Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 153 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
7601 Sanford Sports 17-Black 1662 44-28 61% 17 SD
7602 SIVBC 12 Monsoon 1662 44-28 61% 12 WA
7603 Venom 18-Black 1662 42-16 72% 18 AZ
7604 West E 16-Purple 1662 20-8 71% 16 PA
7605 608 Juniors 18-1 1662 24-25 49% 18 WI
7606 Core STL 13-Navy 1662 33-25 56% 13 MO
7607 C-Force VBC 14-Black 1662 24-9 73% 14 TN
7608 Lady Legends 12-Teal 1662 6-0 100% 12 PA
7609 BSVBC 17-Black 1662 20-14 59% 17 IL
7610 Allegro 16-Red 1662 33-19 63% 16 NJ
7611 Club V 14-Cassidy 1662 27-21 47% 14 UT
7612 Tstreet SN 14-Laura 1662 27-8 77% 14 CA
7613 Legacy 14-V 1662 15-5 75% 14 OH
7614 Rainier 15-Summit oms 1662 39-29 57% 15 WA
7615 SDVBC 14-Ari 1662 17-24 41% 14 CA
7616 Northeast 13-2 1662 33-13 72% 13 CT
7617 Mass Premier 16-1 1662 27-20 57% 16 MA
7618 DME Elite 12-1 1662 26-31 46% 12 FL
7619 NRG VBC 17-Ampd white 1662 23-16 55% 17 TX
7620 Erie Elite Lori 16 1662 18-4 82% 16 PA
7621 SET IT OFF 13-U 1662 19-2 90% 13 IA
7622 JET 13-Williams 1662 19-17 53% 13 TX
7623 Spa City 11-Aqua 1662 5-0 100% 11 NY
7624 FLASH 14 1662 5-0 100% 14 OH
7625 MVP 12-Black 1662 39-22 63% 12 MD
7626 Pohaku Volleyball Club 14-1 1662 5-1 71% 14 KS
7627 CV Starlings 12-Marisa 1662 8-1 89% 12 CA
7628 CVC 16 National (NO) 1662 17-17 50% 16 ND
7629 Grandlake 16-Mele 1662 6-0 100% 16 OH
7630 EVOLUTION ELITE 13 1662 4-0 100% 13
7631 NY Ninja Attack 15 1662 26-11 70% 15
7632 SWMN 15-1 1662 2-1 67% 15
7633 SKY Elite West 14-1 1662 26-13 67% 14 PA
7634 SGV 16-Phoenix 1662 8-1 89% 16 CA
7635 Victory Volleyball LP 16-1 1661 34-15 69% 16
7636 JTown Juniors 14-Black 1661 26-20 57% 14 AR
7637 FTL 12-Nuclear tania 1661 43-22 66% 12 FL
7638 Illini Elite 15-L red 1661 23-9 72% 15 IL
7639 ITVC 14 Baden 1661 25-18 58% 14 WA
7640 Air VBC 16-Blue 1661 20-11 65% 16 WI
7641 Ballistic Ryan 14 1661 21-6 78% 14 MI
7642 Austin Skyline 13-Black 1661 20-28 42% 13 TX
7643 CSF 14-Legacy 1661 30-18 63% 14 NC
7644 Brownsville Dynamite 11-1 1661 12-2 80% 11 TX
7645 DBQ Elite GOLD 16-1 1661 11-5 69% 16 IA
7646 CWVC 16-Black 1661 8-2 80% 16 WI
7647 ECC 16-National mark 1661 31-26 54% 16 NJ
7648 ForceVC 15-2 1661 25-15 63% 15 OH
7649 ESVC 14-Blue 1661 28-9 76% 14 AL
7650 ForceVC 12-1 1661 30-16 65% 12 OH
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.