Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 157 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
7801 FVA 17-Blaze - a 1659 16-13 52% 17 AK
7802 Local Girl 15-S 1659 22-21 51% 15 SC
7803 UVA 15 1659 19-5 76% 15 LA
7804 EMV 15-National black maddy 1659 6-1 86% 15 TX
7805 HNL Volleyball 14 1658 5-1 83% 14 HI
7806 Elevation 14-Omar 1658 30-32 48% 14 OH
7807 XTEAM 14-1 1658 6-1 86% 14 NV
7808 Prime Time 14-Blue 1658 17-11 61% 14 IL
7809 IHT Elite 14-1 1658 12-5 60% 14 ND
7810 LRVBC 14-3 1658 6-5 55% 14 NY
7811 SFSVC 14-1 melinda 1658 25-8 76% 14 NM
7812 FC Elite 14-Blue 1658 35-16 69% 14 WI
7813 JVB 14-S 1658 21-6 78% 14 MN
7814 USJVA South 14-Red 1658 24-20 55% 14 AL
7815 GJ 14 PREMIER 1658 31-31 50% 14 FL
7816 AZ EVJ 12-Elite 1658 38-26 59% 12 AZ
7817 Viper 16-Jo/hannah 1658 6-2 75% 16 NV
7818 Titanas 16 1658 10-4 71% 16 PR
7819 Silver Hammers VBC 16-1 1658 31-15 67% 16 NJ
7820 TIV 16-Red 1658 12-5 71% 16 TX
7821 Golden State 17-Black 1658 27-10 73% 17 CA
7822 CJHEAT 15-National 1658 33-17 66% 15 NJ
7823 Premier 16 Nimbus 1658 47-25 65% 16 OH
7824 Quantum Volleyball Acadmey 12 12 Hydrogen (FL) 1658 7-7 50% 12 FL
7825 Volitude 12-Black 1658 27-15 64% 12 CA
7826 DCVA 12-1 1658 0-0 0% 12 CO
7827 PVA 16-4 1658 10-4 67% 16 MO
7828 AVCN 17-1 red 1658 43-22 65% 17 VA
7829 MWS 16-Black 1658 36-28 56% 16 IL
7830 MJVA 12-Elite black 1658 35-22 60% 12 TN
7831 Lakes 12-1 1658 7-6 54% 12 MN
7832 Top Notch 11-Elite 1658 24-9 65% 11 MO
7833 Driven 10-Teal 1658 23-11 68% 10 FL
7834 SWMN 15-1 1658 2-1 67% 15 MN
7835 FaR Out 17-Onyx 1658 32-21 60% 17 MI
7836 Florida Conquer 16-National 1658 49-20 71% 16 FL
7837 DeSoto 16-1 1658 36-11 77% 16 FL
7838 GVA 12-White 1658 21-7 75% 12 PR
7839 PacWest 15-Jay 1658 26-20 57% 15 CA
7840 EVOLUTION ELITE 13 1658 4-0 100% 13 CA
7841 SKY Elite 17-Black 1658 23-17 57% 17 PA
7842 Lakes 15-1 1658 18-8 67% 15 MN
7843 Ks Networks Volleyball Club 16-6 1658 7-1 88% 16 KS
7844 Pulse 16 Gonzalez 1658 38-13 75% 16 CA
7845 AZ OUTLAWS 15 ELITE 1658 46-16 74% 15 AZ
7846 Top Flight Volleyball Academy 15-National red 1658 28-24 54% 15 NV
7847 Apex 13-Elite 1658 19-7 66% 13 MT
7848 Allegiance 15 Royal 1658 36-16 68% 15 TX
7849 575 15-Wsr olivia 1658 32-9 78% 15 GA
7850 Mem Metro 15-Elite blk 1658 30-35 46% 15 TN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.