Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 144 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
7151 ROCK Volleyball 15-Sky 1672 37-37 50% 15 PA
7152 Braves CVC 16-Bleu 1672 4-3 57% 16 FL
7153 Shockwave 13-Black 1672 10-5 67% 13 KS
7154 Net Force Volleyball Club 13 Net Force Surge (IA) 1672 12-2 80% 13 IA
7155 CHiX 17-PiNK 1672 37-31 54% 17 OH
7156 SUPERIOR 12-Adidas 1672 30-8 77% 12 TX
7157 RVC Redeem 16-1 1672 16-12 57% 16 OH
7158 SCVB 15 Mike 1672 26-16 62% 15 CA
7159 ProPlay 13-Zoe/bri 1672 25-15 63% 13 CA
7160 CJV 15-National 1672 31-17 65% 15 AR
7161 Junior Mints 10-Navy 1672 15-4 79% 10 TX
7162 COLAVOL 14-Black 1672 25-10 71% 14 GA
7163 Synergy 15 Potassium 1672 44-23 66% 15 PA
7164 CBS Volleyball 15-U female 1672 8-1 89% 15
7165 SUVA 12-2 1672 6-0 100% 12 OH
7166 Alamo 16-Gold 1 1672 32-11 71% 16 TX
7167 LHVA 13-Purple travel 1671 29-7 81% 13 NY
7168 Shonto Starlings 15-S 1671 7-0 88% 15 AZ
7169 BVC 12-1 michael 1671 5-0 100% 12 AL
7170 Iron VC 15-1 1671 13-2 87% 15 AL
7171 A-10 Gray 18-Girls 1671 61-33 65% 18 PA
7172 Roots 14-2 blue 1671 34-22 61% 14 TX
7173 VOLT 14-Black 1671 38-16 70% 14 ND
7174 Moorhead Juniors 14-1 1671 19-6 73% 14 ND
7175 Mintonette Sports 18-2 1671 21-31 40% 18 OH
7176 LA Diggers 14-Purple 1671 19-7 73% 14 MN
7177 LEGACY 14-Elite bella 1671 36-26 58% 14 FL
7178 Las Vegas VolleyStars 14 Vegas VolleyStars (SC) 1671 8-6 57% 14 CA
7179 NORCO 14-Blue 1671 30-22 58% 14 CO
7180 Air VBC 14 National 1671 34-13 72% 14 WI
7181 Oasis 14-National 1671 25-12 68% 14 CA
7182 AZ EVJ 14-Navy 1671 36-15 71% 14 AZ
7183 Silverton Bearcats 14-1 1671 26-6 76% 14 OR
7184 KPV 16-Pink-brooke 1671 24-30 44% 16 KY
7185 ForceVC 15-2 1671 25-15 63% 15 OH
7186 PCVC 16 Nalu 1671 30-16 65% 16 CA
7187 Pursuit 13-National 1671 18-13 58% 13 MO
7188 NDVBC Shockwave 13 1671 34-8 79% 13 MO
7189 Cadets 12-C 1671 25-7 78% 12 IN
7190 Prior Lake Extreme 11-1 1671 19-5 79% 11 MN
7191 HPSTL 10 Royal 1671 32-12 68% 10 MO
7192 Shockwave 15-Gold 1671 9-5 64% 15 KS
7193 Alamo 15-Elite 2 1671 36-27 57% 15 TX
7194 573 Missouri Juniors 15-3 1671 4-1 36% 15 MO
7195 Elevation 17-Timberline black 1671 33-25 57% 17 CO
7196 Tri-State Elite 12-Gray 1671 23-10 70% 12 KY
7197 BAVC 11-1 royals 1671 32-13 70% 11 OK
7198 National 17-1 1671 5-3 63% 17 MA
7199 CLUB 43 12-2 1671 22-7 76% 12 MN
7200 Illini Elite 15-L red 1671 23-9 72% 15 IL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.