Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 148 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
7351 Texas Fury 13-Legacy 1667 22-18 55% 13 TX
7352 Tulsa Power 15-3 1667 34-12 74% 15 OK
7353 VOLT 14-2 1667 47-31 60% 14 ND
7354 Victorium 17 UA 1667 21-33 39% 17 AZ
7355 Kairos 16 Gamma 1667 29-29 50% 16 SD
7356 Academy 12-R cheetahs 1667 29-15 66% 12 IN
7357 Lakeville South 11-Gold 1667 9-1 90% 11 MN
7358 NORCO 16-White 1667 29-14 67% 16 CO
7359 108 BVC 16-Black 1667 24-8 75% 16 VA
7360 APEX1 14-Black 1667 20-16 56% 14 CA
7361 MGA 16-Stars 1667 25-12 68% 16 MA
7362 Lockdown VBC 12-Sandpipers 1667 23-13 64% 12 MA
7363 Tsunami 16-1n shota 1667 13-12 52% 16 GA
7364 Shockwave 15-Gold 1667 9-5 64% 15 KS
7365 Elevate 18-Raging rhinos 1667 35-13 73% 18 WI
7366 HRVC Hurricanes 17-1 1667 2-10 17% 17 ON
7367 United 13-Evren 1667 4-3 57% 13 IL
7368 Mintonette Sports 18-2 1667 21-31 40% 18 OH
7369 Mintonette Sports 16-4 1667 41-24 63% 16 OH
7370 H Skyline 12-White 1667 17-9 65% 12 TX
7371 H Skyline 13-Silver 1667 17-11 61% 13 TX
7372 Yuba Elite VBC 14-Pink 1667 19-8 70% 14 CA
7373 Mizuno Northern Lights 14-W 1667 5-1 83% 14
7374 FAV 14 Phoenix 1667 20-9 69% 14 CA
7375 Desert Elite 14 1667 21-8 72% 14 CA
7376 Premier 11-1 blue 1666 20-9 63% 11
7377 KC Thunder U16-Blue 1666 15-4 79% 16
7378 BVA 14 Elite 1666 24-13 65% 14 NC
7379 Courthouse 15-Blue 1666 32-14 70% 15 OR
7380 Club One AZ 15-Royal-ang 1666 28-10 74% 15 AZ
7381 Club Z 17-Bri 1666 32-19 63% 17 TX
7382 CVC 15 SILVER 1666 35-16 69% 15 OH
7383 ECC 16-South national 1666 23-24 49% 16 NJ
7384 MAVS KC 11 Regional 1666 13-10 57% 11 KS
7385 GSJ 14 National 1666 33-20 62% 14 SC
7386 Adrenaline 15-Leslie 1666 32-23 58% 15 IA
7387 PCVC 16 Nalu 1666 30-16 65% 16 BC
7388 Stingray VBA 15 Adidas 1666 29-13 69% 15 OK
7389 Vegas United G18-Black 1666 16-16 50% 18 NV
7390 319 United 14 Jenna 1666 9-2 82% 14 IA
7391 WDVB 15-2 1666 16-6 70% 15 IA
7392 Rockwood Thunder 13-White 1666 32-17 64% 13 MO
7393 BORINQUEN COQUI 14-2f 1666 19-10 66% 14 PR
7394 Top Notch 16-Elite 1666 16-21 43% 16 IL
7395 Elevation 17-Timberline black 1666 33-25 57% 17 CO
7396 Elevate Athletics 16-Nike masi 1666 18-23 44% 16 UT
7397 WAVE 17-Kali 1666 32-15 68% 17 CA
7398 Pulse 14-Carson 1666 17-13 57% 14 CA
7399 Emerald Coast 13-National - kelly 1666 8-5 62% 13 FL
7400 Mass Impact 16-Mae 1666 21-9 70% 16 MA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.