Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 518 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
25851 Impact Volleyball Club 14-2 1453 20-20 50% 14 TX
25852 Elite Volleyball Teal 13 1453 12-22 32% 13 IA
25853 Ohana 13-Girls national 1453 2-3 40% 13 IA
25854 NJVBC 18-Tsunami 1453 4-6 40% 18 NJ
25855 Starlings 15-Black 1453 2-3 40% 15 NE
25856 Blocksport 15-R 1453 2-2 18% 15 TX
25857 Top Notch Club Volleyball 16-Rodgers 1453 26-23 53% 16 OR
25858 Silverton Bearcats 16-1 1453 22-20 52% 16 OR
25859 MiElite 13-Diamond west 1453 15-10 60% 13 MI
25860 Starlings 14-Black 1453 1-2 20% 14 NE
25861 Blaze 12-Black 1453 2-3 40% 12 IA
25862 FWFIRE 17-2p 1453 3-7 30% 17 TX
25863 Ark Volley 17-Reg plus 1453 27-24 51% 17 AR
25864 1United 10-Regional 1453 7-12 29% 10 TX
25865 Starlights 10-Gold 1453 6-6 50% 10 TX
25866 IPV 18-Hp 1453 30-27 51% 18 IL
25867 CVC 16-Grey 1453 11-10 52% 16 OH
25868 DBQ Insanity 15-1 1453 2-3 40% 15 IA
25869 Tsunami 14-2e jordan 1453 25-25 50% 14 GA
25870 MN Freeze 14-White 1453 8-7 53% 14 MN
25871 FC Elite North 15-S 1453 2-3 40% 15 WI
25872 Zoom 15-1 calvin 1453 13-11 54% 15 KS
25873 Ks Networks Volleyball Club 15-4 1453 3-4 43% 15 KS
25874 West E 17-Black 1453 6-7 46% 17 PA
25875 CNVKC Mizuno 13-Sophia 1453 11-11 50% 13 MO
25876 Drive Nation 13-White 1453 4-6 40% 13 TX
25877 Top Flight 12-Nu sp 1453 2-3 40% 12 IL
25878 Hammerhead 14-Black 1453 11-13 46% 14 MN
25879 Guns Up VBC 13 Plainview 1453 19-19 50% 13 TX
25880 Roadrunner 13-Crimson 1453 8-17 31% 13 TX
25881 Telluride 14-S team 1453 5-6 45% 14 CO
25882 GPA 16-Black 1453 29-32 48% 16 OH
25883 MVC Mean Green 13 1453 22-18 55% 13 TX
25884 Valley Evolution 13 1453 8-15 35% 13 TX
25885 Redlands Renegade 18-1 1453 25-18 58% 18 CA
25886 1W B14-Red 1453 10-7 59% 14 WI
25887 Mustang VB Club 16 1453 3-3 30% 16 NY
25888 AFVBC 12-Everest 1453 22-24 48% 12 CA
25889 E3VB 14 Empower 1453 16-16 50% 14 NM
25890 Iowa One 10-Betsy 1453 4-5 44% 10 IA
25891 Rise 15-1 (OK) 1453 17-24 39% 15 OK
25892 FTL 15-Nuclear andres 1453 15-19 44% 15 FL
25893 PCVC 16-Navy 1453 11-9 55% 16 MT
25894 SVA 12-2 1453 5-3 63% 12 MN
25895 WGVA 10-Kelli 1453 8-6 57% 10 GA
25896 2L 16-1 1453 1-6 14% 16 FL
25897 BOLD 14 1453 2-3 40% 14 TN
25898 NHVB 12-2 1453 5-7 42% 12 MN
25899 Capital Ice 18-Julie 1453 15-14 52% 18 WA
25900 SPVC 14-Katelyn 1453 7-6 44% 14 NV
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.