Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 145 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
7201 Dinamite 16-Casey 1671 23-10 70% 16 CA
7202 HNL Volleyball 15-Black 1671 5-5 50% 15 HI
7203 ATHENA VB 15-2 black national 1671 41-36 53% 15 OR
7204 MIDTN Volleyball 16-Blue 1671 34-21 62% 16 TN
7205 Bonneville Volleyball Club 15-Kiley 1671 4-2 67% 15 UT
7206 MPV 16-National black 1671 28-18 61% 16 UT
7207 SOINE 12-1 1671 23-12 66% 12 KY
7208 NWI Premier 15-Black 1671 22-9 71% 15 IA
7209 Vision 11-Blue 1671 35-20 64% 11 CA
7210 Ducks Volleyball Club 15-1 bryan 1671 8-1 89% 15
7211 Texas Elite 17-Gold 1670 14-4 78% 17 TX
7212 TNT 15-Shockwave 1670 13-2 87% 15 MA
7213 Attack VBC 13-Elite 1670 34-11 76% 13 MI
7214 Mhvc 16-2 1670 22-5 81% 16 CA
7215 Maks 13 1670 7-1 88% 13 ID
7216 FaR Out 14-White 1670 36-8 82% 14 MI
7217 Left Coast Volleyball Club 12-Black 1670 20-7 74% 12 CA
7218 MAVA 12-Elite 1670 48-16 75% 12 KY
7219 Coastal 14-National 1670 34-16 67% 14 MA
7220 Club Four 14-Select 1670 17-4 81% 14 MO
7221 EVOLUTION BLACK 14 1670 8-1 80% 14 IA
7222 Galaxy 18 Patrick 1670 21-9 70% 18 NC
7223 Keweenaw VBC 14-Black 1670 13-6 68% 14 WI
7224 Crank It 14-Black 1670 31-8 79% 14 MI
7225 NorCal Supreme 18-Blue 1670 36-15 71% 18 CA
7226 MAVA 18-Select 1670 23-27 46% 18 KY
7227 Elite Alliance Volleyball Club 14-1 1670 26-14 65% 14 SD
7228 OT 18-T cade 1670 33-16 67% 18 FL
7229 G3VB 14-1 1670 24-18 57% 14 OR
7230 ENVY 16-National 1670 34-28 55% 16 RI
7231 Core STL 13-Navy 1670 33-25 56% 13 MO
7232 JVC 12-Gold 1670 11-5 65% 12 IN
7233 Pono 14-1 annette 1670 20-22 45% 14 NV
7234 Solon Spartans 11-Black 1670 6-0 100% 11 IA
7235 1United 10-N blue 1670 28-17 57% 10 TX
7236 HVVC 15-Blue 1670 37-21 64% 15 MI
7237 TNT 16-Starstruck 1670 17-29 37% 16 PA
7238 Summit 14-Blue elite 1670 21-30 41% 14 IN
7239 Team Pineapple 12-Black 1670 33-14 70% 12 IN
7240 Nova 16-Purple 1670 52-20 72% 16 AZ
7241 Club V 17-Nicole 1670 17-23 43% 17 UT
7242 SI Wave 15-Black 1670 32-12 73% 15 MO
7243 Alexandria Volleyball Club, MN 16-1 1670 21-9 70% 16 MN
7244 SDVBC 14-Ari 1670 17-24 41% 14 CA
7245 MADFROG 13-Elite green 1670 4-6 40% 13 TX
7246 KC Power 14-3 1670 24-14 60% 14 KS
7247 Rise 15-1 (LA) 1670 5-2 71% 15 LA
7248 Circle City 13-White 1670 45-20 69% 13 IN
7249 MVA 13-Natalia 1670 38-30 56% 13 FL
7250 VVB 16-Austin 1670 34-20 63% 16 GA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.