2025-2026 Season — Page 157 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7801 | Eclipse 15-S purple | 1658 | 15-7 | 68% | 15 | CO |
| 7802 | Lakas 17-Elite | 1658 | 26-22 | 54% | 17 | CA |
| 7803 | Wildcats 16-1 | 1658 | 14-4 | 78% | 16 | MN |
| 7804 | South County 15-Blue | 1658 | 32-25 | 56% | 15 | RI |
| 7805 | Alliance 15-Shockwave | 1658 | 15-6 | 68% | 15 | MA |
| 7806 | Five:1 15-Black | 1658 | 27-34 | 44% | 15 | MI |
| 7807 | Florida Conquer 16-National | 1658 | 43-20 | 68% | 16 | FL |
| 7808 | LMVC 14-Nat sydney | 1658 | 28-14 | 67% | 14 | SC |
| 7809 | IVBA 15-Ren | 1658 | 18-16 | 53% | 15 | MS |
| 7810 | Blue Crab 17 | 1658 | 18-5 | 78% | 17 | LA |
| 7811 | Edge Elite 12-Gold | 1658 | 5-0 | 100% | 12 | PA |
| 7812 | EMV 15-National black maddy | 1658 | 6-1 | 86% | 15 | TX |
| 7813 | Apex Volleyball Club 13-1 | 1658 | 6-2 | 75% | 13 | MO |
| 7814 | JET 18-Fuel | 1658 | 5-2 | 71% | 18 | TX |
| 7815 | Matchbox 18-Adidas | 1658 | 16-9 | 64% | 18 | SD |
| 7816 | Eureka Sting 12-Travel | 1658 | 19-3 | 86% | 12 | IL |
| 7817 | Arete 15-Steel ethos | 1658 | 21-14 | 53% | 15 | TX |
| 7818 | Slainte 13-Black | 1658 | 25-14 | 64% | 13 | CA |
| 7819 | UPvbc 15-Adidas elite | 1658 | 3-1 | 75% | 15 | OK |
| 7820 | No Limits 16 National (LSC) | 1658 | 9-6 | 60% | 16 | TX |
| 7821 | MVC 16 Ali | 1658 | 38-18 | 68% | 16 | OH |
| 7822 | ZUMAZ 16-1 | 1658 | 10-5 | 63% | 16 | MN |
| 7823 | FH 13-Ikaika-ari | 1658 | 22-17 | 54% | 13 | TX |
| 7824 | DVVC 15-1 | 1658 | 6-2 | 75% | 15 | |
| 7825 | USJVA South 14-Red | 1658 | 24-20 | 55% | 14 | |
| 7826 | Idaho Peak IFJS EMMA/BRI 13-S | 1658 | 5-7 | 42% | 13 | |
| 7827 | Dallas Premier 13-Black rhae | 1658 | 2-5 | 29% | 13 | |
| 7828 | Intensity 16 Sapphires | 1657 | 33-14 | 70% | 16 | |
| 7829 | MWP 15 Gold | 1657 | 13-3 | 81% | 15 | |
| 7830 | A4 Volley 15-Kimo | 1657 | 29-30 | 49% | 15 | CA |
| 7831 | LA Diggers 12-Purple | 1657 | 10-2 | 83% | 12 | MN |
| 7832 | NCH 11-1 | 1657 | 10-2 | 83% | 11 | KS |
| 7833 | Allegiance 15 Royal | 1657 | 36-16 | 68% | 15 | TX |
| 7834 | Lakes 12-1 | 1657 | 7-6 | 54% | 12 | MN |
| 7835 | IA Juniors 16-Black | 1657 | 24-17 | 59% | 16 | IA |
| 7836 | IV Force 16-Wildpepper | 1657 | 32-17 | 65% | 16 | CA |
| 7837 | AVCN 17-1 red | 1657 | 43-22 | 65% | 17 | MD |
| 7838 | Club Cactus 15-Silver | 1657 | 35-21 | 63% | 15 | AZ |
| 7839 | Club 909 13-1 | 1657 | 24-14 | 63% | 13 | CA |
| 7840 | MWS 16-Black | 1657 | 36-28 | 56% | 16 | IL |
| 7841 | PEAK 16-3 | 1657 | 31-18 | 63% | 16 | AZ |
| 7842 | Southern Swing 11-BLUE | 1657 | 11-3 | 79% | 11 | TX |
| 7843 | SNVF 15 STORM | 1657 | 35-29 | 55% | 15 | WA |
| 7844 | SOINE 13-1 | 1657 | 30-15 | 67% | 13 | KY |
| 7845 | SVBC 18-Elite | 1657 | 25-8 | 74% | 18 | IA |
| 7846 | 208 15-Elite | 1657 | 37-33 | 53% | 15 | WA |
| 7847 | 314 VBC 16-Red | 1657 | 32-26 | 54% | 16 | MO |
| 7848 | 248 Elite 17-Blue | 1657 | 20-8 | 71% | 17 | MI |
| 7849 | WAVE 16-Garrett | 1657 | 31-14 | 69% | 16 | CA |
| 7850 | Top Notch 11-Elite | 1657 | 24-9 | 65% | 11 | IL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.