2025-2026 Season — Page 14 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 651 | SA Juniors 17-Adidas | 2058 | 43-34 | 56% | 17 | TX |
| 652 | Top Select 13 Elite | 2058 | 54-30 | 64% | 13 | FL |
| 653 | AP 15 adidas | 2057 | 37-33 | 53% | 15 | TX |
| 654 | K2 15 Elite | 2057 | 43-41 | 51% | 15 | TN |
| 655 | Happy Volley 16-Blue | 2057 | 51-18 | 74% | 16 | PA |
| 656 | Premier 17-Black g | 2057 | 41-19 | 67% | 17 | TX |
| 657 | Austin Skyline 14-Royal | 2057 | 52-39 | 57% | 14 | TX |
| 658 | OK PEAK 16-1 | 2057 | 15-3 | 83% | 16 | OK |
| 659 | Iowa Rockets 17-R | 2057 | 55-26 | 67% | 17 | IA |
| 660 | HOU STELLAR 12-Elite | 2056 | 39-10 | 80% | 12 | TX |
| 661 | H Skyline 16-Black | 2056 | 28-33 | 46% | 16 | TX |
| 662 | MichioChicago 17-Bluesmoke | 2056 | 32-27 | 54% | 17 | IL |
| 663 | Shockwave 17-Black | 2056 | 23-17 | 57% | 17 | KS |
| 664 | Boiler Jrs 18-O gold | 2055 | 45-17 | 73% | 18 | IN |
| 665 | 3DGE 15-1 gold | 2055 | 33-25 | 57% | 15 | PA |
| 666 | DNVB 15-Red | 2055 | 8-2 | 80% | 15 | MA |
| 667 | Roots 14-1 green | 2054 | 45-27 | 63% | 14 | TX |
| 668 | TKVBC 17-Outlaws elite | 2054 | 55-24 | 70% | 17 | GA |
| 669 | Circle City 18-Black | 2054 | 41-16 | 72% | 18 | IN |
| 670 | OT 18-Tony | 2054 | 39-15 | 72% | 18 | FL |
| 671 | United 12-Evren | 2054 | 8-0 | 100% | 12 | HI |
| 672 | VAQUE 14-1 | 2053 | 7-1 | 88% | 14 | PR |
| 673 | HPSTL 13-Orange | 2052 | 58-20 | 73% | 13 | MO |
| 674 | 1st Alliance 16-Black | 2052 | 45-22 | 67% | 16 | IL |
| 675 | Absolute 12-Black | 2052 | 47-13 | 78% | 12 | CA |
| 676 | MKE Sting 15-Black | 2052 | 61-21 | 74% | 15 | WI |
| 677 | MINOI 14-Black | 2052 | 51-9 | 85% | 14 | UT |
| 678 | Red Storm 17-National xi | 2052 | 50-24 | 68% | 17 | LA |
| 679 | AVC 13-1 (NT) | 2051 | 33-4 | 89% | 13 | TX |
| 680 | NE Elite 15-1 | 2051 | 4-5 | 44% | 15 | NE |
| 681 | 1st Alliance 17-Black | 2051 | 40-18 | 69% | 17 | IL |
| 682 | NorCal 15-1 black | 2051 | 37-28 | 57% | 15 | CA |
| 683 | WPVC 18-Armour black | 2050 | 31-16 | 66% | 18 | FL |
| 684 | Tulsa Power 14-1 | 2050 | 46-13 | 78% | 14 | OK |
| 685 | Elevation 15 Peak | 2050 | 38-15 | 72% | 15 | CO |
| 686 | Legacy 17-2 adidas | 2050 | 47-36 | 57% | 17 | MI |
| 687 | VCNebraska 15-Elite | 2050 | 25-14 | 64% | 15 | NE |
| 688 | St. Pete 16-Teal | 2050 | 79-25 | 76% | 16 | FL |
| 689 | Iowa Rockets 18-R | 2049 | 30-12 | 71% | 18 | IA |
| 690 | Tulsa Power 13-1 | 2049 | 64-6 | 90% | 13 | OK |
| 691 | KIVA 14-White | 2049 | 54-24 | 69% | 14 | KY |
| 692 | Paramount VBC 13 Walter | 2048 | 51-23 | 68% | 13 | VA |
| 693 | A5 17-Gonzalez | 2047 | 32-9 | 78% | 17 | GA |
| 694 | MVA 14-Freideman | 2047 | 51-31 | 62% | 14 | FL |
| 695 | SPIRIT VBC 16-1 | 2047 | 31-27 | 53% | 16 | OH |
| 696 | Mintonette Sports 17-2 | 2047 | 55-25 | 69% | 17 | OH |
| 697 | Jupiter Elite 13-E | 2046 | 44-21 | 68% | 13 | FL |
| 698 | Iowa Rockets 14-R | 2046 | 50-28 | 64% | 14 | IA |
| 699 | Integrity 18-Intense blue | 2046 | 35-6 | 85% | 18 | TX |
| 700 | Academy 15 Diamond | 2046 | 35-29 | 55% | 15 | NC |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.