 | IL |
| 988 | Munciana In 16 Cardinals | 1990 | 45-33 | 58% | 16 | IN |
| 989 | NE Elite 15-Apex | 1990 | 20-26 | 43% | 15 | NE |
| 990 | TX STORM 14 SMACK | 1990 | 49-15 | 77% | 14 | TX |
| 991 | Jax Skyline 12-Royal | 1990 | 56-21 | 73% | 12 | FL |
| 992 | Madtown 14-1 national | 1990 | 43-18 | 70% | 14 | WI |
| 993 | Mintonette Sports 13-1 | 1990 | 31-28 | 53% | 13 | OH |
| 994 | Vegas Aces 15 REN | 1990 | 35-28 | 56% | 15 | NV |
| 995 | Shockwave 15-Black | 1990 | 25-16 | 61% | 15 | KS |
| 996 | Synergy 15 Titanium | 1990 | 54-18 | 75% | 15 | PA |
| 997 | Nordiques Jr 18-1 | 1989 | 6-3 | 67% | 18 | PA |
| 998 | TEJAS 16-Black arthur | 1989 | 41-24 | 63% | 16 | TX |
| 999 | Jax Skyline 16-Royal | 1989 | 46-36 | 56% | 16 | FL |
| 1000 | FH 17-1 ikaika andy | 1989 | 28-12 | 68% | 17 | TX |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.