Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 148 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
7351 OVA 14-G legacy 1667 35-31 53% 14 AZ
7352 Tstreet SN 14-Laura 1667 27-8 77% 14 NV
7353 BORINQUEN COQUI 14-2f 1667 19-10 66% 14 PR
7354 Saratoga 14-Select 1667 52-14 76% 14 NY
7355 Sandia Elite 14-National 1 1667 6-2 75% 14 NV
7356 White Cross Elite 14 Dave 1667 18-7 72% 14 NC
7357 RVC 14 National 1667 35-34 51% 14 VA
7358 ThunderVanbc 17-1 1667 4-4 50% 17 WA
7359 Bristol Crush 13-Andy x 1667 18-4 75% 13 CT
7360 RVC 13 Zonal 1667 43-17 72% 13 VA
7361 ND Elite 18-Dalziel 1667 21-10 64% 18 ND
7362 Amarillo Xtreme 13 Blackout 1667 17-8 68% 13 TX
7363 TNT 12-Fuse 1667 34-15 69% 12 PA
7364 Monsters 16-Elite navy 1667 31-12 72% 16 MI
7365 Club Velocity 13-1 1667 47-22 68% 13 MN
7366 United 13-Evren 1667 4-3 57% 13 HI
7367 I.C. Stars 13 Alexis 1667 15-7 68% 13 NC
7368 BVC 13-National carly 1667 25-21 54% 13 AL
7369 Chicago Elite 15 Elite 1667 25-37 40% 15 IL
7370 EU 16-Black 1667 27-30 47% 16 IN
7371 FRVBC 16-Red 1667 10-8 56% 16 CO
7372 METRO Elite 15-Black 1667 26-8 76% 15 GA
7373 IMGA Ascender Elite 16-1 1667 26-29 47% 16 FL
7374 FH 13-Ikaika-ari 1667 22-17 54% 13 TX
7375 Crystal City Volleyball Club 15 CRYSTAL CITY RUBIES (WE) 1667 19-3 70% 15 NY
7376 InfinitySouth 13-1 1667 25-11 69% 13 LA
7377 Countdown 15-2 elite 1667 41-21 66% 15 FL
7378 FRST VOLLEYBALL 15-1 royal 1667 26-15 63% 15 TX
7379 CMVBC 13-1 1667 23-14 62% 13 MO
7380 MGA 16-Stars 1667 25-12 68% 16 MA
7381 Loveland Volleyball Club 16-1 1667 32-13 71% 16 CO
7382 Spiketown USA 18.1 1667 28-15 65% 18 WI
7383 Premier 11-1 blue 1667 20-9 63% 11 AL
7384 Barefoot Volleyball 17-National 1667 8-0 100% 17 TX
7385 Courthouse 15-Blue 1667 32-14 70% 15 OR
7386 ID Peak 17-S billie 1667 6-7 46% 17 UT
7387 MVA 16-Raquel 1667 40-35 53% 16 FL
7388 501 Volley 13-3 reg plus 1667 28-8 78% 13 AR
7389 American 15-Blue 1667 52-20 71% 15 VA
7390 HOVA 17-A red elite 1667 27-10 73% 17 OH
7391 Arks Jrs 15-National 1667 14-6 70% 15 AR
7392 Core 18-National 1667 20-13 61% 18 NJ
7393 Texas Fury 13-Legacy 1667 22-18 55% 13 TX
7394 KC Thunder U16-Blue 1667 15-4 79% 16 WA
7395 Rogue330 Volleyball Club 17 17R BLAZE 1666 13-3 81% 17
7396 TQ 16 1666 40-14 74% 16 AZ
7397 GOLDENBULLS 15-G black 1666 8-1 89% 15 FL
7398 SMASH 15-2 1666 6-1 86% 15 MA
7399 London Elite 12-Blue 1666 9-2 82% 12 OH
7400 EVC 14 Elite 1666 23-25 48% 14 IL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.