Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 149 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
7401 ACAD 14-Red 1666 20-30 40% 14 NY
7402 EU 14-Platinum 1666 37-17 69% 14 IN
7403 Desert Elite 14 1666 21-8 72% 14 CA
7404 Columbia 14-Black 1666 46-42 51% 14 MD
7405 Hill Country Axis 14-Blue 1666 43-25 63% 14 TX
7406 Roots 14-3 maple 1666 38-11 78% 14 TX
7407 Hustle Volleyball Club 14-Girls athena 1666 9-0 100% 14 MN
7408 ProPlay 14-Zoe 1666 24-13 65% 14 CA
7409 Pulse 14-Carson 1666 17-13 57% 14 CA
7410 Invasion 12-Black 1666 15-7 68% 12 MO
7411 HNL Volleyball 16-Blue 1666 16-8 67% 16 HI
7412 CVC 15-Navy 1666 26-13 65% 15 ND
7413 Hatchet Volleyball Club 12-Black 1666 14-4 74% 12 IN
7414 PVA 16-National summit 1666 23-31 43% 16 NY
7415 Dig This 15-Pink 1666 20-11 65% 15 NV
7416 TEJAS 16-Black aja 1666 29-24 51% 16 TX
7417 TVS 11 Emily 1666 8-3 67% 11 TX
7418 NSSC 17-Black 1666 32-13 68% 17 MO
7419 K2 18 Redbacks 1666 27-11 71% 18 TN
7420 ESVBC 16-Tsunami 1666 16-10 62% 16 IA
7421 H Skyline 13-Silver 1666 17-11 61% 13 TX
7422 Athena 15-Safi 1666 29-12 71% 15 CA
7423 Firecrackers 17-Red 1666 39-12 76% 17 NC
7424 Durham Attack VBC 17 Durham Attack Crush 1666 6-2 75% 17 PA
7425 3CVBC 17 Elite 1666 34-15 69% 17 TX
7426 Apex NW 16-Elevate 1666 26-10 72% 16 WA
7427 LAV 18-Regional black 1666 34-10 77% 18 AL
7428 Team Momentum 13 Org 1666 44-18 71% 13 MO
7429 CIA 16-Silver 1666 22-15 58% 16 IA
7430 GP 16-Local black 1666 59-14 81% 16 FL
7431 CHAVC 13-Black 1666 23-20 53% 13 NC
7432 Club Z 17-Bri 1666 32-19 63% 17 NM
7433 MKE Sting 12-Black 1666 35-34 51% 12 WI
7434 Heat 13 Black (TX) 1666 27-13 68% 13 TX
7435 City 12-Gold 1666 26-26 50% 12 CA
7436 MHAC 16-1 black 1666 29-14 67% 16 OR
7437 DME Elite 12-1 1666 26-31 46% 12 FL
7438 Iowa One 16-Angela 1666 27-9 73% 16 IA
7439 HRVC Hurricanes 17-1 1666 2-10 17% 17 ON
7440 Kohala 14-1 1665 4-5 44% 14
7441 WYORVC-DMTYS 18 WYORVC-DMTYS Black 1665 8-1 89% 18 WY
7442 London Elite 18-Blue 1665 20-10 67% 18 OH
7443 Prodigy 18-1 premier 1665 24-14 63% 18 NY
7444 Ozark Juniors 10-Blue 1665 21-6 75% 10 AR
7445 Maverick 15 Phoenix 1665 39-17 70% 15 AZ
7446 UPvbc 17-Adidas elite 1665 3-2 60% 17 OK
7447 Mass Impact 15-Brent 1665 38-15 72% 15 MA
7448 OK Charge 15-National 1665 41-22 65% 15 OK
7449 Blaze 11-Volley stars 1665 9-3 64% 11 IL
7450 SIVBC 12 Monsoon 1665 44-28 61% 12 WA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.