Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 146 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
7251 FOCUS 14 14-Lucas 1669 30-10 75% 14
7252 DCVA 17-Hong 1669 19-20 49% 17 NM
7253 Honolulu Wave 14 1669 36-9 78% 14 HI
7254 Mid-Michigan ACES 16 Nick 1669 5-1 83% 16 MI
7255 Durham Attack VBC 18 Durham Attack Intensity 1669 4-1 80% 18 PA
7256 PEPVB 14-Silver 1669 10-5 67% 14 GA
7257 ECVC 14-National - india 1669 14-9 61% 14 AL
7258 OK Elevate 18-1 1669 42-13 76% 18 OK
7259 SKY Elite West 14-1 1669 26-13 67% 14 PA
7260 Venom 18-Black 1669 42-16 72% 18 AZ
7261 Shockwave 14-Gold 1669 10-5 67% 14 KS
7262 Carolina Rogue 14-Black 1669 29-26 53% 14 SC
7263 FAV 14 Phoenix 1669 20-9 69% 14 CA
7264 Luverne Airborne 14-1 1669 7-2 78% 14 MN
7265 AVC 14-1 (NT) 1669 10-13 43% 14 TX
7266 TORCH 13-Avery 1669 26-17 60% 13 CA
7267 FTL 16-Fusion winston 1669 38-31 55% 16 FL
7268 Minnesota Volleyball Academy 12-1 1669 35-21 63% 12 MN
7269 Goldenwest 16-Tower zero 1669 34-13 72% 16 CA
7270 Ark Jrs 13-National 1669 18-11 62% 13 AR
7271 Refine 16 Refine Sheats 1669 11-0 100% 16 AL
7272 Brownsburg 10-U 1669 6-2 75% 10 IN
7273 Premier Nebraska 12-Red 1669 19-9 68% 12 NE
7274 DIG 13-Black - lindsey 1669 26-14 60% 13 TX
7275 Club South 13-1 1669 21-14 58% 13 TX
7276 Horseshoe VBC 15-Red 1669 21-11 64% 15 PA
7277 TEAM Kiwi 13-Graphite 1669 38-17 69% 13 FL
7278 Rival 13-State premier 1669 49-20 71% 13 FL
7279 305VBC 15-N cesar 1669 28-37 43% 15 FL
7280 TNT 17 Rush 1669 19-21 48% 17 PA
7281 Black Hills Juniors 15-Black 1669 10-1 91% 15 WY
7282 Pgh Elite 15-Black 1669 25-13 66% 15 PA
7283 H Skyline 11-Black 1669 15-6 71% 11 TX
7284 T4VBC 16 Elite 1669 35-32 52% 16 TX
7285 City Beach 12-Black 1669 32-21 60% 12 CA
7286 SRS 15-Blue 1669 34-18 65% 15 SC
7287 PEVC 11-N walter 1669 25-10 71% 11 AL
7288 Coyotes 12 1669 5-0 100% 12 MN
7289 Aura Volleyball Club 12 Aura Juniors 1669 17-3 85% 12 CA
7290 South County 17 Erica 1669 21-22 49% 17 UT
7291 Cajun Elite 13-1 1669 5-3 63% 13 LA
7292 SOUTH SHORE 15-Mizuno 1669 21-10 66% 15 TX
7293 Vision 12-White 1669 23-13 64% 12 CA
7294 Adrenaline 15-Leslie 1669 32-23 58% 15 IA
7295 Mass Premier 16-1 1669 27-20 57% 16 MA
7296 Mets 10-Andres 1669 12-9 57% 10 PR
7297 Oly Reign 16-Gold 1669 19-22 46% 16 WA
7298 WPVC 11-Armour black 1669 26-43 38% 11 FL
7299 LES 13-Layken 1669 19-6 76% 13 AL
7300 RVC VYVL 14-Diandra 1668 6-0 100% 14
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.