2025-2026 Season — Page 23 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1101 | Epic United 16 Elite | 1969 | 46-18 | 72% | 16 | IN |
| 1102 | MOD Elite 17-Blue | 1969 | 25-31 | 45% | 17 | IL |
| 1103 | SPVB 18 Kahl | 1969 | 19-11 | 63% | 18 | IL |
| 1104 | WGVC 11-1 national | 1969 | 70-7 | 91% | 11 | FL |
| 1105 | Actyve 13-Navy | 1969 | 30-21 | 59% | 13 | CA |
| 1106 | CANGREJERAS 16-Fs | 1969 | 10-4 | 71% | 16 | PR |
| 1107 | OPVC 14-Hubbell | 1969 | 32-29 | 52% | 14 | OH |
| 1108 | TAV 16-Blue (NTR) | 1969 | 12-3 | 80% | 16 | |
| 1109 | BRVA 13-1 | 1968 | 22-5 | 79% | 13 | VA |
| 1110 | MKE Sting 13-Black | 1968 | 57-27 | 68% | 13 | WI |
| 1111 | SA Elite 15-1 navy | 1968 | 53-14 | 78% | 15 | TX |
| 1112 | KUIKAHI 18-Wahine rsb | 1968 | 28-11 | 72% | 18 | HI |
| 1113 | All In 12 | 1968 | 65-16 | 80% | 12 | AZ |
| 1114 | Legacy Girls 18-Elite | 1968 | 33-14 | 70% | 18 | CA |
| 1115 | Ignite 13-Susie (UT) | 1968 | 15-3 | 71% | 13 | UT |
| 1116 | MC 12-1 shepherd | 1967 | 37-4 | 86% | 12 | |
| 1117 | OK Charge 12-Ua tulsa | 1967 | 53-5 | 91% | 12 | OK |
| 1118 | Drive Nation 16-Red | 1967 | 25-17 | 60% | 16 | TX |
| 1119 | AVC CLE 15-White | 1967 | 41-23 | 64% | 15 | OH |
| 1120 | KIVA 17-White | 1966 | 48-26 | 65% | 17 | KY |
| 1121 | HPSTL 11 Royal | 1966 | 58-12 | 81% | 11 | MO |
| 1122 | Metro 12 Travel | 1966 | 50-16 | 76% | 12 | DC |
| 1123 | NKYVC 14-1 tsunami | 1966 | 35-28 | 56% | 14 | KY |
| 1124 | WGVA 16-Black | 1966 | 45-24 | 65% | 16 | GA |
| 1125 | ARVC 16-Red adidas | 1966 | 44-18 | 71% | 16 | NM |
| 1126 | Canuck VBC 18-1 | 1965 | 10-1 | 91% | 18 | |
| 1127 | Alliance 16-Red | 1965 | 49-15 | 77% | 16 | TN |
| 1128 | MISSION VOLLEYBALL 14-1 | 1965 | 31-15 | 67% | 14 | TX |
| 1129 | Munciana Indy 17 Cheetahs | 1965 | 41-29 | 59% | 17 | IN |
| 1130 | ID Crush 12-Bower | 1965 | 29-6 | 81% | 12 | ID |
| 1131 | K2 18 Jota | 1964 | 27-24 | 53% | 18 | TN |
| 1132 | Apex 14-National navy | 1964 | 24-11 | 69% | 14 | MO |
| 1133 | BCS Skyline H 16-Royal | 1964 | 35-25 | 58% | 16 | TX |
| 1134 | FSJ 14-Elite | 1964 | 46-15 | 75% | 14 | AR |
| 1135 | Wildfire 15-N john | 1964 | 35-21 | 63% | 15 | FL |
| 1136 | Next Level 16-1 abner | 1964 | 20-5 | 80% | 16 | CA |
| 1137 | St. Pete 14-Teal | 1964 | 68-21 | 76% | 14 | FL |
| 1138 | TAMPA UNITED VBA 14-Black | 1964 | 48-26 | 65% | 14 | FL |
| 1139 | Madfrog 17-N black kallas | 1964 | 31-18 | 62% | 17 | TX |
| 1140 | Happy Volley Academy 16-1 | 1964 | 6-2 | 75% | 16 | |
| 1141 | KCV 17 PREMIER | 1963 | 66-13 | 84% | 17 | TX |
| 1142 | CoJrs 16-Bri | 1963 | 31-19 | 62% | 16 | CO |
| 1143 | Premier 16 Kinsei | 1963 | 57-14 | 80% | 16 | OH |
| 1144 | AJV 18 adidas | 1963 | 38-14 | 73% | 18 | TX |
| 1145 | CALI 16-Black | 1963 | 50-20 | 71% | 16 | NY |
| 1146 | Blue Ridge 18-Blue | 1963 | 10-4 | 71% | 18 | VA |
| 1147 | Coast United 18 | 1963 | 37-17 | 69% | 18 | CA |
| 1148 | South Central NE 18-Black | 1962 | 13-3 | 81% | 18 | |
| 1149 | COAST 15-2 colton | 1962 | 41-22 | 65% | 15 | CA |
| 1150 | MAVS 816 14-Premier | 1962 | 36-9 | 80% | 14 | KS |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.