2025-2026 Season — Page 143 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7101 | QCA 13-Under armour black | 1673 | 19-6 | 76% | 13 | MS |
| 7102 | MiElite 16-National west | 1673 | 37-18 | 67% | 16 | MI |
| 7103 | ACE Volleyball Academy 17 17U Hondo | 1673 | 9-2 | 82% | 17 | AK |
| 7104 | Ashland VC 17-1 | 1673 | 11-0 | 100% | 17 | OR |
| 7105 | NNVC 16 | 1673 | 30-12 | 68% | 16 | NV |
| 7106 | 414 17-Elite | 1673 | 42-28 | 60% | 17 | WI |
| 7107 | DIGS 14 Maroon | 1673 | 9-2 | 82% | 14 | MN |
| 7108 | MKE Sting 17-White | 1673 | 38-29 | 57% | 17 | WI |
| 7109 | NorthEast Volleyball Club 16-3 | 1673 | 46-14 | 77% | 16 | CT |
| 7110 | WAVE 17-Kali | 1673 | 32-15 | 68% | 17 | CA |
| 7111 | Syndicate VC 15-1 | 1673 | 18-6 | 75% | 15 | CA |
| 7112 | Legacy Girls 17-Elite | 1672 | 30-22 | 58% | 17 | CA |
| 7113 | KC Ignite 17-1 | 1672 | 35-19 | 64% | 17 | |
| 7114 | Freeze ND 14 Polar | 1672 | 36-23 | 58% | 14 | ND |
| 7115 | Eastern Iowa Bulldogs 17 | 1672 | 13-2 | 81% | 17 | IA |
| 7116 | Aces 14-Purple | 1672 | 10-2 | 83% | 14 | ND |
| 7117 | GCVC 14-Blue | 1672 | 27-13 | 68% | 14 | OH |
| 7118 | Pipeline VC 15-Empire | 1672 | 3-4 | 43% | 15 | IL |
| 7119 | Hive 16-Gold | 1672 | 29-29 | 50% | 16 | UT |
| 7120 | CADO 18-1 | 1672 | 5-1 | 83% | 18 | NY |
| 7121 | Club V 14-Cassidy | 1672 | 27-21 | 47% | 14 | UT |
| 7122 | TEXAS FIERCE ELITE 18-1 | 1672 | 7-1 | 88% | 18 | TX |
| 7123 | Downstate North 18-Cobras | 1672 | 33-9 | 79% | 18 | NY |
| 7124 | Vibe 14-Blackout | 1672 | 23-14 | 62% | 14 | CA |
| 7125 | LAVBC 14-Black | 1672 | 21-13 | 62% | 14 | CA |
| 7126 | NSSC 14 Nike | 1672 | 45-21 | 68% | 14 | MO |
| 7127 | Black Bears 14-Black | 1672 | 17-9 | 65% | 14 | NC |
| 7128 | Idaho ONE 14-Im criswell | 1672 | 32-15 | 68% | 14 | ID |
| 7129 | UNION 14-Ky white | 1672 | 37-14 | 73% | 14 | IN |
| 7130 | MOJO Elite Volleyball 16-Black | 1672 | 24-18 | 53% | 16 | VA |
| 7131 | Phoenix G16-Red | 1672 | 27-23 | 54% | 16 | OH |
| 7132 | KNVBC 17-Heights premier | 1672 | 8-7 | 53% | 17 | KS |
| 7133 | Invasion 15-Blue | 1672 | 17-10 | 63% | 15 | MO |
| 7134 | AZ EVJ 16 Select | 1672 | 32-31 | 51% | 16 | AZ |
| 7135 | Adira 14-Blackburn | 1672 | 34-9 | 77% | 14 | TN |
| 7136 | Keweenaw VBC 16 | 1672 | 24-9 | 73% | 16 | WI |
| 7137 | Brownsville Dynamite 12-1 | 1672 | 17-3 | 81% | 12 | TX |
| 7138 | SC Legends 12-Nike | 1672 | 35-16 | 69% | 12 | CA |
| 7139 | Sideout Sports Volleyball Club 16-T marissa | 1672 | 13-5 | 72% | 16 | NJ |
| 7140 | Skyline 11-White | 1672 | 18-12 | 60% | 11 | TX |
| 7141 | SBS 11-Eileen | 1672 | 6-3 | 60% | 11 | TX |
| 7142 | SMASH 15-1 | 1672 | 5-3 | 63% | 15 | ON |
| 7143 | AAVC 17-1 | 1672 | 34-14 | 71% | 17 | VA |
| 7144 | Fission 17-Elite 1 | 1672 | 35-19 | 65% | 17 | GA |
| 7145 | Zona VBC 16-Red | 1672 | 25-21 | 54% | 16 | AZ |
| 7146 | SWI3D 15-Black | 1672 | 16-3 | 84% | 15 | NE |
| 7147 | Independent 10-Went | 1672 | 5-0 | 100% | 10 | IN |
| 7148 | Club 1 15-Skronkstrong | 1672 | 31-29 | 52% | 15 | IL |
| 7149 | Saratoga 15-Blue | 1672 | 50-13 | 74% | 15 | NY |
| 7150 | SVC 16-Black national | 1672 | 23-12 | 66% | 16 | MO |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.