Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 27 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1301 FH 12-Ikaika-marcus 1941 35-9 80% 12 TX
1302 Apex 13-Bobby 1941 10-2 83% 13 UT
1303 AVC CLE 17-White 1941 49-22 69% 17 OH
1304 AZ EVJ 18 Elite 1940 41-19 68% 18 AZ
1305 MKE Sting 18-White 1940 52-13 80% 18 WI
1306 Rockwood Thunder 18 Navy 1940 54-18 74% 18 MO
1307 UNION 14-Black 1940 44-36 55% 14 CA
1308 WAVE 15-Dave 1940 43-18 70% 15 CA
1309 407 14-Orange 1940 40-38 51% 14 FL
1310 SC Rockstar LOVB 18-Joy 1940 14-18 44% 18 CA
1311 EXCEL 13-National white 1940 31-14 67% 13 TX
1312 DN 17-Red 1940 9-1 90% 17 TX
1313 MAVS 18 Elite 1939 16-16 50% 18 KS
1314 CNVKC Mizuno 17-Coach ib 1939 43-18 70% 17 MO
1315 Mem Metro 16-Elite blk 1939 53-26 67% 16 TN
1316 RockCity 15 N1 1939 33-32 51% 15 OH
1317 540 VB 17 Elite 1939 49-21 70% 17 VA
1318 Absolute 16-Pink 1939 38-31 55% 16 CA
1319 Club Rampage 16-S black 1939 26-13 67% 16 UT
1320 AJV 12 adidas 1938 49-16 75% 12 TX
1321 Elevation 17 Peak 1938 30-23 57% 17 CO
1322 Top Flight Volleyball Academy 16-National black 1938 28-13 68% 16 NV
1323 Pursuit 14-National 1938 39-21 65% 14 MO
1324 No Coast 17-Tsunami 1938 35-20 64% 17 MO
1325 NYC Juniors 15-National 1938 47-19 71% 15 NY
1326 FVA 15-1 1938 65-26 71% 15 AK
1327 Aspire NW 16-1 empire 1937 30-27 53% 16 WA
1328 FC Elite 18 Elite 1937 24-35 41% 18 WI
1329 FaR Out 16 Gold 1937 52-16 76% 16 MI
1330 HJV 15-Premier 1937 56-29 66% 15 TX
1331 MVA 16-National 1937 69-24 74% 16 FL
1332 MJVA 15-1 1937 9-7 56% 15 TN
1333 Rising Tide 16-S breakers 1937 28-31 47% 16 SC
1334 ClubRedVB WI 17 Nationals 1936 51-21 71% 17 WI
1335 Platform 14-Adidas 1936 58-18 74% 14 IA
1336 Elite 16-National nancy 1936 36-21 63% 16 FL
1337 VCN 16-Black 1936 14-4 78% 16 NE
1338 Rancho Valley 16-Premier 1936 9-15 38% 16 CA
1339 MADFROG 14-N white 1936 37-18 66% 14 TX
1340 NVA 15-Premier willie 1936 61-23 73% 15 FL
1341 KC Voltage 17-1 1935 39-20 66% 17
1342 AZ EVJ 17 Elite 1935 44-31 59% 17 AZ
1343 Colorado Juniors 18-Open 1935 26-12 68% 18 CO
1344 NPJ Salem 15 National 1935 39-34 53% 15 OR
1345 Alamo 15-Elite 1 1935 56-22 72% 15 TX
1346 Colorado Juniors 17-Kevin 1935 19-4 83% 17 CO
1347 FC Elite 17-Navy 1935 31-29 52% 17 WI
1348 NE Elite 12-Nova 1935 28-13 68% 12 NE
1349 New WAVE 16 Tsunami 1934 33-16 67% 16 IL
1350 Premier 15-Black t 1934 28-15 65% 15 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.