Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 521 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
26001 Club Fusion 12 Royal 1452 17-19 47% 12 IL
26002 ESVBC 18-Spartans local 1452 15-10 60% 18 IA
26003 Central Noble 13-Cougars 1452 1-2 33% 13 IN
26004 NCWVBC 16-4 white 1452 8-11 42% 16 WA
26005 630 Volleyball 12-Black 1452 7-11 39% 12 IL
26006 PowerPlex Iowa Heart 15-Red 1452 2-3 40% 15 IA
26007 SFVC 16-1 1452 5-3 63% 16 FL
26008 Golden State 15-Black 1452 11-16 41% 15 CA
26009 TEV 16-Holly/annie 1452 15-16 48% 16 TN
26010 City Beach 15-Green 1452 31-31 50% 15 CA
26011 FoothillVBC 15-Red 1452 19-32 37% 15 CA
26012 Kansas Volleyball Club 13-2 1452 3-4 43% 13 KS
26013 TriCounty ATTACK Volleyball Club 16-1 1452 10-14 42% 16 NJ
26014 Attack 12-Black spring 1452 3-7 25% 12 IL
26015 Dynamix 16-Purple 1452 9-14 39% 16 CA
26016 ESA 14-Black 1452 11-16 41% 14 NV
26017 Venom Dynasty 18 1452 1-4 20% 18 FL
26018 NASA 12-White bre 1452 9-15 38% 12 AL
26019 Vibe 14-Premier 1452 11-12 41% 14 VT
26020 WBVBC 14-2 carliegh 1452 11-24 31% 14 OH
26021 MVP 17-Yellow 1452 1-3 25% 17 OH
26022 PVA 12-Gray 1452 2-3 40% 12 MO
26023 G3 13-National christina 1452 25-33 42% 13 MO
26024 Vortex 18-Joe 1452 19-17 50% 18 UT
26025 Lakeville South 12-White 1452 3-7 30% 12 MN
26026 Next Rev VB 18 Royal 1452 18-16 53% 18 VA
26027 Notorious 18-Adam/leo 1452 14-13 52% 18 CA
26028 Evolve 18-Red 1452 12-10 55% 18 CA
26029 Mana Toa 14-2 1452 2-3 40% 14 AL
26030 Prime 18 PRIME 1452 3-4 43% 18
26031 Ridgeland Reds-Red 18 1452 9-10 47% 18 WI
26032 Epic 14-Slate 1452 13-10 54% 14 WI
26033 RVA G14-White 1452 29-27 52% 14 WI
26034 Phoenix Rising 17 Jess 1452 13-16 45% 17 TN
26035 HVVC 13-Silver 1452 3-2 60% 13 MI
26036 SAV 12-Black 1452 7-10 41% 12 FL
26037 LI Surge Volleyball Club 14-Premier white 1452 2-3 40% 14 NY
26038 CALI 14-Gold south 1452 18-22 45% 14 NY
26039 FSVC 12 NATIONAL 1452 27-18 60% 12 FL
26040 360 15-Kaos white 1452 17-15 47% 15 NV
26041 S4C 15-Red 1452 12-5 71% 15 AZ
26042 Academy West 14-Hp-2 1452 18-30 38% 14 CA
26043 IMUA UVC 14-Aqua 1452 12-16 43% 14 CA
26044 Dig It 14 1452 4-4 50% 14 CA
26045 Ace 15-1 nicole 1452 7-15 32% 15 AK
26046 MGA 15-South 1452 25-20 56% 15 MA
26047 VVA 13-Berdak 1452 16-21 43% 13 CA
26048 MVVC G 13-Pink 1452 17-22 44% 13 CA
26049 BAVA 15 Cyclones 1452 23-27 43% 15 MD
26050 BEVBC 15-Black 1452 29-30 46% 15 MD
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.