2025-2026 Season — Page 25 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1201 | SA Force 16 Darkside | 1956 | 54-20 | 73% | 16 | TX |
| 1202 | Seal Beach 14-Black | 1956 | 38-14 | 73% | 14 | CA |
| 1203 | KIVA 14-Black | 1956 | 59-24 | 71% | 14 | KY |
| 1204 | TAV 13-Black bill | 1955 | 38-22 | 62% | 13 | TX |
| 1205 | VAQUERAS 10-F lewis | 1955 | 26-4 | 87% | 10 | PR |
| 1206 | BVC 15 Judy | 1955 | 34-20 | 63% | 15 | CA |
| 1207 | St. Joe Storm 14-1 | 1955 | 23-8 | 74% | 14 | MO |
| 1208 | ECC 17-National walker | 1955 | 42-23 | 65% | 17 | NJ |
| 1209 | River City Jrs 18 Navy | 1955 | 45-7 | 87% | 18 | IA |
| 1210 | Alamo 12 Premier | 1955 | 48-23 | 67% | 12 | TX |
| 1211 | Core STL 16-Navy | 1955 | 46-16 | 74% | 16 | MO |
| 1212 | K1 Bayamon Weso 14-9 | 1955 | 12-3 | 80% | 14 | PR |
| 1213 | Austin Skyline 12 Royal | 1955 | 51-18 | 74% | 12 | TX |
| 1214 | BRUSA 14-Mauro | 1955 | 30-10 | 75% | 14 | CA |
| 1215 | ARVC 15-Black adidas | 1954 | 32-17 | 65% | 15 | NM |
| 1216 | FEVA 15-Katia | 1954 | 45-27 | 63% | 15 | FL |
| 1217 | MAVS 18 Elite | 1954 | 20-20 | 50% | 18 | KS |
| 1218 | RockCity 12 N1 | 1954 | 55-10 | 85% | 12 | OH |
| 1219 | SPVB 17-Red | 1954 | 10-11 | 48% | 17 | IL |
| 1220 | 573 17-Premier c | 1954 | 32-9 | 78% | 17 | MO |
| 1221 | 1United 16-N blue | 1954 | 33-20 | 60% | 16 | TX |
| 1222 | Sky High 17-Black | 1953 | 46-29 | 60% | 17 | IL |
| 1223 | OK Charge 16-National | 1953 | 43-22 | 66% | 16 | OK |
| 1224 | Alliance 14-Ren | 1953 | 41-26 | 61% | 14 | TN |
| 1225 | Tsunami 12-1e kim | 1953 | 55-17 | 76% | 12 | GA |
| 1226 | Juggernaut 16-National1 | 1953 | 44-26 | 63% | 16 | CO |
| 1227 | Sunshine 17-Pacific | 1953 | 34-32 | 52% | 17 | CA |
| 1228 | Ultimate VBC 16-Gold | 1953 | 5-3 | 63% | 16 | IL |
| 1229 | Aspire NW 12-1 beaverton | 1953 | 39-7 | 85% | 12 | OR |
| 1230 | HRVC Hurricanes 16-1 | 1953 | 6-7 | 46% | 16 | ON |
| 1231 | 1United 13-N white | 1952 | 39-18 | 67% | 13 | TX |
| 1232 | MOD Elite 17-Blue | 1952 | 30-47 | 39% | 17 | IL |
| 1233 | Amarillo Xtreme 15 Icons | 1952 | 37-10 | 79% | 15 | TX |
| 1234 | Carroll Thunder 12 Carroll Thunder 6th (IA) (32) | 1952 | 5-4 | 56% | 12 | IA |
| 1235 | MOCO Volleyball Club LLC 15 MOCO (MD) Menace | 1952 | 10-6 | 63% | 15 | MD |
| 1236 | South Central NE 16-Black | 1952 | 20-12 | 63% | 16 | NE |
| 1237 | TVC 17 | 1952 | 47-14 | 77% | 17 | CA |
| 1238 | COA 17-Surge | 1952 | 62-13 | 83% | 17 | IN |
| 1239 | TVC 16-Black | 1952 | 29-36 | 45% | 16 | OH |
| 1240 | Tribe 16-Vktry white | 1952 | 47-38 | 55% | 16 | FL |
| 1241 | NORCO 16-Black | 1952 | 42-32 | 57% | 16 | CO |
| 1242 | VA Juniors 16-Elite | 1952 | 44-34 | 56% | 16 | VA |
| 1243 | AVC CLE 15-Blue | 1951 | 62-10 | 86% | 15 | OH |
| 1244 | Apex 13-Bobby | 1951 | 10-2 | 83% | 13 | UT |
| 1245 | FaR Out 16 Gold | 1951 | 52-16 | 76% | 16 | MI |
| 1246 | EXCEL 15-National blue | 1951 | 41-9 | 80% | 15 | TX |
| 1247 | Absolute 16-Pink | 1951 | 38-31 | 55% | 16 | CA |
| 1248 | DYNASTY 12-Blue | 1951 | 47-18 | 72% | 12 | KS |
| 1249 | Alliance 13-Ren | 1951 | 44-23 | 66% | 13 | TN |
| 1250 | WACO VBC 17-Ua black | 1950 | 34-22 | 61% | 17 | TX |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.