2025-2026 Season — Page 10 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 451 | Nebraska ONE 17-Black | 2111 | 36-15 | 71% | 17 | NE |
| 452 | Elevation 15-Tony | 2111 | 43-21 | 67% | 15 | OH |
| 453 | Legacy 18-1 adidas | 2111 | 31-22 | 58% | 18 | MI |
| 454 | AP 14-Adidas | 2110 | 45-21 | 68% | 14 | TX |
| 455 | CoJrs 17-Kevin | 2110 | 31-17 | 65% | 17 | CO |
| 456 | Mizuno CNVBC 16-Angela | 2110 | 41-22 | 65% | 16 | MO |
| 457 | VAQUERAS 13-F heyner | 2110 | 17-5 | 77% | 13 | PR |
| 458 | Academy 14 Diamond | 2110 | 38-44 | 46% | 14 | NC |
| 459 | Integrity 16-Intense blue | 2109 | 48-15 | 76% | 16 | TX |
| 460 | STVA 16-1 madison | 2109 | 57-18 | 76% | 16 | TX |
| 461 | Red Rock 12 Gabriel | 2109 | 43-9 | 83% | 12 | CA |
| 462 | TX LEGACY 15 ELITE | 2109 | 51-20 | 72% | 15 | TX |
| 463 | CSDP Volleyball Club 15-1 | 2108 | 24-17 | 59% | 15 | |
| 464 | Black Swamp 16-1 | 2108 | 55-15 | 79% | 16 | OH |
| 465 | Seal Beach 13-Black | 2108 | 52-15 | 78% | 13 | CA |
| 466 | Tstreet 16-Bailey | 2108 | 39-28 | 58% | 16 | CA |
| 467 | TXP 16-Black alonso | 2107 | 44-18 | 70% | 16 | TX |
| 468 | FH 12-1 ikaika michele | 2107 | 7-3 | 70% | 12 | TX |
| 469 | Arete Athletics 14-Navy telos | 2107 | 6-2 | 75% | 14 | |
| 470 | 1st Alliance 17 Silver | 2106 | 41-24 | 63% | 17 | IL |
| 471 | JJVA 16 Teal | 2106 | 52-30 | 63% | 16 | FL |
| 472 | K1 Bayamon 13-Wes | 2106 | 5-2 | 71% | 13 | PR |
| 473 | MAVS 15-Elite | 2105 | 41-26 | 61% | 15 | KS |
| 474 | Kairos 15 Alpha | 2105 | 36-27 | 57% | 15 | SD |
| 475 | EXCEL 16-National white | 2104 | 41-18 | 69% | 16 | TX |
| 476 | PSVA 18-1 | 2104 | 35-6 | 85% | 18 | FL |
| 477 | Premier Nebraska 13 Gold | 2104 | 31-18 | 63% | 13 | NE |
| 478 | SA Juniors 14-Adidas | 2104 | 52-21 | 71% | 14 | TX |
| 479 | CUVC 15 Open | 2103 | 46-30 | 61% | 15 | NC |
| 480 | PowerPlex 17-Mendoza | 2103 | 46-25 | 65% | 17 | IA |
| 481 | Madfrog 12-N black | 2103 | 43-9 | 83% | 12 | TX |
| 482 | HPSTL 14-Royal | 2102 | 37-32 | 54% | 14 | MO |
| 483 | SIVBC 16-Thunder | 2102 | 42-19 | 69% | 16 | WA |
| 484 | DYNASTY 16-Blue | 2102 | 40-22 | 65% | 16 | KS |
| 485 | TW Skyline 16-Royal | 2101 | 36-28 | 56% | 16 | TX |
| 486 | LAV 18-National black | 2101 | 35-11 | 76% | 18 | AL |
| 487 | Rockwood Thunder 17-Elite | 2101 | 35-26 | 56% | 17 | MO |
| 488 | Ne Jrs 17-Black | 2100 | 21-9 | 70% | 17 | |
| 489 | H Skyline 13-Royal | 2100 | 44-22 | 67% | 13 | TX |
| 490 | Tribe 15-Vktry cardinal | 2099 | 38-35 | 52% | 15 | FL |
| 491 | Elevation 18-Lehman | 2099 | 30-12 | 71% | 18 | OH |
| 492 | MiElite 17-Mizuno | 2099 | 35-33 | 51% | 17 | MI |
| 493 | JVC 14-1 | 2098 | 43-9 | 83% | 14 | IN |
| 494 | GVA 13-Pink | 2098 | 36-8 | 82% | 13 | PR |
| 495 | PCVC 14-Nalu | 2098 | 37-19 | 66% | 14 | BC |
| 496 | FEVA 14-Katia | 2098 | 54-14 | 79% | 14 | FL |
| 497 | Sideout 15-N artem | 2098 | 69-10 | 87% | 15 | NJ |
| 498 | TAV Houston 13-Black | 2097 | 41-34 | 55% | 13 | TX |
| 499 | VVA 17-Wiechmann | 2097 | 45-27 | 63% | 17 | CA |
| 500 | 501 Volley 13-1 national | 2096 | 50-11 | 82% | 13 | AR |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.