Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 26 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1251 1st Alliance 17-White 1950 36-17 68% 17 IL
1252 Sanford Fargo 15-Ua 1950 45-15 75% 15 MN
1253 Ama 212 12-Aces 1950 42-5 88% 12 TX
1254 SF Elite 14-Salazar 1950 30-24 56% 14 CA
1255 WSRVC 14-Jimenez 1950 33-6 85% 14 WY
1256 TX LEGACY 16-Elite 1949 36-29 55% 16 TX
1257 MVVC 16-Red 1949 45-34 57% 16 CA
1258 FTL 16-Fusion cuba 1948 39-29 57% 16 FL
1259 CVC 11-BLACK 1948 36-12 75% 11 OH
1260 Ozark Juniors 17 Premier 1948 43-26 62% 17 AR
1261 ECVC 15-Pink 1948 52-18 74% 15 VA
1262 Blue Ridge 18-Blue 1947 35-16 69% 18 VA
1263 HJV 15-Premier 1947 56-29 66% 15 TX
1264 ASKYL 18-1 1947 8-1 89% 18 MA
1265 FIELDHOUSE VBC 11-Ikaika toa 1947 7-1 88% 11 TX
1266 TEJAS 14-Black luis 1947 36-26 58% 14 TX
1267 MichioChicago 18-Bluesmoke 1947 29-7 81% 18 IL
1268 EP Elite 15-Smack 1 1947 44-21 68% 15 TX
1269 VA Juniors 18-Elite 1947 40-18 69% 18 VA
1270 NORCO 15-Black 1947 32-20 62% 15 CO
1271 WAVE 15-Dave 1946 43-18 70% 15 CA
1272 Apex 14-Elite 1946 31-8 76% 14 MT
1273 CPA 16-Drew 1946 32-23 57% 16 WA
1274 MKE Sting 18-White 1946 52-13 80% 18 WI
1275 AJV 12 adidas 1946 49-16 75% 12 TX
1276 NE Elite 12-Nova 1946 28-13 68% 12 NE
1277 JVC 15-1 1946 34-0 100% 15 IN
1278 PineappleHP 15U 1946 30-30 50% 15 IN
1279 Top Flight Volleyball Academy 16-National black 1945 28-13 68% 16 NV
1280 Jupiter Elite 18-E 1945 19-15 56% 18 FL
1281 Lions 13-Red 1945 53-27 66% 13 IL
1282 Miami Hype 18-Prime 1945 32-26 55% 18 FL
1283 Momentous VBC 13-Alice 1945 46-14 77% 13 CA
1284 SMV 15-1 black 1945 65-11 86% 15 MN
1285 Academy West 15-National 1945 66-50 57% 15 CA
1286 Lynden Volleyball Club 17 LYNDEN (3) 1945 12-0 100% 17
1287 FINESSE VOLLEYBALL ACADEMY 15-1 1945 53-23 69% 15 MO
1288 SIVBC 18 Tsunami 1944 33-25 57% 18 WA
1289 Viper 12-Kehau/ashlyn 1944 5-5 50% 12 CA
1290 Madfrog 17-N black eright 1944 42-20 68% 17 TX
1291 AVC CLE 17-White 1944 49-22 69% 17 OH
1292 1st Alliance 15-White 1944 49-17 74% 15 IL
1293 Ultimate G15 Gold 1944 37-20 65% 15 IL
1294 Aspire NW 16-1 vancouver 1944 16-2 89% 16 WA
1295 EMOVOL Volleyball Club 13 1943 6-5 55% 13 PR
1296 540 VB 17 Elite 1943 49-21 70% 17 VA
1297 SVC 14 National 1943 50-6 89% 14 IA
1298 915 13-Hill 1943 42-31 57% 13 TX
1299 MADFROG 14-N white 1943 37-18 66% 14 TX
1300 SVC 16-Elite 1943 12-4 75% 16 AZ
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.