2025-2026 Season — Page 143 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7101 | Midwest Blitz 18-1 | 1672 | 12-3 | 80% | 18 | |
| 7102 | IMPACT - 13-1 | 1672 | 52-21 | 70% | 13 | TX |
| 7103 | Austin Skyline 14 Molten | 1672 | 33-19 | 63% | 14 | TX |
| 7104 | TEAM Kiwi 13-Graphite | 1672 | 38-17 | 69% | 13 | FL |
| 7105 | Ka Ulukoa 15 Geno | 1672 | 35-17 | 67% | 15 | HI |
| 7106 | BAVA 16 Breakers | 1672 | 31-28 | 51% | 16 | MD |
| 7107 | Chi City Elite 13-1 | 1672 | 21-28 | 43% | 13 | IL |
| 7108 | CHiX 17-PiNK | 1672 | 37-31 | 54% | 17 | OH |
| 7109 | Millennium 15-J.hiser | 1672 | 41-19 | 68% | 15 | OH |
| 7110 | Moxie 14U | 1672 | 22-8 | 73% | 14 | TX |
| 7111 | Paradigm Rampage 13-S | 1672 | 18-9 | 58% | 13 | NY |
| 7112 | Rise 18-S | 1672 | 26-12 | 68% | 18 | CA |
| 7113 | SRS 15-Blue | 1672 | 34-18 | 65% | 15 | SC |
| 7114 | SUPERIOR 12-Adidas | 1672 | 30-8 | 77% | 12 | TX |
| 7115 | SCVB 15 Mike | 1672 | 26-16 | 62% | 15 | RI |
| 7116 | Texas Fury 14 Unite | 1672 | 33-12 | 73% | 14 | TX |
| 7117 | TEXAS FIERCE ELITE 18-1 | 1672 | 7-1 | 88% | 18 | TX |
| 7118 | VOLT 14-Black | 1672 | 38-16 | 70% | 14 | ND |
| 7119 | Vibe 14-Blackout | 1672 | 23-14 | 62% | 14 | CA |
| 7120 | Tri-State Elite 18-White | 1672 | 22-22 | 50% | 18 | OH |
| 7121 | Va Wave 14 Crest | 1672 | 40-13 | 75% | 14 | VA |
| 7122 | Core 16-National | 1672 | 19-14 | 58% | 16 | NJ |
| 7123 | New Prague JO 12-Black | 1672 | 5-0 | 100% | 12 | MN |
| 7124 | USANY FORTITUDE 18 | 1672 | 4-3 | 57% | 18 | NY |
| 7125 | TAMPA UNITED VBA 14-Red | 1672 | 46-26 | 64% | 14 | FL |
| 7126 | SMASH 15-1 | 1672 | 5-3 | 63% | 15 | MA |
| 7127 | MiElite 16-National west | 1672 | 37-18 | 67% | 16 | MI |
| 7128 | Big City M 13-Select | 1672 | 16-5 | 76% | 13 | NY |
| 7129 | SOUTH SHORE 15-Mizuno | 1672 | 21-10 | 66% | 15 | MA |
| 7130 | MCV 12-Hogan | 1672 | 8-2 | 80% | 12 | NC |
| 7131 | Arks Jrs 15-National | 1672 | 14-6 | 70% | 15 | AR |
| 7132 | AVC 11-1 | 1672 | 20-13 | 59% | 11 | FL |
| 7133 | Elevate 12-Kickin kangas | 1672 | 33-12 | 73% | 12 | WI |
| 7134 | Oiler Attack 15-Black | 1672 | 23-9 | 72% | 15 | OH |
| 7135 | AVA 12-Coral | 1672 | 37-22 | 63% | 12 | FL |
| 7136 | 1United 17-N black | 1672 | 28-19 | 58% | 17 | TX |
| 7137 | FSVC 16-Red april | 1672 | 7-4 | 64% | 16 | CA |
| 7138 | Xcel 17-Red | 1672 | 8-1 | 89% | 17 | TX |
| 7139 | Skyline 11-White | 1672 | 18-12 | 60% | 11 | TX |
| 7140 | Tsunami 15-1e aau trina | 1672 | 11-1 | 92% | 15 | GA |
| 7141 | UVA 15-Elite | 1672 | 3-0 | 100% | 15 | LA |
| 7142 | FORZA1 NORTH 15-Nat red | 1672 | 8-2 | 80% | 15 | CA |
| 7143 | Fission 17-Elite 1 | 1672 | 35-19 | 65% | 17 | GA |
| 7144 | NBVBC 15-White | 1672 | 13-3 | 81% | 15 | MI |
| 7145 | Yorktowne VB 16-Blue | 1672 | 41-36 | 53% | 16 | PA |
| 7146 | CBS Volleyball 15-U female | 1672 | 8-1 | 89% | 15 | |
| 7147 | EVOLUTION BLACK 14 | 1672 | 8-1 | 80% | 14 | |
| 7148 | HardRock 18 | 1672 | 30-8 | 79% | 18 | |
| 7149 | Paradigm Revolution 18-S | 1672 | 24-13 | 62% | 18 | |
| 7150 | Lady Lions 13 | 1672 | 8-3 | 57% | 13 |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.