Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 9 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
401 Top Select 15-Top blue 2128 51-24 68% 15 FL
402 Legacy 18-1 adidas 2127 31-22 58% 18 MI
403 NRG VBC 16-Ampd navy 2127 43-20 66% 16 TX
404 KNVBC 13-Hype black 2126 40-11 78% 13 KS
405 H Skyline 18 Royal 2125 31-11 74% 18 TX
406 Dakine 17-National pink 2125 65-21 76% 17 WA
407 AP 16-Adidas 2125 52-22 70% 16 TX
408 Alabama Perf 15-N red 2124 48-17 74% 15 AL
409 Elevation 16-Renfro 2123 29-32 48% 16 OH
410 Boss CLE 14-1 2123 47-21 69% 14 OH
411 OK Charge 14-Ua 2123 50-9 85% 14 OK
412 AZ Storm Elite VBC 12-Thunder 2123 7-0 100% 12 NV
413 Manhattan Mayhem 17-P 2123 64-13 82% 17 KS
414 PSVA 17-1 2123 61-17 78% 17 FL
415 Triangle 16-Blue 2123 58-20 74% 16 NC
416 Invasion 16-Black 2122 47-7 87% 16 MO
417 Vegas Aces 14-Ren 2122 29-12 71% 14 NV
418 Top Flight 15-Elite 2122 39-21 65% 15 IL
419 NorthEast Volleyball Club 16-1 2121 53-17 76% 16 CT
420 Legacy 15-2 adidas 2121 47-27 64% 15 MI
421 Integrity 16-Intense blue 2121 48-15 76% 16 TX
422 Titanas 12-1 2121 7-6 54% 12 PR
423 TAV Houston 14-Black 2121 46-26 64% 14 TX
424 MAVS 17-Elite 2121 33-25 57% 17 KS
425 MJVA 15-Elite black 2120 54-12 82% 15 TN
426 COAST 18-1 victor 2120 37-16 70% 18 CA
427 Circle City 12-Purple 2120 63-14 82% 12 IN
428 Mizuno CNVBC 16-Angela 2120 41-22 65% 16 MO
429 Ozark Juniors 13 Premier 2119 46-23 67% 13 AR
430 GJ 13 ADIDAS 2119 48-27 64% 13 FL
431 Kairos 15 Alpha 2119 36-27 57% 15 SD
432 SCVC 16-Nina 2118 8-2 80% 16 NV
433 STVA 16-1 madison 2118 57-18 76% 16 TX
434 Elevate Athletics 16-Nike 2118 25-11 69% 16 UT
435 Triangle 13-Black 2118 44-21 68% 13 NC
436 Gulfside 15-Prime 2118 60-21 74% 15 FL
437 Premier Nebraska 18-1 2117 7-2 78% 18 NE
438 SA Juniors 14-Adidas 2117 52-21 71% 14 TX
439 AZ EVJ 14 Elite 2117 53-29 65% 14 AZ
440 Elevation 15-Tony 2117 43-21 67% 15 OH
441 AJV 13-Adidas 2117 57-15 79% 13 TX
442 Sideout Sports Volleyball Club 15-N artem 2116 50-3 94% 15 NJ
443 Academy West 14-National 2116 71-60 54% 14 CA
444 HPSTL 17-Orange 2116 49-25 64% 17 MO
445 BORINQUEN COQUI 12-1f 2114 33-7 83% 12 PR
446 TX LEGACY 15 ELITE 2114 51-20 72% 15 TX
447 501 Volley 16-1 national 2112 55-13 81% 16 AR
448 Tribe 16-Vktry navy 2112 68-18 79% 16 FL
449 Academy 14 Diamond 2112 38-44 46% 14 NC
450 EXCEL 16-National white 2112 41-18 69% 16 TX
← Previous123456789101112Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.