2025-2026 Season — Page 9 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 401 | Top Select 15-Top blue | 2128 | 51-24 | 68% | 15 | FL |
| 402 | Legacy 18-1 adidas | 2127 | 31-22 | 58% | 18 | MI |
| 403 | NRG VBC 16-Ampd navy | 2127 | 43-20 | 66% | 16 | TX |
| 404 | KNVBC 13-Hype black | 2126 | 40-11 | 78% | 13 | KS |
| 405 | H Skyline 18 Royal | 2125 | 31-11 | 74% | 18 | TX |
| 406 | Dakine 17-National pink | 2125 | 65-21 | 76% | 17 | WA |
| 407 | AP 16-Adidas | 2125 | 52-22 | 70% | 16 | TX |
| 408 | Alabama Perf 15-N red | 2124 | 48-17 | 74% | 15 | AL |
| 409 | Elevation 16-Renfro | 2123 | 29-32 | 48% | 16 | OH |
| 410 | Boss CLE 14-1 | 2123 | 47-21 | 69% | 14 | OH |
| 411 | OK Charge 14-Ua | 2123 | 50-9 | 85% | 14 | OK |
| 412 | AZ Storm Elite VBC 12-Thunder | 2123 | 7-0 | 100% | 12 | NV |
| 413 | Manhattan Mayhem 17-P | 2123 | 64-13 | 82% | 17 | KS |
| 414 | PSVA 17-1 | 2123 | 61-17 | 78% | 17 | FL |
| 415 | Triangle 16-Blue | 2123 | 58-20 | 74% | 16 | NC |
| 416 | Invasion 16-Black | 2122 | 47-7 | 87% | 16 | MO |
| 417 | Vegas Aces 14-Ren | 2122 | 29-12 | 71% | 14 | NV |
| 418 | Top Flight 15-Elite | 2122 | 39-21 | 65% | 15 | IL |
| 419 | NorthEast Volleyball Club 16-1 | 2121 | 53-17 | 76% | 16 | CT |
| 420 | Legacy 15-2 adidas | 2121 | 47-27 | 64% | 15 | MI |
| 421 | Integrity 16-Intense blue | 2121 | 48-15 | 76% | 16 | TX |
| 422 | Titanas 12-1 | 2121 | 7-6 | 54% | 12 | PR |
| 423 | TAV Houston 14-Black | 2121 | 46-26 | 64% | 14 | TX |
| 424 | MAVS 17-Elite | 2121 | 33-25 | 57% | 17 | KS |
| 425 | MJVA 15-Elite black | 2120 | 54-12 | 82% | 15 | TN |
| 426 | COAST 18-1 victor | 2120 | 37-16 | 70% | 18 | CA |
| 427 | Circle City 12-Purple | 2120 | 63-14 | 82% | 12 | IN |
| 428 | Mizuno CNVBC 16-Angela | 2120 | 41-22 | 65% | 16 | MO |
| 429 | Ozark Juniors 13 Premier | 2119 | 46-23 | 67% | 13 | AR |
| 430 | GJ 13 ADIDAS | 2119 | 48-27 | 64% | 13 | FL |
| 431 | Kairos 15 Alpha | 2119 | 36-27 | 57% | 15 | SD |
| 432 | SCVC 16-Nina | 2118 | 8-2 | 80% | 16 | NV |
| 433 | STVA 16-1 madison | 2118 | 57-18 | 76% | 16 | TX |
| 434 | Elevate Athletics 16-Nike | 2118 | 25-11 | 69% | 16 | UT |
| 435 | Triangle 13-Black | 2118 | 44-21 | 68% | 13 | NC |
| 436 | Gulfside 15-Prime | 2118 | 60-21 | 74% | 15 | FL |
| 437 | Premier Nebraska 18-1 | 2117 | 7-2 | 78% | 18 | NE |
| 438 | SA Juniors 14-Adidas | 2117 | 52-21 | 71% | 14 | TX |
| 439 | AZ EVJ 14 Elite | 2117 | 53-29 | 65% | 14 | AZ |
| 440 | Elevation 15-Tony | 2117 | 43-21 | 67% | 15 | OH |
| 441 | AJV 13-Adidas | 2117 | 57-15 | 79% | 13 | TX |
| 442 | Sideout Sports Volleyball Club 15-N artem | 2116 | 50-3 | 94% | 15 | NJ |
| 443 | Academy West 14-National | 2116 | 71-60 | 54% | 14 | CA |
| 444 | HPSTL 17-Orange | 2116 | 49-25 | 64% | 17 | MO |
| 445 | BORINQUEN COQUI 12-1f | 2114 | 33-7 | 83% | 12 | PR |
| 446 | TX LEGACY 15 ELITE | 2114 | 51-20 | 72% | 15 | TX |
| 447 | 501 Volley 16-1 national | 2112 | 55-13 | 81% | 16 | AR |
| 448 | Tribe 16-Vktry navy | 2112 | 68-18 | 79% | 16 | FL |
| 449 | Academy 14 Diamond | 2112 | 38-44 | 46% | 14 | NC |
| 450 | EXCEL 16-National white | 2112 | 41-18 | 69% | 16 | TX |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.