2025-2026 Season — Page 146 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7251 | FOCUS 14 14-Lucas | 1669 | 30-10 | 75% | 14 | |
| 7252 | DCVA 17-Hong | 1669 | 19-20 | 49% | 17 | NM |
| 7253 | Honolulu Wave 14 | 1669 | 36-9 | 78% | 14 | HI |
| 7254 | Mid-Michigan ACES 16 Nick | 1669 | 5-1 | 83% | 16 | MI |
| 7255 | Durham Attack VBC 18 Durham Attack Intensity | 1669 | 4-1 | 80% | 18 | PA |
| 7256 | PEPVB 14-Silver | 1669 | 10-5 | 67% | 14 | GA |
| 7257 | ECVC 14-National - india | 1669 | 14-9 | 61% | 14 | AL |
| 7258 | OK Elevate 18-1 | 1669 | 42-13 | 76% | 18 | OK |
| 7259 | SKY Elite West 14-1 | 1669 | 26-13 | 67% | 14 | PA |
| 7260 | Venom 18-Black | 1669 | 42-16 | 72% | 18 | AZ |
| 7261 | Shockwave 14-Gold | 1669 | 10-5 | 67% | 14 | KS |
| 7262 | Carolina Rogue 14-Black | 1669 | 29-26 | 53% | 14 | SC |
| 7263 | FAV 14 Phoenix | 1669 | 20-9 | 69% | 14 | CA |
| 7264 | Luverne Airborne 14-1 | 1669 | 7-2 | 78% | 14 | MN |
| 7265 | AVC 14-1 (NT) | 1669 | 10-13 | 43% | 14 | TX |
| 7266 | TORCH 13-Avery | 1669 | 26-17 | 60% | 13 | CA |
| 7267 | FTL 16-Fusion winston | 1669 | 38-31 | 55% | 16 | FL |
| 7268 | Minnesota Volleyball Academy 12-1 | 1669 | 35-21 | 63% | 12 | MN |
| 7269 | Goldenwest 16-Tower zero | 1669 | 34-13 | 72% | 16 | CA |
| 7270 | Ark Jrs 13-National | 1669 | 18-11 | 62% | 13 | AR |
| 7271 | Refine 16 Refine Sheats | 1669 | 11-0 | 100% | 16 | AL |
| 7272 | Brownsburg 10-U | 1669 | 6-2 | 75% | 10 | IN |
| 7273 | Premier Nebraska 12-Red | 1669 | 19-9 | 68% | 12 | NE |
| 7274 | DIG 13-Black - lindsey | 1669 | 26-14 | 60% | 13 | TX |
| 7275 | Club South 13-1 | 1669 | 21-14 | 58% | 13 | TX |
| 7276 | Horseshoe VBC 15-Red | 1669 | 21-11 | 64% | 15 | PA |
| 7277 | TEAM Kiwi 13-Graphite | 1669 | 38-17 | 69% | 13 | FL |
| 7278 | Rival 13-State premier | 1669 | 49-20 | 71% | 13 | FL |
| 7279 | 305VBC 15-N cesar | 1669 | 28-37 | 43% | 15 | FL |
| 7280 | TNT 17 Rush | 1669 | 19-21 | 48% | 17 | PA |
| 7281 | Black Hills Juniors 15-Black | 1669 | 10-1 | 91% | 15 | WY |
| 7282 | Pgh Elite 15-Black | 1669 | 25-13 | 66% | 15 | PA |
| 7283 | H Skyline 11-Black | 1669 | 15-6 | 71% | 11 | TX |
| 7284 | T4VBC 16 Elite | 1669 | 35-32 | 52% | 16 | TX |
| 7285 | City Beach 12-Black | 1669 | 32-21 | 60% | 12 | CA |
| 7286 | SRS 15-Blue | 1669 | 34-18 | 65% | 15 | SC |
| 7287 | PEVC 11-N walter | 1669 | 25-10 | 71% | 11 | AL |
| 7288 | Coyotes 12 | 1669 | 5-0 | 100% | 12 | MN |
| 7289 | Aura Volleyball Club 12 Aura Juniors | 1669 | 17-3 | 85% | 12 | CA |
| 7290 | South County 17 Erica | 1669 | 21-22 | 49% | 17 | UT |
| 7291 | Cajun Elite 13-1 | 1669 | 5-3 | 63% | 13 | LA |
| 7292 | SOUTH SHORE 15-Mizuno | 1669 | 21-10 | 66% | 15 | TX |
| 7293 | Vision 12-White | 1669 | 23-13 | 64% | 12 | CA |
| 7294 | Adrenaline 15-Leslie | 1669 | 32-23 | 58% | 15 | IA |
| 7295 | Mass Premier 16-1 | 1669 | 27-20 | 57% | 16 | MA |
| 7296 | Mets 10-Andres | 1669 | 12-9 | 57% | 10 | PR |
| 7297 | Oly Reign 16-Gold | 1669 | 19-22 | 46% | 16 | WA |
| 7298 | WPVC 11-Armour black | 1669 | 26-43 | 38% | 11 | FL |
| 7299 | LES 13-Layken | 1669 | 19-6 | 76% | 13 | AL |
| 7300 | RVC VYVL 14-Diandra | 1668 | 6-0 | 100% | 14 |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.