2025-2026 Season — Page 156 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7751 | BCVC 14-Smack | 1659 | 23-10 | 70% | 14 | CA |
| 7752 | SCENIC CITY 14-National | 1659 | 25-18 | 58% | 14 | TN |
| 7753 | 516 Elite 16-Black | 1659 | 28-13 | 68% | 16 | NY |
| 7754 | TVC 15-Royal | 1659 | 32-28 | 53% | 15 | OH |
| 7755 | Zona 16-Red | 1659 | 6-2 | 75% | 16 | AZ |
| 7756 | FaR Out 17-Onyx | 1659 | 32-21 | 60% | 17 | MI |
| 7757 | CJV 12-1 | 1659 | 15-4 | 79% | 12 | MN |
| 7758 | 757 15-Black | 1659 | 43-28 | 61% | 15 | VA |
| 7759 | Big Sky 16-Westside | 1659 | 39-25 | 57% | 16 | MT |
| 7760 | Texas One 15-Royal | 1659 | 29-15 | 66% | 15 | TX |
| 7761 | No Limits 15-Elite | 1659 | 22-22 | 48% | 15 | FL |
| 7762 | ENVY 14-Green | 1659 | 8-2 | 73% | 14 | NE |
| 7763 | Impact 14-S | 1659 | 5-0 | 100% | 14 | TX |
| 7764 | CCVA 16-Kubo | 1659 | 9-5 | 64% | 16 | CA |
| 7765 | LV FORCE VB 16-1 | 1659 | 6-1 | 86% | 16 | PA |
| 7766 | Nebraska ONE 12-Outlaws | 1659 | 5-0 | 71% | 12 | NE |
| 7767 | Sandia Elite 14-National 1 | 1659 | 6-2 | 75% | 14 | NM |
| 7768 | Coastal VBC 15 Navy | 1659 | 41-16 | 72% | 15 | MD |
| 7769 | EVOLUTION RED 12 | 1659 | 7-1 | 78% | 12 | |
| 7770 | Rise 15-1 (LA) | 1659 | 5-2 | 71% | 15 | |
| 7771 | Shonto 14-Pink | 1659 | 5-3 | 63% | 14 | |
| 7772 | Wild Bunch 18-S | 1659 | 8-1 | 80% | 18 | IL |
| 7773 | FORZA1 12-One | 1659 | 24-21 | 53% | 12 | CA |
| 7774 | SGV 12-Flames | 1659 | 8-1 | 89% | 12 | CA |
| 7775 | BVC 18-1 conner | 1659 | 22-8 | 73% | 18 | AL |
| 7776 | AVA TX 15-Attack | 1658 | 25-17 | 60% | 15 | TX |
| 7777 | BEVBC 14 Navy | 1658 | 36-12 | 75% | 14 | MD |
| 7778 | OK Charge 14-Select | 1658 | 21-13 | 55% | 14 | OK |
| 7779 | AZ OUTLAWS 15 ELITE | 1658 | 46-16 | 74% | 15 | AZ |
| 7780 | Corpus Christi Storm 15-1 | 1658 | 33-18 | 65% | 15 | TX |
| 7781 | Angelo Legacy 13 | 1658 | 23-12 | 66% | 13 | TX |
| 7782 | FVBC 14-Regional red | 1658 | 30-10 | 71% | 14 | MD |
| 7783 | MOD Elite 13-Gold | 1658 | 31-15 | 67% | 13 | IL |
| 7784 | New Wave 15-S platinum | 1658 | 33-16 | 67% | 15 | IL |
| 7785 | PIVC Storm 12-Pwr | 1658 | 33-17 | 66% | 12 | AL |
| 7786 | PacWest 15-Jay | 1658 | 26-20 | 57% | 15 | CA |
| 7787 | Pilipa'a Na Wahine VBC 16-1 | 1658 | 24-10 | 71% | 16 | HI |
| 7788 | SLV Marinus 17U | 1658 | 15-7 | 68% | 17 | VA |
| 7789 | RockCity 12 A1 | 1658 | 19-10 | 66% | 12 | OH |
| 7790 | Prime Performance 13-Teal | 1658 | 40-18 | 69% | 13 | CA |
| 7791 | Rise 15 National | 1658 | 30-19 | 61% | 15 | CA |
| 7792 | Premier 16 Nimbus | 1658 | 47-25 | 65% | 16 | OH |
| 7793 | Spiketown USA 18.1 | 1658 | 28-15 | 65% | 18 | WI |
| 7794 | SOL 16-1 | 1658 | 16-10 | 62% | 16 | TX |
| 7795 | Vision 11-Blue | 1658 | 35-20 | 64% | 11 | CA |
| 7796 | Dubuque Force 15 | 1658 | 15-8 | 60% | 15 | IA |
| 7797 | Local Girl 15-S | 1658 | 22-21 | 51% | 15 | SC |
| 7798 | HNL Volleyball 14 | 1658 | 5-1 | 83% | 14 | HI |
| 7799 | Katy Stars 14-Elite | 1658 | 31-16 | 66% | 14 | TX |
| 7800 | ACVC 12-Blue | 1658 | 12-4 | 75% | 12 | TX |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.