2025-2026 Season — Page 27 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1301 | WPVC 14-Armour orange | 1943 | 64-24 | 73% | 14 | FL |
| 1302 | EXCEL 13-National white | 1942 | 31-14 | 67% | 13 | TX |
| 1303 | KIVA 13-White | 1942 | 52-25 | 68% | 13 | KY |
| 1304 | MKE Sting 12-Gold | 1942 | 49-24 | 67% | 12 | WI |
| 1305 | Ozark Juniors 16-Elite | 1942 | 53-18 | 73% | 16 | AR |
| 1306 | EXCEL 10-Cam | 1942 | 37-10 | 77% | 10 | TX |
| 1307 | DN 17-Red | 1942 | 9-1 | 90% | 17 | TX |
| 1308 | No Coast 17-Tsunami | 1942 | 35-20 | 64% | 17 | MO |
| 1309 | Premier 15-Black t | 1942 | 28-15 | 65% | 15 | TX |
| 1310 | MJVA 15-1 | 1942 | 9-7 | 56% | 15 | TN |
| 1311 | Rockwood Thunder 18 Navy | 1941 | 54-18 | 74% | 18 | MO |
| 1312 | NPJ Salem 15 National | 1941 | 39-34 | 53% | 15 | OR |
| 1313 | Alamo 15-Elite 1 | 1941 | 56-22 | 72% | 15 | TX |
| 1314 | Aspire NW 16-1 empire | 1941 | 30-27 | 53% | 16 | OR |
| 1315 | Aces 14-S | 1941 | 31-5 | 78% | 14 | MT |
| 1316 | ID Crush 12-Bower | 1941 | 32-9 | 74% | 12 | ID |
| 1317 | A5 West 17-Tim | 1940 | 46-23 | 67% | 17 | GA |
| 1318 | Mem Metro 16-Elite blk | 1940 | 53-26 | 67% | 16 | TN |
| 1319 | Jupiter Elite 14-E | 1940 | 37-29 | 56% | 14 | FL |
| 1320 | Rising Tide 16-S breakers | 1940 | 28-31 | 47% | 16 | SC |
| 1321 | VAQUE 16-1 | 1940 | 6-2 | 75% | 16 | PR |
| 1322 | CNVKC Mizuno 17-Coach ib | 1940 | 43-18 | 70% | 17 | MO |
| 1323 | EMV 12-Black brit/chris | 1939 | 19-4 | 83% | 12 | TX |
| 1324 | HP South 12 Premier | 1939 | 54-13 | 81% | 12 | MO |
| 1325 | FC Elite 18 Elite | 1939 | 24-35 | 41% | 18 | WI |
| 1326 | AZ EVJ 17 Elite | 1939 | 44-31 | 59% | 17 | AZ |
| 1327 | FaR Out 13-Black | 1939 | 51-37 | 58% | 13 | MI |
| 1328 | KC Voltage 17-1 | 1939 | 39-20 | 66% | 17 | MO |
| 1329 | Elite 16-National nancy | 1939 | 36-21 | 63% | 16 | FL |
| 1330 | NVA 15-Premier willie | 1938 | 61-23 | 73% | 15 | FL |
| 1331 | Aspire NW 15-1 empire | 1938 | 31-19 | 62% | 15 | OR |
| 1332 | Impact 18-Carrie | 1938 | 32-6 | 84% | 18 | MI |
| 1333 | 1United 16-N white | 1938 | 42-20 | 66% | 16 | TX |
| 1334 | TPV 17-Maverick | 1938 | 33-35 | 49% | 17 | TN |
| 1335 | Platform 14-Adidas | 1938 | 58-18 | 74% | 14 | IA |
| 1336 | Pgh Elite 15-Elite | 1938 | 36-28 | 56% | 15 | PA |
| 1337 | Sideout Sports Volleyball Club 16-N cooper | 1938 | 38-13 | 75% | 16 | NJ |
| 1338 | Active 14-Red | 1938 | 49-10 | 83% | 14 | VA |
| 1339 | Skyline 14-White iv | 1937 | 41-20 | 65% | 14 | TX |
| 1340 | Big Sky 14 Westside | 1937 | 41-13 | 73% | 14 | MT |
| 1341 | Drive Nation 13-Red | 1937 | 16-9 | 64% | 13 | TX |
| 1342 | VCN 16-Black | 1937 | 14-4 | 78% | 16 | NE |
| 1343 | PSVBA 16-Legacy 1 | 1937 | 57-25 | 70% | 16 | WA |
| 1344 | K1 Bayamon 13-9 | 1937 | 18-2 | 90% | 13 | PR |
| 1345 | PSVC 15-Jay | 1937 | 36-19 | 65% | 15 | SC |
| 1346 | HPSTL 16-Orange | 1936 | 47-30 | 61% | 16 | MO |
| 1347 | Elevation 17 Peak | 1936 | 30-23 | 57% | 17 | CO |
| 1348 | AZ EVJ 18 Elite | 1936 | 41-19 | 68% | 18 | AZ |
| 1349 | Miami Hype 12-Power | 1936 | 53-14 | 79% | 12 | FL |
| 1350 | Metro Volleyball Club 16-National | 1935 | 43-25 | 61% | 16 | DC |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.