Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 145 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
7201 QCA 13-Under armour black 1670 19-6 76% 13
7202 PROJECT SPIKERS 18-1 1670 23-9 68% 18
7203 Shonto Starlings 15-S 1670 7-0 88% 15 AZ
7204 BVC 13-National carly 1670 25-21 54% 13 AL
7205 Alamo 16-Gold 1 1670 32-11 71% 16 TX
7206 Coyotes 12 1670 5-0 100% 12 AZ
7207 LAV 13-National black 1670 35-31 53% 13 AL
7208 FTL 16-Fusion winston 1670 38-31 55% 16 FL
7209 AVC 18-Black 1670 22-16 54% 18 FL
7210 Brownsville Dynamite 12-1 1670 17-3 81% 12 TX
7211 City Beach 12-Black 1670 32-21 60% 12 CA
7212 DeSoto 14-1 1670 20-4 83% 14 FL
7213 Corpus Christi Storm 18-1 1670 25-14 64% 18 TX
7214 Firecrackers 17-Red 1670 39-12 76% 17 NC
7215 FaR Out 14-White 1670 36-8 82% 14 MI
7216 MoCo MAVS 16-Red 1670 21-33 39% 16 TX
7217 OT 18-T cade 1670 33-16 67% 18 FL
7218 PEVC 11-N walter 1670 25-10 71% 11 FL
7219 SI Wave 15-Black 1670 32-12 73% 15 IL
7220 Southland 12-Black 1670 22-5 81% 12 LA
7221 Vital 13-1 gold 1670 42-28 60% 13 MN
7222 Idaho ONE 12-Im stegeman 1670 37-17 67% 12 ID
7223 IMUA 13-Justin 1670 31-16 66% 13 CA
7224 C4 13-Hannah 1670 28-6 82% 13 TN
7225 BVC 12-1 michael 1670 5-0 100% 12 AL
7226 Coastal 14-National 1670 34-16 67% 14 MA
7227 Tri-State Elite 12-Gray 1670 23-10 70% 12 OH
7228 Bristol Crush 13-Andy x 1670 18-4 75% 13 CT
7229 NE Shock 17-Electric 1670 9-6 60% 17 CT
7230 MM Aces 18-Austyn s26 1670 17-6 74% 18 MI
7231 SFSVC 14-1 melinda 1670 25-8 76% 14
7232 MWM 12 1670 21-8 72% 12
7233 IconVBC 13 Adidas 1670 28-11 72% 13 CA
7234 Nebraska Jrs 15-Gray 1670 9-0 100% 15
7235 TAV 15-Blue (MN) 1670 3-5 38% 15
7236 A-10 Black 18-Girls 1670 32-15 68% 18 PA
7237 Shockwave 14-Gold 1670 10-5 67% 14 KS
7238 SCVC 17-1 savannah 1669 13-3 81% 17
7239 Moorhead Juniors 14-1 1669 19-6 73% 14
7240 Lawrence Landsharks 15-1 1669 9-2 64% 15
7241 Attack 14-Smack 1669 21-10 66% 14 IA
7242 Kairos 17 Delta 1669 45-17 73% 17 SD
7243 Brownsburg 10-U 1669 6-2 75% 10 IN
7244 Loudoun Elite 17 Tony 1669 33-27 54% 17 VA
7245 Athena 15-Safi 1669 29-12 71% 15 OR
7246 LTX SELECT 14-Blue 1669 18-6 75% 14 TX
7247 Roots 14-3 maple 1669 38-11 78% 14 IA
7248 Cass County 16-1 black 1669 21-6 78% 16 IN
7249 Circle City 13-White 1669 45-20 69% 13 IN
7250 Elite Mountain 18 1669 15-7 68% 18 AZ
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.