Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 12 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
551 WAVE 13-Tammy 2079 32-24 57% 13 CA
552 EliteVBTC 14-Black 2079 47-20 70% 14 OH
553 MKE Sting 17-Black 2079 42-31 58% 17 WI
554 GP 17 National 2079 63-35 64% 17 FL
555 Club One AZ 15-Platinum 2079 60-29 67% 15 AZ
556 MINOI 12-Black 2079 61-9 87% 12 UT
557 1st Alliance 16-White 2079 49-17 74% 16 IL
558 SA Elite 13-1 navy 2078 50-19 72% 13 TX
559 PSVC 14-Christi 2078 49-7 88% 14 SC
560 Dal Skyline 17-Royal-ping 2077 25-31 45% 17 TX
561 MN Select 15-1 2077 45-38 54% 15 MN
562 Rockwood Thunder 18 Elite 2077 48-20 71% 18 MO
563 OT 13-T kesha 2077 47-23 67% 13 FL
564 Club Fusion 14-1 national 2076 43-11 80% 14 IL
565 Triangle 14-Black 2076 36-31 54% 14 NC
566 MVVC 15-Red 2076 46-28 62% 15 CA
567 EU 14-Black 2076 47-15 76% 14 IN
568 Northern Lights 13-1 2076 47-26 64% 13 MN
569 Idaho ONE 14-Elite 2075 56-31 64% 14 ID
570 Iowa United 17-1 elite 2075 37-28 57% 17 IA
571 TVC 15-Black 2075 45-17 73% 15 OH
572 OK Charge 13-Ua 2074 36-15 71% 13 OK
573 Synergy 16-Plutonium 2074 51-21 71% 16 PA
574 Tri-State Elite 13-Blue 2074 36-24 60% 13 KY
575 HNL Volleyball 16-Black 2073 20-12 63% 16 HI
576 EliteVBTC 16-Black 2072 44-33 57% 16 OH
577 Iowa Select 14-Mizuno 2072 58-15 78% 14 IA
578 FEVA 13-Fernando 2072 47-24 66% 13 FL
579 PEAK 15-1 elite 2071 32-16 67% 15 OK
580 Vision 16 Gold 2071 42-36 54% 16 CA
581 TAV 18-Black haroun 2071 33-17 65% 18 TX
582 Nebraska ONE 14-Apex 2071 34-14 71% 14 NE
583 Boiler Jrs 11-E gold 2071 62-11 85% 11 IN
584 1United 15-N blue 2071 36-33 52% 15 TX
585 UNION 13-Black 2071 49-25 66% 13 IN
586 KC Power 17-2 2070 43-20 68% 17 KS
587 NOLA Hannah/Eva 14 2070 130-27 82% 14 LA
588 HP Illinois 17 National 2070 43-23 64% 17 MO
589 HPSTL 13 Royal 2069 42-27 61% 13 MO
590 Northern Lights 14-2 2069 62-25 71% 14 MN
591 Alamo 15-Premier 2069 53-27 65% 15 TX
592 540 VB 18 Elite 2069 37-5 88% 18 VA
593 AZ REV 13-Premier 2069 57-57 50% 13 AZ
594 Pohaku 14-1 2069 34-24 58% 14 KS
595 Topeka Saints 16 Gold 2068 22-14 61% 16 KS
596 Tstreet Volleyball Club 12-Curtis 2068 36-18 67% 12 CA
597 Boiler Jrs 12-O gold 2068 54-24 69% 12 IN
598 1st Alliance 18 Silver 2068 32-10 76% 18 IL
599 SASVBC G 17 DAN 2068 22-10 69% 17 HI
600 ATHENA VB 14-1 gold national 2068 42-24 64% 14 OR
← Previous123456789101112131415Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.