2025-2026 Season — Page 17 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 801 | OT 13-T patty | 2025 | 52-20 | 72% | 13 | FL |
| 802 | Pgh Elite 16-Elite | 2025 | 37-33 | 53% | 16 | PA |
| 803 | OPU 12-1 | 2024 | 49-14 | 78% | 12 | FL |
| 804 | PSVBA 17-Legacy | 2024 | 65-20 | 76% | 17 | WA |
| 805 | Premier Nebraska 16-Black | 2024 | 36-16 | 69% | 16 | NE |
| 806 | MKE Sting 16-Black | 2024 | 46-27 | 63% | 16 | WI |
| 807 | WAVE 11-Adam | 2024 | 44-5 | 90% | 11 | CA |
| 808 | K1 11-Jose i | 2023 | 25-4 | 86% | 11 | PR |
| 809 | Club Cactus 16-Mizuno | 2023 | 44-26 | 63% | 16 | AZ |
| 810 | VCNebraska 13-Elite | 2023 | 21-9 | 70% | 13 | NE |
| 811 | Top Select 13-Top blue | 2023 | 55-20 | 73% | 13 | FL |
| 812 | DYNASTY 18-Black | 2023 | 29-19 | 60% | 18 | KS |
| 813 | NKYVC 16-2 tide | 2023 | 35-32 | 52% | 16 | KY |
| 814 | EXCEL 12-National white | 2022 | 41-19 | 65% | 12 | TX |
| 815 | Tri-State Elite 18-Blue | 2022 | 31-17 | 65% | 18 | KY |
| 816 | AZ REV North 18 Premier | 2022 | 68-38 | 64% | 18 | AZ |
| 817 | Spooky Nook Volleyball Academy 17-Black | 2022 | 65-19 | 77% | 17 | PA |
| 818 | Six Pack 14 | 2021 | 62-30 | 66% | 14 | IA |
| 819 | Academy West 16-National | 2021 | 91-61 | 60% | 16 | CA |
| 820 | RVC 16 National | 2021 | 63-14 | 82% | 16 | VA |
| 821 | LIV 15-Royal susie | 2021 | 47-15 | 76% | 15 | CA |
| 822 | 360 17-Hp elite | 2021 | 43-20 | 67% | 17 | TX |
| 823 | HOU STELLAR 16 ELITE | 2021 | 48-27 | 64% | 16 | TX |
| 824 | Forza1 Volleyball North 13 FORZA 1 NORTH 13 ONE (SC) (6) | 2020 | 10-1 | 91% | 13 | CA |
| 825 | Vegas Aces 18 REN | 2020 | 37-24 | 61% | 18 | NV |
| 826 | Drive Nation 14-Red | 2020 | 17-9 | 65% | 14 | TX |
| 827 | Wildfire 18-N shane | 2020 | 29-10 | 74% | 18 | FL |
| 828 | LIVEWIRE 16 Prime | 2020 | 50-22 | 69% | 16 | AZ |
| 829 | CVC 13-Blue | 2020 | 39-20 | 66% | 13 | OH |
| 830 | South County 13-Jonny | 2020 | 27-3 | 90% | 13 | UT |
| 831 | Monon 15-1o fang | 2019 | 42-42 | 50% | 15 | IN |
| 832 | DaKine 15-National pink | 2019 | 48-21 | 70% | 15 | WA |
| 833 | CJV 15 Mizuno | 2019 | 36-29 | 55% | 15 | NC |
| 834 | VC United 17-1 elite | 2018 | 22-20 | 52% | 17 | IL |
| 835 | BVA 16-N chris | 2018 | 33-40 | 45% | 16 | FL |
| 836 | Sky High Adidas 13 Onyx | 2018 | 40-20 | 67% | 13 | IL |
| 837 | VA Juniors 15-Elite | 2018 | 71-16 | 82% | 15 | VA |
| 838 | SPVB 14 Elite | 2018 | 34-17 | 67% | 14 | IL |
| 839 | STVA 17-1 jordan | 2017 | 55-22 | 71% | 17 | TX |
| 840 | Dallas Skyline 13-Black | 2017 | 37-17 | 67% | 13 | TX |
| 841 | Aspire 16 Alpha | 2017 | 44-39 | 53% | 16 | AZ |
| 842 | OPVC 15-Hart | 2017 | 35-32 | 52% | 15 | OH |
| 843 | Iowa Rockets 16-R | 2016 | 47-20 | 68% | 16 | IA |
| 844 | Academy North 11 National | 2016 | 84-27 | 76% | 11 | CA |
| 845 | United VBA 18 Adidas | 2016 | 30-21 | 59% | 18 | TX |
| 846 | Armor Elite 14-N1 | 2016 | 37-30 | 55% | 14 | AZ |
| 847 | C2 15-1 nationals chloee | 2016 | 45-19 | 70% | 15 | TN |
| 848 | SMASH Volleyball Club 16-S | 2016 | 23-13 | 64% | 16 | MA |
| 849 | Attack VBC 16 Select | 2016 | 45-23 | 66% | 16 | IL |
| 850 | ASHOK 16-1 | 2015 | 56-33 | 62% | 16 | GA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.