Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 17 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
801 Club Cactus 16-Mizuno 2025 44-26 63% 16 AZ
802 HP Illinois 15 National 2025 47-21 68% 15 IL
803 Dallas Skyline 14-Black 2025 34-14 71% 14 TX
804 OK Charge 14-Ua tulsa 2024 57-14 80% 14 OK
805 Six Pack 14 2024 55-21 72% 14 IA
806 WPVC 16-Armour black 2024 36-40 47% 16 FL
807 Aspire 16 Alpha 2023 44-39 53% 16 AB
808 TAV Houston 12-Black 2023 35-17 67% 12 TX
809 MVP 16-Blue 2023 60-23 72% 16 WI
810 K1 11-Jose i 2023 25-4 86% 11 PR
811 Apex 16-1 2023 9-5 64% 16 GA
812 Sky High Adidas 13 Onyx 2022 40-20 67% 13 IL
813 Tri-State Elite 18-Blue 2022 31-17 65% 18 OH
814 PSVBA 17-Legacy 2022 65-20 76% 17 WA
815 Club V 17-Prodigy silver 2022 55-36 60% 17 UT
816 575 16-Lpe danny 2022 53-29 65% 16 GA
817 Pgh Elite 16-Elite 2022 37-33 53% 16 PA
818 Armor Elite 14-N1 2021 37-30 55% 14 AZ
819 Milwaukee Jr's 15-1 2021 66-27 71% 15 WI
820 NKYVC 16-2 tide 2021 35-32 52% 16 KY
821 Top Select 13-Top blue 2021 55-20 73% 13 FL
822 WAVE 11-Adam 2021 44-5 90% 11 CA
823 EXCEL 12-National white 2021 41-19 65% 12 TX
824 HOU STELLAR 16 ELITE 2020 48-27 64% 16 TX
825 Wildfire 18-N shane 2020 29-10 74% 18 FL
826 LIV 15-Royal susie 2020 47-15 76% 15 LA
827 Blue Ridge 16-Blue 2020 12-9 57% 16 VA
828 HJV 16-Premier 2019 44-36 55% 16 TX
829 Monon 15-1o fang 2019 42-42 50% 15 IN
830 RVC 16 National 2019 63-14 82% 16 VA
831 SMASH 17 2019 26-10 72% 17 MA
832 VAQUERAS 12-F freddy 2019 19-6 76% 12 PR
833 CVC 13-Blue 2019 39-20 66% 13 OH
834 VCNebraska 13-Elite 2019 21-9 70% 13 NE
835 Austin Performance 13-Adidas 2019 5-3 63% 13
836 LIVEWIRE 16 Prime 2018 50-22 69% 16 AZ
837 360 17-Hp elite 2018 43-20 67% 17 TX
838 CC Force 17-1 crossfire 2017 36-15 71% 17 TX
839 Drive Nation 14-Red 2017 17-9 65% 14 TX
840 Premier Nebraska 16-Black 2017 36-16 69% 16 NE
841 SPVB 14 Elite 2017 34-17 67% 14 IL
842 Attack VBC 16 Select 2017 45-23 66% 16 IL
843 Austin Performance 14-Adidas 2017 4-4 50% 14
844 Iowa Rockets 16-R 2016 47-20 68% 16 IA
845 FORZA1 NORTH 18 ONE 2016 33-22 60% 18 CA
846 NVA 17-Black 2016 67-20 77% 17 PA
847 Vegas Aces 18 REN 2016 37-24 61% 18 NV
848 MPV 15-National green 2016 61-28 69% 15 UT
849 Dallas Skyline 13-Black 2016 37-17 67% 13 TX
850 EAVC 17-1 2016 7-8 47% 17 UT
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.