2025-2026 Season — Page 7 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 301 | Circle City 18-Purple | 2166 | 46-20 | 70% | 18 | IN |
| 302 | H Skyline 17-Royal | 2166 | 33-33 | 50% | 17 | TX |
| 303 | KIVA 14-Red | 2166 | 51-24 | 68% | 14 | KY |
| 304 | CJV 16-Mizuno | 2165 | 45-22 | 67% | 16 | NC |
| 305 | MAVS 13-Elite | 2165 | 31-25 | 55% | 13 | KS |
| 306 | Northern Lights 15-1 | 2165 | 44-35 | 56% | 15 | MN |
| 307 | CPA 18 Benson | 2164 | 22-11 | 67% | 18 | WA |
| 308 | Madfrog 11-N green | 2164 | 43-5 | 90% | 11 | TX |
| 309 | AZ Sky 16 Gold | 2163 | 59-27 | 69% | 16 | AZ |
| 310 | TX STORM 16 SMACK | 2163 | 46-11 | 81% | 16 | TX |
| 311 | 1st Alliance 18 Gold | 2163 | 31-21 | 60% | 18 | IL |
| 312 | CoJrs 14-Jen | 2162 | 29-12 | 71% | 14 | CO |
| 313 | Circle City 16-Black | 2161 | 45-23 | 66% | 16 | IN |
| 314 | FC Elite 14 Navy | 2161 | 41-32 | 56% | 14 | WI |
| 315 | Club V 18-Prodigy wayne/kris | 2161 | 47-12 | 80% | 18 | UT |
| 316 | VCNebraska 16 Elite | 2159 | 26-25 | 51% | 16 | NE |
| 317 | RAGE 14-Greg | 2158 | 49-21 | 70% | 14 | CA |
| 318 | 1st Alliance 15 Silver | 2158 | 54-16 | 77% | 15 | IL |
| 319 | Dal Skyline 14-Royal-josh | 2156 | 54-22 | 71% | 14 | TX |
| 320 | Tribe 15-Vktry navy | 2156 | 55-22 | 71% | 15 | FL |
| 321 | MADFROG 18-N green | 2156 | 33-15 | 69% | 18 | TX |
| 322 | MAVA 15-Select | 2155 | 54-31 | 64% | 15 | KY |
| 323 | HJV 15 ELITE | 2155 | 43-35 | 55% | 15 | TX |
| 324 | OT 14-O omi | 2155 | 49-22 | 69% | 14 | FL |
| 325 | 1United 17-N blue | 2154 | 33-30 | 52% | 17 | TX |
| 326 | Wisconsin Elite 15-Elite | 2153 | 60-14 | 81% | 15 | WI |
| 327 | WD Nation 16-Black | 2153 | 36-17 | 68% | 16 | LA |
| 328 | Legacy 13-1 adidas | 2153 | 37-27 | 58% | 13 | MI |
| 329 | OK Charge 17-Ua tulsa | 2153 | 36-16 | 69% | 17 | OK |
| 330 | GJ 12 PREMIER | 2152 | 49-11 | 82% | 12 | FL |
| 331 | SNVF 17 BLITZ | 2152 | 65-25 | 72% | 17 | WA |
| 332 | Rockwood Thunder 14-Elite | 2152 | 51-25 | 67% | 14 | MO |
| 333 | PowerPlex 17-Brogean | 2151 | 48-24 | 67% | 17 | IA |
| 334 | RAGE 16 GARREN | 2151 | 47-26 | 64% | 16 | CA |
| 335 | MN Select 17-2 | 2151 | 59-25 | 70% | 17 | MN |
| 336 | MODE 15 National | 2150 | 50-22 | 69% | 15 | WA |
| 337 | MemphisVBAcademy 16-Red | 2150 | 49-16 | 74% | 16 | MS |
| 338 | Actyve 15-Navy | 2150 | 42-26 | 62% | 15 | CA |
| 339 | EC Power KOP 17-Black | 2149 | 43-25 | 63% | 17 | PA |
| 340 | OK Charge 16-Ua | 2149 | 38-20 | 66% | 16 | OK |
| 341 | WI Juniors 16-1 | 2148 | 53-19 | 74% | 16 | WI |
| 342 | MKE Sting 14 Gold | 2147 | 61-27 | 69% | 14 | WI |
| 343 | Elevate Athletics 17-Nike | 2147 | 50-13 | 79% | 17 | UT |
| 344 | Illini Elite 17 Cardinal | 2146 | 28-19 | 60% | 17 | IL |
| 345 | Iowa United 15-1 elite | 2146 | 49-25 | 66% | 15 | IA |
| 346 | KIVA 15-White | 2146 | 49-33 | 60% | 15 | KY |
| 347 | AZ REV 18 Premier | 2145 | 48-15 | 76% | 18 | AZ |
| 348 | AZ Sky 18 Gold | 2145 | 46-22 | 68% | 18 | AZ |
| 349 | Vegas Aces 16 REN | 2145 | 36-29 | 55% | 16 | NV |
| 350 | TAMPA UNITED VBA 16-Black | 2145 | 43-29 | 60% | 16 | FL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.