2025-2026 Season — Page 21 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1001 | Mizuno CNVBC 18-Sammie | 1988 | 34-13 | 72% | 18 | MO |
| 1002 | MN Select 18-1 | 1988 | 27-23 | 54% | 18 | MN |
| 1003 | Rhythm 15 Dasia | 1988 | 46-17 | 72% | 15 | TN |
| 1004 | Jax Skyline 12-Royal | 1988 | 56-21 | 73% | 12 | FL |
| 1005 | Pgh Elite 14-Elite | 1988 | 41-19 | 68% | 14 | PA |
| 1006 | MARIN 13-Black | 1987 | 41-27 | 60% | 13 | CA |
| 1007 | TEJAS 16-Black arthur | 1987 | 41-24 | 63% | 16 | TX |
| 1008 | Dinos 17-1 | 1987 | 8-5 | 62% | 17 | AB |
| 1009 | 360 15-Hp elite | 1986 | 44-17 | 71% | 15 | TX |
| 1010 | M2 Volleyball 15-E1 | 1986 | 58-16 | 78% | 15 | GA |
| 1011 | MVA 17 Freideman | 1986 | 51-32 | 61% | 17 | FL |
| 1012 | SPVB 16-C-fed | 1986 | 34-23 | 60% | 16 | IL |
| 1013 | MN Select 16-2 | 1986 | 53-25 | 68% | 16 | MN |
| 1014 | LAV 15-National black | 1986 | 38-23 | 62% | 15 | AL |
| 1015 | Big Sky 15-1 | 1986 | 33-20 | 59% | 15 | MT |
| 1016 | AZ SKY 13-Gold | 1985 | 50-34 | 60% | 13 | AZ |
| 1017 | NVA 14-Premier willie | 1985 | 57-17 | 77% | 14 | FL |
| 1018 | Victory 15-National black | 1984 | 35-18 | 63% | 15 | TX |
| 1019 | Ultimate G14 Gold | 1984 | 46-20 | 70% | 14 | IL |
| 1020 | Tri-State Elite 13-White | 1984 | 40-21 | 66% | 13 | OH |
| 1021 | Vaqueras 15-F julio | 1984 | 31-14 | 69% | 15 | PR |
| 1022 | Peak VA 15-Black | 1984 | 45-14 | 71% | 15 | TX |
| 1023 | Northern Lights 14-B | 1984 | 12-2 | 86% | 14 | MN |
| 1024 | TI Elite 15.1 | 1984 | 50-22 | 69% | 15 | |
| 1025 | Nordiques Jr 18-1 | 1983 | 6-3 | 67% | 18 | |
| 1026 | ATOMIC 14-Smack premier | 1983 | 53-29 | 65% | 14 | MI |
| 1027 | EXCEL 15-National red | 1983 | 28-28 | 49% | 15 | TX |
| 1028 | Munciana In 16 Cardinals | 1983 | 45-33 | 58% | 16 | IN |
| 1029 | BSVBC 13-Black | 1983 | 34-14 | 71% | 13 | IL |
| 1030 | Northeast 15-1 | 1983 | 44-29 | 60% | 15 | CT |
| 1031 | 573 15-Premier c | 1983 | 28-9 | 76% | 15 | MO |
| 1032 | NT 13-Windermere | 1983 | 72-12 | 86% | 13 | FL |
| 1033 | Balboa Bay 16-Blue | 1982 | 42-19 | 69% | 16 | CA |
| 1034 | Dallas Skyline 18-Black | 1982 | 45-17 | 71% | 18 | TX |
| 1035 | SC Rockstar 13-Moni | 1982 | 35-19 | 65% | 13 | CA |
| 1036 | SPVB 18 Elite | 1982 | 16-13 | 55% | 18 | IL |
| 1037 | Vegas Aces 15 REN | 1982 | 35-28 | 56% | 15 | NV |
| 1038 | LAV 14-National black | 1982 | 55-16 | 77% | 14 | AL |
| 1039 | L2 17-1 | 1982 | 33-32 | 51% | 17 | MI |
| 1040 | TAV 17-Blue | 1982 | 38-19 | 64% | 17 | TX |
| 1041 | 540 VB 15 Elite | 1981 | 55-20 | 73% | 15 | VA |
| 1042 | Alabama Perf 16-N red | 1981 | 36-26 | 58% | 16 | AL |
| 1043 | Jupiter Elite 15-E | 1981 | 40-30 | 57% | 15 | FL |
| 1044 | BORINQUEN COQUI 14-1f | 1981 | 19-10 | 66% | 14 | PR |
| 1045 | Six Pack 15 | 1980 | 55-17 | 76% | 15 | IA |
| 1046 | COA 12-Scorpions | 1980 | 37-17 | 69% | 12 | IN |
| 1047 | HJV 18 ELITE | 1980 | 27-19 | 59% | 18 | TX |
| 1048 | NKYVC 12-1 tsunami | 1980 | 29-15 | 66% | 12 | KY |
| 1049 | Jax Skyline 16-Royal | 1980 | 46-36 | 56% | 16 | FL |
| 1050 | Next Level 16-1 | 1980 | 7-1 | 88% | 16 | CA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.