2025-2026 Season — Page 150 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7451 | Lebanon VBC 14-1 elite | 1665 | 20-9 | 69% | 14 | OR |
| 7452 | MARIN 16-Green | 1665 | 35-24 | 59% | 16 | CA |
| 7453 | Sky High Adidas 16-Onyx | 1665 | 37-27 | 58% | 16 | IL |
| 7454 | United 16 Chelsea | 1665 | 24-13 | 65% | 16 | CO |
| 7455 | ProPlay 14-Zoe | 1665 | 24-13 | 65% | 14 | CA |
| 7456 | WGVA 18-Black | 1665 | 34-10 | 77% | 18 | GA |
| 7457 | Mass Impact 18-Shannon | 1665 | 30-18 | 63% | 18 | MA |
| 7458 | Surge 16-Black | 1665 | 15-12 | 56% | 16 | RI |
| 7459 | Allegro 18-South black | 1665 | 37-16 | 70% | 18 | NJ |
| 7460 | NYC Juniors 17-Si | 1665 | 29-13 | 69% | 17 | NY |
| 7461 | SEV 17-Armour | 1665 | 9-5 | 64% | 17 | AL |
| 7462 | TAV South 14-Royal | 1665 | 27-20 | 53% | 14 | TX |
| 7463 | Core 18-National | 1665 | 20-13 | 61% | 18 | CA |
| 7464 | PVA 16-4 | 1665 | 10-4 | 67% | 16 | MO |
| 7465 | AVA 17 ONYX | 1665 | 24-47 | 34% | 17 | TX |
| 7466 | HNL Volleyball 16-Blue | 1665 | 16-8 | 67% | 16 | HI |
| 7467 | Figs Volleyball Club 17-1 | 1665 | 9-10 | 47% | 17 | CA |
| 7468 | Legit 11-Grey | 1665 | 5-0 | 100% | 11 | |
| 7469 | Mizuno Northern Lights 14-2 | 1665 | 3-2 | 60% | 14 | |
| 7470 | CTRUS 13-1 | 1665 | 20-6 | 77% | 13 | CA |
| 7471 | MVA 16-Raquel | 1665 | 40-35 | 53% | 16 | FL |
| 7472 | Pgh Elite 15-Black | 1665 | 25-13 | 66% | 15 | PA |
| 7473 | Lakeville South 14-Gold | 1665 | 21-8 | 72% | 14 | MN |
| 7474 | Vibe 13-G | 1665 | 16-13 | 55% | 13 | CA |
| 7475 | MVC Panthers 11-Pink | 1664 | 17-6 | 74% | 11 | |
| 7476 | HVC 12-Black | 1664 | 16-7 | 67% | 12 | BC |
| 7477 | Canuck VBC 16-2 | 1664 | 3-4 | 43% | 16 | |
| 7478 | JVB 14-S | 1664 | 21-6 | 78% | 14 | |
| 7479 | Advanced Ath 17-1 natl | 1664 | 21-7 | 75% | 17 | TX |
| 7480 | Ignite AZ 14-National | 1664 | 48-16 | 75% | 14 | AZ |
| 7481 | Mana Toa 16-Carrie | 1664 | 21-5 | 81% | 16 | AL |
| 7482 | Amarillo Xtreme 13 T4G | 1664 | 20-8 | 71% | 13 | TX |
| 7483 | BOOST 14 Navy | 1664 | 24-15 | 62% | 14 | IA |
| 7484 | Carolina ICE 14 National | 1664 | 25-14 | 64% | 14 | SC |
| 7485 | FC Elite 14-Blue | 1664 | 35-16 | 69% | 14 | WI |
| 7486 | Empowered 16-Elite onyx | 1664 | 35-17 | 67% | 16 | IN |
| 7487 | Five Star 14-Black | 1664 | 43-21 | 67% | 14 | CA |
| 7488 | EVC 14 Elite | 1664 | 23-25 | 48% | 14 | IL |
| 7489 | MAVS KC 11 National | 1664 | 11-10 | 52% | 11 | KS |
| 7490 | Gulfside 12-Prime | 1664 | 31-26 | 54% | 12 | FL |
| 7491 | HEAT 18-National ryan | 1664 | 22-14 | 61% | 18 | CA |
| 7492 | MARIN 15-Slate | 1664 | 37-14 | 73% | 15 | CA |
| 7493 | EXCELL 15-1 paul navy | 1664 | 45-16 | 74% | 15 | SC |
| 7494 | NASA BHM 18-PURPLE | 1664 | 19-11 | 63% | 18 | AL |
| 7495 | Alpha Omega 13-National | 1664 | 13-6 | 68% | 13 | MO |
| 7496 | MOVA UA 14 GOLD | 1664 | 46-25 | 65% | 14 | MO |
| 7497 | NM Rev 16-Jackie | 1664 | 35-17 | 67% | 16 | AZ |
| 7498 | MoCo MAVS 13-Red | 1664 | 43-23 | 65% | 13 | TX |
| 7499 | PVA 17 Molten | 1664 | 21-11 | 66% | 17 | MO |
| 7500 | Revolution Cburg 14-White | 1664 | 30-22 | 57% | 14 | PA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.