Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 21 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1001 Mizuno CNVBC 18-Sammie 1988 34-13 72% 18 MO
1002 MN Select 18-1 1988 27-23 54% 18 MN
1003 Rhythm 15 Dasia 1988 46-17 72% 15 TN
1004 Jax Skyline 12-Royal 1988 56-21 73% 12 FL
1005 Pgh Elite 14-Elite 1988 41-19 68% 14 PA
1006 MARIN 13-Black 1987 41-27 60% 13 CA
1007 TEJAS 16-Black arthur 1987 41-24 63% 16 TX
1008 Dinos 17-1 1987 8-5 62% 17 AB
1009 360 15-Hp elite 1986 44-17 71% 15 TX
1010 M2 Volleyball 15-E1 1986 58-16 78% 15 GA
1011 MVA 17 Freideman 1986 51-32 61% 17 FL
1012 SPVB 16-C-fed 1986 34-23 60% 16 IL
1013 MN Select 16-2 1986 53-25 68% 16 MN
1014 LAV 15-National black 1986 38-23 62% 15 AL
1015 Big Sky 15-1 1986 33-20 59% 15 MT
1016 AZ SKY 13-Gold 1985 50-34 60% 13 AZ
1017 NVA 14-Premier willie 1985 57-17 77% 14 FL
1018 Victory 15-National black 1984 35-18 63% 15 TX
1019 Ultimate G14 Gold 1984 46-20 70% 14 IL
1020 Tri-State Elite 13-White 1984 40-21 66% 13 OH
1021 Vaqueras 15-F julio 1984 31-14 69% 15 PR
1022 Peak VA 15-Black 1984 45-14 71% 15 TX
1023 Northern Lights 14-B 1984 12-2 86% 14 MN
1024 TI Elite 15.1 1984 50-22 69% 15
1025 Nordiques Jr 18-1 1983 6-3 67% 18
1026 ATOMIC 14-Smack premier 1983 53-29 65% 14 MI
1027 EXCEL 15-National red 1983 28-28 49% 15 TX
1028 Munciana In 16 Cardinals 1983 45-33 58% 16 IN
1029 BSVBC 13-Black 1983 34-14 71% 13 IL
1030 Northeast 15-1 1983 44-29 60% 15 CT
1031 573 15-Premier c 1983 28-9 76% 15 MO
1032 NT 13-Windermere 1983 72-12 86% 13 FL
1033 Balboa Bay 16-Blue 1982 42-19 69% 16 CA
1034 Dallas Skyline 18-Black 1982 45-17 71% 18 TX
1035 SC Rockstar 13-Moni 1982 35-19 65% 13 CA
1036 SPVB 18 Elite 1982 16-13 55% 18 IL
1037 Vegas Aces 15 REN 1982 35-28 56% 15 NV
1038 LAV 14-National black 1982 55-16 77% 14 AL
1039 L2 17-1 1982 33-32 51% 17 MI
1040 TAV 17-Blue 1982 38-19 64% 17 TX
1041 540 VB 15 Elite 1981 55-20 73% 15 VA
1042 Alabama Perf 16-N red 1981 36-26 58% 16 AL
1043 Jupiter Elite 15-E 1981 40-30 57% 15 FL
1044 BORINQUEN COQUI 14-1f 1981 19-10 66% 14 PR
1045 Six Pack 15 1980 55-17 76% 15 IA
1046 COA 12-Scorpions 1980 37-17 69% 12 IN
1047 HJV 18 ELITE 1980 27-19 59% 18 TX
1048 NKYVC 12-1 tsunami 1980 29-15 66% 12 KY
1049 Jax Skyline 16-Royal 1980 46-36 56% 16 FL
1050 Next Level 16-1 1980 7-1 88% 16 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.