2025-2026 Season — Page 145 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7201 | Dinamite 16-Casey | 1671 | 23-10 | 70% | 16 | CA |
| 7202 | HNL Volleyball 15-Black | 1671 | 5-5 | 50% | 15 | HI |
| 7203 | ATHENA VB 15-2 black national | 1671 | 41-36 | 53% | 15 | OR |
| 7204 | MIDTN Volleyball 16-Blue | 1671 | 34-21 | 62% | 16 | TN |
| 7205 | Bonneville Volleyball Club 15-Kiley | 1671 | 4-2 | 67% | 15 | UT |
| 7206 | MPV 16-National black | 1671 | 28-18 | 61% | 16 | UT |
| 7207 | SOINE 12-1 | 1671 | 23-12 | 66% | 12 | KY |
| 7208 | NWI Premier 15-Black | 1671 | 22-9 | 71% | 15 | IA |
| 7209 | Vision 11-Blue | 1671 | 35-20 | 64% | 11 | CA |
| 7210 | Ducks Volleyball Club 15-1 bryan | 1671 | 8-1 | 89% | 15 | |
| 7211 | Texas Elite 17-Gold | 1670 | 14-4 | 78% | 17 | TX |
| 7212 | TNT 15-Shockwave | 1670 | 13-2 | 87% | 15 | MA |
| 7213 | Attack VBC 13-Elite | 1670 | 34-11 | 76% | 13 | MI |
| 7214 | Mhvc 16-2 | 1670 | 22-5 | 81% | 16 | CA |
| 7215 | Maks 13 | 1670 | 7-1 | 88% | 13 | ID |
| 7216 | FaR Out 14-White | 1670 | 36-8 | 82% | 14 | MI |
| 7217 | Left Coast Volleyball Club 12-Black | 1670 | 20-7 | 74% | 12 | CA |
| 7218 | MAVA 12-Elite | 1670 | 48-16 | 75% | 12 | KY |
| 7219 | Coastal 14-National | 1670 | 34-16 | 67% | 14 | MA |
| 7220 | Club Four 14-Select | 1670 | 17-4 | 81% | 14 | MO |
| 7221 | EVOLUTION BLACK 14 | 1670 | 8-1 | 80% | 14 | IA |
| 7222 | Galaxy 18 Patrick | 1670 | 21-9 | 70% | 18 | NC |
| 7223 | Keweenaw VBC 14-Black | 1670 | 13-6 | 68% | 14 | WI |
| 7224 | Crank It 14-Black | 1670 | 31-8 | 79% | 14 | MI |
| 7225 | NorCal Supreme 18-Blue | 1670 | 36-15 | 71% | 18 | CA |
| 7226 | MAVA 18-Select | 1670 | 23-27 | 46% | 18 | KY |
| 7227 | Elite Alliance Volleyball Club 14-1 | 1670 | 26-14 | 65% | 14 | SD |
| 7228 | OT 18-T cade | 1670 | 33-16 | 67% | 18 | FL |
| 7229 | G3VB 14-1 | 1670 | 24-18 | 57% | 14 | OR |
| 7230 | ENVY 16-National | 1670 | 34-28 | 55% | 16 | RI |
| 7231 | Core STL 13-Navy | 1670 | 33-25 | 56% | 13 | MO |
| 7232 | JVC 12-Gold | 1670 | 11-5 | 65% | 12 | IN |
| 7233 | Pono 14-1 annette | 1670 | 20-22 | 45% | 14 | NV |
| 7234 | Solon Spartans 11-Black | 1670 | 6-0 | 100% | 11 | IA |
| 7235 | 1United 10-N blue | 1670 | 28-17 | 57% | 10 | TX |
| 7236 | HVVC 15-Blue | 1670 | 37-21 | 64% | 15 | MI |
| 7237 | TNT 16-Starstruck | 1670 | 17-29 | 37% | 16 | PA |
| 7238 | Summit 14-Blue elite | 1670 | 21-30 | 41% | 14 | IN |
| 7239 | Team Pineapple 12-Black | 1670 | 33-14 | 70% | 12 | IN |
| 7240 | Nova 16-Purple | 1670 | 52-20 | 72% | 16 | AZ |
| 7241 | Club V 17-Nicole | 1670 | 17-23 | 43% | 17 | UT |
| 7242 | SI Wave 15-Black | 1670 | 32-12 | 73% | 15 | MO |
| 7243 | Alexandria Volleyball Club, MN 16-1 | 1670 | 21-9 | 70% | 16 | MN |
| 7244 | SDVBC 14-Ari | 1670 | 17-24 | 41% | 14 | CA |
| 7245 | MADFROG 13-Elite green | 1670 | 4-6 | 40% | 13 | TX |
| 7246 | KC Power 14-3 | 1670 | 24-14 | 60% | 14 | KS |
| 7247 | Rise 15-1 (LA) | 1670 | 5-2 | 71% | 15 | LA |
| 7248 | Circle City 13-White | 1670 | 45-20 | 69% | 13 | IN |
| 7249 | MVA 13-Natalia | 1670 | 38-30 | 56% | 13 | FL |
| 7250 | VVB 16-Austin | 1670 | 34-20 | 63% | 16 | GA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.