Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 152 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
7551 City 12-Gold 1663 26-26 50% 12 CA
7552 HVVC 15-Blue 1663 37-21 64% 15 MI
7553 Oly Reign 16-Gold 1663 19-22 46% 16 WA
7554 504 VBC 18-2 1663 6-2 75% 18 LA
7555 TIV 16-Red 1663 12-5 71% 16 TX
7556 Big Sky 18-2 1663 21-4 75% 18 MT
7557 STVA 17-3 1663 6-2 75% 17 TX
7558 STATC 14-2 1663 9-4 69% 14 MO
7559 NEVA 17-Black kalani 1663 29-11 69% 17 UT
7560 FWFIRE 11-P 1663 23-6 68% 11 TX
7561 GOLDENBULLS 15-G black 1663 8-1 89% 15 FL
7562 FeVA 15 1663 39-29 57% 15 WA
7563 A5 Gwinnett 18-Jdx 1663 37-25 60% 18 GA
7564 A5 Gwinnett 14-Morgan 1663 34-14 71% 14 GA
7565 T4VBC 16 Elite 1663 35-32 52% 16 TX
7566 LevelOne Albany 16-1 1663 30-15 67% 16 OR
7567 ITVC 15-Baden 1663 33-21 61% 15 WA
7568 Emerald Coast 15-National - cheyenne 1663 10-4 71% 15 FL
7569 WC 18 11 1663 6-2 75% 11
7570 AV Coach Bri / Coach Tommy 15 1663 5-4 56% 15
7571 Summit 14-Blue elite 1663 21-30 41% 14 IN
7572 Team Momentum 13 Org 1663 44-18 71% 13 MO
7573 SWI3D 13-White 1662 5-0 100% 13
7574 Aus Velocity 13-1 boys 1662 4-0 67% 13 TX
7575 Summit VC 13-National 1662 33-18 65% 13 MO
7576 Hollywood Rise 14 Elite 1662 18-12 60% 14 OH
7577 CJVA 12-Black 1662 24-15 62% 12 NJ
7578 OVVC 18-Green 1662 9-5 64% 18 OH
7579 PVA 16-National summit 1662 23-31 43% 16 PA
7580 Elevate 13-Blue 1662 26-23 50% 13 TX
7581 IA VIBE 13-1 teal 1662 17-4 77% 13 CA
7582 CVBC 14-1s 1662 25-11 69% 14 IN
7583 CLBRK 14-1 1662 12-3 80% 14 WI
7584 Club Unite 14-Lw gray 1662 25-7 78% 14 TN
7585 C2 15-2 reg blue kym 1662 24-9 73% 15 TN
7586 NHouston Elite 13-Liberty 1662 12-3 75% 13 TX
7587 Attack VBC 16-Mizuno lime 1662 33-27 55% 16 TX
7588 Austin Skyline 15-B kelsey 1662 22-28 44% 15 TX
7589 Dinos 14-2 1662 5-4 56% 14 AB
7590 EASTON VBC 14-1 1662 37-11 73% 14 PA
7591 CTX Slam 14-N gold 1662 44-22 67% 14 TX
7592 Coastline 17-Black 1662 28-8 78% 17 NC
7593 Epic 15-Adidas 1662 46-22 68% 15 WI
7594 FaR Out 18 Onyx 1662 21-18 54% 18 MI
7595 HOVA 16-A red elite 1662 37-19 66% 16 OH
7596 MKE Sting 17-White 1662 38-29 57% 17 WI
7597 Ozark Juniors 17 Elite 1662 37-34 52% 17 AR
7598 RISE 13 MORGAN 1662 27-19 59% 13 CA
7599 Sandhills 14-Monique 1662 15-7 68% 14 NC
7600 RVC 13 Zonal 1662 43-17 72% 13 VA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.