Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 15 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
701 Colorado Juniors 18-Open 2046 32-13 71% 18 CO
702 Texas United 14-Red 2045 43-21 67% 14 TX
703 Arete 12-Navy telos 2045 44-11 76% 12 TX
704 Rev 15-1 fuego 2045 49-32 60% 15 IN
705 HPSTL 14-Orange 2045 52-23 68% 14 MO
706 No Coast 14-Pacific 2045 47-18 72% 14 MO
707 AZ REV North 15 Premier 2044 67-70 49% 15 AZ
708 NorCal 13-1 black 2044 43-28 61% 13 CA
709 AZ EVJ 16 Elite 2044 50-30 63% 16 AZ
710 OPVC 12-Herber 2044 40-21 66% 12 OH
711 RockCity 17 N1 2044 38-28 58% 17 OH
712 Momentous Volleyball Club 16-Antonette 2043 10-9 53% 16 CA
713 A5 12-La 2043 35-29 55% 12 GA
714 Tsunami 17-1e michael 2043 50-19 72% 17 GA
715 KIVA 16-White 2043 54-33 62% 16 KY
716 Northern Lights 16-B 2043 64-23 74% 16 MN
717 Elite 15-National nancy 2042 42-18 70% 15 FL
718 CIA 14-Black 2041 46-12 79% 14 IA
719 GJ 16 ADIDAS 2040 46-22 68% 16 FL
720 High Tide 13-Elite 2040 42-21 67% 13 FL
721 SA Juniors 16 Adidas 2040 53-22 71% 16 TX
722 Peak VA 16-Black 2040 42-29 59% 16 TX
723 Rancho 15 Premier 2040 44-27 62% 15 CA
724 Sunshine 18 LA 2040 33-18 65% 18 CA
725 CIA 17-Black 2040 45-16 74% 17 IA
726 River City Jrs 15 Navy 2039 42-10 81% 15 IA
727 Stars 12 Candi 2039 67-7 91% 12 SC
728 A5 West 15-Joe 2038 50-22 69% 15 GA
729 EMV 12-Black chris 2038 18-8 69% 12 TX
730 1st Alliance 15-Black 2038 44-19 70% 15 IL
731 I AM VBC 17-Red 2038 55-22 71% 17 WI
732 Apex 16-1 girls 2038 33-16 67% 16 SC
733 UVC 12-Evren/quillan 2038 40-18 69% 12 CA
734 PowerPlex 16-Nelson 2037 63-22 74% 16 IA
735 Salty 17-S 2037 35-19 65% 17 IA
736 1W 17-1 elite 2037 52-19 73% 17 WI
737 WPVC 16-Armour black 2036 36-40 47% 16 FL
738 C2 16-1 nationals travis 2036 57-23 71% 16 TN
739 NYC Juniors 14-National 2036 51-17 73% 14 NY
740 TW Skyline 14-Royal 2036 48-17 74% 14 TX
741 DACAN 16-1 hydra 2036 6-2 75% 16 ON
742 Kairos 16 Beta 2035 38-20 66% 16 SD
743 305VBC 14-E ruben 2035 51-26 66% 14 FL
744 Skyline 11-Royal 2035 43-10 80% 11 TX
745 VCN 17-Elite 2035 9-1 90% 17 NE
746 Metro Volleyball Club 13-Travel 2035 50-25 66% 13 DC
747 Boss CLE 15-1 2035 37-29 56% 15 OH
748 STVA 15-1 cristian 2035 56-28 67% 15 TX
749 AVC CLE 18-Red 2034 33-31 52% 18 OH
750 Kairos 13 Alpha 2034 42-19 69% 13 SD
← Previous123456789101112131415161718Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.