2025-2026 Season — Page 147 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7301 | PCVBC 16 Taylor | 1668 | 28-9 | 76% | 16 | OH |
| 7302 | OT 13-J rico | 1668 | 16-24 | 40% | 13 | FL |
| 7303 | Topeka Saints 11 Gold | 1668 | 12-10 | 55% | 11 | KS |
| 7304 | TORCH 13-Avery | 1668 | 26-17 | 60% | 13 | CA |
| 7305 | 1st Alliance 18-White | 1668 | 23-9 | 72% | 18 | IL |
| 7306 | Vision 12-White | 1668 | 23-13 | 64% | 12 | CA |
| 7307 | 3CVBC 17 Elite | 1668 | 34-15 | 69% | 17 | TX |
| 7308 | Saratoga 15-Blue | 1668 | 50-13 | 74% | 15 | NY |
| 7309 | Momentum Volleyball 16-Riley | 1668 | 12-10 | 55% | 16 | CO |
| 7310 | Sky High 18-Vilsoet | 1668 | 27-9 | 71% | 18 | IL |
| 7311 | Left Coast 12-Black | 1668 | 20-7 | 74% | 12 | CA |
| 7312 | Husky 16-New england red | 1668 | 27-18 | 60% | 16 | CT |
| 7313 | Tsunami 15-1e eric/huy | 1668 | 30-24 | 56% | 15 | GA |
| 7314 | DYS 16-Thunder | 1668 | 37-10 | 79% | 16 | VA |
| 7315 | Texas Elite 14-Gold | 1668 | 23-14 | 62% | 14 | TX |
| 7316 | MOD Regional 11-Blue | 1668 | 10-2 | 83% | 11 | IL |
| 7317 | PREVAIL Girls 13-Platinum | 1668 | 12-5 | 71% | 13 | PA |
| 7318 | AVC 14-1 (NT) | 1668 | 10-13 | 43% | 14 | TX |
| 7319 | Xtreme 13-National ali | 1668 | 19-6 | 76% | 13 | NJ |
| 7320 | CALI 13-Black | 1668 | 28-31 | 47% | 13 | NY |
| 7321 | UtahIce 15-Brad | 1668 | 6-1 | 86% | 15 | |
| 7322 | Apex 13-1 girls | 1668 | 21-22 | 49% | 13 | SC |
| 7323 | BRVC 15 | 1668 | 26-12 | 68% | 15 | KY |
| 7324 | Ignite 14-National (SC) | 1668 | 20-22 | 48% | 14 | CA |
| 7325 | VUVC 17-Black | 1668 | 16-11 | 59% | 17 | NV |
| 7326 | WC Stars 17-1 | 1667 | 27-12 | 69% | 17 | |
| 7327 | QCA 16-Under armour black | 1667 | 30-14 | 68% | 16 | |
| 7328 | Mabel-Canton 13 | 1667 | 5-0 | 83% | 13 | |
| 7329 | Ne Jrs 15-Gray | 1667 | 6-3 | 67% | 15 | |
| 7330 | Alamo 15-Elite 2 | 1667 | 36-27 | 57% | 15 | TX |
| 7331 | Mets 10-Andres | 1667 | 12-9 | 57% | 10 | PR |
| 7332 | Iowa One 16-Angela | 1667 | 27-9 | 73% | 16 | IA |
| 7333 | Cap City 18-Gold | 1667 | 35-13 | 73% | 18 | NC |
| 7334 | InfinitySouth 13-1 | 1667 | 25-11 | 69% | 13 | LA |
| 7335 | Integrity Elite 16 | 1667 | 19-7 | 73% | 16 | IL |
| 7336 | Invasion 12-Black | 1667 | 15-7 | 68% | 12 | MO |
| 7337 | ATHENA VB 15-2 black national | 1667 | 41-36 | 53% | 15 | OR |
| 7338 | Club South 13-1 | 1667 | 21-14 | 58% | 13 | TX |
| 7339 | Domination 18-As | 1667 | 27-6 | 82% | 18 | TX |
| 7340 | GAVA 16 Gold | 1667 | 31-25 | 55% | 16 | UT |
| 7341 | EP Elite 12-Smack | 1667 | 18-13 | 53% | 12 | TX |
| 7342 | Mavericks 14-Orange | 1667 | 19-4 | 83% | 14 | MI |
| 7343 | MHAC 16-1 black | 1667 | 29-14 | 67% | 16 | OR |
| 7344 | MKE Sting 12-Black | 1667 | 35-34 | 51% | 12 | WI |
| 7345 | MVI 14-Jana | 1667 | 14-4 | 78% | 14 | CA |
| 7346 | OK Charge 15-National | 1667 | 41-22 | 65% | 15 | OK |
| 7347 | Rhythm 13 MC | 1667 | 43-23 | 65% | 13 | TN |
| 7348 | SAVA 11-Blue | 1667 | 31-13 | 70% | 11 | AL |
| 7349 | Synergy 15 Potassium | 1667 | 44-23 | 66% | 15 | CA |
| 7350 | TNT 14 Aerosmith | 1667 | 43-30 | 59% | 14 | PA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.