Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 150 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
7451 H Skyline 12-White 1665 17-9 65% 12 TX
7452 Gulfside 12-Prime 1665 31-26 54% 12 FL
7453 PAEVA 15-Maroon 1665 43-24 64% 15 PA
7454 NORCO 15-Blue 1665 26-18 59% 15 CO
7455 IV Force 16-Wildpepper 1665 32-17 65% 16 CA
7456 AVB Fire 18-1 black 1665 5-1 83% 18 MN
7457 Crossfire 12-Mercury 1665 9-1 90% 12 MN
7458 Vibe 13-G 1665 16-13 55% 13 CA
7459 WGVA 18-Black 1665 34-10 77% 18 GA
7460 108 BVC 16-Black 1665 24-8 75% 16 VA
7461 Lockdown VBC 12-Sandpipers 1665 23-13 64% 12 MA
7462 Eastview Lightning 13-1 1665 31-15 67% 13 MN
7463 Impact 17-1 1665 43-22 66% 17 MN
7464 PREVAIL Girls 13-Platinum 1665 12-5 71% 13 PA
7465 VBAY AU 16-Papaya 1665 3-5 38% 16 AL
7466 Believe 16 Premier 1665 19-7 73% 16 CO
7467 Club V 16-Lexi 1665 25-17 60% 16 UT
7468 M1 13-Blue 1665 35-26 57% 13 TN
7469 Monsters 18 1665 20-5 80% 18 MI
7470 Legit 11-Grey 1665 5-0 100% 11 IA
7471 Maks 14 1665 16-6 73% 14 ID
7472 Aspire NW 13-1 vancouver 1665 9-6 60% 13 WA
7473 Tribe 14 1665 8-1 89% 14 UT
7474 Delaware United Volleyball Club 12-Navy 1665 25-11 69% 12 DE
7475 Premier EDGE 17 1665 62-63 49% 17 DE
7476 San Diego VBC 12-Shawn 1665 30-16 65% 12 CA
7477 Impact Volleyball Club 13-1 1664 52-21 70% 13 TX
7478 TDV 18-Elite 1664 25-13 66% 18 OH
7479 Cap City 18-Gold 1664 35-13 73% 18 NC
7480 Allegro 18-South black 1664 37-16 70% 18 NJ
7481 TC ELITE 15-J 1664 9-2 82% 15 LA
7482 Lakeville South 11-Gold 1664 9-1 90% 11 MN
7483 Alliance 15-Shockwave 1664 15-6 68% 15 MA
7484 Mets 17-Arbet 1664 6-8 43% 17 PR
7485 WEVBC 16-1 1664 44-19 70% 16 GA
7486 Boost 13-Navy 1664 11-7 58% 13 IA
7487 NEVA 17-Black kalani 1664 29-11 69% 17 UT
7488 Mass Impact 16-Mae 1664 21-9 70% 16 MA
7489 Empire 12-Nevaeh 1664 9-3 75% 12 CA
7490 TNT 14 Aerosmith 1664 43-30 59% 14 PA
7491 VCN 18-Elite 1664 4-4 50% 18 NE
7492 SBS 12U 1664 10-3 77% 12 TX
7493 GO Volley 14 N 1664 27-33 44% 14 VA
7494 MOVA UA 13 GOLD 1664 38-25 60% 13 MO
7495 Academy 12-R cheetahs 1664 29-15 66% 12 IN
7496 Impact vball club 16 1664 29-14 64% 16 MO
7497 Rise 16-Angela 1664 27-18 60% 16 ID
7498 MOD Regional 11-Blue 1664 10-2 83% 11 IL
7499 Courthouse 14-Blue 1664 25-11 69% 14 OR
7500 MOD Elite 13-Blue 1664 37-41 47% 13 IL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.