Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 23 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1101 Epic United 16 Elite 1969 46-18 72% 16 IN
1102 MOD Elite 17-Blue 1969 25-31 45% 17 IL
1103 SPVB 18 Kahl 1969 19-11 63% 18 IL
1104 WGVC 11-1 national 1969 70-7 91% 11 FL
1105 Actyve 13-Navy 1969 30-21 59% 13 CA
1106 CANGREJERAS 16-Fs 1969 10-4 71% 16 PR
1107 OPVC 14-Hubbell 1969 32-29 52% 14 OH
1108 TAV 16-Blue (NTR) 1969 12-3 80% 16
1109 BRVA 13-1 1968 22-5 79% 13 VA
1110 MKE Sting 13-Black 1968 57-27 68% 13 WI
1111 SA Elite 15-1 navy 1968 53-14 78% 15 TX
1112 KUIKAHI 18-Wahine rsb 1968 28-11 72% 18 HI
1113 All In 12 1968 65-16 80% 12 AZ
1114 Legacy Girls 18-Elite 1968 33-14 70% 18 CA
1115 Ignite 13-Susie (UT) 1968 15-3 71% 13 UT
1116 MC 12-1 shepherd 1967 37-4 86% 12
1117 OK Charge 12-Ua tulsa 1967 53-5 91% 12 OK
1118 Drive Nation 16-Red 1967 25-17 60% 16 TX
1119 AVC CLE 15-White 1967 41-23 64% 15 OH
1120 KIVA 17-White 1966 48-26 65% 17 KY
1121 HPSTL 11 Royal 1966 58-12 81% 11 MO
1122 Metro 12 Travel 1966 50-16 76% 12 DC
1123 NKYVC 14-1 tsunami 1966 35-28 56% 14 KY
1124 WGVA 16-Black 1966 45-24 65% 16 GA
1125 ARVC 16-Red adidas 1966 44-18 71% 16 NM
1126 Canuck VBC 18-1 1965 10-1 91% 18
1127 Alliance 16-Red 1965 49-15 77% 16 TN
1128 MISSION VOLLEYBALL 14-1 1965 31-15 67% 14 TX
1129 Munciana Indy 17 Cheetahs 1965 41-29 59% 17 IN
1130 ID Crush 12-Bower 1965 29-6 81% 12 ID
1131 K2 18 Jota 1964 27-24 53% 18 TN
1132 Apex 14-National navy 1964 24-11 69% 14 MO
1133 BCS Skyline H 16-Royal 1964 35-25 58% 16 TX
1134 FSJ 14-Elite 1964 46-15 75% 14 AR
1135 Wildfire 15-N john 1964 35-21 63% 15 FL
1136 Next Level 16-1 abner 1964 20-5 80% 16 CA
1137 St. Pete 14-Teal 1964 68-21 76% 14 FL
1138 TAMPA UNITED VBA 14-Black 1964 48-26 65% 14 FL
1139 Madfrog 17-N black kallas 1964 31-18 62% 17 TX
1140 Happy Volley Academy 16-1 1964 6-2 75% 16
1141 KCV 17 PREMIER 1963 66-13 84% 17 TX
1142 CoJrs 16-Bri 1963 31-19 62% 16 CO
1143 Premier 16 Kinsei 1963 57-14 80% 16 OH
1144 AJV 18 adidas 1963 38-14 73% 18 TX
1145 CALI 16-Black 1963 50-20 71% 16 NY
1146 Blue Ridge 18-Blue 1963 10-4 71% 18 VA
1147 Coast United 18 1963 37-17 69% 18 CA
1148 South Central NE 18-Black 1962 13-3 81% 18
1149 COAST 15-2 colton 1962 41-22 65% 15 CA
1150 MAVS 816 14-Premier 1962 36-9 80% 14 KS
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.