2025-2026 Season — Page 22 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1051 | Big Sky 16-1 | 1979 | 32-20 | 62% | 16 | MT |
| 1052 | Jammers 14-Kalepa | 1979 | 46-13 | 78% | 14 | HI |
| 1053 | Club V 15-Prodigy steph | 1979 | 23-24 | 49% | 15 | UT |
| 1054 | OMNI 16 Elite | 1979 | 49-31 | 61% | 16 | CA |
| 1055 | Stars 14-Bb | 1979 | 58-10 | 85% | 14 | SC |
| 1056 | GVA 15-Pink | 1979 | 26-9 | 74% | 15 | PR |
| 1057 | Dead Frog 15-Black | 1979 | 34-19 | 64% | 15 | MI |
| 1058 | Roots 16-1 green | 1978 | 41-20 | 67% | 16 | IA |
| 1059 | LAV 17-National black | 1978 | 40-20 | 67% | 17 | AL |
| 1060 | Ignite 16-Nationals | 1978 | 16-7 | 70% | 16 | TX |
| 1061 | UEPA 18-D | 1977 | 47-7 | 85% | 18 | TX |
| 1062 | Level Up 14-1 | 1977 | 46-10 | 82% | 14 | CA |
| 1063 | FORZA1 NORTH 12-One | 1977 | 33-14 | 70% | 12 | CA |
| 1064 | A5 17-Acevedo | 1977 | 28-7 | 80% | 17 | GA |
| 1065 | AZ SKY 18-Blue | 1976 | 46-23 | 67% | 18 | AZ |
| 1066 | WPVC 12-Armour black | 1976 | 54-22 | 71% | 12 | FL |
| 1067 | Cape Coast 13-Columbia | 1976 | 43-14 | 75% | 13 | FL |
| 1068 | ARVC 13-Orange | 1975 | 48-9 | 84% | 13 | NC |
| 1069 | Decatur Force 13 Teal | 1975 | 51-14 | 78% | 13 | IN |
| 1070 | MADFROG 16-N black cj | 1975 | 42-25 | 62% | 16 | TX |
| 1071 | Metro 15 National | 1975 | 46-25 | 64% | 15 | DC |
| 1072 | Yorktown 14 | 1975 | 31-4 | 89% | 14 | IN |
| 1073 | NE Elite 14-Koa | 1975 | 30-11 | 73% | 14 | NE |
| 1074 | I AM VBC 13-Red | 1975 | 63-17 | 79% | 13 | WI |
| 1075 | Elevation 18 Peak | 1974 | 27-14 | 66% | 18 | CO |
| 1076 | DYNASTY 13-Blue | 1974 | 44-16 | 73% | 13 | KS |
| 1077 | Metro VBC 14-Pink | 1974 | 43-21 | 67% | 14 | IN |
| 1078 | SMASH 16 | 1974 | 22-13 | 63% | 16 | MA |
| 1079 | 417 MoJrs 16 Elite | 1974 | 47-17 | 73% | 16 | MO |
| 1080 | Idaho ONE 16-Elite | 1974 | 57-30 | 66% | 16 | ID |
| 1081 | Madfrog 18-N black sears | 1974 | 35-20 | 64% | 18 | TX |
| 1082 | Tribe 18-Vktry cardinal | 1973 | 30-23 | 57% | 18 | FL |
| 1083 | Idaho ONE 12-Elite | 1973 | 53-20 | 73% | 12 | ID |
| 1084 | St. Joe Storm 14-1 | 1972 | 23-8 | 74% | 14 | |
| 1085 | A5 16-Danielle | 1972 | 70-22 | 76% | 16 | GA |
| 1086 | VAQUERAS 16-F heyner | 1972 | 31-6 | 84% | 16 | PR |
| 1087 | BORINQUEN COQUI 13-1f | 1972 | 20-4 | 83% | 13 | PR |
| 1088 | BRUSA 18-William | 1972 | 31-16 | 66% | 18 | CA |
| 1089 | SF Stars 14 | 1972 | 10-1 | 91% | 14 | CA |
| 1090 | Mintonette Sports 18-1 | 1972 | 34-28 | 54% | 18 | OH |
| 1091 | AP 12 adidas | 1971 | 34-17 | 67% | 12 | TX |
| 1092 | Pohaku 13-1 | 1971 | 31-17 | 65% | 13 | KS |
| 1093 | Rhythm 18 Jeff | 1971 | 30-13 | 70% | 18 | TN |
| 1094 | SG Elite 18-Roshambo | 1971 | 34-19 | 64% | 18 | CA |
| 1095 | Emovol 13 | 1970 | 9-7 | 56% | 13 | |
| 1096 | TXP 14-Black aaron | 1970 | 42-17 | 70% | 14 | TX |
| 1097 | Premier Nebraska 12-Gold | 1970 | 28-18 | 61% | 12 | NE |
| 1098 | Lions Cityside 12-1 | 1970 | 42-12 | 78% | 12 | IL |
| 1099 | Metro VBC 16-Pink | 1970 | 44-24 | 65% | 16 | IN |
| 1100 | ATOMIC 12-Smack premier | 1969 | 71-16 | 82% | 12 | MI |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.