Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 146 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
7251 KNVBC 13-Hype teal 1669 9-6 60% 13 KS
7252 OK Charge 17-Select tulsa 1669 34-20 63% 17 OK
7253 Silverton Bearcats 14-1 1669 26-6 76% 14 OR
7254 TX SPARKS 13-3 kaitlynn 1669 21-9 68% 13 TX
7255 Lady Legends 12-Purple 1669 10-4 67% 12 PA
7256 FRVBC 16-Red 1669 10-8 56% 16 CO
7257 Club V 17-Nicole 1669 17-23 43% 17 UT
7258 Hive 16-Gold 1669 29-29 50% 16 UT
7259 Honolulu Wave 14 1669 36-9 78% 14 HI
7260 Legacy 13-National 1669 28-16 64% 13 NY
7261 Prodigy 18-1 premier 1669 20-11 65% 18 NY
7262 Northeast 16-3 1669 46-14 77% 16 CT
7263 Mass Impact 15-Brent 1669 38-15 72% 15 MA
7264 Ks Networks Volleyball Club 16-6 1669 7-1 88% 16 KS
7265 NASA 11-1 1669 11-4 73% 11 AL
7266 Elevate 16-Grumpy giraffes 1669 49-27 64% 16 WI
7267 Legacy Girls 17-Elite 1669 30-22 58% 17 CA
7268 Barefoot Volleyball 17-National 1669 8-0 100% 17 TX
7269 AVBC 15-R - yates 1669 10-2 83% 15 OH
7270 OK Elevate 18-1 1669 42-13 76% 18 OK
7271 Black Hills Juniors 17-Black 1669 5-0 100% 17 SD
7272 Alpha 13-2 1669 30-13 70% 13 KY
7273 Aleta 12-1 1669 5-1 83% 12 OH
7274 HNL Volleyball 15-Black 1669 5-5 50% 15 HI
7275 NVPUR 15 1669 14-12 54% 15 PR
7276 H Skyline 11-Black 1669 15-6 71% 11 TX
7277 CINCY EAST 14-1 black 1669 31-29 52% 14 OH
7278 MAVA 18-Select 1669 23-27 46% 18 KY
7279 PowerPlex 13-Wilson 1669 29-11 73% 13 IA
7280 The Shore 14-Premier 1669 26-8 76% 14 MI
7281 WE 17-1 1668 24-6 80% 17
7282 MWP 16 Silver 1668 15-4 79% 16
7283 Air VBC 14 National 1668 34-13 72% 14 WI
7284 CB Juniors 12-S 1668 14-6 70% 12
7285 Heat 13 Black (TX) 1668 27-13 68% 13 TX
7286 Club Solano 15-Maroon 1668 33-27 55% 15 CA
7287 APAC 15 Rachel 1668 35-19 65% 15 TX
7288 BCS Skyline H 16-Black 1668 33-18 65% 16 TX
7289 Apex NW 16-Elevate 1668 26-10 72% 16 WA
7290 Club Four 14-Select 1668 17-4 81% 14 IL
7291 Cajun Elite 14 Reggi 1668 28-8 76% 14 LA
7292 Galaxy 18 Patrick 1668 21-9 70% 18 NC
7293 EU 14-Platinum 1668 37-17 69% 14 IN
7294 EVA 16 National 1668 43-26 62% 16 AR
7295 G3VB 14-1 1668 24-18 57% 14 OR
7296 GCVC 14-Blue 1668 27-13 68% 14 OH
7297 McMinnville 16-1 1668 22-8 73% 16 OR
7298 GSA 17-National 1668 48-24 67% 17 NJ
7299 Monsters 18 1668 20-5 80% 18 MI
7300 METRO Elite 15-Black 1668 26-8 76% 15 SC
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.