Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 147 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
7301 PCVBC 16 Taylor 1668 28-9 76% 16 OH
7302 OT 13-J rico 1668 16-24 40% 13 FL
7303 Topeka Saints 11 Gold 1668 12-10 55% 11 KS
7304 TORCH 13-Avery 1668 26-17 60% 13 CA
7305 1st Alliance 18-White 1668 23-9 72% 18 IL
7306 Vision 12-White 1668 23-13 64% 12 CA
7307 3CVBC 17 Elite 1668 34-15 69% 17 TX
7308 Saratoga 15-Blue 1668 50-13 74% 15 NY
7309 Momentum Volleyball 16-Riley 1668 12-10 55% 16 CO
7310 Sky High 18-Vilsoet 1668 27-9 71% 18 IL
7311 Left Coast 12-Black 1668 20-7 74% 12 CA
7312 Husky 16-New england red 1668 27-18 60% 16 CT
7313 Tsunami 15-1e eric/huy 1668 30-24 56% 15 GA
7314 DYS 16-Thunder 1668 37-10 79% 16 VA
7315 Texas Elite 14-Gold 1668 23-14 62% 14 TX
7316 MOD Regional 11-Blue 1668 10-2 83% 11 IL
7317 PREVAIL Girls 13-Platinum 1668 12-5 71% 13 PA
7318 AVC 14-1 (NT) 1668 10-13 43% 14 TX
7319 Xtreme 13-National ali 1668 19-6 76% 13 NJ
7320 CALI 13-Black 1668 28-31 47% 13 NY
7321 UtahIce 15-Brad 1668 6-1 86% 15
7322 Apex 13-1 girls 1668 21-22 49% 13 SC
7323 BRVC 15 1668 26-12 68% 15 KY
7324 Ignite 14-National (SC) 1668 20-22 48% 14 CA
7325 VUVC 17-Black 1668 16-11 59% 17 NV
7326 WC Stars 17-1 1667 27-12 69% 17
7327 QCA 16-Under armour black 1667 30-14 68% 16
7328 Mabel-Canton 13 1667 5-0 83% 13
7329 Ne Jrs 15-Gray 1667 6-3 67% 15
7330 Alamo 15-Elite 2 1667 36-27 57% 15 TX
7331 Mets 10-Andres 1667 12-9 57% 10 PR
7332 Iowa One 16-Angela 1667 27-9 73% 16 IA
7333 Cap City 18-Gold 1667 35-13 73% 18 NC
7334 InfinitySouth 13-1 1667 25-11 69% 13 LA
7335 Integrity Elite 16 1667 19-7 73% 16 IL
7336 Invasion 12-Black 1667 15-7 68% 12 MO
7337 ATHENA VB 15-2 black national 1667 41-36 53% 15 OR
7338 Club South 13-1 1667 21-14 58% 13 TX
7339 Domination 18-As 1667 27-6 82% 18 TX
7340 GAVA 16 Gold 1667 31-25 55% 16 UT
7341 EP Elite 12-Smack 1667 18-13 53% 12 TX
7342 Mavericks 14-Orange 1667 19-4 83% 14 MI
7343 MHAC 16-1 black 1667 29-14 67% 16 OR
7344 MKE Sting 12-Black 1667 35-34 51% 12 WI
7345 MVI 14-Jana 1667 14-4 78% 14 CA
7346 OK Charge 15-National 1667 41-22 65% 15 OK
7347 Rhythm 13 MC 1667 43-23 65% 13 TN
7348 SAVA 11-Blue 1667 31-13 70% 11 AL
7349 Synergy 15 Potassium 1667 44-23 66% 15 CA
7350 TNT 14 Aerosmith 1667 43-30 59% 14 PA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.