Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 25 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1201 SA Force 16 Darkside 1956 54-20 73% 16 TX
1202 Seal Beach 14-Black 1956 38-14 73% 14 CA
1203 KIVA 14-Black 1956 59-24 71% 14 KY
1204 TAV 13-Black bill 1955 38-22 62% 13 TX
1205 VAQUERAS 10-F lewis 1955 26-4 87% 10 PR
1206 BVC 15 Judy 1955 34-20 63% 15 CA
1207 St. Joe Storm 14-1 1955 23-8 74% 14 MO
1208 ECC 17-National walker 1955 42-23 65% 17 NJ
1209 River City Jrs 18 Navy 1955 45-7 87% 18 IA
1210 Alamo 12 Premier 1955 48-23 67% 12 TX
1211 Core STL 16-Navy 1955 46-16 74% 16 MO
1212 K1 Bayamon Weso 14-9 1955 12-3 80% 14 PR
1213 Austin Skyline 12 Royal 1955 51-18 74% 12 TX
1214 BRUSA 14-Mauro 1955 30-10 75% 14 CA
1215 ARVC 15-Black adidas 1954 32-17 65% 15 NM
1216 FEVA 15-Katia 1954 45-27 63% 15 FL
1217 MAVS 18 Elite 1954 20-20 50% 18 KS
1218 RockCity 12 N1 1954 55-10 85% 12 OH
1219 SPVB 17-Red 1954 10-11 48% 17 IL
1220 573 17-Premier c 1954 32-9 78% 17 MO
1221 1United 16-N blue 1954 33-20 60% 16 TX
1222 Sky High 17-Black 1953 46-29 60% 17 IL
1223 OK Charge 16-National 1953 43-22 66% 16 OK
1224 Alliance 14-Ren 1953 41-26 61% 14 TN
1225 Tsunami 12-1e kim 1953 55-17 76% 12 GA
1226 Juggernaut 16-National1 1953 44-26 63% 16 CO
1227 Sunshine 17-Pacific 1953 34-32 52% 17 CA
1228 Ultimate VBC 16-Gold 1953 5-3 63% 16 IL
1229 Aspire NW 12-1 beaverton 1953 39-7 85% 12 OR
1230 HRVC Hurricanes 16-1 1953 6-7 46% 16 ON
1231 1United 13-N white 1952 39-18 67% 13 TX
1232 MOD Elite 17-Blue 1952 30-47 39% 17 IL
1233 Amarillo Xtreme 15 Icons 1952 37-10 79% 15 TX
1234 Carroll Thunder 12 Carroll Thunder 6th (IA) (32) 1952 5-4 56% 12 IA
1235 MOCO Volleyball Club LLC 15 MOCO (MD) Menace 1952 10-6 63% 15 MD
1236 South Central NE 16-Black 1952 20-12 63% 16 NE
1237 TVC 17 1952 47-14 77% 17 CA
1238 COA 17-Surge 1952 62-13 83% 17 IN
1239 TVC 16-Black 1952 29-36 45% 16 OH
1240 Tribe 16-Vktry white 1952 47-38 55% 16 FL
1241 NORCO 16-Black 1952 42-32 57% 16 CO
1242 VA Juniors 16-Elite 1952 44-34 56% 16 VA
1243 AVC CLE 15-Blue 1951 62-10 86% 15 OH
1244 Apex 13-Bobby 1951 10-2 83% 13 UT
1245 FaR Out 16 Gold 1951 52-16 76% 16 MI
1246 EXCEL 15-National blue 1951 41-9 80% 15 TX
1247 Absolute 16-Pink 1951 38-31 55% 16 CA
1248 DYNASTY 12-Blue 1951 47-18 72% 12 KS
1249 Alliance 13-Ren 1951 44-23 66% 13 TN
1250 WACO VBC 17-Ua black 1950 34-22 61% 17 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.