Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 156 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
7751 BCVC 14-Smack 1659 23-10 70% 14 CA
7752 SCENIC CITY 14-National 1659 25-18 58% 14 TN
7753 516 Elite 16-Black 1659 28-13 68% 16 NY
7754 TVC 15-Royal 1659 32-28 53% 15 OH
7755 Zona 16-Red 1659 6-2 75% 16 AZ
7756 FaR Out 17-Onyx 1659 32-21 60% 17 MI
7757 CJV 12-1 1659 15-4 79% 12 MN
7758 757 15-Black 1659 43-28 61% 15 VA
7759 Big Sky 16-Westside 1659 39-25 57% 16 MT
7760 Texas One 15-Royal 1659 29-15 66% 15 TX
7761 No Limits 15-Elite 1659 22-22 48% 15 FL
7762 ENVY 14-Green 1659 8-2 73% 14 NE
7763 Impact 14-S 1659 5-0 100% 14 TX
7764 CCVA 16-Kubo 1659 9-5 64% 16 CA
7765 LV FORCE VB 16-1 1659 6-1 86% 16 PA
7766 Nebraska ONE 12-Outlaws 1659 5-0 71% 12 NE
7767 Sandia Elite 14-National 1 1659 6-2 75% 14 NM
7768 Coastal VBC 15 Navy 1659 41-16 72% 15 MD
7769 EVOLUTION RED 12 1659 7-1 78% 12
7770 Rise 15-1 (LA) 1659 5-2 71% 15
7771 Shonto 14-Pink 1659 5-3 63% 14
7772 Wild Bunch 18-S 1659 8-1 80% 18 IL
7773 FORZA1 12-One 1659 24-21 53% 12 CA
7774 SGV 12-Flames 1659 8-1 89% 12 CA
7775 BVC 18-1 conner 1659 22-8 73% 18 AL
7776 AVA TX 15-Attack 1658 25-17 60% 15 TX
7777 BEVBC 14 Navy 1658 36-12 75% 14 MD
7778 OK Charge 14-Select 1658 21-13 55% 14 OK
7779 AZ OUTLAWS 15 ELITE 1658 46-16 74% 15 AZ
7780 Corpus Christi Storm 15-1 1658 33-18 65% 15 TX
7781 Angelo Legacy 13 1658 23-12 66% 13 TX
7782 FVBC 14-Regional red 1658 30-10 71% 14 MD
7783 MOD Elite 13-Gold 1658 31-15 67% 13 IL
7784 New Wave 15-S platinum 1658 33-16 67% 15 IL
7785 PIVC Storm 12-Pwr 1658 33-17 66% 12 AL
7786 PacWest 15-Jay 1658 26-20 57% 15 CA
7787 Pilipa'a Na Wahine VBC 16-1 1658 24-10 71% 16 HI
7788 SLV Marinus 17U 1658 15-7 68% 17 VA
7789 RockCity 12 A1 1658 19-10 66% 12 OH
7790 Prime Performance 13-Teal 1658 40-18 69% 13 CA
7791 Rise 15 National 1658 30-19 61% 15 CA
7792 Premier 16 Nimbus 1658 47-25 65% 16 OH
7793 Spiketown USA 18.1 1658 28-15 65% 18 WI
7794 SOL 16-1 1658 16-10 62% 16 TX
7795 Vision 11-Blue 1658 35-20 64% 11 CA
7796 Dubuque Force 15 1658 15-8 60% 15 IA
7797 Local Girl 15-S 1658 22-21 51% 15 SC
7798 HNL Volleyball 14 1658 5-1 83% 14 HI
7799 Katy Stars 14-Elite 1658 31-16 66% 14 TX
7800 ACVC 12-Blue 1658 12-4 75% 12 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.