Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 149 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
7401 603 United 17-Seacoast blue 1666 27-6 82% 17 NH
7402 DYS 17-Thunder 1666 33-13 72% 17 VA
7403 TEJAS 16-Black aja 1666 29-24 51% 16 TX
7404 OVA 16-National rich 1666 25-22 53% 16 FL
7405 Columbus 12-2 1666 21-7 66% 12 OH
7406 Elevate 14-1 1666 10-2 83% 14 TX
7407 Herederas 15-1 rickie 1666 8-7 53% 15 PR
7408 Matchbox 15-Premier 1666 11-5 69% 15 SD
7409 Aspire NW 13-1 vancouver 1666 9-6 60% 13 WA
7410 Club One 16-1 black 1666 5-1 83% 16 OH
7411 Solon Spartans 11-Black 1666 6-0 100% 11 IA
7412 Blue Crab 12-Blue 1666 34-18 65% 12 LA
7413 MADFROG 13-Elite green 1666 4-6 40% 13 TX
7414 UVC 12-U black 1666 7-5 47% 12 MA
7415 Hustle Volleyball Club 14-Girls athena 1666 9-0 100% 14
7416 NORCO 14-Blue 1666 30-22 58% 14 CO
7417 Northern Lights 13-B 1666 34-21 62% 13 MN
7418 STARZ 14-White 1666 31-11 74% 14 IL
7419 Iron VC 12-2 1665 12-2 67% 12
7420 Luverne Airborne 14-1 1665 7-2 78% 14
7421 Green Wave 16 1665 23-11 57% 16
7422 SPYAC Storm 14-Black - ne 1665 5-0 100% 14
7423 Shockwave VB Academy 15-2 1665 8-4 50% 15
7424 JVC 14-1 (PR) 1665 31-9 78% 14 KY
7425 Ozark Juniors 10-Blue 1665 21-6 75% 10 AR
7426 NNVC 16 1665 30-12 68% 16 VA
7427 UVA 15 1665 19-5 76% 15 LA
7428 VAQUERAS 14-F jimmy g 1665 19-4 83% 14 PR
7429 PEPVB 14-Silver 1665 10-5 67% 14 GA
7430 Shockwave 13-Black 1665 10-5 67% 13 KS
7431 Cats Volleyball 12 1665 9-2 82% 12 IA
7432 TAV 12-Black (NT) 1665 13-11 48% 12 TX
7433 CALI 12-Black 1665 50-22 69% 12 NY
7434 Prodigy 17-1 premier 1665 28-22 56% 17 NY
7435 KPV 16-Pink-brooke 1665 24-30 44% 16 KY
7436 Club Velocity 13-1 1665 47-22 68% 13 AR
7437 DBQ Insanity 15-1 national 1665 35-19 64% 15 IA
7438 FRST VOLLEYBALL 15-1 royal 1665 26-15 63% 15 TX
7439 Hill Country Axis 14-Blue 1665 43-25 63% 14 TX
7440 NYCLBVC 15-Blue elite 1665 32-14 70% 15 NY
7441 TDV 18-Elite 1665 25-13 66% 18 OH
7442 RockCity 13 N1 1665 37-31 54% 13 OH
7443 SPARKS VBC 16-Red 1665 40-12 77% 16 PA
7444 SBS 12U 1665 10-3 77% 12 TX
7445 TEXAS FURY 12 Legacy 1665 24-14 63% 12 TX
7446 Village Juniors 12 1665 24-8 75% 12 AR
7447 SVC 14 Silver 1665 18-8 69% 14 IA
7448 Synergy 18 Magnesium 1665 35-19 65% 18 CA
7449 TVS 11 Emily 1665 8-3 67% 11 TX
7450 AR Metro 11-Regional plus 1665 33-22 60% 11 MD
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.