2025-2026 Season — Page 149 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7401 | 603 United 17-Seacoast blue | 1666 | 27-6 | 82% | 17 | NH |
| 7402 | DYS 17-Thunder | 1666 | 33-13 | 72% | 17 | VA |
| 7403 | TEJAS 16-Black aja | 1666 | 29-24 | 51% | 16 | TX |
| 7404 | OVA 16-National rich | 1666 | 25-22 | 53% | 16 | FL |
| 7405 | Columbus 12-2 | 1666 | 21-7 | 66% | 12 | OH |
| 7406 | Elevate 14-1 | 1666 | 10-2 | 83% | 14 | TX |
| 7407 | Herederas 15-1 rickie | 1666 | 8-7 | 53% | 15 | PR |
| 7408 | Matchbox 15-Premier | 1666 | 11-5 | 69% | 15 | SD |
| 7409 | Aspire NW 13-1 vancouver | 1666 | 9-6 | 60% | 13 | WA |
| 7410 | Club One 16-1 black | 1666 | 5-1 | 83% | 16 | OH |
| 7411 | Solon Spartans 11-Black | 1666 | 6-0 | 100% | 11 | IA |
| 7412 | Blue Crab 12-Blue | 1666 | 34-18 | 65% | 12 | LA |
| 7413 | MADFROG 13-Elite green | 1666 | 4-6 | 40% | 13 | TX |
| 7414 | UVC 12-U black | 1666 | 7-5 | 47% | 12 | MA |
| 7415 | Hustle Volleyball Club 14-Girls athena | 1666 | 9-0 | 100% | 14 | |
| 7416 | NORCO 14-Blue | 1666 | 30-22 | 58% | 14 | CO |
| 7417 | Northern Lights 13-B | 1666 | 34-21 | 62% | 13 | MN |
| 7418 | STARZ 14-White | 1666 | 31-11 | 74% | 14 | IL |
| 7419 | Iron VC 12-2 | 1665 | 12-2 | 67% | 12 | |
| 7420 | Luverne Airborne 14-1 | 1665 | 7-2 | 78% | 14 | |
| 7421 | Green Wave 16 | 1665 | 23-11 | 57% | 16 | |
| 7422 | SPYAC Storm 14-Black - ne | 1665 | 5-0 | 100% | 14 | |
| 7423 | Shockwave VB Academy 15-2 | 1665 | 8-4 | 50% | 15 | |
| 7424 | JVC 14-1 (PR) | 1665 | 31-9 | 78% | 14 | KY |
| 7425 | Ozark Juniors 10-Blue | 1665 | 21-6 | 75% | 10 | AR |
| 7426 | NNVC 16 | 1665 | 30-12 | 68% | 16 | VA |
| 7427 | UVA 15 | 1665 | 19-5 | 76% | 15 | LA |
| 7428 | VAQUERAS 14-F jimmy g | 1665 | 19-4 | 83% | 14 | PR |
| 7429 | PEPVB 14-Silver | 1665 | 10-5 | 67% | 14 | GA |
| 7430 | Shockwave 13-Black | 1665 | 10-5 | 67% | 13 | KS |
| 7431 | Cats Volleyball 12 | 1665 | 9-2 | 82% | 12 | IA |
| 7432 | TAV 12-Black (NT) | 1665 | 13-11 | 48% | 12 | TX |
| 7433 | CALI 12-Black | 1665 | 50-22 | 69% | 12 | NY |
| 7434 | Prodigy 17-1 premier | 1665 | 28-22 | 56% | 17 | NY |
| 7435 | KPV 16-Pink-brooke | 1665 | 24-30 | 44% | 16 | KY |
| 7436 | Club Velocity 13-1 | 1665 | 47-22 | 68% | 13 | AR |
| 7437 | DBQ Insanity 15-1 national | 1665 | 35-19 | 64% | 15 | IA |
| 7438 | FRST VOLLEYBALL 15-1 royal | 1665 | 26-15 | 63% | 15 | TX |
| 7439 | Hill Country Axis 14-Blue | 1665 | 43-25 | 63% | 14 | TX |
| 7440 | NYCLBVC 15-Blue elite | 1665 | 32-14 | 70% | 15 | NY |
| 7441 | TDV 18-Elite | 1665 | 25-13 | 66% | 18 | OH |
| 7442 | RockCity 13 N1 | 1665 | 37-31 | 54% | 13 | OH |
| 7443 | SPARKS VBC 16-Red | 1665 | 40-12 | 77% | 16 | PA |
| 7444 | SBS 12U | 1665 | 10-3 | 77% | 12 | TX |
| 7445 | TEXAS FURY 12 Legacy | 1665 | 24-14 | 63% | 12 | TX |
| 7446 | Village Juniors 12 | 1665 | 24-8 | 75% | 12 | AR |
| 7447 | SVC 14 Silver | 1665 | 18-8 | 69% | 14 | IA |
| 7448 | Synergy 18 Magnesium | 1665 | 35-19 | 65% | 18 | CA |
| 7449 | TVS 11 Emily | 1665 | 8-3 | 67% | 11 | TX |
| 7450 | AR Metro 11-Regional plus | 1665 | 33-22 | 60% | 11 | MD |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.