2025-2026 Season — Page 144 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7151 | H Skyline TW 15-Royal | 1672 | 3-5 | 38% | 15 | |
| 7152 | Northern Lights 12-2 | 1672 | 40-22 | 65% | 12 | MN |
| 7153 | LES 13-Layken | 1671 | 19-6 | 76% | 13 | |
| 7154 | WEVBC 17-1 | 1671 | 18-12 | 60% | 17 | |
| 7155 | TFVBC 14-1 | 1671 | 18-11 | 62% | 14 | |
| 7156 | HPSTL 10 Royal | 1671 | 32-12 | 68% | 10 | MO |
| 7157 | 1United 10-N blue | 1671 | 28-17 | 57% | 10 | TX |
| 7158 | 913Athletics 15-National-d | 1671 | 27-23 | 54% | 15 | KS |
| 7159 | Ignite AZ 15-National 1 | 1671 | 34-30 | 53% | 15 | AZ |
| 7160 | Juggernaut 18-National1 | 1671 | 24-18 | 57% | 18 | CO |
| 7161 | Elite Alliance 14-1 | 1671 | 26-14 | 65% | 14 | SD |
| 7162 | Jr Vikings 11-Blue | 1671 | 14-4 | 78% | 11 | WI |
| 7163 | BAVC 11-1 royals | 1671 | 32-13 | 70% | 11 | CA |
| 7164 | K2 18 Redbacks | 1671 | 27-11 | 71% | 18 | TN |
| 7165 | APVA 15 Capybara | 1671 | 23-13 | 64% | 15 | TN |
| 7166 | Chi City Elite 17-1 | 1671 | 25-31 | 45% | 17 | IL |
| 7167 | Colorado Elite 16 Grizzly | 1671 | 32-31 | 51% | 16 | CO |
| 7168 | DSVC 13 NATIONAL | 1671 | 30-19 | 61% | 13 | AL |
| 7169 | MAVA 12-Elite | 1671 | 48-16 | 75% | 12 | KY |
| 7170 | HOVA 17-A red elite | 1671 | 27-10 | 73% | 17 | OH |
| 7171 | Boss CLE 17-1 | 1671 | 34-23 | 60% | 17 | OH |
| 7172 | NIVA 15 SILVER | 1671 | 33-11 | 75% | 15 | IN |
| 7173 | Momentum 13-Reven | 1671 | 18-14 | 56% | 13 | CO |
| 7174 | ProPlay 13-Zoe/bri | 1671 | 25-15 | 63% | 13 | CA |
| 7175 | SOINE 12-1 | 1671 | 23-12 | 66% | 12 | KY |
| 7176 | Rockwood Thunder 13-Black | 1671 | 39-18 | 68% | 13 | MO |
| 7177 | Sanford Sports 15-Black | 1671 | 48-24 | 67% | 15 | SD |
| 7178 | SERV 12 Select | 1671 | 36-11 | 77% | 12 | VA |
| 7179 | TEV 16-Carley/brittany | 1671 | 24-14 | 63% | 16 | TN |
| 7180 | Triangle 14-White | 1671 | 35-31 | 53% | 14 | NC |
| 7181 | XP 13-Elite 1 | 1671 | 27-18 | 60% | 13 | IL |
| 7182 | 949 G15-Black | 1671 | 24-23 | 51% | 15 | CA |
| 7183 | CCVA 14-Elite | 1671 | 16-8 | 67% | 14 | CA |
| 7184 | SC Legends 14-Nike | 1671 | 20-15 | 57% | 14 | CA |
| 7185 | SC Legends 12-Nike | 1671 | 35-16 | 69% | 12 | CA |
| 7186 | BOKEY VA 15-Orange | 1671 | 19-16 | 54% | 15 | FL |
| 7187 | NYC Juniors 14-Brooklyn | 1671 | 21-11 | 66% | 14 | NY |
| 7188 | DIG 13-Black - lindsey | 1671 | 26-14 | 60% | 13 | TX |
| 7189 | NSSC 17-Black | 1671 | 32-13 | 68% | 17 | MO |
| 7190 | Allegro 14-Awesome | 1671 | 46-12 | 79% | 14 | NJ |
| 7191 | Ducks Volleyball Club 15-1 bryan | 1671 | 8-1 | 89% | 15 | |
| 7192 | Mizuno Northern Lights 16-W | 1671 | 5-1 | 83% | 16 | |
| 7193 | Braves CVC 16-Bleu | 1671 | 4-3 | 57% | 16 | |
| 7194 | Mhvc 16-2 | 1671 | 22-5 | 81% | 16 | CA |
| 7195 | NorCal Supreme 18-Blue | 1671 | 36-15 | 71% | 18 | CA |
| 7196 | Nova 16-Purple | 1671 | 52-20 | 72% | 16 | FL |
| 7197 | ACAD 14-Red | 1671 | 20-30 | 40% | 14 | NY |
| 7198 | C1VB 16-Elite skylar | 1671 | 25-13 | 66% | 16 | SC |
| 7199 | FCVBC 17-1 | 1670 | 15-6 | 71% | 17 | |
| 7200 | Cadets 12-C | 1670 | 25-7 | 78% | 12 |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.