Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 20 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
951 ATOMIC 16-Smack premier 1997 54-28 66% 16 AZ
952 HPSTL 12-Orange 1997 54-16 76% 12 MO
953 Sunshine 16 LA 1997 38-37 51% 16 CA
954 NE Elite 17-1 1997 37-20 65% 17 NE
955 CoJrs 16-Bri 1996 50-25 67% 16 CO
956 HJV 17 PREMIER 1996 50-22 69% 17 TX
957 414 16-Elite 1996 59-19 76% 16 WI
958 EVA 15-Elite 1996 60-12 82% 15 AR
959 ESVBC 16-Thunder natl 1996 39-13 75% 16 IA
960 Rhythm 16 Christina 1996 37-25 59% 16 TN
961 Circle City 17-Black 1995 53-26 67% 17 IN
962 K2 17-Jota 1995 16-12 57% 17 TN
963 SynergyForce 13-1 natl 1995 40-28 59% 13 CA
964 ATOMIC 17-Smack premier 1995 53-31 63% 17 AZ
965 360 15-Hp elite 1995 44-17 71% 15 TX
966 LV 13-Avoli 1995 54-14 79% 13 TX
967 Vegas Aces Volleyball 12-Ren 1995 40-13 75% 12 NV
968 Blue Ridge Volleyball Association 13-Blue 1994 40-8 82% 13 VA
969 Top Select 11-Elite 1994 66-9 88% 11 FL
970 NorthEast Volleyball Club 15-1 1994 44-29 60% 15 CT
971 Pgh Elite 14-Elite 1994 41-19 68% 14 PA
972 Idaho ONE 12-Elite 1994 53-20 73% 12 ID
973 Zona VBC 14-Black 1994 40-18 69% 14 AZ
974 EliteVBTC 17-Black 1994 44-31 59% 17 OH
975 SC Rockstar 17-Adidas 1994 40-35 53% 17 CA
976 NO NAME 18 Sarah 1993 23-14 62% 18 FL
977 Elevate VBC 14-Blue 1993 42-17 70% 14 TX
978 Ozark Juniors 14 Premier 1992 60-17 78% 14 AR
979 Dallas Skyline 15-Black 1992 41-16 72% 15 TX
980 Monon 13-1o cardinals 1992 41-34 55% 13 IN
981 MARIN 13-Black 1992 41-27 60% 13 CA
982 Tribe 12-Elite cardinal 1992 44-25 64% 12 FL
983 Blue Royals 14 Opal 1992 50-16 76% 14 WA
984 CUVC 18-Open 1992 42-17 71% 18 NC
985 Mizuno CNVBC 18-Sammie 1992 34-13 72% 18 MO
986 Miami Hype 16-Prime1 1991 32-39 45% 16 FL
987 Illini Elite 15 Cardinal 1991 39-31 56% 15 IL
988 Munciana In 16 Cardinals 1990 45-33 58% 16 IN
989 NE Elite 15-Apex 1990 20-26 43% 15 NE
990 TX STORM 14 SMACK 1990 49-15 77% 14 TX
991 Jax Skyline 12-Royal 1990 56-21 73% 12 FL
992 Madtown 14-1 national 1990 43-18 70% 14 WI
993 Mintonette Sports 13-1 1990 31-28 53% 13 OH
994 Vegas Aces 15 REN 1990 35-28 56% 15 NV
995 Shockwave 15-Black 1990 25-16 61% 15 KS
996 Synergy 15 Titanium 1990 54-18 75% 15 PA
997 Nordiques Jr 18-1 1989 6-3 67% 18 PA
998 TEJAS 16-Black arthur 1989 41-24 63% 16 TX
999 Jax Skyline 16-Royal 1989 46-36 56% 16 FL
1000 FH 17-1 ikaika andy 1989 28-12 68% 17 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.