Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 12 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
551 Alamo 13-Premier 2079 49-25 66% 13 TX
552 Apex 16-National navy 2079 14-18 44% 16 MO
553 Elevate Athletics 17-Nike kekoa 2079 7-1 88% 17 UT
554 H Skyline 14-Black 2079 39-24 62% 14 TX
555 Club One AZ 15-Platinum 2078 60-29 67% 15 AZ
556 Tri-State Elite 13-Blue 2078 36-24 60% 13 OH
557 1United 15-N blue 2078 36-33 52% 15 TX
558 Northern Lights 14-2 2078 59-23 72% 14 MN
559 L2 15-1 2078 44-21 68% 15 MI
560 Illini Elite 16 Cardinal 2077 40-32 56% 16 IL
561 Adversity 17-Adidas 2077 34-26 57% 17 IL
562 FEVA 13-Fernando 2077 47-24 66% 13 FL
563 Elevate 14 Julia 2077 52-6 90% 14 TX
564 EliteVBTC 14-Black 2076 47-20 70% 14 OH
565 OT 13-T kesha 2076 47-23 67% 13 FL
566 Invasion 13-Black 2075 37-21 64% 13 MO
567 OK Charge 13-Ua 2075 36-15 71% 13 OK
568 Vision 12 Gold 2075 45-18 71% 12 CA
569 SA Juniors 15-Adidas 2075 60-17 78% 15 TX
570 SA Elite 13-1 navy 2075 50-19 72% 13 TX
571 Iowa Select 14-Mizuno 2074 58-15 78% 14 IA
572 CSVC 17-Black 2074 52-25 68% 17 NC
573 Maunalani 15-Rise 2074 48-18 73% 15 HI
574 MKE Sting 17-Black 2074 42-31 58% 17 WI
575 MN Select 15-1 2074 45-38 54% 15 MN
576 MINOI 12-Black 2074 61-9 87% 12 UT
577 Florida's Sports Coast Elite 15-Blue 2074 62-16 79% 15 FL
578 CLUB LEGACY 15-Alpha 2074 30-10 75% 15 MI
579 KEVC 15-1 2073 49-5 91% 15
580 EU 14-Black 2073 47-15 76% 14 IN
581 Triangle 14-Black 2073 36-31 54% 14 NC
582 Iowa United 17-1 elite 2073 37-28 57% 17 IA
583 TVC 15-Black 2073 45-17 73% 15 OH
584 TAV 18-Black haroun 2073 33-17 65% 18 TX
585 Idaho ONE 14-Elite 2072 56-31 64% 14 ID
586 Boiler Jrs 12-O gold 2072 54-24 69% 12 IN
587 TXP 12-Black alonso 2072 50-12 81% 12 TX
588 Nebraska ONE 14-Apex 2071 34-14 71% 14 NE
589 Pohaku 14-1 2071 29-23 56% 14 KS
590 UNION 13-Black 2071 49-25 66% 13 CA
591 HNL Volleyball 16-Black 2071 20-12 63% 16 HI
592 CoJrs 16-Sherri 2070 23-25 48% 16 CO
593 TX STORM 18-Smack 2070 41-4 91% 18 TX
594 KC Power 17-2 2070 43-20 68% 17 KS
595 PSVC 14-Christi 2070 49-7 88% 14 SC
596 HP Illinois 17 National 2070 43-23 64% 17 IL
597 EliteVBTC 16-Black 2070 44-33 57% 16 OH
598 SASVBC G 17 DAN 2070 22-10 69% 17 HI
599 Six Pack 17 2069 55-17 76% 17 IA
600 540 VB 18 Elite 2069 37-5 88% 18 VA
← Previous123456789101112131415Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.