Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 519 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
25901 InfinitySouth 15-1 1453 13-12 52% 15 LA
25902 Zona VBC 13-R1 1453 12-9 57% 13 AZ
25903 Sand 16-Black 1453 19-23 45% 16 CA
25904 573 Missouri Juniors 15-5 1453 9-3 60% 15 MO
25905 Exodus 16-Cosmos 1453 3-3 50% 16 CA
25906 Dead Frog 14-Jessie 1453 2-3 40% 14 MI
25907 Summit VC 15-Blue 1453 12-15 43% 15 MO
25908 Y Not 15-1 1453 10-14 38% 15 VA
25909 Rancho Valley 16-Select k 1453 7-10 41% 16 CA
25910 Mizuno CNVBC 15-Remy 1453 10-9 53% 15 MO
25911 NNJ 13-Nnvl+ 1453 12-16 43% 13 NV
25912 CVC 16 Teal 1453 25-11 69% 16 AZ
25913 NNJ 17-Justin 1453 27-27 50% 17 NV
25914 KCV 11 REGIONAL 1453 14-27 33% 11 TX
25915 Latitude 41 Volleyball Club 12 12 Silver (OV) 1453 4-4 50% 12 OH
25916 Rocky Elite 13-Express 1453 4-3 57% 13 CO
25917 Amplify 18-Black 1453 7-4 64% 18 CA
25918 Enspire 18-Tony 1453 31-23 57% 18 CA
25919 Unity Volleyball Club 15 Unity Resilience 1453 2-3 40% 15 MA
25920 Thunder VBC 18-Black 1453 2-2 50% 18 IA
25921 AVA 17-Molly 1453 6-22 21% 17 FL
25922 Titans 13 1453 11-10 46% 13 VA
25923 Emerald Rain 14 Premier 1453 30-32 48% 14 WA
25924 Asphalt Green VBC 18-1 1453 1-2 33% 18 NY
25925 SIVBA 18-Black 1453 16-17 44% 18 MO
25926 Exodus 17-Levi 1453 17-16 52% 17 CA
25927 AYOSA 17-Royal 1453 8-9 47% 17 CO
25928 Spartan Club 12 1453 3-4 38% 12 UT
25929 Goldenwest 15-Tower zero 1453 19-22 46% 15 CA
25930 Metro Heat Volleyball Club G18-1 1453 3-2 60% 18 MO
25931 PVA Select 16-1 1453 5-2 71% 16 KS
25932 Fresno Heat HEAT 15-National junior 1453 2-6 25% 15 NV
25933 Big Sky 14-4 1453 18-14 49% 14 MT
25934 Tamales 18-1 1453 10-9 53% 18 MO
25935 M2 Volleyball 15-N2 1453 28-16 64% 15 GA
25936 RUSH T 15-Black 1453 3-5 38% 15 NV
25937 Santa Monica 14-Adidas premier 1453 13-17 43% 14 CA
25938 Venom Athletics 17 1453 14-17 44% 17 MD
25939 Madison Starlings 15-blue 1453 14-9 56% 15 WI
25940 WI Juniors 15-Elite 1453 98-118 45% 15 WI
25941 PAEVA 14-Black 1453 10-11 48% 14 PA
25942 Topeka Elite 11-1 1453 2-2 50% 11 KS
25943 Ignite 13-Red 1453 25-40 37% 13 WA
25944 Cajun Elite 15 Meredith 1453 18-16 53% 15 LA
25945 MiElite 16-Ns north 1453 14-17 45% 16 MI
25946 HI Bred 16-Purple 1453 7-5 44% 16 HI
25947 FRST VOLLEYBALL 14-1 pink 1453 13-22 37% 14 TX
25948 Niagara Athletics Volleyball Club 14 Athletics ALLIANCE (CA) 1453 2-3 40% 14
25949 Maya Voll 15 Maya Voll 1452 2-3 40% 15
25950 Pure Aloha 14-Girls 1452 10-10 50% 14 HI
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.