Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 154 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
7651 Midwest Penguins 12-Black 1661 27-13 68% 12 WI
7652 ND Elite 16 Winter 1661 11-4 73% 16 ND
7653 Rhythm 17 Janvier 1661 32-36 46% 17 TN
7654 SERV 14 Impact 1661 59-18 77% 14 VA
7655 SG Elite 11-Roshambo 1661 26-17 60% 11 CA
7656 SA Renegades Adidas 13-1 1661 28-18 61% 13 TX
7657 SPIRIT VBC 12-1 1661 30-15 67% 12 OH
7658 501 Volley 14-3 reg plus 1661 27-8 77% 14 AR
7659 LA Diggers 14-Purple 1661 19-7 73% 14 MN
7660 Air VBC 18 National 1661 32-7 82% 18 WI
7661 TVC 16-1 1661 20-11 65% 16 OR
7662 VCN 18-Elite 1661 4-4 50% 18 NE
7663 PSVBC 13-Elite 1661 21-6 72% 13 WV
7664 IMUA UVC 12-Ua 1661 28-12 70% 12 CA
7665 SDVBC 12-Shawn 1661 30-16 65% 12 CA
7666 RVA 16-Jensen 1661 20-19 51% 16 IA
7667 Elevate 13-Pink 1661 18-4 82% 13 TX
7668 Valencianas 17 1661 7-1 88% 17 PR
7669 ID Peak 17-S billie 1661 6-7 46% 17 ID
7670 SKPV 15-1 1661 24-7 77% 15 KY
7671 ND Elite 18-Dalziel 1661 21-10 64% 18 ND
7672 MiElite 12-National west 1661 17-5 77% 12 MI
7673 Aces 17 1661 4-1 80% 17 TX
7674 Victory 12-Nat'l black 1661 2-1 40% 12 TX
7675 FWFIRE 18-P 1661 6-3 55% 18 TX
7676 Blue Crab 14-Blue 1661 39-16 71% 14 LA
7677 573 Missouri Juniors 16-N 1661 5-5 50% 16 MO
7678 Victory 16-Nat'l green 1661 4-3 44% 16 TX
7679 Four Corners 15 1661 7-2 78% 15
7680 Summit 12-Elite black 1661 17-7 65% 12 TX
7681 NORCO 15-Blue 1661 26-18 59% 15 CO
7682 SEVC 15-1 1660 13-3 81% 15
7683 IHT Elite 14-1 1660 9-3 60% 14
7684 ZVC 18-1 1660 13-8 62% 18
7685 Mabel-Canton Jrs 16 1660 6-0 100% 16
7686 575 15-Wsr olivia 1660 32-9 78% 15 GA
7687 ESO 18-Elite 1660 28-17 62% 18 OH
7688 AZ REV 17 Elite 1660 28-38 42% 17 AZ
7689 Metro 12-Central 1660 23-10 68% 12 DC
7690 Crossfire 12-Mercury 1660 9-1 90% 12 MN
7691 Courthouse 14-Blue 1660 25-11 69% 14 OR
7692 DeSoto 16-1 1660 36-11 77% 16 FL
7693 Eclipse 17 Solar 1660 35-15 70% 17 WI
7694 HBJ 15-Haleigh/chandler 1660 30-14 68% 15 AR
7695 Hot Shots 15-Black 1660 23-10 70% 15 OH
7696 Roots 14-2 blue 1660 34-22 61% 14 IA
7697 Sanford Sports 14-Black 1660 51-29 64% 14 SD
7698 SPVB 16-Blue 1660 43-15 74% 16 IL
7699 LEVBC 17-National 1660 25-46 34% 17 MD
7700 New York Elite 17-Blue 1660 25-8 76% 17 NY
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.