2025-2026 Season — Page 15 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 701 | I AM VBC 17-Red | 2045 | 55-22 | 71% | 17 | WI |
| 702 | Texas United 14-Red | 2045 | 43-21 | 67% | 14 | TX |
| 703 | RockCity 17 N1 | 2045 | 38-28 | 58% | 17 | OH |
| 704 | Iowa Rockets 14-R | 2044 | 50-28 | 64% | 14 | IA |
| 705 | Sky High Adidas 14 Elite | 2044 | 37-25 | 60% | 14 | IL |
| 706 | OT 18-Tony | 2044 | 39-15 | 72% | 18 | FL |
| 707 | OPVC 12-Herber | 2044 | 40-21 | 66% | 12 | OH |
| 708 | Tsunami 17-1e michael | 2044 | 50-19 | 72% | 17 | GA |
| 709 | Mintonette Sports 17-2 | 2044 | 55-25 | 69% | 17 | OH |
| 710 | VCN 17-Elite | 2044 | 9-1 | 90% | 17 | NE |
| 711 | Arete 12-Navy telos | 2043 | 44-11 | 76% | 12 | TX |
| 712 | Peak VA 16-Black | 2043 | 42-29 | 59% | 16 | TX |
| 713 | A5 12-La | 2043 | 35-29 | 55% | 12 | GA |
| 714 | Integrity 18-Intense blue | 2042 | 35-6 | 85% | 18 | TX |
| 715 | Rancho Valley 14-Premier | 2042 | 14-5 | 74% | 14 | CA |
| 716 | River City Jrs 15 Navy | 2042 | 38-7 | 84% | 15 | NE |
| 717 | St. Pete 16-Teal | 2042 | 79-25 | 76% | 16 | FL |
| 718 | High Tide 13-Elite | 2042 | 42-21 | 67% | 13 | FL |
| 719 | CoJrs 18-Open | 2042 | 6-1 | 86% | 18 | CO |
| 720 | No Coast 14-Pacific | 2041 | 47-18 | 72% | 14 | MO |
| 721 | TW Skyline 14-Royal | 2041 | 48-17 | 74% | 14 | TX |
| 722 | Boiler Jrs 18-O gold | 2041 | 45-17 | 73% | 18 | IN |
| 723 | VCNebraska 15-Elite | 2041 | 25-14 | 64% | 15 | NE |
| 724 | 3DGE 15-1 gold | 2041 | 33-25 | 57% | 15 | PA |
| 725 | Absolute 12-Black | 2041 | 47-13 | 78% | 12 | CA |
| 726 | MINOI 14-Black | 2040 | 51-9 | 85% | 14 | UT |
| 727 | Elevation 15 Peak | 2040 | 38-15 | 72% | 15 | CO |
| 728 | Rev 15-1 fuego | 2040 | 49-32 | 60% | 15 | IN |
| 729 | WPVC 18-Armour black | 2040 | 31-16 | 66% | 18 | FL |
| 730 | C2 16-1 nationals travis | 2040 | 57-23 | 71% | 16 | TN |
| 731 | Academy 15 Diamond | 2040 | 35-29 | 55% | 15 | NC |
| 732 | North Point 16-Pali | 2040 | 40-14 | 71% | 16 | TX |
| 733 | EMV 12-Black chris | 2040 | 18-8 | 69% | 12 | TX |
| 734 | Leaside 17-Sparks | 2040 | 17-7 | 71% | 17 | ON |
| 735 | Kairos 16 Beta | 2039 | 38-20 | 66% | 16 | SD |
| 736 | CIA 17-Black | 2039 | 45-16 | 74% | 17 | IA |
| 737 | DACAN 16-1 hydra | 2039 | 6-2 | 75% | 16 | |
| 738 | AP) Austin Performance 16-Adidas | 2039 | 4-4 | 50% | 16 | |
| 739 | AZ EVJ 16 Elite | 2037 | 50-30 | 63% | 16 | AZ |
| 740 | Sunshine 18 LA | 2037 | 33-18 | 65% | 18 | CA |
| 741 | Tulsa Power 14-1 | 2037 | 46-13 | 78% | 14 | OK |
| 742 | Elite 15-National nancy | 2037 | 42-18 | 70% | 15 | FL |
| 743 | NorCal 13-1 black | 2037 | 43-28 | 61% | 13 | CA |
| 744 | KIVA 16-White | 2036 | 54-33 | 62% | 16 | KY |
| 745 | CIA 14-Black | 2036 | 46-12 | 79% | 14 | IA |
| 746 | Apex 16-1 girls | 2036 | 33-16 | 67% | 16 | SC |
| 747 | KIVA 12-White | 2035 | 64-18 | 78% | 12 | KY |
| 748 | Stars 12 Candi | 2035 | 67-7 | 91% | 12 | SC |
| 749 | HP 17-1 | 2035 | 35-30 | 54% | 17 | MI |
| 750 | United 12-Evren | 2035 | 8-0 | 100% | 12 | IL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.