Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 24 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1151 Texas Performance TXP 12-Black alonso 1962 6-3 67% 12 NV
1152 MiElite 15 Mizuno 1962 33-38 46% 15 MI
1153 Montana Volleyball Academy 16-National 1962 51-12 81% 16 MT
1154 BRUSA 16 Fiapo 1962 37-28 57% 16 CA
1155 Wildfire 15-N john 1962 35-21 63% 15 FL
1156 EXCEL 11-N red 1962 26-5 84% 11 TX
1157 TKVBC 16-Mavericks elite 1961 62-26 70% 16 GA
1158 Madtown 16-2 national 1961 35-21 63% 16 WI
1159 Premier 16 Kinsei 1961 57-14 80% 16 OH
1160 IVBA 14 REN 1961 43-15 74% 14 MS
1161 Paramount VBC 14 Jasmine 1961 18-6 75% 14 VA
1162 Athlete HQ 14-Gasper 1961 37-32 54% 14 OH
1163 MAVS 816 14-Premier 1961 36-9 80% 14 KS
1164 MemphisVBAcademy 15-Red 1961 35-18 66% 15 MS
1165 Elevate Athletics 16-Nike isa 1961 18-6 75% 16 UT
1166 Rockwood Thunder 16-Navy 1961 43-26 62% 16 MO
1167 Canuck VBC 18-1 1960 10-1 91% 18 GA
1168 LVVC LV 13-Avoli 1960 9-0 100% 13 NV
1169 Madtown 15-2 national 1960 41-24 63% 15 WI
1170 NHouston Elite 18 Premier 1960 42-14 75% 18 TX
1171 Premier Nebraska 12-Gold 1960 28-18 61% 12 NE
1172 ARVC 13-Orange 1959 48-9 84% 13 NC
1173 OK Charge 16-Ua tulsa 1959 41-23 64% 16 OK
1174 Ascent 17-Black 1959 35-15 70% 17 AZ
1175 CPA 12 Dreves 1959 37-1 97% 12 WA
1176 Club V 16-Prodigy jenna 1959 49-38 56% 16 UT
1177 CALI 16-Black 1959 50-20 71% 16 NY
1178 VCN 14-Elite 1959 4-4 50% 14 NE
1179 Texas Fury 18 Legacy 1958 44-10 81% 18 TX
1180 407 14-Orange 1958 40-38 51% 14 FL
1181 Madfrog 11-N black 1958 33-8 79% 11 TX
1182 Juggernaut 14-National1 1958 49-26 65% 14 CO
1183 WVBA 17-Adidas 1958 49-19 72% 17 WA
1184 Premier 18 Onitsuka 1958 51-22 70% 18 OH
1185 SC Rockstar LOVB 18-Joy 1958 27-26 51% 18 CA
1186 1st Alliance 16-Onyx 1958 47-17 73% 16 IL
1187 EVA 14-Blue 1958 54-4 93% 14 KY
1188 Surfside 14-Pv elite 1958 38-12 76% 14 CA
1189 Innerlight VC 16 GOLD 1957 49-12 80% 16 TN
1190 South Central NE 18-Black 1957 13-3 81% 18 NE
1191 Zoo City Volleyball Club 14 Gators (CR) (1) 1957 14-2 88% 14 NC
1192 Aspire NW 17-1 empire 1957 28-20 58% 17 OR
1193 SG Elite 14-Roshambo 1957 33-24 58% 14 CA
1194 TVC 13-Black 1957 38-15 72% 13 OH
1195 Summit 18-Blue elite 1957 29-26 53% 18 IN
1196 PSVA 13-1 1957 50-19 72% 13 FL
1197 VCNebraska 14-Black 1957 15-10 60% 14 NE
1198 Midwest Elite 18-1 1957 30-7 81% 18 NE
1199 Brandywine Volleyball Club 13-1 1956 41-5 87% 13 DE
1200 ATHENA VB 16-1 gold national 1956 27-40 40% 16 OR
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.