Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 157 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
7801 Eclipse 15-S purple 1658 15-7 68% 15 CO
7802 Lakas 17-Elite 1658 26-22 54% 17 CA
7803 Wildcats 16-1 1658 14-4 78% 16 MN
7804 South County 15-Blue 1658 32-25 56% 15 RI
7805 Alliance 15-Shockwave 1658 15-6 68% 15 MA
7806 Five:1 15-Black 1658 27-34 44% 15 MI
7807 Florida Conquer 16-National 1658 43-20 68% 16 FL
7808 LMVC 14-Nat sydney 1658 28-14 67% 14 SC
7809 IVBA 15-Ren 1658 18-16 53% 15 MS
7810 Blue Crab 17 1658 18-5 78% 17 LA
7811 Edge Elite 12-Gold 1658 5-0 100% 12 PA
7812 EMV 15-National black maddy 1658 6-1 86% 15 TX
7813 Apex Volleyball Club 13-1 1658 6-2 75% 13 MO
7814 JET 18-Fuel 1658 5-2 71% 18 TX
7815 Matchbox 18-Adidas 1658 16-9 64% 18 SD
7816 Eureka Sting 12-Travel 1658 19-3 86% 12 IL
7817 Arete 15-Steel ethos 1658 21-14 53% 15 TX
7818 Slainte 13-Black 1658 25-14 64% 13 CA
7819 UPvbc 15-Adidas elite 1658 3-1 75% 15 OK
7820 No Limits 16 National (LSC) 1658 9-6 60% 16 TX
7821 MVC 16 Ali 1658 38-18 68% 16 OH
7822 ZUMAZ 16-1 1658 10-5 63% 16 MN
7823 FH 13-Ikaika-ari 1658 22-17 54% 13 TX
7824 DVVC 15-1 1658 6-2 75% 15
7825 USJVA South 14-Red 1658 24-20 55% 14
7826 Idaho Peak IFJS EMMA/BRI 13-S 1658 5-7 42% 13
7827 Dallas Premier 13-Black rhae 1658 2-5 29% 13
7828 Intensity 16 Sapphires 1657 33-14 70% 16
7829 MWP 15 Gold 1657 13-3 81% 15
7830 A4 Volley 15-Kimo 1657 29-30 49% 15 CA
7831 LA Diggers 12-Purple 1657 10-2 83% 12 MN
7832 NCH 11-1 1657 10-2 83% 11 KS
7833 Allegiance 15 Royal 1657 36-16 68% 15 TX
7834 Lakes 12-1 1657 7-6 54% 12 MN
7835 IA Juniors 16-Black 1657 24-17 59% 16 IA
7836 IV Force 16-Wildpepper 1657 32-17 65% 16 CA
7837 AVCN 17-1 red 1657 43-22 65% 17 MD
7838 Club Cactus 15-Silver 1657 35-21 63% 15 AZ
7839 Club 909 13-1 1657 24-14 63% 13 CA
7840 MWS 16-Black 1657 36-28 56% 16 IL
7841 PEAK 16-3 1657 31-18 63% 16 AZ
7842 Southern Swing 11-BLUE 1657 11-3 79% 11 TX
7843 SNVF 15 STORM 1657 35-29 55% 15 WA
7844 SOINE 13-1 1657 30-15 67% 13 KY
7845 SVBC 18-Elite 1657 25-8 74% 18 IA
7846 208 15-Elite 1657 37-33 53% 15 WA
7847 314 VBC 16-Red 1657 32-26 54% 16 MO
7848 248 Elite 17-Blue 1657 20-8 71% 17 MI
7849 WAVE 16-Garrett 1657 31-14 69% 16 CA
7850 Top Notch 11-Elite 1657 24-9 65% 11 IL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.