2025-2026 Season — Page 517 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25801 | EuroWay 14-Teal | 1454 | 16-16 | 50% | 14 | TX |
| 25802 | PAV 14-99 | 1454 | 3-5 | 38% | 14 | FL |
| 25803 | AMBITION 16-2 premiere | 1454 | 11-12 | 48% | 16 | WA |
| 25804 | NorthShore 13-Woodland | 1454 | 10-9 | 53% | 13 | OH |
| 25805 | Buckeyefire 13-2 | 1454 | 20-22 | 48% | 13 | OH |
| 25806 | SVA 16-Gen | 1454 | 28-35 | 44% | 16 | WA |
| 25807 | Club Fusion 14-Spark spring | 1454 | 6-6 | 50% | 14 | IL |
| 25808 | CB Elite 12-Red | 1454 | 1-2 | 33% | 12 | WA |
| 25809 | Apex Volleyball Club 16-3 | 1454 | 2-3 | 40% | 16 | MO |
| 25810 | Hāna Hou 16-Nate | 1454 | 8-7 | 42% | 16 | HI |
| 25811 | Miami United 14-Kylee | 1454 | 1-2 | 33% | 14 | FL |
| 25812 | CCV 17 Velocity | 1454 | 13-7 | 65% | 17 | AZ |
| 25813 | SVA 17-1 | 1454 | 4-4 | 50% | 17 | MN |
| 25814 | Club 801 14-Regional mandi | 1454 | 11-27 | 26% | 14 | UT |
| 25815 | Lakeville South 14-Red | 1454 | 14-13 | 52% | 14 | MN |
| 25816 | Sweet Digs 12U Gold | 1454 | 4-6 | 36% | 12 | TX |
| 25817 | NM Cactus 18-N1 | 1453 | 21-15 | 58% | 18 | NM |
| 25818 | Top Select 14-Select | 1453 | 42-30 | 58% | 14 | FL |
| 25819 | FTL 14-Fusion usa-liberty kayla | 1453 | 1-4 | 20% | 14 | FL |
| 25820 | GJ 14-Power | 1453 | 13-17 | 43% | 14 | FL |
| 25821 | Lex United 11 Elite | 1453 | 17-23 | 43% | 11 | KY |
| 25822 | UPVBC 10-Pink | 1453 | 15-18 | 43% | 10 | OK |
| 25823 | OK Charge South 13-2 | 1453 | 15-13 | 54% | 13 | OK |
| 25824 | S-MAQ 16-2 black | 1453 | 9-13 | 41% | 16 | OH |
| 25825 | RP 17-S | 1453 | 4-6 | 40% | 17 | MN |
| 25826 | Texas 512 17-Orange | 1453 | 25-23 | 52% | 17 | TX |
| 25827 | SJVC 12-White | 1453 | 2-4 | 33% | 12 | FL |
| 25828 | Eastlake 14-Lauren | 1453 | 4-3 | 57% | 14 | CA |
| 25829 | Impact Volleyball Club 12-1 | 1453 | 17-21 | 45% | 12 | TX |
| 25830 | Drive Nation 12-Black | 1453 | 12-16 | 40% | 12 | TX |
| 25831 | Impact 15-Purple | 1453 | 14-23 | 38% | 15 | TX |
| 25832 | OK Premier 13-Alani | 1453 | 2-2 | 50% | 13 | OK |
| 25833 | A4 Volley 14-Kortney | 1453 | 14-15 | 48% | 14 | CA |
| 25834 | HEMOLELE 14-99 | 1453 | 3-4 | 43% | 14 | HI |
| 25835 | ABV Flash 13-Sharisse | 1453 | 10-12 | 45% | 13 | CA |
| 25836 | Over The Top Volleyball Club 15-Power | 1453 | 4-8 | 33% | 15 | CA |
| 25837 | Soar VBC 16-Heather | 1453 | 2-2 | 50% | 16 | AL |
| 25838 | CE CENLA 18 | 1453 | 8-8 | 50% | 18 | LA |
| 25839 | TAV South 16-Royal | 1453 | 13-27 | 28% | 16 | TX |
| 25840 | Sun City Flames 15-1 | 1453 | 3-2 | 60% | 15 | TX |
| 25841 | VCNebraska 11-Black | 1453 | 2-3 | 40% | 11 | NE |
| 25842 | ID Impact 14-Tammy | 1453 | 7-12 | 37% | 14 | WA |
| 25843 | Tsunami 12-1n vicki | 1453 | 12-16 | 41% | 12 | GA |
| 25844 | T4 Volleyball 15-G navy | 1453 | 3-3 | 50% | 15 | IL |
| 25845 | City Juniors 14-Red | 1453 | 16-15 | 46% | 14 | TX |
| 25846 | TI Elite 14.3 | 1453 | 36-34 | 51% | 14 | IN |
| 25847 | NK 14-Maroon | 1453 | 5-5 | 50% | 14 | ND |
| 25848 | NK 14-Black | 1453 | 4-5 | 40% | 14 | ND |
| 25849 | LPV 18 | 1453 | 0-3 | 0% | 18 | PR |
| 25850 | SEIVB 14 Thompson | 1453 | 5-6 | 45% | 14 | IN |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.