2025-2026 Season — Page 521 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26001 | Club Fusion 12 Royal | 1452 | 17-19 | 47% | 12 | IL |
| 26002 | ESVBC 18-Spartans local | 1452 | 15-10 | 60% | 18 | IA |
| 26003 | Central Noble 13-Cougars | 1452 | 1-2 | 33% | 13 | IN |
| 26004 | NCWVBC 16-4 white | 1452 | 8-11 | 42% | 16 | WA |
| 26005 | 630 Volleyball 12-Black | 1452 | 7-11 | 39% | 12 | IL |
| 26006 | PowerPlex Iowa Heart 15-Red | 1452 | 2-3 | 40% | 15 | IA |
| 26007 | SFVC 16-1 | 1452 | 5-3 | 63% | 16 | FL |
| 26008 | Golden State 15-Black | 1452 | 11-16 | 41% | 15 | CA |
| 26009 | TEV 16-Holly/annie | 1452 | 15-16 | 48% | 16 | TN |
| 26010 | City Beach 15-Green | 1452 | 31-31 | 50% | 15 | CA |
| 26011 | FoothillVBC 15-Red | 1452 | 19-32 | 37% | 15 | CA |
| 26012 | Kansas Volleyball Club 13-2 | 1452 | 3-4 | 43% | 13 | KS |
| 26013 | TriCounty ATTACK Volleyball Club 16-1 | 1452 | 10-14 | 42% | 16 | NJ |
| 26014 | Attack 12-Black spring | 1452 | 3-7 | 25% | 12 | IL |
| 26015 | Dynamix 16-Purple | 1452 | 9-14 | 39% | 16 | CA |
| 26016 | ESA 14-Black | 1452 | 11-16 | 41% | 14 | NV |
| 26017 | Venom Dynasty 18 | 1452 | 1-4 | 20% | 18 | FL |
| 26018 | NASA 12-White bre | 1452 | 9-15 | 38% | 12 | AL |
| 26019 | Vibe 14-Premier | 1452 | 11-12 | 41% | 14 | VT |
| 26020 | WBVBC 14-2 carliegh | 1452 | 11-24 | 31% | 14 | OH |
| 26021 | MVP 17-Yellow | 1452 | 1-3 | 25% | 17 | OH |
| 26022 | PVA 12-Gray | 1452 | 2-3 | 40% | 12 | MO |
| 26023 | G3 13-National christina | 1452 | 25-33 | 42% | 13 | MO |
| 26024 | Vortex 18-Joe | 1452 | 19-17 | 50% | 18 | UT |
| 26025 | Lakeville South 12-White | 1452 | 3-7 | 30% | 12 | MN |
| 26026 | Next Rev VB 18 Royal | 1452 | 18-16 | 53% | 18 | VA |
| 26027 | Notorious 18-Adam/leo | 1452 | 14-13 | 52% | 18 | CA |
| 26028 | Evolve 18-Red | 1452 | 12-10 | 55% | 18 | CA |
| 26029 | Mana Toa 14-2 | 1452 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | AL |
| 26030 | Prime 18 PRIME | 1452 | 3-4 | 43% | 18 | |
| 26031 | Ridgeland Reds-Red 18 | 1452 | 9-10 | 47% | 18 | WI |
| 26032 | Epic 14-Slate | 1452 | 13-10 | 54% | 14 | WI |
| 26033 | RVA G14-White | 1452 | 29-27 | 52% | 14 | WI |
| 26034 | Phoenix Rising 17 Jess | 1452 | 13-16 | 45% | 17 | TN |
| 26035 | HVVC 13-Silver | 1452 | 3-2 | 60% | 13 | MI |
| 26036 | SAV 12-Black | 1452 | 7-10 | 41% | 12 | FL |
| 26037 | LI Surge Volleyball Club 14-Premier white | 1452 | 2-3 | 40% | 14 | NY |
| 26038 | CALI 14-Gold south | 1452 | 18-22 | 45% | 14 | NY |
| 26039 | FSVC 12 NATIONAL | 1452 | 27-18 | 60% | 12 | FL |
| 26040 | 360 15-Kaos white | 1452 | 17-15 | 47% | 15 | NV |
| 26041 | S4C 15-Red | 1452 | 12-5 | 71% | 15 | AZ |
| 26042 | Academy West 14-Hp-2 | 1452 | 18-30 | 38% | 14 | CA |
| 26043 | IMUA UVC 14-Aqua | 1452 | 12-16 | 43% | 14 | CA |
| 26044 | Dig It 14 | 1452 | 4-4 | 50% | 14 | CA |
| 26045 | Ace 15-1 nicole | 1452 | 7-15 | 32% | 15 | AK |
| 26046 | MGA 15-South | 1452 | 25-20 | 56% | 15 | MA |
| 26047 | VVA 13-Berdak | 1452 | 16-21 | 43% | 13 | CA |
| 26048 | MVVC G 13-Pink | 1452 | 17-22 | 44% | 13 | CA |
| 26049 | BAVA 15 Cyclones | 1452 | 23-27 | 43% | 15 | MD |
| 26050 | BEVBC 15-Black | 1452 | 29-30 | 46% | 15 | MD |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.