Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 9 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
401 TAV 14-Black (NT) 2127 23-14 62% 14 TX
402 Academy West 14-National 2127 53-25 68% 14 CA
403 1United 12-N blue 2127 52-12 81% 12 TX
404 OT 17-J john 2126 42-36 54% 17 FL
405 Dakine 17-National pink 2126 65-21 76% 17 WA
406 MJVA 16-1 2126 16-3 84% 16 TN
407 HPSTL 17-Orange 2125 49-25 64% 17 MO
408 EC Power KOP 18-Black 2124 31-19 62% 18 PA
409 OK Charge 14-Ua 2124 50-9 85% 14 OK
410 OT 16-J will 2124 36-27 57% 16 FL
411 Top Select 15-Top blue 2124 51-24 68% 15 FL
412 A5 18-Boba 2123 62-8 89% 18 GA
413 Alabama Perf 15-N red 2123 48-17 74% 15 AL
414 Manhattan Mayhem 17-P 2122 64-13 82% 17
415 AP 16-Adidas 2122 52-22 70% 16 TX
416 HPSTL 13 Royal 2122 42-27 61% 13 MO
417 Elevation 16-Renfro 2122 29-32 48% 16 OH
418 NRG VBC 16-Ampd navy 2122 43-20 66% 16 TX
419 CUVC 16 Open 2121 43-37 54% 16 NC
420 GJ 13 ADIDAS 2121 48-27 64% 13 FL
421 Iowa United 16-1 elite 2121 48-20 71% 16 IA
422 CoJrs 13-Tammy 2120 23-12 66% 13 CO
423 PSVA 17-1 2120 61-17 78% 17 FL
424 AJV 13-Adidas 2120 57-15 79% 13 TX
425 Top Flight 15-Elite 2120 39-21 65% 15 IL
426 Invasion 16-Black 2119 47-7 87% 16 MO
427 Ozark Juniors 13 Premier 2119 46-23 67% 13 AR
428 Triangle 13-Black 2119 44-21 68% 13 NC
429 Vegas Aces 14-Ren 2119 29-12 71% 14 NV
430 Boss CLE 14-1 2119 47-21 69% 14 OH
431 AZ REV 15 Premier 2119 42-38 53% 15 AZ
432 H Skyline 18 Royal 2118 31-11 74% 18 TX
433 Momentous VBC 17-Dan 2118 26-23 53% 17 CA
434 COAST 18-1 victor 2117 37-16 70% 18 CA
435 MAVS 17-Elite 2117 33-25 57% 17 KS
436 SCVC 16-Nina 2116 8-2 80% 16
437 AZ EVJ 14 Elite 2116 53-29 65% 14 AZ
438 NORCO 13-Black 2115 55-10 85% 13 CO
439 Legacy 15-2 adidas 2115 47-27 64% 15 MI
440 Elevate Athletics 16-Nike 2115 25-11 69% 16 UT
441 MJVA 15-Elite black 2114 54-12 82% 15 TN
442 1st Alliance 12-1 2114 47-14 77% 12 IL
443 Tribe 16-Vktry navy 2113 68-18 79% 16 FL
444 Gulfside 15-Prime 2113 60-21 74% 15 FL
445 TAV Houston 14-Black 2112 46-26 64% 14 TX
446 Northeast 16-1 2112 53-17 76% 16 CT
447 A5 14-Kip 2112 57-17 77% 14 GA
448 Triangle 16-Blue 2111 58-20 74% 16 NC
449 Top Select 12 Elite 2111 45-17 73% 12 FL
450 BORINQUEN COQUI 12-1f 2111 33-7 83% 12 PR
← Previous123456789101112Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.