2025-2026 Season — Page 21 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1001 | Alamo 17 Premier | 1989 | 50-27 | 65% | 17 | TX |
| 1002 | Piedmont VBC 16 FLY | 1989 | 34-27 | 56% | 16 | NC |
| 1003 | TAMPA UNITED VBA 13-Black | 1989 | 49-20 | 71% | 13 | FL |
| 1004 | M2 Volleyball 15-E1 | 1988 | 58-16 | 78% | 15 | GA |
| 1005 | MN Select 18-1 | 1988 | 27-23 | 54% | 18 | MN |
| 1006 | NorthEast Volleyball Club 18-1 | 1988 | 52-24 | 68% | 18 | CT |
| 1007 | Alabama Perf 16-N red | 1988 | 36-26 | 58% | 16 | AL |
| 1008 | MOD Elite 15-Blue | 1988 | 50-26 | 66% | 15 | IL |
| 1009 | 540 VB 15 Elite | 1988 | 55-20 | 73% | 15 | VA |
| 1010 | 573 15-Premier c | 1987 | 28-9 | 76% | 15 | MO |
| 1011 | Dinos 17-1 | 1987 | 8-5 | 62% | 17 | WA |
| 1012 | Rhythm 15 Dasia | 1987 | 46-17 | 72% | 15 | TN |
| 1013 | Next Level 16-1 | 1986 | 7-1 | 88% | 16 | PR |
| 1014 | Tri-State Elite 13-White | 1986 | 40-21 | 66% | 13 | KY |
| 1015 | WPVC 12-Armour black | 1986 | 54-22 | 71% | 12 | FL |
| 1016 | Shockwave 16-Black | 1986 | 28-18 | 61% | 16 | KS |
| 1017 | SPVB 18 Elite | 1986 | 16-13 | 55% | 18 | IL |
| 1018 | Dead Frog 15-Black | 1986 | 34-19 | 64% | 15 | MI |
| 1019 | L2 17-1 | 1986 | 33-32 | 51% | 17 | MI |
| 1020 | Stars 14-Bb | 1986 | 58-10 | 85% | 14 | SC |
| 1021 | EXCEL 15-National red | 1986 | 28-28 | 49% | 15 | TX |
| 1022 | FH 12-Ikaika-marcus | 1986 | 42-11 | 79% | 12 | TX |
| 1023 | Jupiter Elite 15-E | 1986 | 40-30 | 57% | 15 | FL |
| 1024 | HJV 18 ELITE | 1985 | 27-19 | 59% | 18 | TX |
| 1025 | ATOMIC 14-Smack premier | 1985 | 53-29 | 65% | 14 | AZ |
| 1026 | BSVBC 13-Black | 1985 | 34-14 | 71% | 13 | IL |
| 1027 | COA 12-Scorpions | 1985 | 37-17 | 69% | 12 | IN |
| 1028 | SPVB 16-C-fed | 1985 | 34-23 | 60% | 16 | IL |
| 1029 | LAV 14-National black | 1985 | 55-16 | 77% | 14 | AL |
| 1030 | A5 17-Acevedo | 1984 | 28-7 | 80% | 17 | GA |
| 1031 | Jammers 14-Kalepa | 1984 | 46-13 | 78% | 14 | HI |
| 1032 | Peak VA 15-Black | 1984 | 45-14 | 71% | 15 | TX |
| 1033 | NVA 14-Premier willie | 1983 | 57-17 | 77% | 14 | FL |
| 1034 | Dallas Skyline 18-Black | 1983 | 45-17 | 71% | 18 | TX |
| 1035 | TAV 17-Blue | 1983 | 38-19 | 64% | 17 | TX |
| 1036 | Balboa Bay Volleyball Club 16-Blue | 1983 | 42-19 | 69% | 16 | CA |
| 1037 | Iowa Select 17-Mizuno | 1982 | 43-26 | 61% | 17 | IA |
| 1038 | GVA 15-Pink | 1982 | 26-9 | 74% | 15 | PR |
| 1039 | AZ SKY 13-Gold | 1982 | 50-34 | 60% | 13 | AZ |
| 1040 | Ignite 16-Nationals | 1982 | 16-7 | 70% | 16 | UT |
| 1041 | BORINQUEN COQUI 14-1f | 1982 | 19-10 | 66% | 14 | PR |
| 1042 | LAV 17-National black | 1981 | 40-20 | 67% | 17 | AL |
| 1043 | ATHENA VB 18-1 gold national | 1981 | 31-24 | 56% | 18 | OR |
| 1044 | Level Up 14-1 | 1981 | 46-10 | 82% | 14 | OH |
| 1045 | NT 13-Windermere | 1981 | 72-12 | 86% | 13 | FL |
| 1046 | Club V 15-Prodigy steph | 1981 | 23-24 | 49% | 15 | UT |
| 1047 | TI Elite 15.1 | 1981 | 50-22 | 69% | 15 | IN |
| 1048 | Metro Volleyball Club 15-National | 1980 | 46-25 | 64% | 15 | DC |
| 1049 | MN Select 16-2 | 1980 | 53-25 | 68% | 16 | MN |
| 1050 | CSVC 14-Black | 1980 | 53-17 | 76% | 14 | NC |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.