2025-2026 Season — Page 24 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1151 | Rockwood Thunder 16-Navy | 1962 | 43-26 | 62% | 16 | MO |
| 1152 | Kokoro Volleyball 15-1 | 1961 | 39-38 | 51% | 15 | MN |
| 1153 | CSVC 14-Black | 1961 | 53-17 | 76% | 14 | NC |
| 1154 | COA 17-Surge | 1961 | 62-13 | 83% | 17 | IN |
| 1155 | EXCEL 11-N red | 1961 | 26-5 | 84% | 11 | TX |
| 1156 | SynergyForce 17-1 natl | 1960 | 36-31 | 54% | 17 | CA |
| 1157 | Core STL 16-Navy | 1960 | 46-16 | 74% | 16 | MO |
| 1158 | VCNebraska 14-Black | 1960 | 15-10 | 60% | 14 | NE |
| 1159 | Miami Hype 13-Power | 1960 | 10-3 | 77% | 13 | FL |
| 1160 | CPA 12 Dreves | 1959 | 37-1 | 97% | 12 | WA |
| 1161 | Ascent 17-Black | 1959 | 24-12 | 67% | 17 | AZ |
| 1162 | MiElite 15 Mizuno | 1959 | 33-38 | 46% | 15 | MI |
| 1163 | PEAK 17-1 elite | 1959 | 26-11 | 70% | 17 | AZ |
| 1164 | UVA 18 Matt | 1959 | 53-16 | 77% | 18 | VA |
| 1165 | Iowa United 14-1 elite | 1959 | 47-25 | 65% | 14 | IA |
| 1166 | LVVC LV 13-Avoli | 1959 | 9-0 | 100% | 13 | |
| 1167 | IVBA 14 REN | 1958 | 43-15 | 74% | 14 | MS |
| 1168 | BRUSA 16 Fiapo | 1958 | 37-28 | 57% | 16 | CA |
| 1169 | Premier Nebraska 15-Black | 1958 | 36-22 | 62% | 15 | NE |
| 1170 | OK Charge 16-Ua tulsa | 1958 | 41-23 | 64% | 16 | OK |
| 1171 | Juggernaut 14-National1 | 1958 | 49-26 | 65% | 14 | CO |
| 1172 | Surfside 14-Pv elite | 1958 | 38-12 | 76% | 14 | CA |
| 1173 | Tsunami 16-1e marko | 1958 | 40-20 | 67% | 16 | GA |
| 1174 | River City Jrs 18 Navy | 1957 | 37-6 | 86% | 18 | NE |
| 1175 | Elevate Athletics 16-Nike isa | 1957 | 18-6 | 75% | 16 | UT |
| 1176 | TeamLVC 16-Black | 1957 | 44-21 | 68% | 16 | NY |
| 1177 | VCN 14-Elite | 1957 | 4-4 | 50% | 14 | NE |
| 1178 | FIELDHOUSE VBC 12-Ikaika marcus | 1957 | 7-2 | 78% | 12 | |
| 1179 | Alabama Perf 17-N red | 1957 | 28-31 | 47% | 17 | AL |
| 1180 | Athlete HQ 14-Gasper | 1956 | 37-32 | 54% | 14 | OH |
| 1181 | DME Elite 18-1 | 1956 | 44-19 | 70% | 18 | FL |
| 1182 | Madtown 15-2 national | 1956 | 41-24 | 63% | 15 | WI |
| 1183 | WVBA 17-Adidas | 1956 | 49-19 | 72% | 17 | WA |
| 1184 | TAV 13-Black bill | 1956 | 38-22 | 62% | 13 | TX |
| 1185 | EVA 14-Blue | 1956 | 54-4 | 93% | 14 | KY |
| 1186 | SF Elite 16-Symone | 1956 | 35-27 | 56% | 16 | CA |
| 1187 | Blue Royals 16-Emerald | 1955 | 54-16 | 77% | 16 | WA |
| 1188 | Big Sky 14-1 | 1955 | 59-22 | 71% | 14 | MT |
| 1189 | Aspire NW 12-1 beaverton | 1955 | 39-7 | 85% | 12 | WA |
| 1190 | Aspire NW 17-1 empire | 1955 | 28-20 | 58% | 17 | WA |
| 1191 | 1st Alliance 17-White | 1955 | 36-17 | 68% | 17 | IL |
| 1192 | KIVA 14-Black | 1955 | 59-24 | 71% | 14 | KY |
| 1193 | MemphisVBAcademy 15-Red | 1954 | 35-18 | 66% | 15 | MS |
| 1194 | ATHENA VB 16-1 gold national | 1954 | 27-40 | 40% | 16 | OR |
| 1195 | DYNASTY 12-Blue | 1954 | 47-18 | 72% | 12 | KS |
| 1196 | VA Juniors 16-Elite | 1954 | 44-34 | 56% | 16 | VA |
| 1197 | Premier 18 Onitsuka | 1954 | 51-22 | 70% | 18 | OH |
| 1198 | RockCity 12 N1 | 1954 | 55-10 | 85% | 12 | OH |
| 1199 | TKVBC 16-Mavericks elite | 1954 | 62-26 | 70% | 16 | GA |
| 1200 | Sunshine 13 Westside | 1954 | 29-26 | 53% | 13 | CA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.