Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 155 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
7701 608 Jr's 18-1 1660 6-1 86% 18 WI
7702 ATN 14-Smooth 1660 28-24 54% 14 CA
7703 Impact 17-1 1660 66-27 71% 17 TX
7704 Texas Fury 14-Impact 1660 28-24 54% 14 TX
7705 1st Alliance 16-Grey 1660 35-22 61% 16 IL
7706 Dig Deep 16-Ginger 1660 23-27 46% 16 NH
7707 Texas Elite 15-Gold 1660 21-19 53% 15 TX
7708 Apex 13-Elite 1660 19-7 66% 13 MT
7709 TopFlight 16-National red 1660 8-14 36% 16 NV
7710 360 16-1 1660 16-8 50% 16 TX
7711 Spiketown VBC 15-1 national 1660 6-2 75% 15 OH
7712 UPvbc 17-Adidas elite 1660 3-2 60% 17 OK
7713 Cajunlnd 18-N 1660 12-2 86% 18 LA
7714 Viper 16-Jo/hannah 1660 6-2 75% 16 CA
7715 Phoenix G16-Red 1660 27-23 54% 16 OH
7716 Husky 14-New england red 1660 26-20 57% 14 CT
7717 MVA 13-Natalia 1660 38-30 56% 13 FL
7718 AVC 13-1 (NO) 1660 18-14 55% 13
7719 WINVS 17-1 1660 5-0 100% 17
7720 Lakes Region 18-1 1660 30-10 75% 18
7721 Slainte 13-Nationals 1660 9-9 50% 13 CA
7722 Ignite 17-National (SC) 1660 30-21 59% 17 CA
7723 Point Break VBC 14-Sebastian 1660 16-5 76% 14 CA
7724 A5 16-5 1660 6-2 75% 16 GA
7725 WE 16-1 1659 26-8 76% 16
7726 Driven 10-Teal 1659 23-11 68% 10 FL
7727 OK Charge 11-National 1659 32-16 65% 11 OK
7728 Invasion 16-Blue 1659 24-15 62% 16 MO
7729 LIVEWIRE 12-Prime 1659 44-21 68% 12 AZ
7730 ARVC 18-Black adidas 1659 15-12 56% 18 NM
7731 Blue Heat 11 Elite 1659 23-7 77% 11 MO
7732 CID 15-Blue 1659 13-4 76% 15 UT
7733 CLUB 43 12-2 1659 22-7 76% 12 MN
7734 CHAVC 13-Black 1659 23-20 53% 13 NC
7735 GJ 14 PREMIER 1659 31-31 50% 14 FL
7736 EU 16-Black 1659 27-30 47% 16 IN
7737 Manhattan Mamba 17-1 1659 30-14 68% 17 KS
7738 NASA BHM 17-BLACK 1659 25-15 63% 17 AL
7739 OT 12-J will 1659 28-22 56% 12 FL
7740 OMNI 14 Power 1659 36-19 65% 14 CA
7741 SEVC 14 National 1659 34-18 65% 14 WA
7742 SoDak Juniors 16 Elite 1659 35-14 71% 16 SD
7743 Silver Hammers VBC 16-1 1659 31-15 67% 16 NJ
7744 SVC Summit 18-1 1659 23-7 77% 18 GA
7745 SVBC 14-Elite 1659 23-13 64% 14 IA
7746 501 Volley 15-3 reg plus 1659 25-9 74% 15 AR
7747 Wisconsin Ice 16 National 1659 40-27 60% 16 WI
7748 KNVBC 15-Showtime 1659 18-13 58% 15 KS
7749 Allons 15-Mack 1659 30-10 75% 15 LA
7750 La Jolla 15-1 kayla 1659 32-16 67% 15 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.