2025-2026 Season — Page 6 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 251 | MKE Sting 14-Black | 2191 | 66-22 | 75% | 14 | WI |
| 252 | Premier Nebraska 18 Gold | 2191 | 28-4 | 88% | 18 | NE |
| 253 | KC Power 18-1 | 2191 | 31-12 | 72% | 18 | KS |
| 254 | PEAK 13-1 elite | 2191 | 42-16 | 72% | 13 | OK |
| 255 | VCNebraska 14-Elite | 2191 | 25-12 | 68% | 14 | NE |
| 256 | NKYVC 15-1 tsunami | 2189 | 44-33 | 57% | 15 | KY |
| 257 | South County 15-Darice | 2188 | 53-15 | 78% | 15 | UT |
| 258 | AZ Sky 15 Gold | 2187 | 60-26 | 70% | 15 | AZ |
| 259 | SG Elite 16 Roshambo | 2187 | 45-23 | 66% | 16 | CA |
| 260 | SC Elite 15-Blue-jake | 2186 | 57-17 | 77% | 15 | SC |
| 261 | AJV 17-Adidas | 2186 | 46-23 | 67% | 17 | TX |
| 262 | MADFROG 15-N black | 2186 | 56-17 | 77% | 15 | TX |
| 263 | OK Charge 17-Ua | 2186 | 33-25 | 57% | 17 | OK |
| 264 | FaR Out 16-Black | 2185 | 39-29 | 57% | 16 | MI |
| 265 | Mintonette Sports 14-1 | 2184 | 40-33 | 55% | 14 | OH |
| 266 | IMGA Ascender Elite 18-1 | 2184 | 46-12 | 79% | 18 | FL |
| 267 | Elevation 13-Molly | 2183 | 34-19 | 64% | 13 | OH |
| 268 | Panda 13-1 | 2182 | 64-16 | 80% | 13 | CA |
| 269 | OPU 15-1 | 2182 | 62-14 | 82% | 15 | FL |
| 270 | Miami Hype 17-Prime1 | 2180 | 47-26 | 64% | 17 | FL |
| 271 | A5 17 AG | 2180 | 41-19 | 68% | 17 | GA |
| 272 | 1st Alliance 16-Silver | 2180 | 51-16 | 76% | 16 | IL |
| 273 | AZ REV 14 Premier | 2178 | 78-50 | 61% | 14 | AZ |
| 274 | FaR Out 18-Black | 2178 | 37-9 | 80% | 18 | MI |
| 275 | CVC 15-Black | 2178 | 39-33 | 54% | 15 | OH |
| 276 | VVA 16-Rosen | 2177 | 55-19 | 74% | 16 | CA |
| 277 | KC Power 13-1 | 2177 | 39-26 | 60% | 13 | KS |
| 278 | EXCEL 11-Red | 2177 | 15-1 | 94% | 11 | TX |
| 279 | OPU 14-1 | 2176 | 61-19 | 76% | 14 | FL |
| 280 | H Skyline 17-Royal | 2176 | 33-33 | 50% | 17 | TX |
| 281 | COAST 16-1 nilay | 2176 | 37-30 | 55% | 16 | CA |
| 282 | Monon 14-1o nova | 2176 | 57-27 | 68% | 14 | IN |
| 283 | Arete 16-Navy telos | 2175 | 43-24 | 64% | 16 | TX |
| 284 | Premier Nebraska 17 Gold | 2175 | 41-19 | 68% | 17 | NE |
| 285 | MPV 17-National green | 2174 | 80-17 | 82% | 17 | UT |
| 286 | AVC CLE 15-Red | 2174 | 50-21 | 70% | 15 | OH |
| 287 | Wildfire 13-N lee ann | 2173 | 52-29 | 64% | 13 | FL |
| 288 | MKE Sting 18 Gold | 2173 | 31-20 | 61% | 18 | WI |
| 289 | EXCEL 12-National red | 2173 | 54-13 | 81% | 12 | TX |
| 290 | Stars 17 ALex | 2173 | 57-21 | 73% | 17 | SC |
| 291 | HPSTL 12 Royal | 2172 | 66-12 | 85% | 12 | MO |
| 292 | Northern Lights 15-1 | 2172 | 48-36 | 57% | 15 | MN |
| 293 | 1st Alliance 15 Silver | 2170 | 54-16 | 77% | 15 | IL |
| 294 | Pohaku 18-1 | 2170 | 34-18 | 65% | 18 | KS |
| 295 | Paramount VBC 15 Nick | 2169 | 55-29 | 65% | 15 | VA |
| 296 | Dal Skyline 17-Royal-sean | 2169 | 41-24 | 62% | 17 | TX |
| 297 | VCNebraska 16 Elite | 2169 | 26-25 | 51% | 16 | NE |
| 298 | CJV 16-Mizuno | 2169 | 45-22 | 67% | 16 | NC |
| 299 | Dal Skyline 14-Royal-josh | 2168 | 54-22 | 71% | 14 | TX |
| 300 | Circle City 18-Purple | 2168 | 46-20 | 70% | 18 | IN |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.