Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 7 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
301 Alamo 14-Premier 2168 55-32 63% 14 TX
302 KIVA 14-Red 2168 51-24 68% 14 KY
303 MAVS 13-Elite 2167 31-25 55% 13 KS
304 FC Elite 16 Elite 2166 39-26 60% 16 WI
305 Circle City 16-Black 2165 45-23 66% 16 IN
306 OK Charge 15-Ua 2165 41-7 85% 15 OK
307 Boiler Jrs 13-O gold 2165 57-26 69% 13 IN
308 Colorado Juniors 14-Jen 2165 50-16 76% 14 CO
309 1st Alliance 18 Gold 2165 31-21 60% 18 IL
310 CPA 18 Benson 2165 22-11 67% 18 WA
311 TX STORM 16 SMACK 2164 46-11 81% 16 TX
312 NKYVC 18-1 tsunami 2163 34-15 69% 18 KY
313 RAGE 14-Greg 2163 49-21 70% 14 CA
314 Momentous Volleyball Club 17-Dan 2163 32-26 55% 17 CA
315 Madfrog 11-N green 2162 43-5 90% 11 TX
316 MADFROG 18-N green 2162 33-15 69% 18 TX
317 MAVA 15-Select 2161 54-31 64% 15 KY
318 1United 17-N blue 2159 33-30 52% 17 TX
319 FC Elite 14 Navy 2159 50-39 56% 14 WI
320 EC Power KOP 17-Black 2158 43-25 63% 17 PA
321 WD Nation 16-Black 2157 36-17 68% 16 LA
322 HJV 15 ELITE 2157 43-35 55% 15 TX
323 Tribe 15-Vktry navy 2156 55-22 71% 15 FL
324 1st Alliance 14-1 2155 157-83 65% 14 IL
325 Club V 18-Prodigy wayne/kris 2155 47-12 80% 18 UT
326 AZ Sky 16 Gold 2155 59-27 69% 16 AZ
327 OK Charge 17-Ua tulsa 2155 36-16 69% 17 OK
328 Actyve 15-Navy 2154 42-26 62% 15 CA
329 SNVF 17 BLITZ 2154 65-25 72% 17 WA
330 MN Select 17-2 2154 59-25 70% 17 MN
331 OT 14-O omi 2154 49-22 69% 14 FL
332 Elevate Athletics 17-Nike 2154 50-13 79% 17 UT
333 PowerPlex 17-Brogean 2154 54-24 69% 17 IA
334 MemphisVBAcademy 16-Red 2153 49-16 74% 16 MS
335 Rockwood Thunder 14-Elite 2152 51-25 67% 14 MO
336 Countdown 15-1 elite 2152 43-26 62% 15 FL
337 Legacy 13-1 adidas 2152 37-27 58% 13 MI
338 MJVA 16-1 2151 16-3 84% 16 TN
339 RAGE 16 GARREN 2150 47-26 64% 16 CA
340 KC Power 15-2 2149 48-15 75% 15 KS
341 MKE Sting 14 Gold 2148 61-27 69% 14 WI
342 OK Charge 16-Ua 2148 38-20 66% 16 OK
343 MODE 15 National 2148 50-22 69% 15 WA
344 TAMPA UNITED VBA 16-Black 2148 43-29 60% 16 FL
345 Illini Elite 17 Cardinal 2146 28-19 60% 17 IL
346 OT 15-O christian 2146 53-32 62% 15 FL
347 Iowa United 15-1 elite 2146 49-25 66% 15 IA
348 Northern Lights 16-2 2145 66-23 74% 16 MN
349 Vegas Aces 16 REN 2145 36-29 55% 16 NV
350 Rockwood Thunder 16-Elite 2145 43-22 65% 16 MO
← Previous12345678910Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.