Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 143 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
7101 QCA 13-Under armour black 1673 19-6 76% 13 MS
7102 MiElite 16-National west 1673 37-18 67% 16 MI
7103 ACE Volleyball Academy 17 17U Hondo 1673 9-2 82% 17 AK
7104 Ashland VC 17-1 1673 11-0 100% 17 OR
7105 NNVC 16 1673 30-12 68% 16 NV
7106 414 17-Elite 1673 42-28 60% 17 WI
7107 DIGS 14 Maroon 1673 9-2 82% 14 MN
7108 MKE Sting 17-White 1673 38-29 57% 17 WI
7109 NorthEast Volleyball Club 16-3 1673 46-14 77% 16 CT
7110 WAVE 17-Kali 1673 32-15 68% 17 CA
7111 Syndicate VC 15-1 1673 18-6 75% 15 CA
7112 Legacy Girls 17-Elite 1672 30-22 58% 17 CA
7113 KC Ignite 17-1 1672 35-19 64% 17
7114 Freeze ND 14 Polar 1672 36-23 58% 14 ND
7115 Eastern Iowa Bulldogs 17 1672 13-2 81% 17 IA
7116 Aces 14-Purple 1672 10-2 83% 14 ND
7117 GCVC 14-Blue 1672 27-13 68% 14 OH
7118 Pipeline VC 15-Empire 1672 3-4 43% 15 IL
7119 Hive 16-Gold 1672 29-29 50% 16 UT
7120 CADO 18-1 1672 5-1 83% 18 NY
7121 Club V 14-Cassidy 1672 27-21 47% 14 UT
7122 TEXAS FIERCE ELITE 18-1 1672 7-1 88% 18 TX
7123 Downstate North 18-Cobras 1672 33-9 79% 18 NY
7124 Vibe 14-Blackout 1672 23-14 62% 14 CA
7125 LAVBC 14-Black 1672 21-13 62% 14 CA
7126 NSSC 14 Nike 1672 45-21 68% 14 MO
7127 Black Bears 14-Black 1672 17-9 65% 14 NC
7128 Idaho ONE 14-Im criswell 1672 32-15 68% 14 ID
7129 UNION 14-Ky white 1672 37-14 73% 14 IN
7130 MOJO Elite Volleyball 16-Black 1672 24-18 53% 16 VA
7131 Phoenix G16-Red 1672 27-23 54% 16 OH
7132 KNVBC 17-Heights premier 1672 8-7 53% 17 KS
7133 Invasion 15-Blue 1672 17-10 63% 15 MO
7134 AZ EVJ 16 Select 1672 32-31 51% 16 AZ
7135 Adira 14-Blackburn 1672 34-9 77% 14 TN
7136 Keweenaw VBC 16 1672 24-9 73% 16 WI
7137 Brownsville Dynamite 12-1 1672 17-3 81% 12 TX
7138 SC Legends 12-Nike 1672 35-16 69% 12 CA
7139 Sideout Sports Volleyball Club 16-T marissa 1672 13-5 72% 16 NJ
7140 Skyline 11-White 1672 18-12 60% 11 TX
7141 SBS 11-Eileen 1672 6-3 60% 11 TX
7142 SMASH 15-1 1672 5-3 63% 15 ON
7143 AAVC 17-1 1672 34-14 71% 17 VA
7144 Fission 17-Elite 1 1672 35-19 65% 17 GA
7145 Zona VBC 16-Red 1672 25-21 54% 16 AZ
7146 SWI3D 15-Black 1672 16-3 84% 15 NE
7147 Independent 10-Went 1672 5-0 100% 10 IN
7148 Club 1 15-Skronkstrong 1672 31-29 52% 15 IL
7149 Saratoga 15-Blue 1672 50-13 74% 15 NY
7150 SVC 16-Black national 1672 23-12 66% 16 MO
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.