Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 154 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
7651 Ft Wayne VBC 14-Select blue 1661 23-9 72% 14 IN
7652 Laredo Premier 14-Force 1661 18-9 67% 14 TX
7653 ITVC 14 Baden 1661 25-18 58% 14 WA
7654 CJV 15-National navy 1661 24-44 35% 15 NC
7655 C1VB 16-Elite skylar 1661 25-13 66% 16 SC
7656 TVC 15-Royal 1661 32-28 53% 15 OH
7657 Club One AZ 15-Royal-ang 1661 28-10 74% 15 AZ
7658 Mintonette Sports 12 Mintonette Sports - m.11 1661 10-4 71% 12 OH
7659 Midwest Penguins 12-Black 1661 27-13 68% 12 WI
7660 DCVA 12-Aaron 1661 12-16 43% 12 NM
7661 MVC 16 Ali 1661 38-18 68% 16 OH
7662 Crosscourt 16 1661 33-22 60% 16 PA
7663 SVBC Blazers 12 Kristine 1661 16-9 64% 12 SC
7664 Momentum Volleyball Club 16-Riley 1661 8-7 53% 16 AZ
7665 Prime Volleyball 12 Prime TEAL 1661 9-5 56% 12 UT
7666 No Limits 15-Elite 1661 22-22 48% 15 TX
7667 FWFIRE 18-P 1661 6-3 55% 18 TX
7668 Spa City 11-Aqua 1661 5-0 100% 11 NY
7669 SA Renegades Adidas 13-1 1661 28-18 61% 13 TX
7670 AR Metro 11-Regional plus 1661 33-22 60% 11 AR
7671 Bristol Crush 15-1 1661 16-5 76% 15 CT
7672 Coastline 17-Black 1661 28-8 78% 17 NC
7673 Sanford Sports 17-Black 1661 44-28 61% 17 SD
7674 Intense 17-S - bb 1661 42-10 81% 17 LA
7675 UVC 12-U black 1661 7-5 47% 12 IL
7676 No Limits 16 National (LSC) 1661 9-6 60% 16 TX
7677 West Branch Bears 13 1661 5-1 83% 13 IA
7678 MMVC 17 Gold 1661 22-31 42% 17 WV
7679 IVBA 15-Ren 1661 18-16 53% 15 MS
7680 Florida Conquer 17-National 1661 36-15 71% 17 FL
7681 516 Elite 16-Black 1661 28-13 68% 16 NY
7682 SPIRIT VBC 12-1 1661 30-15 67% 12 OH
7683 FORZA1 12-One 1661 24-21 53% 12 CA
7684 GSA 17-National 1661 48-24 67% 17 NJ
7685 Ta'ahine AZ 12-Tu'ipulotu 1661 38-15 72% 12 AZ
7686 ECC 16-National mark 1661 31-26 54% 16 NJ
7687 Pequot Lakes 12-Blue 1661 5-0 100% 12 MN
7688 KIVA 12 KIVA Mckenzie (PR) (27) 1661 3-1 75% 12 KY
7689 Carolina One 12 C1VB Juniors Easley 1 (PM) (1) 1661 6-0 100% 12 SC
7690 Lancers 12-Scarlet 1661 11-4 69% 12 IA
7691 Austin Skyline 13-Black 1661 20-28 42% 13 TX
7692 Aggression 13-2 premier 1661 10-1 91% 13 IL
7693 757 15-Black 1661 43-28 61% 15 VA
7694 JJVA Club 15-E 1661 10-4 71% 15 FL
7695 RVA G16 Navy 1661 36-37 49% 16 WI
7696 NASA BHM 17-BLACK 1661 25-15 63% 17 AL
7697 Four1Nine Xtreme 14 14-Flick (OV) 1660 6-0 100% 14 OH
7698 DBQ Insanity 14-2n black 1660 37-21 64% 14 IA
7699 CLBRK 14-1 1660 12-3 80% 14 WI
7700 IVBA 18-Ren 1660 10-8 56% 18 MS
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.