2025-2026 Season — Page 155 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7701 | Sandhills 14-Monique | 1660 | 15-7 | 68% | 14 | NC |
| 7702 | Greenwich Volleyball Club 14-Blue | 1660 | 13-15 | 46% | 14 | CT |
| 7703 | Matchbox 18-Adidas | 1660 | 16-9 | 64% | 18 | SD |
| 7704 | COAST 14-4 cassandra | 1660 | 23-17 | 57% | 14 | CA |
| 7705 | Cleveland Wave Volleyball Club 14 CWAVE Coreno | 1660 | 15-4 | 79% | 14 | OH |
| 7706 | SVC Summit 18-1 | 1660 | 23-7 | 77% | 18 | GA |
| 7707 | Ocean Volleyball 14-National | 1660 | 40-25 | 62% | 14 | NJ |
| 7708 | ENVY 14-Green | 1660 | 8-2 | 73% | 14 | IA |
| 7709 | SVC 14 Silver | 1660 | 18-8 | 69% | 14 | IA |
| 7710 | OK Charge 14-Select | 1660 | 21-13 | 55% | 14 | OK |
| 7711 | ESVC 14-Blue | 1660 | 28-9 | 76% | 14 | AL |
| 7712 | Club 801 15-National elyse | 1660 | 19-44 | 30% | 15 | UT |
| 7713 | Lex United 15 Elite | 1660 | 55-74 | 43% | 15 | KY |
| 7714 | Texas Elite 15-Gold | 1660 | 21-19 | 53% | 15 | TX |
| 7715 | Apex Volleyball Club 13-1 | 1660 | 6-2 | 75% | 13 | MO |
| 7716 | Wave 15-Rip | 1660 | 30-10 | 71% | 15 | CA |
| 7717 | Blue Crab 12-Blue | 1660 | 34-18 | 65% | 12 | LA |
| 7718 | A5 16-5 | 1660 | 6-2 | 75% | 16 | GA |
| 7719 | Jax Skyline 16-Black | 1660 | 42-32 | 57% | 16 | FL |
| 7720 | 248 Elite 17-Blue | 1660 | 20-8 | 71% | 17 | IL |
| 7721 | 608 Jr's 18-1 | 1660 | 6-1 | 86% | 18 | MN |
| 7722 | TVC 16 National | 1660 | 28-10 | 74% | 16 | VA |
| 7723 | I.C. Stars 15 Nerissa | 1660 | 12-8 | 60% | 15 | NC |
| 7724 | DYS 16-Thunder | 1660 | 37-10 | 79% | 16 | VA |
| 7725 | FWFIRE 11-P | 1660 | 23-6 | 68% | 11 | TX |
| 7726 | Torrance Volleyball Club 13 | 1660 | 23-14 | 62% | 13 | CA |
| 7727 | Mass Impact 18-Shannon | 1660 | 30-18 | 63% | 18 | MA |
| 7728 | NNJ 16-Alix | 1660 | 24-24 | 50% | 16 | NV |
| 7729 | Digs 18-Red | 1660 | 22-16 | 58% | 18 | NJ |
| 7730 | River City Jrs 15-White | 1660 | 33-16 | 67% | 15 | IA |
| 7731 | WINVS 17-1 | 1660 | 5-0 | 100% | 17 | IA |
| 7732 | 360 16-1 | 1660 | 16-8 | 50% | 16 | NV |
| 7733 | Rainier 15-Summit oms | 1660 | 39-29 | 57% | 15 | WA |
| 7734 | Summit 12-Elite black | 1660 | 17-7 | 65% | 12 | TX |
| 7735 | CVC 17-BLUE | 1660 | 22-34 | 39% | 17 | OH |
| 7736 | Normal Flight 13-1 | 1660 | 16-6 | 73% | 13 | IL |
| 7737 | Edge Elite 12-Gold | 1660 | 5-0 | 100% | 12 | PA |
| 7738 | adidas DYNASTY 18-1 | 1660 | 6-2 | 75% | 18 | KS |
| 7739 | Texas One 15-Royal | 1660 | 33-18 | 65% | 15 | TX |
| 7740 | RISE 16-Elise | 1660 | 24-9 | 73% | 16 | LA |
| 7741 | AVA TX 15-Attack | 1660 | 25-17 | 60% | 15 | TX |
| 7742 | Sartell 12-1 | 1660 | 9-1 | 90% | 12 | MN |
| 7743 | Brownsville Dynamite 11-1 | 1660 | 12-2 | 80% | 11 | TX |
| 7744 | NYC Juniors 17-Si | 1660 | 29-13 | 69% | 17 | NY |
| 7745 | WYORVC-DMTYS 16 WYORVC-DMTYS Green | 1660 | 6-3 | 67% | 16 | WY |
| 7746 | DBQ County WDVB 15-1 | 1660 | 5-2 | 71% | 15 | IA |
| 7747 | EVA 16-Green | 1660 | 23-7 | 77% | 16 | KY |
| 7748 | Ridgetop VBC 13-Apex red | 1660 | 6-1 | 86% | 13 | PA |
| 7749 | Four Corners 15 | 1660 | 7-2 | 78% | 15 | CA |
| 7750 | Mana Toa 16-Carrie | 1660 | 21-5 | 81% | 16 | AL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.