Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 515 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
25701 Tri-Star 17-1 1454 2-5 29% 17 TN
25702 Mesa Juniors VBCO 15-Teal 1454 1-2 33% 15 CO
25703 Stewie 11-Blue 1454 7-7 50% 11 MN
25704 Iowa Impact 10-Reg 1454 1-2 33% 10 IA
25705 BWVC 16-Mizuno elite 1454 22-22 50% 16 FL
25706 Ultimate 13-Black 1454 21-12 64% 13 IL
25707 Wisconsin Elite 14-White 1454 20-18 53% 14 WI
25708 Mass Premier 12-1 1454 12-13 48% 12 MA
25709 RVC 15-Silver 1454 15-31 31% 15 TX
25710 CCCVB 17-1 1454 3-3 50% 17 NE
25711 208 14-Az 1454 4-6 40% 14 ID
25712 OVC 14-2 1454 14-16 45% 14 MO
25713 High Line 18-Renegades 1454 18-18 45% 18 PA
25714 WKVC 12-Hannah 1454 10-9 53% 12 KY
25715 MHS 17-1 1454 3-7 30% 17 NM
25716 Eclipse Volleyball Club 16 EVC Gray 1454 5-5 50% 16
25717 MJVA 12-National black 1454 15-22 39% 12 TN
25718 Club Phoenix VB - MO 17-1 1454 1-1 25% 17 MO
25719 Vibe VBC 15-Blue 1454 20-21 49% 15 CA
25720 Mass Impact 15-Sarah 1454 16-14 53% 15 MA
25721 Sideout 12 Elite 1454 14-12 54% 12 FL
25722 PRVC 18-Tessa 1454 12-14 46% 18 WY
25723 Shock 14-Surge 1454 17-22 44% 14 IL
25724 Alliance 15 1454 4-5 44% 15 PA
25725 PRV 14-Julie 1454 15-15 50% 14 SC
25726 H. Prep 10 Mizuno 1454 11-20 35% 10 TX
25727 NCVC 15-Mizuno 1454 16-20 44% 15 CA
25728 JNVBC 15-E black 1454 22-21 51% 15 IA
25729 WC 16-Elite 1454 7-10 37% 16 GA
25730 CID 12-Blue 1454 13-14 48% 12 ID
25731 PDX VB 14-2 red 1454 15-15 47% 14 OR
25732 Mountain View Volleyball Club 12 MVVC Youth G 4/5- Tammie 1454 4-4 50% 12 CA
25733 Ohana 15-National 1454 21-25 44% 15 IA
25734 Premier Volleyball 13 Premier Stingrays (CH) 1454 10-12 45% 13 DE
25735 Nebraska ONE 11-Dominators 1454 5-6 45% 11 NE
25736 Tribe 12-Elite white 1454 16-28 36% 12 FL
25737 Zona VBC 10-R1 1454 6-6 50% 10 AZ
25738 Ohana 15-Girls regional 1454 5-5 50% 15 IA
25739 Vision 11-Regional blue 1454 11-9 46% 11 TX
25740 WF Elite 11-White 1454 6-6 40% 11 TX
25741 Garden Oaks Sprouts 11-Green 1454 4-6 33% 11 TX
25742 NC Intensity 18-Kristin 1454 7-8 47% 18 NC
25743 Guns Up VBC 11-New home 1454 3-3 50% 11 TX
25744 CT STARS 16-S jenna 1454 18-14 56% 16 CT
25745 OptimalVBC 14-1 1454 20-16 56% 14 GA
25746 Tstreet IE 12-Serina 1454 16-19 46% 12 CA
25747 NHVC 15 Legacy 1454 19-19 50% 15 TX
25748 PLVC 14 adidas 1454 18-22 44% 14 MO
25749 Landshark 18-Black 1454 4-9 31% 18 KS
25750 SERVE VBC 12-1 1454 2-2 50% 12 OH
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.