Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 27 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1301 WPVC 14-Armour orange 1943 64-24 73% 14 FL
1302 EXCEL 13-National white 1942 31-14 67% 13 TX
1303 KIVA 13-White 1942 52-25 68% 13 KY
1304 MKE Sting 12-Gold 1942 49-24 67% 12 WI
1305 Ozark Juniors 16-Elite 1942 53-18 73% 16 AR
1306 EXCEL 10-Cam 1942 37-10 77% 10 TX
1307 DN 17-Red 1942 9-1 90% 17 TX
1308 No Coast 17-Tsunami 1942 35-20 64% 17 MO
1309 Premier 15-Black t 1942 28-15 65% 15 TX
1310 MJVA 15-1 1942 9-7 56% 15 TN
1311 Rockwood Thunder 18 Navy 1941 54-18 74% 18 MO
1312 NPJ Salem 15 National 1941 39-34 53% 15 OR
1313 Alamo 15-Elite 1 1941 56-22 72% 15 TX
1314 Aspire NW 16-1 empire 1941 30-27 53% 16 OR
1315 Aces 14-S 1941 31-5 78% 14 MT
1316 ID Crush 12-Bower 1941 32-9 74% 12 ID
1317 A5 West 17-Tim 1940 46-23 67% 17 GA
1318 Mem Metro 16-Elite blk 1940 53-26 67% 16 TN
1319 Jupiter Elite 14-E 1940 37-29 56% 14 FL
1320 Rising Tide 16-S breakers 1940 28-31 47% 16 SC
1321 VAQUE 16-1 1940 6-2 75% 16 PR
1322 CNVKC Mizuno 17-Coach ib 1940 43-18 70% 17 MO
1323 EMV 12-Black brit/chris 1939 19-4 83% 12 TX
1324 HP South 12 Premier 1939 54-13 81% 12 MO
1325 FC Elite 18 Elite 1939 24-35 41% 18 WI
1326 AZ EVJ 17 Elite 1939 44-31 59% 17 AZ
1327 FaR Out 13-Black 1939 51-37 58% 13 MI
1328 KC Voltage 17-1 1939 39-20 66% 17 MO
1329 Elite 16-National nancy 1939 36-21 63% 16 FL
1330 NVA 15-Premier willie 1938 61-23 73% 15 FL
1331 Aspire NW 15-1 empire 1938 31-19 62% 15 OR
1332 Impact 18-Carrie 1938 32-6 84% 18 MI
1333 1United 16-N white 1938 42-20 66% 16 TX
1334 TPV 17-Maverick 1938 33-35 49% 17 TN
1335 Platform 14-Adidas 1938 58-18 74% 14 IA
1336 Pgh Elite 15-Elite 1938 36-28 56% 15 PA
1337 Sideout Sports Volleyball Club 16-N cooper 1938 38-13 75% 16 NJ
1338 Active 14-Red 1938 49-10 83% 14 VA
1339 Skyline 14-White iv 1937 41-20 65% 14 TX
1340 Big Sky 14 Westside 1937 41-13 73% 14 MT
1341 Drive Nation 13-Red 1937 16-9 64% 13 TX
1342 VCN 16-Black 1937 14-4 78% 16 NE
1343 PSVBA 16-Legacy 1 1937 57-25 70% 16 WA
1344 K1 Bayamon 13-9 1937 18-2 90% 13 PR
1345 PSVC 15-Jay 1937 36-19 65% 15 SC
1346 HPSTL 16-Orange 1936 47-30 61% 16 MO
1347 Elevation 17 Peak 1936 30-23 57% 17 CO
1348 AZ EVJ 18 Elite 1936 41-19 68% 18 AZ
1349 Miami Hype 12-Power 1936 53-14 79% 12 FL
1350 Metro Volleyball Club 16-National 1935 43-25 61% 16 DC
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.