Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 7 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
301 Circle City 18-Purple 2166 46-20 70% 18 IN
302 H Skyline 17-Royal 2166 33-33 50% 17 TX
303 KIVA 14-Red 2166 51-24 68% 14 KY
304 CJV 16-Mizuno 2165 45-22 67% 16 NC
305 MAVS 13-Elite 2165 31-25 55% 13 KS
306 Northern Lights 15-1 2165 44-35 56% 15 MN
307 CPA 18 Benson 2164 22-11 67% 18 WA
308 Madfrog 11-N green 2164 43-5 90% 11 TX
309 AZ Sky 16 Gold 2163 59-27 69% 16 AZ
310 TX STORM 16 SMACK 2163 46-11 81% 16 TX
311 1st Alliance 18 Gold 2163 31-21 60% 18 IL
312 CoJrs 14-Jen 2162 29-12 71% 14 CO
313 Circle City 16-Black 2161 45-23 66% 16 IN
314 FC Elite 14 Navy 2161 41-32 56% 14 WI
315 Club V 18-Prodigy wayne/kris 2161 47-12 80% 18 UT
316 VCNebraska 16 Elite 2159 26-25 51% 16 NE
317 RAGE 14-Greg 2158 49-21 70% 14 CA
318 1st Alliance 15 Silver 2158 54-16 77% 15 IL
319 Dal Skyline 14-Royal-josh 2156 54-22 71% 14 TX
320 Tribe 15-Vktry navy 2156 55-22 71% 15 FL
321 MADFROG 18-N green 2156 33-15 69% 18 TX
322 MAVA 15-Select 2155 54-31 64% 15 KY
323 HJV 15 ELITE 2155 43-35 55% 15 TX
324 OT 14-O omi 2155 49-22 69% 14 FL
325 1United 17-N blue 2154 33-30 52% 17 TX
326 Wisconsin Elite 15-Elite 2153 60-14 81% 15 WI
327 WD Nation 16-Black 2153 36-17 68% 16 LA
328 Legacy 13-1 adidas 2153 37-27 58% 13 MI
329 OK Charge 17-Ua tulsa 2153 36-16 69% 17 OK
330 GJ 12 PREMIER 2152 49-11 82% 12 FL
331 SNVF 17 BLITZ 2152 65-25 72% 17 WA
332 Rockwood Thunder 14-Elite 2152 51-25 67% 14 MO
333 PowerPlex 17-Brogean 2151 48-24 67% 17 IA
334 RAGE 16 GARREN 2151 47-26 64% 16 CA
335 MN Select 17-2 2151 59-25 70% 17 MN
336 MODE 15 National 2150 50-22 69% 15 WA
337 MemphisVBAcademy 16-Red 2150 49-16 74% 16 MS
338 Actyve 15-Navy 2150 42-26 62% 15 CA
339 EC Power KOP 17-Black 2149 43-25 63% 17 PA
340 OK Charge 16-Ua 2149 38-20 66% 16 OK
341 WI Juniors 16-1 2148 53-19 74% 16 WI
342 MKE Sting 14 Gold 2147 61-27 69% 14 WI
343 Elevate Athletics 17-Nike 2147 50-13 79% 17 UT
344 Illini Elite 17 Cardinal 2146 28-19 60% 17 IL
345 Iowa United 15-1 elite 2146 49-25 66% 15 IA
346 KIVA 15-White 2146 49-33 60% 15 KY
347 AZ REV 18 Premier 2145 48-15 76% 18 AZ
348 AZ Sky 18 Gold 2145 46-22 68% 18 AZ
349 Vegas Aces 16 REN 2145 36-29 55% 16 NV
350 TAMPA UNITED VBA 16-Black 2145 43-29 60% 16 FL
← Previous12345678910Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.