Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 15 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
701 I AM VBC 17-Red 2045 55-22 71% 17 WI
702 Texas United 14-Red 2045 43-21 67% 14 TX
703 RockCity 17 N1 2045 38-28 58% 17 OH
704 Iowa Rockets 14-R 2044 50-28 64% 14 IA
705 Sky High Adidas 14 Elite 2044 37-25 60% 14 IL
706 OT 18-Tony 2044 39-15 72% 18 FL
707 OPVC 12-Herber 2044 40-21 66% 12 OH
708 Tsunami 17-1e michael 2044 50-19 72% 17 GA
709 Mintonette Sports 17-2 2044 55-25 69% 17 OH
710 VCN 17-Elite 2044 9-1 90% 17 NE
711 Arete 12-Navy telos 2043 44-11 76% 12 TX
712 Peak VA 16-Black 2043 42-29 59% 16 TX
713 A5 12-La 2043 35-29 55% 12 GA
714 Integrity 18-Intense blue 2042 35-6 85% 18 TX
715 Rancho Valley 14-Premier 2042 14-5 74% 14 CA
716 River City Jrs 15 Navy 2042 38-7 84% 15 NE
717 St. Pete 16-Teal 2042 79-25 76% 16 FL
718 High Tide 13-Elite 2042 42-21 67% 13 FL
719 CoJrs 18-Open 2042 6-1 86% 18 CO
720 No Coast 14-Pacific 2041 47-18 72% 14 MO
721 TW Skyline 14-Royal 2041 48-17 74% 14 TX
722 Boiler Jrs 18-O gold 2041 45-17 73% 18 IN
723 VCNebraska 15-Elite 2041 25-14 64% 15 NE
724 3DGE 15-1 gold 2041 33-25 57% 15 PA
725 Absolute 12-Black 2041 47-13 78% 12 CA
726 MINOI 14-Black 2040 51-9 85% 14 UT
727 Elevation 15 Peak 2040 38-15 72% 15 CO
728 Rev 15-1 fuego 2040 49-32 60% 15 IN
729 WPVC 18-Armour black 2040 31-16 66% 18 FL
730 C2 16-1 nationals travis 2040 57-23 71% 16 TN
731 Academy 15 Diamond 2040 35-29 55% 15 NC
732 North Point 16-Pali 2040 40-14 71% 16 TX
733 EMV 12-Black chris 2040 18-8 69% 12 TX
734 Leaside 17-Sparks 2040 17-7 71% 17 ON
735 Kairos 16 Beta 2039 38-20 66% 16 SD
736 CIA 17-Black 2039 45-16 74% 17 IA
737 DACAN 16-1 hydra 2039 6-2 75% 16
738 AP) Austin Performance 16-Adidas 2039 4-4 50% 16
739 AZ EVJ 16 Elite 2037 50-30 63% 16 AZ
740 Sunshine 18 LA 2037 33-18 65% 18 CA
741 Tulsa Power 14-1 2037 46-13 78% 14 OK
742 Elite 15-National nancy 2037 42-18 70% 15 FL
743 NorCal 13-1 black 2037 43-28 61% 13 CA
744 KIVA 16-White 2036 54-33 62% 16 KY
745 CIA 14-Black 2036 46-12 79% 14 IA
746 Apex 16-1 girls 2036 33-16 67% 16 SC
747 KIVA 12-White 2035 64-18 78% 12 KY
748 Stars 12 Candi 2035 67-7 91% 12 SC
749 HP 17-1 2035 35-30 54% 17 MI
750 United 12-Evren 2035 8-0 100% 12 IL
← Previous123456789101112131415161718Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.