Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 520 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
25951 JAG VBC 15-5 1452 2-2 50% 15 WI
25952 South Shore Slam 15-Lime 1452 12-19 39% 15 WI
25953 West Shore YMCA 13-Blue 1452 2-3 40% 13 PA
25954 BEVC Kryptonite 14-Black 1452 12-14 46% 14 NC
25955 SLPVC 14-1 1452 5-7 42% 14 IN
25956 M2 Volleyball 14-N2 1452 28-27 51% 14 GA
25957 C2 14-3 regional orange gary 1452 9-10 47% 14 TN
25958 Local Girl 13 Navy 1452 19-19 50% 13 SC
25959 POVBC 16-1 1452 2-3 40% 16 OH
25960 Millennium 16-Minor 1452 18-18 50% 16 OH
25961 RCVC 13-1 1452 10-8 53% 13 AL
25962 EXCEL 10-Sofia 1452 13-17 42% 10 TX
25963 TAV Houston 10-Royal 1452 11-14 44% 10 TX
25964 Club 1 16-White 1452 22-22 50% 16 IL
25965 IVC 16 Regional 1452 9-12 43% 16 AK
25966 Carolina Vibe 18 Annette 1452 15-9 63% 18 NC
25967 JCVC 13-B 1452 13-16 45% 13 TN
25968 Illini Elite 11-Jessica 1452 4-10 29% 11 IL
25969 MVA 13-Oscar 1452 28-34 45% 13 FL
25970 Shelby Elite Volleyball Club 16-1 1452 7-8 47% 16 IN
25971 MiElite 17-National west 1452 15-37 29% 17 MI
25972 Royal Legends 14-Blue 1452 19-26 42% 14 PA
25973 Central Kansas Rampage 11-1 1452 3-7 25% 11 KS
25974 BVC GU 15 1452 7-7 50% 15 NJ
25975 PR Juniors 17-1 1452 3-2 60% 17 MN
25976 Texas Charm Volleyball 16-Pink 1452 1-2 33% 16 TX
25977 Blaze 14-1 1452 2-6 25% 14 IA
25978 DIG 14-Red 1452 14-15 44% 14 TX
25979 MN North 15-1 red 1452 33-41 45% 15 MN
25980 Johnston 16-National 1452 13-15 43% 16 IA
25981 Iowa United 13-1 premier 1452 12-17 39% 13 IA
25982 Hammerin Hawks 13-1 1452 1-2 25% 13 IA
25983 ENG Volleyball 12-1 1452 3-2 60% 12 TN
25984 GVA 12-Grey 1452 7-7 50% 12 PR
25985 LVC 18-1 1452 3-5 38% 18 SK
25986 Elite Alliance 11-1 1452 1-2 25% 11 SD
25987 Club Ace Long Island 13-Gold north 1452 12-15 44% 13 NY
25988 Iowa Alliance 12-Pink 1452 3-5 33% 12 IA
25989 Onondaga Volleyball Club 13 Onondaga Tsunami 1452 8-8 44% 13 NY
25990 TEJAS 15-Red julian 1452 19-25 40% 15 TX
25991 VALLEY VENOM - 13-1 red 1452 9-15 38% 13 TX
25992 VUVC 16-Red 1452 21-21 47% 16 NV
25993 Next Level 16-Hinahina 1452 20-19 51% 16 NV
25994 Wisconsin Elite 16-White 1452 22-16 58% 16 WI
25995 Rise MKE VBC 16 RiseMKEVBC16's National 1452 31-20 60% 16 WI
25996 London Elite 15-Black 1452 3-5 38% 15 OH
25997 HEAT 14 ELITE 1452 59-63 48% 14 OK
25998 MVIce 17-P lexi 1452 0-7 0% 17 UT
25999 AP 11 Baden 1452 14-20 41% 11 TX
26000 T4VBC 11-Silver 1452 1-2 33% 11 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.