2025-2026 Season — Page 26 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1251 | CPA 16-Drew | 1947 | 32-23 | 57% | 16 | WA |
| 1252 | WSRVC 14-Jimenez | 1946 | 33-6 | 85% | 14 | |
| 1253 | NHouston Elite 18 Premier | 1946 | 42-14 | 75% | 18 | TX |
| 1254 | WACO VBC 17-Ua black | 1946 | 34-22 | 61% | 17 | TX |
| 1255 | FEVA 15-Katia | 1946 | 45-27 | 63% | 15 | FL |
| 1256 | ASKYL 18-1 | 1946 | 8-1 | 89% | 18 | |
| 1257 | AVC CLE 15-Blue | 1946 | 62-10 | 86% | 15 | OH |
| 1258 | EP Elite 15-Smack 1 | 1945 | 44-21 | 68% | 15 | TX |
| 1259 | TEJAS 14-Black luis | 1945 | 36-26 | 58% | 14 | TX |
| 1260 | NORCO 16-Black | 1945 | 42-32 | 57% | 16 | CO |
| 1261 | Panda 16-1 | 1945 | 44-25 | 64% | 16 | CA |
| 1262 | Viper 12-Kehau/ashlyn | 1945 | 5-5 | 50% | 12 | CA |
| 1263 | Six Pack 16 | 1944 | 43-18 | 70% | 16 | IA |
| 1264 | Aspire NW 15-1 empire | 1944 | 31-19 | 62% | 15 | WA |
| 1265 | Amarillo Xtreme 15 Icons | 1944 | 37-10 | 79% | 15 | TX |
| 1266 | HP South 12 Premier | 1944 | 54-13 | 81% | 12 | MO |
| 1267 | Miami Hype 18-Prime | 1944 | 32-26 | 55% | 18 | FL |
| 1268 | MKE Sting 12-Gold | 1944 | 49-24 | 67% | 12 | WI |
| 1269 | Paramount VBC 14 Jasmine | 1944 | 18-6 | 75% | 14 | VA |
| 1270 | VA Juniors 18-Elite | 1944 | 40-18 | 69% | 18 | VA |
| 1271 | EMV 12-Black brit/chris | 1944 | 19-4 | 83% | 12 | TX |
| 1272 | VVB 15-Alfie | 1944 | 20-1 | 95% | 15 | CA |
| 1273 | ECVC 15-Pink | 1944 | 52-18 | 74% | 15 | VA |
| 1274 | Ama 212 12-Aces | 1943 | 42-5 | 88% | 12 | TX |
| 1275 | CVC 11-BLACK | 1943 | 36-12 | 75% | 11 | OH |
| 1276 | ECC 17-National walker | 1943 | 42-23 | 65% | 17 | NJ |
| 1277 | SIVBC 18 Tsunami | 1943 | 33-25 | 57% | 18 | WA |
| 1278 | SVC 14 National | 1943 | 50-6 | 89% | 14 | IA |
| 1279 | WPVC 14-Armour orange | 1943 | 64-24 | 73% | 14 | FL |
| 1280 | 915 13-Hill | 1943 | 42-31 | 57% | 13 | TX |
| 1281 | Lions 13-Red | 1943 | 33-14 | 70% | 13 | IL |
| 1282 | I.C. Stars 16 Mark | 1943 | 37-12 | 76% | 16 | NC |
| 1283 | Jupiter Elite 18-E | 1943 | 19-15 | 56% | 18 | FL |
| 1284 | Sunshine 17-Pacific | 1943 | 34-32 | 52% | 17 | CA |
| 1285 | EXCEL 15-National blue | 1943 | 41-9 | 80% | 15 | TX |
| 1286 | SVC 16-Elite | 1943 | 12-4 | 75% | 16 | SK |
| 1287 | 1United 13-N white | 1943 | 39-18 | 67% | 13 | TX |
| 1288 | Skyline 14-White iv | 1943 | 41-20 | 65% | 14 | TX |
| 1289 | MVVC 16-Red | 1943 | 45-34 | 57% | 16 | CA |
| 1290 | Leaside 16-1 firebolts | 1943 | 6-2 | 75% | 16 | ON |
| 1291 | MC 18-1 | 1942 | 25-2 | 86% | 18 | |
| 1292 | Momentous VBC 13-Alice | 1942 | 46-14 | 77% | 13 | CA |
| 1293 | Ultimate G15 Gold | 1942 | 37-20 | 65% | 15 | IL |
| 1294 | SNVF 14-Blizzard | 1942 | 47-23 | 67% | 14 | WA |
| 1295 | Amarillo Xtreme 17 LYT | 1941 | 40-13 | 75% | 17 | TX |
| 1296 | NORCO 15-Black | 1941 | 32-20 | 62% | 15 | CO |
| 1297 | Ozark Juniors 16-Elite | 1941 | 53-18 | 73% | 16 | AR |
| 1298 | A5 West 17-Tim | 1941 | 46-23 | 67% | 17 | GA |
| 1299 | Apex 14-Elite | 1941 | 31-8 | 76% | 14 | MT |
| 1300 | EXCEL 10-Cam | 1941 | 37-10 | 77% | 10 | TX |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.