2025-2026 Season — Page 27 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1301 | FH 12-Ikaika-marcus | 1941 | 35-9 | 80% | 12 | TX |
| 1302 | Apex 13-Bobby | 1941 | 10-2 | 83% | 13 | UT |
| 1303 | AVC CLE 17-White | 1941 | 49-22 | 69% | 17 | OH |
| 1304 | AZ EVJ 18 Elite | 1940 | 41-19 | 68% | 18 | AZ |
| 1305 | MKE Sting 18-White | 1940 | 52-13 | 80% | 18 | WI |
| 1306 | Rockwood Thunder 18 Navy | 1940 | 54-18 | 74% | 18 | MO |
| 1307 | UNION 14-Black | 1940 | 44-36 | 55% | 14 | CA |
| 1308 | WAVE 15-Dave | 1940 | 43-18 | 70% | 15 | CA |
| 1309 | 407 14-Orange | 1940 | 40-38 | 51% | 14 | FL |
| 1310 | SC Rockstar LOVB 18-Joy | 1940 | 14-18 | 44% | 18 | CA |
| 1311 | EXCEL 13-National white | 1940 | 31-14 | 67% | 13 | TX |
| 1312 | DN 17-Red | 1940 | 9-1 | 90% | 17 | TX |
| 1313 | MAVS 18 Elite | 1939 | 16-16 | 50% | 18 | KS |
| 1314 | CNVKC Mizuno 17-Coach ib | 1939 | 43-18 | 70% | 17 | MO |
| 1315 | Mem Metro 16-Elite blk | 1939 | 53-26 | 67% | 16 | TN |
| 1316 | RockCity 15 N1 | 1939 | 33-32 | 51% | 15 | OH |
| 1317 | 540 VB 17 Elite | 1939 | 49-21 | 70% | 17 | VA |
| 1318 | Absolute 16-Pink | 1939 | 38-31 | 55% | 16 | CA |
| 1319 | Club Rampage 16-S black | 1939 | 26-13 | 67% | 16 | UT |
| 1320 | AJV 12 adidas | 1938 | 49-16 | 75% | 12 | TX |
| 1321 | Elevation 17 Peak | 1938 | 30-23 | 57% | 17 | CO |
| 1322 | Top Flight Volleyball Academy 16-National black | 1938 | 28-13 | 68% | 16 | NV |
| 1323 | Pursuit 14-National | 1938 | 39-21 | 65% | 14 | MO |
| 1324 | No Coast 17-Tsunami | 1938 | 35-20 | 64% | 17 | MO |
| 1325 | NYC Juniors 15-National | 1938 | 47-19 | 71% | 15 | NY |
| 1326 | FVA 15-1 | 1938 | 65-26 | 71% | 15 | AK |
| 1327 | Aspire NW 16-1 empire | 1937 | 30-27 | 53% | 16 | WA |
| 1328 | FC Elite 18 Elite | 1937 | 24-35 | 41% | 18 | WI |
| 1329 | FaR Out 16 Gold | 1937 | 52-16 | 76% | 16 | MI |
| 1330 | HJV 15-Premier | 1937 | 56-29 | 66% | 15 | TX |
| 1331 | MVA 16-National | 1937 | 69-24 | 74% | 16 | FL |
| 1332 | MJVA 15-1 | 1937 | 9-7 | 56% | 15 | TN |
| 1333 | Rising Tide 16-S breakers | 1937 | 28-31 | 47% | 16 | SC |
| 1334 | ClubRedVB WI 17 Nationals | 1936 | 51-21 | 71% | 17 | WI |
| 1335 | Platform 14-Adidas | 1936 | 58-18 | 74% | 14 | IA |
| 1336 | Elite 16-National nancy | 1936 | 36-21 | 63% | 16 | FL |
| 1337 | VCN 16-Black | 1936 | 14-4 | 78% | 16 | NE |
| 1338 | Rancho Valley 16-Premier | 1936 | 9-15 | 38% | 16 | CA |
| 1339 | MADFROG 14-N white | 1936 | 37-18 | 66% | 14 | TX |
| 1340 | NVA 15-Premier willie | 1936 | 61-23 | 73% | 15 | FL |
| 1341 | KC Voltage 17-1 | 1935 | 39-20 | 66% | 17 | |
| 1342 | AZ EVJ 17 Elite | 1935 | 44-31 | 59% | 17 | AZ |
| 1343 | Colorado Juniors 18-Open | 1935 | 26-12 | 68% | 18 | CO |
| 1344 | NPJ Salem 15 National | 1935 | 39-34 | 53% | 15 | OR |
| 1345 | Alamo 15-Elite 1 | 1935 | 56-22 | 72% | 15 | TX |
| 1346 | Colorado Juniors 17-Kevin | 1935 | 19-4 | 83% | 17 | CO |
| 1347 | FC Elite 17-Navy | 1935 | 31-29 | 52% | 17 | WI |
| 1348 | NE Elite 12-Nova | 1935 | 28-13 | 68% | 12 | NE |
| 1349 | New WAVE 16 Tsunami | 1934 | 33-16 | 67% | 16 | IL |
| 1350 | Premier 15-Black t | 1934 | 28-15 | 65% | 15 | TX |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.