Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 10 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
451 EC Power KOP 18-Black 2112 31-19 62% 18 PA
452 Sunshine 15 Pacific 2112 49-34 59% 15 CA
453 Tstreet 16-Bailey 2111 39-28 58% 16 CA
454 PSVA 18-1 2111 35-6 85% 18 FL
455 A5 14-Kip 2111 57-17 77% 14 GA
456 TXP 16-Black alonso 2111 44-18 70% 16 TX
457 Top Select 12 Elite 2111 45-17 73% 12 FL
458 VAQUERAS 13-F heyner 2110 17-5 77% 13 PR
459 Red Rock 12 Gabriel 2109 43-9 83% 12 CA
460 Nebraska ONE 17-Black 2109 36-15 71% 17 NE
461 K1 Bayamon 13-Wes 2109 5-2 71% 13 PR
462 HPSTL 14-Royal 2108 37-32 54% 14 MO
463 CUVC 15 Open 2108 46-30 61% 15 NC
464 MAVS 15-Elite 2107 41-26 61% 15 KS
465 JVC 14-1 2106 43-9 83% 14 IN
466 FH 12-1 ikaika michele 2106 7-3 70% 12 TX
467 CSDP Volleyball Club 15-1 2106 24-17 59% 15 MO
468 Seal Beach Volleyball Club 13-Black 2106 52-15 78% 13 CA
469 DYNASTY 16-Blue 2106 40-22 65% 16 KS
470 JJVA 16 Teal 2105 52-30 63% 16 FL
471 SIVBC 16-Thunder 2105 42-19 69% 16 WA
472 Black Swamp 16-1 2105 55-15 79% 16 OH
473 Northern Lights 15-2 2105 72-21 77% 15 MN
474 1st Alliance 17 Silver 2105 41-24 63% 17 IL
475 1st Alliance 12-1 2105 99-34 74% 12 IL
476 GVA 13-Pink 2105 36-8 82% 13 PR
477 LAV 18-National black 2104 35-11 76% 18 AL
478 VVA 17-Wiechmann 2103 45-27 63% 17 CA
479 NORCO 18-Black 2103 35-15 70% 18 CO
480 H Skyline 13-Royal 2102 44-22 67% 13 TX
481 OPU 17-1 2102 47-11 81% 17 FL
482 Tribe 15-Vktry cardinal 2101 38-35 52% 15 FL
483 Rockwood Thunder 17-Elite 2101 35-26 56% 17 MO
484 PCVC 14-Nalu 2101 37-19 66% 14 CA
485 FEVA 14-Katia 2101 54-14 79% 14 FL
486 NorStar 16-1 2100 56-25 69% 16 CA
487 Mintonette Sports 16-1 2100 43-35 55% 16 OH
488 501 Volley 13-1 national 2099 50-11 82% 13 AR
489 APV 14-National black 2099 43-16 72% 14 TX
490 PowerPlex 17-Mendoza 2099 51-26 66% 17 IA
491 NORCO 13-Black 2099 55-10 85% 13 CO
492 MiElite 17-Mizuno 2098 35-33 51% 17 MI
493 Elevation 18-Lehman 2098 30-12 71% 18 OH
494 Iowa United 16-1 elite 2097 48-20 71% 16 IA
495 TAV Houston 13-Black 2097 41-34 55% 13 TX
496 Arete 15-Navy telos 2096 39-33 53% 15 TX
497 TW Skyline 16-Royal 2096 36-28 56% 16 TX
498 Madfrog 12-N black 2096 43-9 83% 12 TX
499 Alliance 18 REN 2095 41-12 77% 18 TN
500 Cangrejeras Santurce 18 2095 10-5 67% 18 PR
← Previous12345678910111213Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.