Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 17 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
801 OT 13-T patty 2025 52-20 72% 13 FL
802 Pgh Elite 16-Elite 2025 37-33 53% 16 PA
803 OPU 12-1 2024 49-14 78% 12 FL
804 PSVBA 17-Legacy 2024 65-20 76% 17 WA
805 Premier Nebraska 16-Black 2024 36-16 69% 16 NE
806 MKE Sting 16-Black 2024 46-27 63% 16 WI
807 WAVE 11-Adam 2024 44-5 90% 11 CA
808 K1 11-Jose i 2023 25-4 86% 11 PR
809 Club Cactus 16-Mizuno 2023 44-26 63% 16 AZ
810 VCNebraska 13-Elite 2023 21-9 70% 13 NE
811 Top Select 13-Top blue 2023 55-20 73% 13 FL
812 DYNASTY 18-Black 2023 29-19 60% 18 KS
813 NKYVC 16-2 tide 2023 35-32 52% 16 KY
814 EXCEL 12-National white 2022 41-19 65% 12 TX
815 Tri-State Elite 18-Blue 2022 31-17 65% 18 KY
816 AZ REV North 18 Premier 2022 68-38 64% 18 AZ
817 Spooky Nook Volleyball Academy 17-Black 2022 65-19 77% 17 PA
818 Six Pack 14 2021 62-30 66% 14 IA
819 Academy West 16-National 2021 91-61 60% 16 CA
820 RVC 16 National 2021 63-14 82% 16 VA
821 LIV 15-Royal susie 2021 47-15 76% 15 CA
822 360 17-Hp elite 2021 43-20 67% 17 TX
823 HOU STELLAR 16 ELITE 2021 48-27 64% 16 TX
824 Forza1 Volleyball North 13 FORZA 1 NORTH 13 ONE (SC) (6) 2020 10-1 91% 13 CA
825 Vegas Aces 18 REN 2020 37-24 61% 18 NV
826 Drive Nation 14-Red 2020 17-9 65% 14 TX
827 Wildfire 18-N shane 2020 29-10 74% 18 FL
828 LIVEWIRE 16 Prime 2020 50-22 69% 16 AZ
829 CVC 13-Blue 2020 39-20 66% 13 OH
830 South County 13-Jonny 2020 27-3 90% 13 UT
831 Monon 15-1o fang 2019 42-42 50% 15 IN
832 DaKine 15-National pink 2019 48-21 70% 15 WA
833 CJV 15 Mizuno 2019 36-29 55% 15 NC
834 VC United 17-1 elite 2018 22-20 52% 17 IL
835 BVA 16-N chris 2018 33-40 45% 16 FL
836 Sky High Adidas 13 Onyx 2018 40-20 67% 13 IL
837 VA Juniors 15-Elite 2018 71-16 82% 15 VA
838 SPVB 14 Elite 2018 34-17 67% 14 IL
839 STVA 17-1 jordan 2017 55-22 71% 17 TX
840 Dallas Skyline 13-Black 2017 37-17 67% 13 TX
841 Aspire 16 Alpha 2017 44-39 53% 16 AZ
842 OPVC 15-Hart 2017 35-32 52% 15 OH
843 Iowa Rockets 16-R 2016 47-20 68% 16 IA
844 Academy North 11 National 2016 84-27 76% 11 CA
845 United VBA 18 Adidas 2016 30-21 59% 18 TX
846 Armor Elite 14-N1 2016 37-30 55% 14 AZ
847 C2 15-1 nationals chloee 2016 45-19 70% 15 TN
848 SMASH Volleyball Club 16-S 2016 23-13 64% 16 MA
849 Attack VBC 16 Select 2016 45-23 66% 16 IL
850 ASHOK 16-1 2015 56-33 62% 16 GA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.