Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 142 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
7051 KC Ignite 17-1 1673 29-18 62% 17
7052 Club DD 12-1 1673 19-6 61% 12
7053 SWI3D 16-Black 1673 6-0 100% 16
7054 EP Elite 10-Navy 1673 15-4 71% 10 TX
7055 Junior Mints 10-Navy 1673 7-2 78% 10 KY
7056 CVC 13 ROYAL 1673 18-11 62% 13 OH
7057 DIGS 14 Maroon 1673 9-2 82% 14 NJ
7058 All Sets 14-Enchv 1673 28-11 72% 14 AK
7059 Delaware United 12-Navy 1673 25-11 69% 12 DE
7060 CJV 15-National 1673 31-17 65% 15 AR
7061 AVC CLE 16-Blue 1673 32-15 68% 16 OH
7062 KNVBC 17-Heights premier 1673 8-7 53% 17 KS
7063 FVA 14-Ember - m1 1673 10-4 71% 14 AK
7064 GP 16-Local black 1673 59-14 81% 16 FL
7065 H2 13-2 longhorns_steph 1673 8-1 80% 13 MO
7066 I.C. Stars 13 Alexis 1673 15-7 68% 13 NC
7067 New Prague JO 15-Black 1673 9-2 82% 15 MN
7068 Ridgeland Reds-Red 14 1673 12-7 63% 14 WI
7069 SC Midlands 17-National r 1673 21-30 41% 17 SC
7070 Precision 16-Blue 1673 45-8 85% 16 IL
7071 UNION 14-Ky white 1673 37-14 73% 14 CA
7072 Wisconsin Ice 13 National 1673 33-16 67% 13 WI
7073 HaiFive 17-1 1673 40-12 77% 17 MI
7074 NEA Tomahawks 18-Pink 1673 20-7 74% 18 AR
7075 Syndicate VC 15-1 1673 18-6 75% 15 CA
7076 Iowa Select 17-Black 1673 29-20 59% 17 IA
7077 Idaho ONE 14-Im criswell 1673 32-15 68% 14 ID
7078 UEPA 14-G 1673 27-13 59% 14 TX
7079 Digs 15-Red 1673 26-34 43% 15 NJ
7080 BVC 18-BLACK 1673 48-18 73% 18 WY
7081 Dinamite 16-Casey 1673 23-10 70% 16 CA
7082 Red Rock 16-Ruth - walnut creek 1673 34-18 65% 16 CA
7083 Ark Jrs 13-National 1673 18-11 62% 13 AR
7084 573 Missouri Juniors 15-3 1673 4-1 36% 15 MO
7085 Pursuit 13-National 1673 18-13 58% 13 MO
7086 Pono 14-1 annette 1673 20-22 45% 14 TX
7087 IVC 14-National 1673 16-8 67% 14 AK
7088 HIC 12-Lisi 1673 7-12 37% 12 UT
7089 oe 11-2 1673 10-2 83% 11 OH
7090 LVL UP 18 Mana Wahine Koa 1673 44-23 66% 18 AZ
7091 Metro 15 North 1673 45-23 64% 15 DC
7092 Meraki VB 16-1 1673 18-17 51% 16 NH
7093 Main Beach 12-Premier 1673 23-9 72% 12 CA
7094 HIC 14-Keano 1673 6-8 43% 14 UT
7095 TNT 15-Shockwave 1673 13-2 87% 15 PA
7096 SCVBC 14-National 1673 11-4 73% 14
7097 Independent 10-Went 1672 5-0 100% 10
7098 Kilimanjaro - MVC 17 1672 11-10 52% 17
7099 MWP 14-Purple 1672 16-6 73% 14
7100 Sonora DRG 14 1672 7-3 70% 14
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.