Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 26 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1251 CPA 16-Drew 1947 32-23 57% 16 WA
1252 WSRVC 14-Jimenez 1946 33-6 85% 14
1253 NHouston Elite 18 Premier 1946 42-14 75% 18 TX
1254 WACO VBC 17-Ua black 1946 34-22 61% 17 TX
1255 FEVA 15-Katia 1946 45-27 63% 15 FL
1256 ASKYL 18-1 1946 8-1 89% 18
1257 AVC CLE 15-Blue 1946 62-10 86% 15 OH
1258 EP Elite 15-Smack 1 1945 44-21 68% 15 TX
1259 TEJAS 14-Black luis 1945 36-26 58% 14 TX
1260 NORCO 16-Black 1945 42-32 57% 16 CO
1261 Panda 16-1 1945 44-25 64% 16 CA
1262 Viper 12-Kehau/ashlyn 1945 5-5 50% 12 CA
1263 Six Pack 16 1944 43-18 70% 16 IA
1264 Aspire NW 15-1 empire 1944 31-19 62% 15 WA
1265 Amarillo Xtreme 15 Icons 1944 37-10 79% 15 TX
1266 HP South 12 Premier 1944 54-13 81% 12 MO
1267 Miami Hype 18-Prime 1944 32-26 55% 18 FL
1268 MKE Sting 12-Gold 1944 49-24 67% 12 WI
1269 Paramount VBC 14 Jasmine 1944 18-6 75% 14 VA
1270 VA Juniors 18-Elite 1944 40-18 69% 18 VA
1271 EMV 12-Black brit/chris 1944 19-4 83% 12 TX
1272 VVB 15-Alfie 1944 20-1 95% 15 CA
1273 ECVC 15-Pink 1944 52-18 74% 15 VA
1274 Ama 212 12-Aces 1943 42-5 88% 12 TX
1275 CVC 11-BLACK 1943 36-12 75% 11 OH
1276 ECC 17-National walker 1943 42-23 65% 17 NJ
1277 SIVBC 18 Tsunami 1943 33-25 57% 18 WA
1278 SVC 14 National 1943 50-6 89% 14 IA
1279 WPVC 14-Armour orange 1943 64-24 73% 14 FL
1280 915 13-Hill 1943 42-31 57% 13 TX
1281 Lions 13-Red 1943 33-14 70% 13 IL
1282 I.C. Stars 16 Mark 1943 37-12 76% 16 NC
1283 Jupiter Elite 18-E 1943 19-15 56% 18 FL
1284 Sunshine 17-Pacific 1943 34-32 52% 17 CA
1285 EXCEL 15-National blue 1943 41-9 80% 15 TX
1286 SVC 16-Elite 1943 12-4 75% 16 SK
1287 1United 13-N white 1943 39-18 67% 13 TX
1288 Skyline 14-White iv 1943 41-20 65% 14 TX
1289 MVVC 16-Red 1943 45-34 57% 16 CA
1290 Leaside 16-1 firebolts 1943 6-2 75% 16 ON
1291 MC 18-1 1942 25-2 86% 18
1292 Momentous VBC 13-Alice 1942 46-14 77% 13 CA
1293 Ultimate G15 Gold 1942 37-20 65% 15 IL
1294 SNVF 14-Blizzard 1942 47-23 67% 14 WA
1295 Amarillo Xtreme 17 LYT 1941 40-13 75% 17 TX
1296 NORCO 15-Black 1941 32-20 62% 15 CO
1297 Ozark Juniors 16-Elite 1941 53-18 73% 16 AR
1298 A5 West 17-Tim 1941 46-23 67% 17 GA
1299 Apex 14-Elite 1941 31-8 76% 14 MT
1300 EXCEL 10-Cam 1941 37-10 77% 10 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.