2025-2026 Season — Page 157 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7801 | FVA 17-Blaze - a | 1659 | 16-13 | 52% | 17 | AK |
| 7802 | Local Girl 15-S | 1659 | 22-21 | 51% | 15 | SC |
| 7803 | UVA 15 | 1659 | 19-5 | 76% | 15 | LA |
| 7804 | EMV 15-National black maddy | 1659 | 6-1 | 86% | 15 | TX |
| 7805 | HNL Volleyball 14 | 1658 | 5-1 | 83% | 14 | HI |
| 7806 | Elevation 14-Omar | 1658 | 30-32 | 48% | 14 | OH |
| 7807 | XTEAM 14-1 | 1658 | 6-1 | 86% | 14 | NV |
| 7808 | Prime Time 14-Blue | 1658 | 17-11 | 61% | 14 | IL |
| 7809 | IHT Elite 14-1 | 1658 | 12-5 | 60% | 14 | ND |
| 7810 | LRVBC 14-3 | 1658 | 6-5 | 55% | 14 | NY |
| 7811 | SFSVC 14-1 melinda | 1658 | 25-8 | 76% | 14 | NM |
| 7812 | FC Elite 14-Blue | 1658 | 35-16 | 69% | 14 | WI |
| 7813 | JVB 14-S | 1658 | 21-6 | 78% | 14 | MN |
| 7814 | USJVA South 14-Red | 1658 | 24-20 | 55% | 14 | AL |
| 7815 | GJ 14 PREMIER | 1658 | 31-31 | 50% | 14 | FL |
| 7816 | AZ EVJ 12-Elite | 1658 | 38-26 | 59% | 12 | AZ |
| 7817 | Viper 16-Jo/hannah | 1658 | 6-2 | 75% | 16 | NV |
| 7818 | Titanas 16 | 1658 | 10-4 | 71% | 16 | PR |
| 7819 | Silver Hammers VBC 16-1 | 1658 | 31-15 | 67% | 16 | NJ |
| 7820 | TIV 16-Red | 1658 | 12-5 | 71% | 16 | TX |
| 7821 | Golden State 17-Black | 1658 | 27-10 | 73% | 17 | CA |
| 7822 | CJHEAT 15-National | 1658 | 33-17 | 66% | 15 | NJ |
| 7823 | Premier 16 Nimbus | 1658 | 47-25 | 65% | 16 | OH |
| 7824 | Quantum Volleyball Acadmey 12 12 Hydrogen (FL) | 1658 | 7-7 | 50% | 12 | FL |
| 7825 | Volitude 12-Black | 1658 | 27-15 | 64% | 12 | CA |
| 7826 | DCVA 12-1 | 1658 | 0-0 | 0% | 12 | CO |
| 7827 | PVA 16-4 | 1658 | 10-4 | 67% | 16 | MO |
| 7828 | AVCN 17-1 red | 1658 | 43-22 | 65% | 17 | VA |
| 7829 | MWS 16-Black | 1658 | 36-28 | 56% | 16 | IL |
| 7830 | MJVA 12-Elite black | 1658 | 35-22 | 60% | 12 | TN |
| 7831 | Lakes 12-1 | 1658 | 7-6 | 54% | 12 | MN |
| 7832 | Top Notch 11-Elite | 1658 | 24-9 | 65% | 11 | MO |
| 7833 | Driven 10-Teal | 1658 | 23-11 | 68% | 10 | FL |
| 7834 | SWMN 15-1 | 1658 | 2-1 | 67% | 15 | MN |
| 7835 | FaR Out 17-Onyx | 1658 | 32-21 | 60% | 17 | MI |
| 7836 | Florida Conquer 16-National | 1658 | 49-20 | 71% | 16 | FL |
| 7837 | DeSoto 16-1 | 1658 | 36-11 | 77% | 16 | FL |
| 7838 | GVA 12-White | 1658 | 21-7 | 75% | 12 | PR |
| 7839 | PacWest 15-Jay | 1658 | 26-20 | 57% | 15 | CA |
| 7840 | EVOLUTION ELITE 13 | 1658 | 4-0 | 100% | 13 | CA |
| 7841 | SKY Elite 17-Black | 1658 | 23-17 | 57% | 17 | PA |
| 7842 | Lakes 15-1 | 1658 | 18-8 | 67% | 15 | MN |
| 7843 | Ks Networks Volleyball Club 16-6 | 1658 | 7-1 | 88% | 16 | KS |
| 7844 | Pulse 16 Gonzalez | 1658 | 38-13 | 75% | 16 | CA |
| 7845 | AZ OUTLAWS 15 ELITE | 1658 | 46-16 | 74% | 15 | AZ |
| 7846 | Top Flight Volleyball Academy 15-National red | 1658 | 28-24 | 54% | 15 | NV |
| 7847 | Apex 13-Elite | 1658 | 19-7 | 66% | 13 | MT |
| 7848 | Allegiance 15 Royal | 1658 | 36-16 | 68% | 15 | TX |
| 7849 | 575 15-Wsr olivia | 1658 | 32-9 | 78% | 15 | GA |
| 7850 | Mem Metro 15-Elite blk | 1658 | 30-35 | 46% | 15 | TN |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.