2025-2026 Season — Page 14 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 651 | MKE Sting 14-White | 2058 | 73-21 | 78% | 14 | WI |
| 652 | M2 Volleyball 17-E1 | 2058 | 60-23 | 72% | 17 | GA |
| 653 | San Clemente 16-Riley | 2058 | 13-11 | 54% | 16 | CA |
| 654 | Legacy 17-2 adidas | 2058 | 47-36 | 57% | 17 | MI |
| 655 | H Skyline 16-Black | 2057 | 28-33 | 46% | 16 | TX |
| 656 | Academy 15-O venom | 2057 | 40-42 | 49% | 15 | IN |
| 657 | Premier 17-Black g | 2057 | 41-19 | 67% | 17 | TX |
| 658 | Rockwood Thunder 15-Navy | 2056 | 48-20 | 71% | 15 | MO |
| 659 | MichioChicago 17-Bluesmoke | 2056 | 32-27 | 54% | 17 | IL |
| 660 | SWMNVB 16-1 | 2055 | 40-10 | 80% | 16 | |
| 661 | Roots 14-1 green | 2055 | 45-27 | 63% | 14 | IA |
| 662 | BRVA 16-1 | 2055 | 34-8 | 81% | 16 | VA |
| 663 | Shockwave 17-Black | 2055 | 23-17 | 57% | 17 | KS |
| 664 | HPSTL 13-Orange | 2055 | 58-20 | 73% | 13 | MO |
| 665 | Academy 18 Diamond | 2055 | 25-25 | 50% | 18 | NC |
| 666 | OK PEAK 16-1 | 2055 | 15-3 | 83% | 16 | |
| 667 | Red Storm 17-National xi | 2055 | 50-24 | 68% | 17 | LA |
| 668 | AP 15 adidas | 2054 | 37-33 | 53% | 15 | TX |
| 669 | APV 15-National black | 2054 | 45-15 | 75% | 15 | TX |
| 670 | Happy Volley 16-Blue | 2054 | 51-18 | 74% | 16 | PA |
| 671 | 1st Alliance 17-Black | 2054 | 40-18 | 69% | 17 | IL |
| 672 | EXCEL 18-National red | 2054 | 34-21 | 61% | 18 | TX |
| 673 | Illini Elite 18 Cardinal | 2053 | 18-9 | 67% | 18 | IL |
| 674 | TX LEGACY 14-Elite | 2052 | 58-16 | 78% | 14 | TX |
| 675 | Austin Skyline 14-Royal | 2052 | 52-39 | 57% | 14 | TX |
| 676 | K2 15 Elite | 2052 | 43-41 | 51% | 15 | TN |
| 677 | PowerPlex 16-Nelson | 2051 | 59-21 | 74% | 16 | IA |
| 678 | Academy North 11 National | 2051 | 54-9 | 86% | 11 | CA |
| 679 | MAVA 15-Select (GA) | 2051 | 8-1 | 89% | 15 | |
| 680 | KIVA 14-White | 2050 | 54-24 | 69% | 14 | KY |
| 681 | MVA 14-Freideman | 2050 | 51-31 | 62% | 14 | FL |
| 682 | BRUSA 15 Courtney | 2050 | 33-16 | 67% | 15 | CA |
| 683 | Metro 13 Travel | 2050 | 49-19 | 71% | 13 | DC |
| 684 | Miami Hype 15-Prime1 | 2049 | 62-26 | 70% | 15 | FL |
| 685 | TKVBC 17-Outlaws elite | 2049 | 55-24 | 70% | 17 | GA |
| 686 | A5 17-Gonzalez | 2049 | 32-9 | 78% | 17 | GA |
| 687 | Club Sol 15-Teal | 2048 | 48-27 | 64% | 15 | |
| 688 | Iowa Rockets 18-R | 2048 | 30-12 | 71% | 18 | IA |
| 689 | Circle City 18-Black | 2048 | 41-16 | 72% | 18 | IN |
| 690 | Paramount VBC 13 Walter | 2048 | 51-23 | 68% | 13 | VA |
| 691 | UEPA 15-D | 2048 | 42-14 | 74% | 15 | TX |
| 692 | NE Elite 15-1 | 2048 | 4-5 | 44% | 15 | NE |
| 693 | MKE Sting 15-Black | 2047 | 61-21 | 74% | 15 | WI |
| 694 | HPSTL 14-Orange | 2046 | 52-23 | 68% | 14 | MO |
| 695 | Tulsa Power 13-1 | 2046 | 64-6 | 90% | 13 | OK |
| 696 | Idaho ONE 15-Elite | 2046 | 56-28 | 67% | 15 | ID |
| 697 | Jupiter Elite 13-E | 2046 | 44-21 | 68% | 13 | FL |
| 698 | SPIRIT VBC 16-1 | 2046 | 31-27 | 53% | 16 | OH |
| 699 | Rancho Valley 15-Premier | 2046 | 20-9 | 69% | 15 | CA |
| 700 | NorCal 15-1 black | 2046 | 37-28 | 57% | 15 | CA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.