Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 25 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1201 Alliance 14-Ren 1954 41-26 61% 14 TN
1202 Sky High 17-Black 1954 46-29 60% 17 IL
1203 Madtown 16-2 national 1953 35-21 63% 16 WI
1204 VAQUERAS 10-F lewis 1953 26-4 87% 10 PR
1205 573 17-Premier c 1953 32-9 78% 17 MO
1206 SG Elite 14-Roshambo 1953 33-24 58% 14 CA
1207 1United 16-N blue 1953 33-20 60% 16 TX
1208 Texas Performance TXP 12-Black alonso 1953 6-3 67% 12
1209 SF Elite 14-Salazar 1953 30-24 56% 14 CA
1210 KIVA 13-White 1952 52-25 68% 13 KY
1211 Alamo 12 Premier 1952 48-23 67% 12 TX
1212 Club V 16-Prodigy jenna 1952 49-38 56% 16 UT
1213 Alliance 13-Ren 1952 44-23 66% 13 TN
1214 NE Elite 13-Nova 1952 20-18 53% 13 NE
1215 Madfrog 11-N black 1952 33-8 79% 11 TX
1216 Summit 18-Blue elite 1952 29-26 53% 18 IN
1217 SMASH 16-S 1951 36-26 57% 16 MA
1218 Tsunami 12-1e kim 1951 55-17 76% 12 GA
1219 FaR Out 13-Black 1951 32-32 50% 13 MI
1220 Midwest Elite 18-1 1951 30-7 81% 18 WI
1221 OK Charge 16-National 1951 43-22 66% 16 OK
1222 TVC 16-Black 1951 29-36 45% 16 OH
1223 Seal Beach 14-Black 1951 38-14 73% 14 CA
1224 BRUSA 14-Mauro 1951 30-10 75% 14 CA
1225 Madfrog 17-N black eright 1951 42-20 68% 17 TX
1226 SPVB 17-Red 1950 10-11 48% 17 IL
1227 SA Force 16 Darkside 1950 54-20 73% 16 TX
1228 TX LEGACY 16-Elite 1949 36-29 55% 16 TX
1229 Texas Fury 18 Legacy 1949 44-10 81% 18 TX
1230 Juggernaut 16-National1 1949 44-26 63% 16 CO
1231 HRVC Hurricanes 16-1 1949 6-7 46% 16 ON
1232 Mindset Premier 14-Red 1949 48-12 80% 14 IL
1233 South Central NE 16-Black 1948 20-12 63% 16
1234 ARVC 15-Black adidas 1948 32-17 65% 15 NM
1235 Lex United 17 Elite 1948 41-34 55% 17 KY
1236 Elevate 14-Blue 1948 50-23 68% 14 TX
1237 Ozark Juniors 17 Premier 1948 43-26 62% 17 AR
1238 PineappleHP 15U 1948 30-30 50% 15 IN
1239 TVC 13-Black 1948 38-15 72% 13 OH
1240 Ultimate VBC 16-Gold 1948 5-3 63% 16 IL
1241 1st Alliance 16-Onyx 1948 47-17 73% 16 IL
1242 TVC 17 1948 47-14 77% 17 CA
1243 FTL 16-Fusion cuba 1947 39-29 57% 16 FL
1244 Austin Skyline 12 Royal 1947 51-18 74% 12 TX
1245 FaR Out 17 Gold 1947 51-18 74% 17 MI
1246 MichioChicago 18-Bluesmoke 1947 29-7 81% 18 IL
1247 PSVA 13-1 1947 50-19 72% 13 FL
1248 1st Alliance 15-White 1947 49-17 74% 15 IL
1249 Alamo 11 Premier 1947 51-8 84% 11 TX
1250 JVC 15-1 1947 34-0 100% 15 IN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.