Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 144 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
7151 H Skyline TW 15-Royal 1672 3-5 38% 15
7152 Northern Lights 12-2 1672 40-22 65% 12 MN
7153 LES 13-Layken 1671 19-6 76% 13
7154 WEVBC 17-1 1671 18-12 60% 17
7155 TFVBC 14-1 1671 18-11 62% 14
7156 HPSTL 10 Royal 1671 32-12 68% 10 MO
7157 1United 10-N blue 1671 28-17 57% 10 TX
7158 913Athletics 15-National-d 1671 27-23 54% 15 KS
7159 Ignite AZ 15-National 1 1671 34-30 53% 15 AZ
7160 Juggernaut 18-National1 1671 24-18 57% 18 CO
7161 Elite Alliance 14-1 1671 26-14 65% 14 SD
7162 Jr Vikings 11-Blue 1671 14-4 78% 11 WI
7163 BAVC 11-1 royals 1671 32-13 70% 11 CA
7164 K2 18 Redbacks 1671 27-11 71% 18 TN
7165 APVA 15 Capybara 1671 23-13 64% 15 TN
7166 Chi City Elite 17-1 1671 25-31 45% 17 IL
7167 Colorado Elite 16 Grizzly 1671 32-31 51% 16 CO
7168 DSVC 13 NATIONAL 1671 30-19 61% 13 AL
7169 MAVA 12-Elite 1671 48-16 75% 12 KY
7170 HOVA 17-A red elite 1671 27-10 73% 17 OH
7171 Boss CLE 17-1 1671 34-23 60% 17 OH
7172 NIVA 15 SILVER 1671 33-11 75% 15 IN
7173 Momentum 13-Reven 1671 18-14 56% 13 CO
7174 ProPlay 13-Zoe/bri 1671 25-15 63% 13 CA
7175 SOINE 12-1 1671 23-12 66% 12 KY
7176 Rockwood Thunder 13-Black 1671 39-18 68% 13 MO
7177 Sanford Sports 15-Black 1671 48-24 67% 15 SD
7178 SERV 12 Select 1671 36-11 77% 12 VA
7179 TEV 16-Carley/brittany 1671 24-14 63% 16 TN
7180 Triangle 14-White 1671 35-31 53% 14 NC
7181 XP 13-Elite 1 1671 27-18 60% 13 IL
7182 949 G15-Black 1671 24-23 51% 15 CA
7183 CCVA 14-Elite 1671 16-8 67% 14 CA
7184 SC Legends 14-Nike 1671 20-15 57% 14 CA
7185 SC Legends 12-Nike 1671 35-16 69% 12 CA
7186 BOKEY VA 15-Orange 1671 19-16 54% 15 FL
7187 NYC Juniors 14-Brooklyn 1671 21-11 66% 14 NY
7188 DIG 13-Black - lindsey 1671 26-14 60% 13 TX
7189 NSSC 17-Black 1671 32-13 68% 17 MO
7190 Allegro 14-Awesome 1671 46-12 79% 14 NJ
7191 Ducks Volleyball Club 15-1 bryan 1671 8-1 89% 15
7192 Mizuno Northern Lights 16-W 1671 5-1 83% 16
7193 Braves CVC 16-Bleu 1671 4-3 57% 16
7194 Mhvc 16-2 1671 22-5 81% 16 CA
7195 NorCal Supreme 18-Blue 1671 36-15 71% 18 CA
7196 Nova 16-Purple 1671 52-20 72% 16 FL
7197 ACAD 14-Red 1671 20-30 40% 14 NY
7198 C1VB 16-Elite skylar 1671 25-13 66% 16 SC
7199 FCVBC 17-1 1670 15-6 71% 17
7200 Cadets 12-C 1670 25-7 78% 12
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.