Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 150 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
7451 Lebanon VBC 14-1 elite 1665 20-9 69% 14 OR
7452 MARIN 16-Green 1665 35-24 59% 16 CA
7453 Sky High Adidas 16-Onyx 1665 37-27 58% 16 IL
7454 United 16 Chelsea 1665 24-13 65% 16 CO
7455 ProPlay 14-Zoe 1665 24-13 65% 14 CA
7456 WGVA 18-Black 1665 34-10 77% 18 GA
7457 Mass Impact 18-Shannon 1665 30-18 63% 18 MA
7458 Surge 16-Black 1665 15-12 56% 16 RI
7459 Allegro 18-South black 1665 37-16 70% 18 NJ
7460 NYC Juniors 17-Si 1665 29-13 69% 17 NY
7461 SEV 17-Armour 1665 9-5 64% 17 AL
7462 TAV South 14-Royal 1665 27-20 53% 14 TX
7463 Core 18-National 1665 20-13 61% 18 CA
7464 PVA 16-4 1665 10-4 67% 16 MO
7465 AVA 17 ONYX 1665 24-47 34% 17 TX
7466 HNL Volleyball 16-Blue 1665 16-8 67% 16 HI
7467 Figs Volleyball Club 17-1 1665 9-10 47% 17 CA
7468 Legit 11-Grey 1665 5-0 100% 11
7469 Mizuno Northern Lights 14-2 1665 3-2 60% 14
7470 CTRUS 13-1 1665 20-6 77% 13 CA
7471 MVA 16-Raquel 1665 40-35 53% 16 FL
7472 Pgh Elite 15-Black 1665 25-13 66% 15 PA
7473 Lakeville South 14-Gold 1665 21-8 72% 14 MN
7474 Vibe 13-G 1665 16-13 55% 13 CA
7475 MVC Panthers 11-Pink 1664 17-6 74% 11
7476 HVC 12-Black 1664 16-7 67% 12 BC
7477 Canuck VBC 16-2 1664 3-4 43% 16
7478 JVB 14-S 1664 21-6 78% 14
7479 Advanced Ath 17-1 natl 1664 21-7 75% 17 TX
7480 Ignite AZ 14-National 1664 48-16 75% 14 AZ
7481 Mana Toa 16-Carrie 1664 21-5 81% 16 AL
7482 Amarillo Xtreme 13 T4G 1664 20-8 71% 13 TX
7483 BOOST 14 Navy 1664 24-15 62% 14 IA
7484 Carolina ICE 14 National 1664 25-14 64% 14 SC
7485 FC Elite 14-Blue 1664 35-16 69% 14 WI
7486 Empowered 16-Elite onyx 1664 35-17 67% 16 IN
7487 Five Star 14-Black 1664 43-21 67% 14 CA
7488 EVC 14 Elite 1664 23-25 48% 14 IL
7489 MAVS KC 11 National 1664 11-10 52% 11 KS
7490 Gulfside 12-Prime 1664 31-26 54% 12 FL
7491 HEAT 18-National ryan 1664 22-14 61% 18 CA
7492 MARIN 15-Slate 1664 37-14 73% 15 CA
7493 EXCELL 15-1 paul navy 1664 45-16 74% 15 SC
7494 NASA BHM 18-PURPLE 1664 19-11 63% 18 AL
7495 Alpha Omega 13-National 1664 13-6 68% 13 MO
7496 MOVA UA 14 GOLD 1664 46-25 65% 14 MO
7497 NM Rev 16-Jackie 1664 35-17 67% 16 AZ
7498 MoCo MAVS 13-Red 1664 43-23 65% 13 TX
7499 PVA 17 Molten 1664 21-11 66% 17 MO
7500 Revolution Cburg 14-White 1664 30-22 57% 14 PA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.