2025-2026 Season — Page 24 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1151 | Texas Performance TXP 12-Black alonso | 1962 | 6-3 | 67% | 12 | NV |
| 1152 | MiElite 15 Mizuno | 1962 | 33-38 | 46% | 15 | MI |
| 1153 | Montana Volleyball Academy 16-National | 1962 | 51-12 | 81% | 16 | MT |
| 1154 | BRUSA 16 Fiapo | 1962 | 37-28 | 57% | 16 | CA |
| 1155 | Wildfire 15-N john | 1962 | 35-21 | 63% | 15 | FL |
| 1156 | EXCEL 11-N red | 1962 | 26-5 | 84% | 11 | TX |
| 1157 | TKVBC 16-Mavericks elite | 1961 | 62-26 | 70% | 16 | GA |
| 1158 | Madtown 16-2 national | 1961 | 35-21 | 63% | 16 | WI |
| 1159 | Premier 16 Kinsei | 1961 | 57-14 | 80% | 16 | OH |
| 1160 | IVBA 14 REN | 1961 | 43-15 | 74% | 14 | MS |
| 1161 | Paramount VBC 14 Jasmine | 1961 | 18-6 | 75% | 14 | VA |
| 1162 | Athlete HQ 14-Gasper | 1961 | 37-32 | 54% | 14 | OH |
| 1163 | MAVS 816 14-Premier | 1961 | 36-9 | 80% | 14 | KS |
| 1164 | MemphisVBAcademy 15-Red | 1961 | 35-18 | 66% | 15 | MS |
| 1165 | Elevate Athletics 16-Nike isa | 1961 | 18-6 | 75% | 16 | UT |
| 1166 | Rockwood Thunder 16-Navy | 1961 | 43-26 | 62% | 16 | MO |
| 1167 | Canuck VBC 18-1 | 1960 | 10-1 | 91% | 18 | GA |
| 1168 | LVVC LV 13-Avoli | 1960 | 9-0 | 100% | 13 | NV |
| 1169 | Madtown 15-2 national | 1960 | 41-24 | 63% | 15 | WI |
| 1170 | NHouston Elite 18 Premier | 1960 | 42-14 | 75% | 18 | TX |
| 1171 | Premier Nebraska 12-Gold | 1960 | 28-18 | 61% | 12 | NE |
| 1172 | ARVC 13-Orange | 1959 | 48-9 | 84% | 13 | NC |
| 1173 | OK Charge 16-Ua tulsa | 1959 | 41-23 | 64% | 16 | OK |
| 1174 | Ascent 17-Black | 1959 | 35-15 | 70% | 17 | AZ |
| 1175 | CPA 12 Dreves | 1959 | 37-1 | 97% | 12 | WA |
| 1176 | Club V 16-Prodigy jenna | 1959 | 49-38 | 56% | 16 | UT |
| 1177 | CALI 16-Black | 1959 | 50-20 | 71% | 16 | NY |
| 1178 | VCN 14-Elite | 1959 | 4-4 | 50% | 14 | NE |
| 1179 | Texas Fury 18 Legacy | 1958 | 44-10 | 81% | 18 | TX |
| 1180 | 407 14-Orange | 1958 | 40-38 | 51% | 14 | FL |
| 1181 | Madfrog 11-N black | 1958 | 33-8 | 79% | 11 | TX |
| 1182 | Juggernaut 14-National1 | 1958 | 49-26 | 65% | 14 | CO |
| 1183 | WVBA 17-Adidas | 1958 | 49-19 | 72% | 17 | WA |
| 1184 | Premier 18 Onitsuka | 1958 | 51-22 | 70% | 18 | OH |
| 1185 | SC Rockstar LOVB 18-Joy | 1958 | 27-26 | 51% | 18 | CA |
| 1186 | 1st Alliance 16-Onyx | 1958 | 47-17 | 73% | 16 | IL |
| 1187 | EVA 14-Blue | 1958 | 54-4 | 93% | 14 | KY |
| 1188 | Surfside 14-Pv elite | 1958 | 38-12 | 76% | 14 | CA |
| 1189 | Innerlight VC 16 GOLD | 1957 | 49-12 | 80% | 16 | TN |
| 1190 | South Central NE 18-Black | 1957 | 13-3 | 81% | 18 | NE |
| 1191 | Zoo City Volleyball Club 14 Gators (CR) (1) | 1957 | 14-2 | 88% | 14 | NC |
| 1192 | Aspire NW 17-1 empire | 1957 | 28-20 | 58% | 17 | OR |
| 1193 | SG Elite 14-Roshambo | 1957 | 33-24 | 58% | 14 | CA |
| 1194 | TVC 13-Black | 1957 | 38-15 | 72% | 13 | OH |
| 1195 | Summit 18-Blue elite | 1957 | 29-26 | 53% | 18 | IN |
| 1196 | PSVA 13-1 | 1957 | 50-19 | 72% | 13 | FL |
| 1197 | VCNebraska 14-Black | 1957 | 15-10 | 60% | 14 | NE |
| 1198 | Midwest Elite 18-1 | 1957 | 30-7 | 81% | 18 | NE |
| 1199 | Brandywine Volleyball Club 13-1 | 1956 | 41-5 | 87% | 13 | DE |
| 1200 | ATHENA VB 16-1 gold national | 1956 | 27-40 | 40% | 16 | OR |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.