Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 20 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
951 Monon 13-1o cardinals 1997 41-34 55% 13 IN
952 Sunshine 16 LA 1997 38-37 51% 16 CA
953 Tribe 14-Elite navy 1997 42-23 65% 14 FL
954 SC Rockstar 17-Adidas 1997 40-35 53% 17 CA
955 Vegas Aces 12-Ren 1997 40-13 75% 12 NV
956 ATOMIC 16-Smack premier 1996 54-28 66% 16 MI
957 ATHENA VB 18-1 gold national 1996 31-24 56% 18 OR
958 GP 16 National 1996 56-42 57% 16 FL
959 Ozark Juniors 14 Premier 1996 60-17 78% 14 AR
960 VQ 14-1 1996 11-6 65% 14 PR
961 LV 13-Avoli 1996 54-14 79% 13 TX
962 DaKine 15-National pink 1996 48-21 70% 15 WA
963 SynergyForce 13-1 natl 1996 40-28 59% 13 CA
964 Madtown 14-1 national 1995 43-18 70% 14 WI
965 NO NAME 18 Sarah 1995 23-14 62% 18 FL
966 Triangle 18-Black 1995 36-26 58% 18 NC
967 Iowa Select 17-Mizuno 1995 43-26 61% 17 IA
968 Miami Hype 16-Prime1 1995 32-39 45% 16 FL
969 Dallas Skyline 15-Black 1994 41-16 72% 15 TX
970 HJV 17 PREMIER 1994 50-22 69% 17 TX
971 Rhythm 16 Christina 1994 37-25 59% 16 TN
972 Tribe 12-Elite cardinal 1994 44-25 64% 12 FL
973 Club V 15-Prodigy stephanie 1994 22-16 58% 15 UT
974 Ultimate VBC 15-Gold 1994 5-3 63% 15 IL
975 HNLV 16-1 1994 19-6 76% 16
976 CSDP Volleyball Club 14-1 1993 22-15 59% 14
977 Blue Royals 14 Opal 1993 50-16 76% 14 WA
978 Kokoro Volleyball 16-1 1993 46-23 67% 16 MN
979 KC Power 16-2 1993 43-17 72% 16 KS
980 AVA TX 16 Adidas 1993 37-30 55% 16 TX
981 EVA 15-Elite 1993 60-12 82% 15 AR
982 MARIN 15-Black 1993 34-25 58% 15 CA
983 Piedmont VBC 16 FLY 1993 34-27 56% 16 NC
984 A5 18 Scott 1993 53-15 78% 18 GA
985 ATOMIC 17-Smack premier 1992 53-31 63% 17 MI
986 Zona VBC 14-Black 1992 40-18 69% 14 AZ
987 Illini Elite 15 Cardinal 1991 39-31 56% 15 IL
988 414 16-Elite 1991 59-19 76% 16 WI
989 LAV 16-National black 1991 41-19 68% 16 AL
990 NE Elite 17-1 1991 37-20 65% 17 NE
991 TAMPA UNITED VBA 12-Black 1991 51-15 77% 12 FL
992 Shockwave 15-Black 1991 25-16 61% 15 KS
993 NE Elite 15-Apex 1991 20-26 43% 15 NE
994 CUVC 18-Open 1990 42-17 71% 18 NC
995 MKE Sting 16-Black 1990 46-27 63% 16 WI
996 Academy West 13-National 1990 34-29 54% 13 CA
997 MIDTN Volleyball 14-Black 1990 42-9 82% 14 TN
998 LOVB 18-Amir 1990 22-7 76% 18 MI
999 K2 17-Jota 1990 16-12 57% 17 TN
1000 TAMPA UNITED VBA 13-Black 1989 49-20 71% 13 FL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.