2025-2026 Season — Page 17 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 801 | Club Cactus 16-Mizuno | 2025 | 44-26 | 63% | 16 | AZ |
| 802 | HP Illinois 15 National | 2025 | 47-21 | 68% | 15 | IL |
| 803 | Dallas Skyline 14-Black | 2025 | 34-14 | 71% | 14 | TX |
| 804 | OK Charge 14-Ua tulsa | 2024 | 57-14 | 80% | 14 | OK |
| 805 | Six Pack 14 | 2024 | 55-21 | 72% | 14 | IA |
| 806 | WPVC 16-Armour black | 2024 | 36-40 | 47% | 16 | FL |
| 807 | Aspire 16 Alpha | 2023 | 44-39 | 53% | 16 | AB |
| 808 | TAV Houston 12-Black | 2023 | 35-17 | 67% | 12 | TX |
| 809 | MVP 16-Blue | 2023 | 60-23 | 72% | 16 | WI |
| 810 | K1 11-Jose i | 2023 | 25-4 | 86% | 11 | PR |
| 811 | Apex 16-1 | 2023 | 9-5 | 64% | 16 | GA |
| 812 | Sky High Adidas 13 Onyx | 2022 | 40-20 | 67% | 13 | IL |
| 813 | Tri-State Elite 18-Blue | 2022 | 31-17 | 65% | 18 | OH |
| 814 | PSVBA 17-Legacy | 2022 | 65-20 | 76% | 17 | WA |
| 815 | Club V 17-Prodigy silver | 2022 | 55-36 | 60% | 17 | UT |
| 816 | 575 16-Lpe danny | 2022 | 53-29 | 65% | 16 | GA |
| 817 | Pgh Elite 16-Elite | 2022 | 37-33 | 53% | 16 | PA |
| 818 | Armor Elite 14-N1 | 2021 | 37-30 | 55% | 14 | AZ |
| 819 | Milwaukee Jr's 15-1 | 2021 | 66-27 | 71% | 15 | WI |
| 820 | NKYVC 16-2 tide | 2021 | 35-32 | 52% | 16 | KY |
| 821 | Top Select 13-Top blue | 2021 | 55-20 | 73% | 13 | FL |
| 822 | WAVE 11-Adam | 2021 | 44-5 | 90% | 11 | CA |
| 823 | EXCEL 12-National white | 2021 | 41-19 | 65% | 12 | TX |
| 824 | HOU STELLAR 16 ELITE | 2020 | 48-27 | 64% | 16 | TX |
| 825 | Wildfire 18-N shane | 2020 | 29-10 | 74% | 18 | FL |
| 826 | LIV 15-Royal susie | 2020 | 47-15 | 76% | 15 | LA |
| 827 | Blue Ridge 16-Blue | 2020 | 12-9 | 57% | 16 | VA |
| 828 | HJV 16-Premier | 2019 | 44-36 | 55% | 16 | TX |
| 829 | Monon 15-1o fang | 2019 | 42-42 | 50% | 15 | IN |
| 830 | RVC 16 National | 2019 | 63-14 | 82% | 16 | VA |
| 831 | SMASH 17 | 2019 | 26-10 | 72% | 17 | MA |
| 832 | VAQUERAS 12-F freddy | 2019 | 19-6 | 76% | 12 | PR |
| 833 | CVC 13-Blue | 2019 | 39-20 | 66% | 13 | OH |
| 834 | VCNebraska 13-Elite | 2019 | 21-9 | 70% | 13 | NE |
| 835 | Austin Performance 13-Adidas | 2019 | 5-3 | 63% | 13 | |
| 836 | LIVEWIRE 16 Prime | 2018 | 50-22 | 69% | 16 | AZ |
| 837 | 360 17-Hp elite | 2018 | 43-20 | 67% | 17 | TX |
| 838 | CC Force 17-1 crossfire | 2017 | 36-15 | 71% | 17 | TX |
| 839 | Drive Nation 14-Red | 2017 | 17-9 | 65% | 14 | TX |
| 840 | Premier Nebraska 16-Black | 2017 | 36-16 | 69% | 16 | NE |
| 841 | SPVB 14 Elite | 2017 | 34-17 | 67% | 14 | IL |
| 842 | Attack VBC 16 Select | 2017 | 45-23 | 66% | 16 | IL |
| 843 | Austin Performance 14-Adidas | 2017 | 4-4 | 50% | 14 | |
| 844 | Iowa Rockets 16-R | 2016 | 47-20 | 68% | 16 | IA |
| 845 | FORZA1 NORTH 18 ONE | 2016 | 33-22 | 60% | 18 | CA |
| 846 | NVA 17-Black | 2016 | 67-20 | 77% | 17 | PA |
| 847 | Vegas Aces 18 REN | 2016 | 37-24 | 61% | 18 | NV |
| 848 | MPV 15-National green | 2016 | 61-28 | 69% | 15 | UT |
| 849 | Dallas Skyline 13-Black | 2016 | 37-17 | 67% | 13 | TX |
| 850 | EAVC 17-1 | 2016 | 7-8 | 47% | 17 | UT |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.