2025-2026 Season — Page 150 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7451 | H Skyline 12-White | 1665 | 17-9 | 65% | 12 | TX |
| 7452 | Gulfside 12-Prime | 1665 | 31-26 | 54% | 12 | FL |
| 7453 | PAEVA 15-Maroon | 1665 | 43-24 | 64% | 15 | PA |
| 7454 | NORCO 15-Blue | 1665 | 26-18 | 59% | 15 | CO |
| 7455 | IV Force 16-Wildpepper | 1665 | 32-17 | 65% | 16 | CA |
| 7456 | AVB Fire 18-1 black | 1665 | 5-1 | 83% | 18 | MN |
| 7457 | Crossfire 12-Mercury | 1665 | 9-1 | 90% | 12 | MN |
| 7458 | Vibe 13-G | 1665 | 16-13 | 55% | 13 | CA |
| 7459 | WGVA 18-Black | 1665 | 34-10 | 77% | 18 | GA |
| 7460 | 108 BVC 16-Black | 1665 | 24-8 | 75% | 16 | VA |
| 7461 | Lockdown VBC 12-Sandpipers | 1665 | 23-13 | 64% | 12 | MA |
| 7462 | Eastview Lightning 13-1 | 1665 | 31-15 | 67% | 13 | MN |
| 7463 | Impact 17-1 | 1665 | 43-22 | 66% | 17 | MN |
| 7464 | PREVAIL Girls 13-Platinum | 1665 | 12-5 | 71% | 13 | PA |
| 7465 | VBAY AU 16-Papaya | 1665 | 3-5 | 38% | 16 | AL |
| 7466 | Believe 16 Premier | 1665 | 19-7 | 73% | 16 | CO |
| 7467 | Club V 16-Lexi | 1665 | 25-17 | 60% | 16 | UT |
| 7468 | M1 13-Blue | 1665 | 35-26 | 57% | 13 | TN |
| 7469 | Monsters 18 | 1665 | 20-5 | 80% | 18 | MI |
| 7470 | Legit 11-Grey | 1665 | 5-0 | 100% | 11 | IA |
| 7471 | Maks 14 | 1665 | 16-6 | 73% | 14 | ID |
| 7472 | Aspire NW 13-1 vancouver | 1665 | 9-6 | 60% | 13 | WA |
| 7473 | Tribe 14 | 1665 | 8-1 | 89% | 14 | UT |
| 7474 | Delaware United Volleyball Club 12-Navy | 1665 | 25-11 | 69% | 12 | DE |
| 7475 | Premier EDGE 17 | 1665 | 62-63 | 49% | 17 | DE |
| 7476 | San Diego VBC 12-Shawn | 1665 | 30-16 | 65% | 12 | CA |
| 7477 | Impact Volleyball Club 13-1 | 1664 | 52-21 | 70% | 13 | TX |
| 7478 | TDV 18-Elite | 1664 | 25-13 | 66% | 18 | OH |
| 7479 | Cap City 18-Gold | 1664 | 35-13 | 73% | 18 | NC |
| 7480 | Allegro 18-South black | 1664 | 37-16 | 70% | 18 | NJ |
| 7481 | TC ELITE 15-J | 1664 | 9-2 | 82% | 15 | LA |
| 7482 | Lakeville South 11-Gold | 1664 | 9-1 | 90% | 11 | MN |
| 7483 | Alliance 15-Shockwave | 1664 | 15-6 | 68% | 15 | MA |
| 7484 | Mets 17-Arbet | 1664 | 6-8 | 43% | 17 | PR |
| 7485 | WEVBC 16-1 | 1664 | 44-19 | 70% | 16 | GA |
| 7486 | Boost 13-Navy | 1664 | 11-7 | 58% | 13 | IA |
| 7487 | NEVA 17-Black kalani | 1664 | 29-11 | 69% | 17 | UT |
| 7488 | Mass Impact 16-Mae | 1664 | 21-9 | 70% | 16 | MA |
| 7489 | Empire 12-Nevaeh | 1664 | 9-3 | 75% | 12 | CA |
| 7490 | TNT 14 Aerosmith | 1664 | 43-30 | 59% | 14 | PA |
| 7491 | VCN 18-Elite | 1664 | 4-4 | 50% | 18 | NE |
| 7492 | SBS 12U | 1664 | 10-3 | 77% | 12 | TX |
| 7493 | GO Volley 14 N | 1664 | 27-33 | 44% | 14 | VA |
| 7494 | MOVA UA 13 GOLD | 1664 | 38-25 | 60% | 13 | MO |
| 7495 | Academy 12-R cheetahs | 1664 | 29-15 | 66% | 12 | IN |
| 7496 | Impact vball club 16 | 1664 | 29-14 | 64% | 16 | MO |
| 7497 | Rise 16-Angela | 1664 | 27-18 | 60% | 16 | ID |
| 7498 | MOD Regional 11-Blue | 1664 | 10-2 | 83% | 11 | IL |
| 7499 | Courthouse 14-Blue | 1664 | 25-11 | 69% | 14 | OR |
| 7500 | MOD Elite 13-Blue | 1664 | 37-41 | 47% | 13 | IL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.