Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 143 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
7101 Midwest Blitz 18-1 1672 12-3 80% 18
7102 IMPACT - 13-1 1672 52-21 70% 13 TX
7103 Austin Skyline 14 Molten 1672 33-19 63% 14 TX
7104 TEAM Kiwi 13-Graphite 1672 38-17 69% 13 FL
7105 Ka Ulukoa 15 Geno 1672 35-17 67% 15 HI
7106 BAVA 16 Breakers 1672 31-28 51% 16 MD
7107 Chi City Elite 13-1 1672 21-28 43% 13 IL
7108 CHiX 17-PiNK 1672 37-31 54% 17 OH
7109 Millennium 15-J.hiser 1672 41-19 68% 15 OH
7110 Moxie 14U 1672 22-8 73% 14 TX
7111 Paradigm Rampage 13-S 1672 18-9 58% 13 NY
7112 Rise 18-S 1672 26-12 68% 18 CA
7113 SRS 15-Blue 1672 34-18 65% 15 SC
7114 SUPERIOR 12-Adidas 1672 30-8 77% 12 TX
7115 SCVB 15 Mike 1672 26-16 62% 15 RI
7116 Texas Fury 14 Unite 1672 33-12 73% 14 TX
7117 TEXAS FIERCE ELITE 18-1 1672 7-1 88% 18 TX
7118 VOLT 14-Black 1672 38-16 70% 14 ND
7119 Vibe 14-Blackout 1672 23-14 62% 14 CA
7120 Tri-State Elite 18-White 1672 22-22 50% 18 OH
7121 Va Wave 14 Crest 1672 40-13 75% 14 VA
7122 Core 16-National 1672 19-14 58% 16 NJ
7123 New Prague JO 12-Black 1672 5-0 100% 12 MN
7124 USANY FORTITUDE 18 1672 4-3 57% 18 NY
7125 TAMPA UNITED VBA 14-Red 1672 46-26 64% 14 FL
7126 SMASH 15-1 1672 5-3 63% 15 MA
7127 MiElite 16-National west 1672 37-18 67% 16 MI
7128 Big City M 13-Select 1672 16-5 76% 13 NY
7129 SOUTH SHORE 15-Mizuno 1672 21-10 66% 15 MA
7130 MCV 12-Hogan 1672 8-2 80% 12 NC
7131 Arks Jrs 15-National 1672 14-6 70% 15 AR
7132 AVC 11-1 1672 20-13 59% 11 FL
7133 Elevate 12-Kickin kangas 1672 33-12 73% 12 WI
7134 Oiler Attack 15-Black 1672 23-9 72% 15 OH
7135 AVA 12-Coral 1672 37-22 63% 12 FL
7136 1United 17-N black 1672 28-19 58% 17 TX
7137 FSVC 16-Red april 1672 7-4 64% 16 CA
7138 Xcel 17-Red 1672 8-1 89% 17 TX
7139 Skyline 11-White 1672 18-12 60% 11 TX
7140 Tsunami 15-1e aau trina 1672 11-1 92% 15 GA
7141 UVA 15-Elite 1672 3-0 100% 15 LA
7142 FORZA1 NORTH 15-Nat red 1672 8-2 80% 15 CA
7143 Fission 17-Elite 1 1672 35-19 65% 17 GA
7144 NBVBC 15-White 1672 13-3 81% 15 MI
7145 Yorktowne VB 16-Blue 1672 41-36 53% 16 PA
7146 CBS Volleyball 15-U female 1672 8-1 89% 15
7147 EVOLUTION BLACK 14 1672 8-1 80% 14
7148 HardRock 18 1672 30-8 79% 18
7149 Paradigm Revolution 18-S 1672 24-13 62% 18
7150 Lady Lions 13 1672 8-3 57% 13
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.