2025-2026 Season — Page 153 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7601 | Sanford Sports 17-Black | 1662 | 44-28 | 61% | 17 | SD |
| 7602 | SIVBC 12 Monsoon | 1662 | 44-28 | 61% | 12 | WA |
| 7603 | Venom 18-Black | 1662 | 42-16 | 72% | 18 | AZ |
| 7604 | West E 16-Purple | 1662 | 20-8 | 71% | 16 | PA |
| 7605 | 608 Juniors 18-1 | 1662 | 24-25 | 49% | 18 | WI |
| 7606 | Core STL 13-Navy | 1662 | 33-25 | 56% | 13 | MO |
| 7607 | C-Force VBC 14-Black | 1662 | 24-9 | 73% | 14 | TN |
| 7608 | Lady Legends 12-Teal | 1662 | 6-0 | 100% | 12 | PA |
| 7609 | BSVBC 17-Black | 1662 | 20-14 | 59% | 17 | IL |
| 7610 | Allegro 16-Red | 1662 | 33-19 | 63% | 16 | NJ |
| 7611 | Club V 14-Cassidy | 1662 | 27-21 | 47% | 14 | UT |
| 7612 | Tstreet SN 14-Laura | 1662 | 27-8 | 77% | 14 | CA |
| 7613 | Legacy 14-V | 1662 | 15-5 | 75% | 14 | OH |
| 7614 | Rainier 15-Summit oms | 1662 | 39-29 | 57% | 15 | WA |
| 7615 | SDVBC 14-Ari | 1662 | 17-24 | 41% | 14 | CA |
| 7616 | Northeast 13-2 | 1662 | 33-13 | 72% | 13 | CT |
| 7617 | Mass Premier 16-1 | 1662 | 27-20 | 57% | 16 | MA |
| 7618 | DME Elite 12-1 | 1662 | 26-31 | 46% | 12 | FL |
| 7619 | NRG VBC 17-Ampd white | 1662 | 23-16 | 55% | 17 | TX |
| 7620 | Erie Elite Lori 16 | 1662 | 18-4 | 82% | 16 | PA |
| 7621 | SET IT OFF 13-U | 1662 | 19-2 | 90% | 13 | IA |
| 7622 | JET 13-Williams | 1662 | 19-17 | 53% | 13 | TX |
| 7623 | Spa City 11-Aqua | 1662 | 5-0 | 100% | 11 | NY |
| 7624 | FLASH 14 | 1662 | 5-0 | 100% | 14 | OH |
| 7625 | MVP 12-Black | 1662 | 39-22 | 63% | 12 | MD |
| 7626 | Pohaku Volleyball Club 14-1 | 1662 | 5-1 | 71% | 14 | KS |
| 7627 | CV Starlings 12-Marisa | 1662 | 8-1 | 89% | 12 | CA |
| 7628 | CVC 16 National (NO) | 1662 | 17-17 | 50% | 16 | ND |
| 7629 | Grandlake 16-Mele | 1662 | 6-0 | 100% | 16 | OH |
| 7630 | EVOLUTION ELITE 13 | 1662 | 4-0 | 100% | 13 | |
| 7631 | NY Ninja Attack 15 | 1662 | 26-11 | 70% | 15 | |
| 7632 | SWMN 15-1 | 1662 | 2-1 | 67% | 15 | |
| 7633 | SKY Elite West 14-1 | 1662 | 26-13 | 67% | 14 | PA |
| 7634 | SGV 16-Phoenix | 1662 | 8-1 | 89% | 16 | CA |
| 7635 | Victory Volleyball LP 16-1 | 1661 | 34-15 | 69% | 16 | |
| 7636 | JTown Juniors 14-Black | 1661 | 26-20 | 57% | 14 | AR |
| 7637 | FTL 12-Nuclear tania | 1661 | 43-22 | 66% | 12 | FL |
| 7638 | Illini Elite 15-L red | 1661 | 23-9 | 72% | 15 | IL |
| 7639 | ITVC 14 Baden | 1661 | 25-18 | 58% | 14 | WA |
| 7640 | Air VBC 16-Blue | 1661 | 20-11 | 65% | 16 | WI |
| 7641 | Ballistic Ryan 14 | 1661 | 21-6 | 78% | 14 | MI |
| 7642 | Austin Skyline 13-Black | 1661 | 20-28 | 42% | 13 | TX |
| 7643 | CSF 14-Legacy | 1661 | 30-18 | 63% | 14 | NC |
| 7644 | Brownsville Dynamite 11-1 | 1661 | 12-2 | 80% | 11 | TX |
| 7645 | DBQ Elite GOLD 16-1 | 1661 | 11-5 | 69% | 16 | IA |
| 7646 | CWVC 16-Black | 1661 | 8-2 | 80% | 16 | WI |
| 7647 | ECC 16-National mark | 1661 | 31-26 | 54% | 16 | NJ |
| 7648 | ForceVC 15-2 | 1661 | 25-15 | 63% | 15 | OH |
| 7649 | ESVC 14-Blue | 1661 | 28-9 | 76% | 14 | AL |
| 7650 | ForceVC 12-1 | 1661 | 30-16 | 65% | 12 | OH |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.