Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 141 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
7001 LBK 14-2 1674 17-7 71% 14 OH
7002 Local Girl 16-S 1674 25-16 61% 16 SC
7003 UP North Jr's DSN 16-Sel 1674 19-9 68% 16 WI
7004 Angelo Rise 15-2 1674 34-13 71% 15 TX
7005 CHAOS 14-1 national 1674 35-12 74% 14 OR
7006 DCVA 17-Hong 1674 19-20 49% 17 NM
7007 Dolphin VBC 13-Green 1674 41-22 65% 13 AL
7008 Galaxy 12 Kayla 1674 17-5 77% 12 NC
7009 GJ 17 PREMIER 1674 39-21 65% 17 FL
7010 GSJ 16 National 1674 36-16 69% 16 SC
7011 Goldenwest 16-Tower zero 1674 34-13 72% 16 CA
7012 Midwest Penguins 16-1 1674 33-27 55% 16 WI
7013 Platinum 15 Power 1674 31-27 53% 15 UT
7014 Premier 18-Black 1674 35-30 53% 18 TX
7015 The Edge 17-Elite 1674 45-14 76% 17 IL
7016 Stingray VBA 16 Adidas 1674 46-20 69% 16 OK
7017 South County 17 Erica 1674 11-18 38% 17 RI
7018 VolleyFX 13 Luck 1674 27-12 68% 13 NY
7019 VC United 14-1 elite 1674 15-21 42% 14 IL
7020 FRVBC 15-White 1674 31-16 66% 15 CO
7021 Rockwood Thunder 14-Navy 1674 24-24 50% 14 MO
7022 Kulia 12-Ku'ualoha 1674 9-1 90% 12 HI
7023 Avoli 16-F feño 1674 17-6 74% 16 PR
7024 Idaho ONE 13-White 1674 33-23 54% 13 ID
7025 Net Force 16-1 elite 1674 26-14 63% 16 IL
7026 Core 18-F national 1674 16-10 62% 18 NJ
7027 Rancho 17-Premier 1674 24-21 53% 17 CA
7028 603 United 18-Seacoast black 1674 20-21 49% 18 NH
7029 RVT 13-1 surf 1674 21-16 57% 13 NY
7030 Cajun Elite 13-1 1674 5-3 63% 13 LA
7031 SIVBC 16-Tornado 1674 24-24 50% 16 WA
7032 AJV 14-Brandon 1674 41-23 64% 14 GA
7033 RVC Redeem 16-1 1674 16-12 57% 16 OH
7034 Aggression 13-2 premier 1674 10-1 91% 13 IL
7035 Victory 11-Elite green 1674 17-8 65% 11 TX
7036 CADO 18-1 1674 5-1 83% 18 NY
7037 Hometown Heat 12-Kindle 1674 21-5 81% 12 WI
7038 FTLUTD Fusion 15-Sidney 1674 6-8 43% 15 FL
7039 Crosscourt 13-Black 1674 17-7 71% 13 PA
7040 Drive Nation 14-Black 1674 11-9 55% 14 TX
7041 SynergyForce 15-Gold 1674 33-21 61% 15 CA
7042 LES 14 Norman 1674 15-2 79% 14
7043 Ho'opa 14-2 1674 6-2 75% 14
7044 EVP Ignite 15-1 1674 12-3 80% 15
7045 Northstar 14 1674 22-6 79% 14
7046 HNLV 15-1 1674 15-9 63% 15
7047 OP2 14-1 elite 1674 3-1 60% 14
7048 NSSC 14 Nike 1674 45-21 68% 14 MO
7049 MoCo Jrs 14-Adidas 1674 28-17 61% 14 TX
7050 Chaos Central 13-5 1673 5-0 100% 13
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.