2025-2026 Season — Page 22 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1051 | SG Elite 18-Roshambo | 1980 | 34-19 | 64% | 18 | CA |
| 1052 | Elevation 18 Peak | 1980 | 27-14 | 66% | 18 | CO |
| 1053 | Northern Lights 14-B | 1979 | 12-2 | 86% | 14 | MN |
| 1054 | Madfrog 18-N black sears | 1979 | 35-20 | 64% | 18 | TX |
| 1055 | Epic United 16 Elite | 1979 | 46-18 | 72% | 16 | IL |
| 1056 | Premier Nebraska 15-Black | 1979 | 36-22 | 62% | 15 | NE |
| 1057 | NKYVC 12-1 tsunami | 1978 | 29-15 | 66% | 12 | KY |
| 1058 | KIVA 17-White | 1978 | 48-26 | 65% | 17 | KY |
| 1059 | Big Sky 15-1 | 1978 | 33-20 | 59% | 15 | MT |
| 1060 | FORZA1 NORTH 12-One | 1978 | 33-14 | 70% | 12 | CA |
| 1061 | Pohaku 13-1 | 1978 | 37-19 | 66% | 13 | KS |
| 1062 | TOVC 15 TOVC 15-E. Garcia | 1978 | 16-7 | 70% | 15 | PR |
| 1063 | AJV 18 adidas | 1978 | 38-14 | 73% | 18 | TX |
| 1064 | UEPA 18-D | 1978 | 47-7 | 85% | 18 | TX |
| 1065 | Roots 16-1 green | 1977 | 41-20 | 67% | 16 | TX |
| 1066 | 417 MoJrs 16 Elite | 1977 | 47-17 | 73% | 16 | MO |
| 1067 | SF Stars 14 | 1977 | 10-1 | 91% | 14 | CA |
| 1068 | COAST 15-2 colton | 1977 | 41-22 | 65% | 15 | CA |
| 1069 | Ignite 13-Susie (UT) | 1976 | 15-3 | 71% | 13 | UT |
| 1070 | NE Elite 14-Koa | 1976 | 30-11 | 73% | 14 | NE |
| 1071 | 1st Alliance 13-1 | 1976 | 87-64 | 58% | 13 | IL |
| 1072 | Rhythm 18 Jeff | 1976 | 30-13 | 70% | 18 | TN |
| 1073 | VAQUERAS 16-F heyner | 1976 | 31-6 | 84% | 16 | PR |
| 1074 | SMASH 16 | 1976 | 22-13 | 63% | 16 | MA |
| 1075 | KUIKAHI 18-Wahine rsb | 1976 | 28-11 | 72% | 18 | HI |
| 1076 | SynergyForce 17-1 natl | 1975 | 36-31 | 54% | 17 | CA |
| 1077 | Mintonette Sports 18-1 | 1975 | 34-28 | 54% | 18 | OH |
| 1078 | Decatur Force 13 Teal | 1975 | 51-14 | 78% | 13 | IN |
| 1079 | BRUSA 18-William | 1975 | 31-16 | 66% | 18 | CA |
| 1080 | Tribe 18-Vktry cardinal | 1975 | 30-23 | 57% | 18 | FL |
| 1081 | WGVA 16-Black | 1975 | 45-24 | 65% | 16 | GA |
| 1082 | MADFROG 16-N black cj | 1975 | 42-25 | 62% | 16 | TX |
| 1083 | TAV 16-Blue (NTR) | 1975 | 12-3 | 80% | 16 | |
| 1084 | Legacy Girls 18-Elite | 1974 | 33-14 | 70% | 18 | CA |
| 1085 | OMNI 16 Elite | 1974 | 49-31 | 61% | 16 | CA |
| 1086 | OPVC 14-Hubbell | 1974 | 32-29 | 52% | 14 | OH |
| 1087 | CANGREJERAS 16-Fs | 1974 | 10-4 | 71% | 16 | PR |
| 1088 | A5 16-Danielle | 1974 | 70-22 | 76% | 16 | GA |
| 1089 | OK Charge 12-Ua tulsa | 1973 | 53-5 | 91% | 12 | OK |
| 1090 | Metro VBC 16-Pink | 1973 | 44-24 | 65% | 16 | IN |
| 1091 | SPVB 18 Kahl | 1973 | 19-11 | 63% | 18 | IL |
| 1092 | AZ SKY 18-Blue | 1973 | 46-23 | 67% | 18 | AZ |
| 1093 | SC Rockstar 13-Moni | 1973 | 35-19 | 65% | 13 | CA |
| 1094 | DYNASTY 13-Blue | 1973 | 44-16 | 73% | 13 | KS |
| 1095 | HPSTL 11 Royal | 1972 | 58-12 | 81% | 11 | MO |
| 1096 | Ultimate G14 Gold | 1972 | 46-20 | 70% | 14 | IL |
| 1097 | Yorktown 14 | 1972 | 31-4 | 89% | 14 | IN |
| 1098 | BORINQUEN COQUI 13-1f | 1972 | 20-4 | 83% | 13 | PR |
| 1099 | SF Elite 16-Symone | 1972 | 35-27 | 56% | 16 | CA |
| 1100 | Coast United 18 | 1972 | 37-17 | 69% | 18 | SC |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.