Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 14 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
651 MKE Sting 14-White 2058 73-21 78% 14 WI
652 M2 Volleyball 17-E1 2058 60-23 72% 17 GA
653 San Clemente 16-Riley 2058 13-11 54% 16 CA
654 Legacy 17-2 adidas 2058 47-36 57% 17 MI
655 H Skyline 16-Black 2057 28-33 46% 16 TX
656 Academy 15-O venom 2057 40-42 49% 15 IN
657 Premier 17-Black g 2057 41-19 67% 17 TX
658 Rockwood Thunder 15-Navy 2056 48-20 71% 15 MO
659 MichioChicago 17-Bluesmoke 2056 32-27 54% 17 IL
660 SWMNVB 16-1 2055 40-10 80% 16
661 Roots 14-1 green 2055 45-27 63% 14 IA
662 BRVA 16-1 2055 34-8 81% 16 VA
663 Shockwave 17-Black 2055 23-17 57% 17 KS
664 HPSTL 13-Orange 2055 58-20 73% 13 MO
665 Academy 18 Diamond 2055 25-25 50% 18 NC
666 OK PEAK 16-1 2055 15-3 83% 16
667 Red Storm 17-National xi 2055 50-24 68% 17 LA
668 AP 15 adidas 2054 37-33 53% 15 TX
669 APV 15-National black 2054 45-15 75% 15 TX
670 Happy Volley 16-Blue 2054 51-18 74% 16 PA
671 1st Alliance 17-Black 2054 40-18 69% 17 IL
672 EXCEL 18-National red 2054 34-21 61% 18 TX
673 Illini Elite 18 Cardinal 2053 18-9 67% 18 IL
674 TX LEGACY 14-Elite 2052 58-16 78% 14 TX
675 Austin Skyline 14-Royal 2052 52-39 57% 14 TX
676 K2 15 Elite 2052 43-41 51% 15 TN
677 PowerPlex 16-Nelson 2051 59-21 74% 16 IA
678 Academy North 11 National 2051 54-9 86% 11 CA
679 MAVA 15-Select (GA) 2051 8-1 89% 15
680 KIVA 14-White 2050 54-24 69% 14 KY
681 MVA 14-Freideman 2050 51-31 62% 14 FL
682 BRUSA 15 Courtney 2050 33-16 67% 15 CA
683 Metro 13 Travel 2050 49-19 71% 13 DC
684 Miami Hype 15-Prime1 2049 62-26 70% 15 FL
685 TKVBC 17-Outlaws elite 2049 55-24 70% 17 GA
686 A5 17-Gonzalez 2049 32-9 78% 17 GA
687 Club Sol 15-Teal 2048 48-27 64% 15
688 Iowa Rockets 18-R 2048 30-12 71% 18 IA
689 Circle City 18-Black 2048 41-16 72% 18 IN
690 Paramount VBC 13 Walter 2048 51-23 68% 13 VA
691 UEPA 15-D 2048 42-14 74% 15 TX
692 NE Elite 15-1 2048 4-5 44% 15 NE
693 MKE Sting 15-Black 2047 61-21 74% 15 WI
694 HPSTL 14-Orange 2046 52-23 68% 14 MO
695 Tulsa Power 13-1 2046 64-6 90% 13 OK
696 Idaho ONE 15-Elite 2046 56-28 67% 15 ID
697 Jupiter Elite 13-E 2046 44-21 68% 13 FL
698 SPIRIT VBC 16-1 2046 31-27 53% 16 OH
699 Rancho Valley 15-Premier 2046 20-9 69% 15 CA
700 NorCal 15-1 black 2046 37-28 57% 15 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.