2025-2026 Season — Page 25 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1201 | Alliance 14-Ren | 1954 | 41-26 | 61% | 14 | TN |
| 1202 | Sky High 17-Black | 1954 | 46-29 | 60% | 17 | IL |
| 1203 | Madtown 16-2 national | 1953 | 35-21 | 63% | 16 | WI |
| 1204 | VAQUERAS 10-F lewis | 1953 | 26-4 | 87% | 10 | PR |
| 1205 | 573 17-Premier c | 1953 | 32-9 | 78% | 17 | MO |
| 1206 | SG Elite 14-Roshambo | 1953 | 33-24 | 58% | 14 | CA |
| 1207 | 1United 16-N blue | 1953 | 33-20 | 60% | 16 | TX |
| 1208 | Texas Performance TXP 12-Black alonso | 1953 | 6-3 | 67% | 12 | |
| 1209 | SF Elite 14-Salazar | 1953 | 30-24 | 56% | 14 | CA |
| 1210 | KIVA 13-White | 1952 | 52-25 | 68% | 13 | KY |
| 1211 | Alamo 12 Premier | 1952 | 48-23 | 67% | 12 | TX |
| 1212 | Club V 16-Prodigy jenna | 1952 | 49-38 | 56% | 16 | UT |
| 1213 | Alliance 13-Ren | 1952 | 44-23 | 66% | 13 | TN |
| 1214 | NE Elite 13-Nova | 1952 | 20-18 | 53% | 13 | NE |
| 1215 | Madfrog 11-N black | 1952 | 33-8 | 79% | 11 | TX |
| 1216 | Summit 18-Blue elite | 1952 | 29-26 | 53% | 18 | IN |
| 1217 | SMASH 16-S | 1951 | 36-26 | 57% | 16 | MA |
| 1218 | Tsunami 12-1e kim | 1951 | 55-17 | 76% | 12 | GA |
| 1219 | FaR Out 13-Black | 1951 | 32-32 | 50% | 13 | MI |
| 1220 | Midwest Elite 18-1 | 1951 | 30-7 | 81% | 18 | WI |
| 1221 | OK Charge 16-National | 1951 | 43-22 | 66% | 16 | OK |
| 1222 | TVC 16-Black | 1951 | 29-36 | 45% | 16 | OH |
| 1223 | Seal Beach 14-Black | 1951 | 38-14 | 73% | 14 | CA |
| 1224 | BRUSA 14-Mauro | 1951 | 30-10 | 75% | 14 | CA |
| 1225 | Madfrog 17-N black eright | 1951 | 42-20 | 68% | 17 | TX |
| 1226 | SPVB 17-Red | 1950 | 10-11 | 48% | 17 | IL |
| 1227 | SA Force 16 Darkside | 1950 | 54-20 | 73% | 16 | TX |
| 1228 | TX LEGACY 16-Elite | 1949 | 36-29 | 55% | 16 | TX |
| 1229 | Texas Fury 18 Legacy | 1949 | 44-10 | 81% | 18 | TX |
| 1230 | Juggernaut 16-National1 | 1949 | 44-26 | 63% | 16 | CO |
| 1231 | HRVC Hurricanes 16-1 | 1949 | 6-7 | 46% | 16 | ON |
| 1232 | Mindset Premier 14-Red | 1949 | 48-12 | 80% | 14 | IL |
| 1233 | South Central NE 16-Black | 1948 | 20-12 | 63% | 16 | |
| 1234 | ARVC 15-Black adidas | 1948 | 32-17 | 65% | 15 | NM |
| 1235 | Lex United 17 Elite | 1948 | 41-34 | 55% | 17 | KY |
| 1236 | Elevate 14-Blue | 1948 | 50-23 | 68% | 14 | TX |
| 1237 | Ozark Juniors 17 Premier | 1948 | 43-26 | 62% | 17 | AR |
| 1238 | PineappleHP 15U | 1948 | 30-30 | 50% | 15 | IN |
| 1239 | TVC 13-Black | 1948 | 38-15 | 72% | 13 | OH |
| 1240 | Ultimate VBC 16-Gold | 1948 | 5-3 | 63% | 16 | IL |
| 1241 | 1st Alliance 16-Onyx | 1948 | 47-17 | 73% | 16 | IL |
| 1242 | TVC 17 | 1948 | 47-14 | 77% | 17 | CA |
| 1243 | FTL 16-Fusion cuba | 1947 | 39-29 | 57% | 16 | FL |
| 1244 | Austin Skyline 12 Royal | 1947 | 51-18 | 74% | 12 | TX |
| 1245 | FaR Out 17 Gold | 1947 | 51-18 | 74% | 17 | MI |
| 1246 | MichioChicago 18-Bluesmoke | 1947 | 29-7 | 81% | 18 | IL |
| 1247 | PSVA 13-1 | 1947 | 50-19 | 72% | 13 | FL |
| 1248 | 1st Alliance 15-White | 1947 | 49-17 | 74% | 15 | IL |
| 1249 | Alamo 11 Premier | 1947 | 51-8 | 84% | 11 | TX |
| 1250 | JVC 15-1 | 1947 | 34-0 | 100% | 15 | IN |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.