2025-2026 Season — Page 141 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7001 | Rocky Elite 13-National | 1675 | 32-16 | 67% | 13 | CO |
| 7002 | Victorium 17 UA | 1675 | 21-33 | 39% | 17 | AZ |
| 7003 | R2R 16-1 | 1675 | 9-2 | 75% | 16 | PA |
| 7004 | LAVA Mission 17-Molten | 1675 | 32-17 | 65% | 17 | CA |
| 7005 | NE D-League 16 | 1675 | 8-3 | 73% | 16 | IA |
| 7006 | Local Girl 16-S | 1675 | 25-16 | 61% | 16 | SC |
| 7007 | MWM 12 | 1675 | 21-8 | 72% | 12 | IL |
| 7008 | New Prague JO 15-Black | 1675 | 9-2 | 82% | 15 | MN |
| 7009 | AppVC 15 Elite | 1675 | 38-17 | 69% | 15 | NC |
| 7010 | River City 18-Blue | 1675 | 36-8 | 82% | 18 | WI |
| 7011 | Chi City Elite 15-1 | 1675 | 24-37 | 39% | 15 | IL |
| 7012 | CCVBC 15-Eric | 1675 | 28-22 | 56% | 15 | CA |
| 7013 | SynergyForce 14-2 natl | 1675 | 21-26 | 45% | 14 | CA |
| 7014 | Anthem United 15-Agape | 1675 | 37-9 | 80% | 15 | GA |
| 7015 | XP 17-Elite 1 | 1675 | 35-20 | 64% | 17 | IL |
| 7016 | WAVE 15-Sarah | 1675 | 21-6 | 78% | 15 | CA |
| 7017 | Prime Performance 13-Teal | 1675 | 40-18 | 69% | 13 | AZ |
| 7018 | IMUA 13-Justin | 1675 | 31-16 | 66% | 13 | CA |
| 7019 | SynergyForce 15-Gold | 1675 | 33-21 | 61% | 15 | CA |
| 7020 | DYNASTY 10-Black | 1675 | 15-12 | 54% | 10 | KS |
| 7021 | Tsunami 16-1n shota | 1675 | 13-12 | 52% | 16 | GA |
| 7022 | Carolina CHAOS 18 Royal | 1675 | 26-9 | 74% | 18 | NC |
| 7023 | UNION 16-Purple | 1675 | 49-25 | 66% | 16 | IN |
| 7024 | Sonora DRG 14 | 1675 | 7-3 | 70% | 14 | MX |
| 7025 | NORCO 16-White | 1675 | 29-14 | 67% | 16 | CO |
| 7026 | Countdown 16-Elite | 1675 | 40-20 | 67% | 16 | FL |
| 7027 | EXCELL 15-1 paul navy | 1674 | 45-16 | 74% | 15 | SC |
| 7028 | EPIC - Corry 17-S | 1674 | 22-8 | 73% | 17 | OH |
| 7029 | oe 11-2 | 1674 | 10-2 | 83% | 11 | OH |
| 7030 | Ridgecrest Starlings 15 | 1674 | 8-1 | 89% | 15 | CA |
| 7031 | TEV 16-Carley/brittany | 1674 | 24-14 | 63% | 16 | TN |
| 7032 | Tri-State Elite 18-White | 1674 | 22-22 | 50% | 18 | KY |
| 7033 | AVA 11-N lite schutte | 1674 | 21-8 | 72% | 11 | OH |
| 7034 | Austin Skyline Junio 16-Black-kilee | 1674 | 2-5 | 29% | 16 | TX |
| 7035 | Green Wave 16 | 1674 | 23-11 | 57% | 16 | ND |
| 7036 | Metro Volleyball Club 15-North | 1674 | 45-23 | 64% | 15 | DC |
| 7037 | STL Crossfire 16 SR1 | 1674 | 43-12 | 77% | 16 | MO |
| 7038 | Augusta Juniors Volleyball Club 14-Brandon | 1674 | 41-23 | 64% | 14 | GA |
| 7039 | Crosscourt 13-Black | 1674 | 17-7 | 71% | 13 | PA |
| 7040 | TX LEGACY 11-Purple | 1674 | 13-3 | 76% | 11 | TX |
| 7041 | Loudoun Elite Volleyball Club 17-Tony | 1674 | 33-27 | 54% | 17 | VA |
| 7042 | Colorado Elite 16 Grizzly | 1674 | 32-31 | 51% | 16 | CO |
| 7043 | BVB 12 | 1674 | 8-0 | 100% | 12 | MN |
| 7044 | AJV 13-Cedar park | 1674 | 31-16 | 66% | 13 | TX |
| 7045 | Sanford Sports 15-Black | 1674 | 48-24 | 67% | 15 | SD |
| 7046 | 1United 17-N black | 1674 | 28-19 | 58% | 17 | TX |
| 7047 | LVL UP 18 Mana Wahine Koa | 1674 | 44-23 | 66% | 18 | AZ |
| 7048 | Stingray VBA 16 Adidas | 1674 | 46-20 | 69% | 16 | OK |
| 7049 | Net Force 16-1 elite | 1674 | 26-14 | 63% | 16 | IA |
| 7050 | Utah Ice 17-1 | 1674 | 5-3 | 63% | 17 | UT |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.