2025-2026 Season — Page 154 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7651 | Ft Wayne VBC 14-Select blue | 1661 | 23-9 | 72% | 14 | IN |
| 7652 | Laredo Premier 14-Force | 1661 | 18-9 | 67% | 14 | TX |
| 7653 | ITVC 14 Baden | 1661 | 25-18 | 58% | 14 | WA |
| 7654 | CJV 15-National navy | 1661 | 24-44 | 35% | 15 | NC |
| 7655 | C1VB 16-Elite skylar | 1661 | 25-13 | 66% | 16 | SC |
| 7656 | TVC 15-Royal | 1661 | 32-28 | 53% | 15 | OH |
| 7657 | Club One AZ 15-Royal-ang | 1661 | 28-10 | 74% | 15 | AZ |
| 7658 | Mintonette Sports 12 Mintonette Sports - m.11 | 1661 | 10-4 | 71% | 12 | OH |
| 7659 | Midwest Penguins 12-Black | 1661 | 27-13 | 68% | 12 | WI |
| 7660 | DCVA 12-Aaron | 1661 | 12-16 | 43% | 12 | NM |
| 7661 | MVC 16 Ali | 1661 | 38-18 | 68% | 16 | OH |
| 7662 | Crosscourt 16 | 1661 | 33-22 | 60% | 16 | PA |
| 7663 | SVBC Blazers 12 Kristine | 1661 | 16-9 | 64% | 12 | SC |
| 7664 | Momentum Volleyball Club 16-Riley | 1661 | 8-7 | 53% | 16 | AZ |
| 7665 | Prime Volleyball 12 Prime TEAL | 1661 | 9-5 | 56% | 12 | UT |
| 7666 | No Limits 15-Elite | 1661 | 22-22 | 48% | 15 | TX |
| 7667 | FWFIRE 18-P | 1661 | 6-3 | 55% | 18 | TX |
| 7668 | Spa City 11-Aqua | 1661 | 5-0 | 100% | 11 | NY |
| 7669 | SA Renegades Adidas 13-1 | 1661 | 28-18 | 61% | 13 | TX |
| 7670 | AR Metro 11-Regional plus | 1661 | 33-22 | 60% | 11 | AR |
| 7671 | Bristol Crush 15-1 | 1661 | 16-5 | 76% | 15 | CT |
| 7672 | Coastline 17-Black | 1661 | 28-8 | 78% | 17 | NC |
| 7673 | Sanford Sports 17-Black | 1661 | 44-28 | 61% | 17 | SD |
| 7674 | Intense 17-S - bb | 1661 | 42-10 | 81% | 17 | LA |
| 7675 | UVC 12-U black | 1661 | 7-5 | 47% | 12 | IL |
| 7676 | No Limits 16 National (LSC) | 1661 | 9-6 | 60% | 16 | TX |
| 7677 | West Branch Bears 13 | 1661 | 5-1 | 83% | 13 | IA |
| 7678 | MMVC 17 Gold | 1661 | 22-31 | 42% | 17 | WV |
| 7679 | IVBA 15-Ren | 1661 | 18-16 | 53% | 15 | MS |
| 7680 | Florida Conquer 17-National | 1661 | 36-15 | 71% | 17 | FL |
| 7681 | 516 Elite 16-Black | 1661 | 28-13 | 68% | 16 | NY |
| 7682 | SPIRIT VBC 12-1 | 1661 | 30-15 | 67% | 12 | OH |
| 7683 | FORZA1 12-One | 1661 | 24-21 | 53% | 12 | CA |
| 7684 | GSA 17-National | 1661 | 48-24 | 67% | 17 | NJ |
| 7685 | Ta'ahine AZ 12-Tu'ipulotu | 1661 | 38-15 | 72% | 12 | AZ |
| 7686 | ECC 16-National mark | 1661 | 31-26 | 54% | 16 | NJ |
| 7687 | Pequot Lakes 12-Blue | 1661 | 5-0 | 100% | 12 | MN |
| 7688 | KIVA 12 KIVA Mckenzie (PR) (27) | 1661 | 3-1 | 75% | 12 | KY |
| 7689 | Carolina One 12 C1VB Juniors Easley 1 (PM) (1) | 1661 | 6-0 | 100% | 12 | SC |
| 7690 | Lancers 12-Scarlet | 1661 | 11-4 | 69% | 12 | IA |
| 7691 | Austin Skyline 13-Black | 1661 | 20-28 | 42% | 13 | TX |
| 7692 | Aggression 13-2 premier | 1661 | 10-1 | 91% | 13 | IL |
| 7693 | 757 15-Black | 1661 | 43-28 | 61% | 15 | VA |
| 7694 | JJVA Club 15-E | 1661 | 10-4 | 71% | 15 | FL |
| 7695 | RVA G16 Navy | 1661 | 36-37 | 49% | 16 | WI |
| 7696 | NASA BHM 17-BLACK | 1661 | 25-15 | 63% | 17 | AL |
| 7697 | Four1Nine Xtreme 14 14-Flick (OV) | 1660 | 6-0 | 100% | 14 | OH |
| 7698 | DBQ Insanity 14-2n black | 1660 | 37-21 | 64% | 14 | IA |
| 7699 | CLBRK 14-1 | 1660 | 12-3 | 80% | 14 | WI |
| 7700 | IVBA 18-Ren | 1660 | 10-8 | 56% | 18 | MS |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.