2025-2026 Season — Page 9 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 401 | TAV 14-Black (NT) | 2127 | 23-14 | 62% | 14 | TX |
| 402 | Academy West 14-National | 2127 | 53-25 | 68% | 14 | CA |
| 403 | 1United 12-N blue | 2127 | 52-12 | 81% | 12 | TX |
| 404 | OT 17-J john | 2126 | 42-36 | 54% | 17 | FL |
| 405 | Dakine 17-National pink | 2126 | 65-21 | 76% | 17 | WA |
| 406 | MJVA 16-1 | 2126 | 16-3 | 84% | 16 | TN |
| 407 | HPSTL 17-Orange | 2125 | 49-25 | 64% | 17 | MO |
| 408 | EC Power KOP 18-Black | 2124 | 31-19 | 62% | 18 | PA |
| 409 | OK Charge 14-Ua | 2124 | 50-9 | 85% | 14 | OK |
| 410 | OT 16-J will | 2124 | 36-27 | 57% | 16 | FL |
| 411 | Top Select 15-Top blue | 2124 | 51-24 | 68% | 15 | FL |
| 412 | A5 18-Boba | 2123 | 62-8 | 89% | 18 | GA |
| 413 | Alabama Perf 15-N red | 2123 | 48-17 | 74% | 15 | AL |
| 414 | Manhattan Mayhem 17-P | 2122 | 64-13 | 82% | 17 | |
| 415 | AP 16-Adidas | 2122 | 52-22 | 70% | 16 | TX |
| 416 | HPSTL 13 Royal | 2122 | 42-27 | 61% | 13 | MO |
| 417 | Elevation 16-Renfro | 2122 | 29-32 | 48% | 16 | OH |
| 418 | NRG VBC 16-Ampd navy | 2122 | 43-20 | 66% | 16 | TX |
| 419 | CUVC 16 Open | 2121 | 43-37 | 54% | 16 | NC |
| 420 | GJ 13 ADIDAS | 2121 | 48-27 | 64% | 13 | FL |
| 421 | Iowa United 16-1 elite | 2121 | 48-20 | 71% | 16 | IA |
| 422 | CoJrs 13-Tammy | 2120 | 23-12 | 66% | 13 | CO |
| 423 | PSVA 17-1 | 2120 | 61-17 | 78% | 17 | FL |
| 424 | AJV 13-Adidas | 2120 | 57-15 | 79% | 13 | TX |
| 425 | Top Flight 15-Elite | 2120 | 39-21 | 65% | 15 | IL |
| 426 | Invasion 16-Black | 2119 | 47-7 | 87% | 16 | MO |
| 427 | Ozark Juniors 13 Premier | 2119 | 46-23 | 67% | 13 | AR |
| 428 | Triangle 13-Black | 2119 | 44-21 | 68% | 13 | NC |
| 429 | Vegas Aces 14-Ren | 2119 | 29-12 | 71% | 14 | NV |
| 430 | Boss CLE 14-1 | 2119 | 47-21 | 69% | 14 | OH |
| 431 | AZ REV 15 Premier | 2119 | 42-38 | 53% | 15 | AZ |
| 432 | H Skyline 18 Royal | 2118 | 31-11 | 74% | 18 | TX |
| 433 | Momentous VBC 17-Dan | 2118 | 26-23 | 53% | 17 | CA |
| 434 | COAST 18-1 victor | 2117 | 37-16 | 70% | 18 | CA |
| 435 | MAVS 17-Elite | 2117 | 33-25 | 57% | 17 | KS |
| 436 | SCVC 16-Nina | 2116 | 8-2 | 80% | 16 | |
| 437 | AZ EVJ 14 Elite | 2116 | 53-29 | 65% | 14 | AZ |
| 438 | NORCO 13-Black | 2115 | 55-10 | 85% | 13 | CO |
| 439 | Legacy 15-2 adidas | 2115 | 47-27 | 64% | 15 | MI |
| 440 | Elevate Athletics 16-Nike | 2115 | 25-11 | 69% | 16 | UT |
| 441 | MJVA 15-Elite black | 2114 | 54-12 | 82% | 15 | TN |
| 442 | 1st Alliance 12-1 | 2114 | 47-14 | 77% | 12 | IL |
| 443 | Tribe 16-Vktry navy | 2113 | 68-18 | 79% | 16 | FL |
| 444 | Gulfside 15-Prime | 2113 | 60-21 | 74% | 15 | FL |
| 445 | TAV Houston 14-Black | 2112 | 46-26 | 64% | 14 | TX |
| 446 | Northeast 16-1 | 2112 | 53-17 | 76% | 16 | CT |
| 447 | A5 14-Kip | 2112 | 57-17 | 77% | 14 | GA |
| 448 | Triangle 16-Blue | 2111 | 58-20 | 74% | 16 | NC |
| 449 | Top Select 12 Elite | 2111 | 45-17 | 73% | 12 | FL |
| 450 | BORINQUEN COQUI 12-1f | 2111 | 33-7 | 83% | 12 | PR |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.