Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 151 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
7501 Triangle 11-Black 1664 16-13 55% 11 NC
7502 ThunderVanbc 17-1 1664 4-4 50% 17 BC
7503 SVBC Blazers 12 Kristine 1664 16-9 64% 12 SC
7504 Vibe 16-1 1664 34-38 47% 16 CA
7505 Mets 17-Arbet 1664 6-8 43% 17 PR
7506 ICA 17-Jonathan 1664 18-0 100% 17 TX
7507 ENVY 16-National 1664 34-28 55% 16 NE
7508 ARSEL 15-1 cuba 1664 18-4 82% 15 PR
7509 CINCY EAST 12-1 black 1664 27-13 68% 12 OH
7510 Premier Nebraska 12-Red 1664 19-9 68% 12 NE
7511 Blaze 11-Volley stars 1664 9-3 64% 11 IA
7512 IVC 15-National 1664 59-35 60% 15 AK
7513 Integrity 14-Intense red 1664 29-19 58% 14 TX
7514 Apex 17-National navy 1664 4-5 44% 17 MO
7515 TC ELITE 15-J 1664 9-2 82% 15 LA
7516 TQ 16 1664 40-14 74% 16 GA
7517 Legit 14-G gray 1664 8-0 100% 14
7518 NorCal Supreme 13-Blue 1664 20-8 71% 13 CA
7519 NW Elite 16-3 red 1664 31-9 78% 16 OR
7520 504 VBC 18 1664 34-12 72% 18 LA
7521 LAVBC 14-Black 1664 21-13 62% 14 CA
7522 Premier 12-3 black 1663 16-8 57% 12
7523 MIVBC 16-1 1663 22-10 61% 16
7524 NDVBC Tsunami 10 1663 11-4 73% 10
7525 Saratoga 14-Select 1663 52-14 76% 14 NY
7526 M1 13-Blue 1663 35-26 57% 13 TN
7527 HHVBC 10-1g 1663 5-0 100% 10 IA
7528 Iowa Impact 14-1 premier 1663 21-8 72% 14 IA
7529 LAVA West 11-Premier 1663 24-18 57% 11 CA
7530 Countdown 15-2 elite 1663 41-21 66% 15 FL
7531 ATHENA VB 16-3 gold select 1663 38-20 66% 16 OR
7532 Amarillo Xtreme 13 Blackout 1663 17-8 68% 13 TX
7533 CCVBC 15-Eric 1663 21-19 53% 15 CA
7534 Eastview Lightning 13-1 1663 31-15 67% 13 MN
7535 ESO 15-Elite grey 1663 34-19 64% 15 OH
7536 FL HYPE 18 Smack 1663 41-18 69% 18 FL
7537 GSJ West 13-Black 1663 25-9 74% 13 SC
7538 FRVBC 15-3 white 1663 18-4 82% 15 CO
7539 Maverick 15 Phoenix 1663 39-17 70% 15 AZ
7540 Hot Shots 18-Black 1663 20-9 69% 18 OH
7541 NE D-League 15 1663 17-10 63% 15 NE
7542 Monsters 16-Elite navy 1663 31-12 72% 16 MI
7543 NxtLvl 18-Blue 1663 36-18 67% 18 PA
7544 TX LEGACY 16 NATIONAL 1663 36-15 71% 16 TX
7545 501 Volley 13-3 reg plus 1663 28-8 78% 13 AR
7546 HDVC 18-Savannah 1663 25-8 76% 18 CA
7547 Club 217 16-Kristy 1663 30-12 71% 16 IL
7548 MIDTN Volleyball 13-Black 1663 21-10 68% 13 TN
7549 Rise 16-Angela 1663 27-18 60% 16 CA
7550 South County 17-Blue 1663 27-27 50% 17 RI
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.