Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 141 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
7001 Rocky Elite 13-National 1675 32-16 67% 13 CO
7002 Victorium 17 UA 1675 21-33 39% 17 AZ
7003 R2R 16-1 1675 9-2 75% 16 PA
7004 LAVA Mission 17-Molten 1675 32-17 65% 17 CA
7005 NE D-League 16 1675 8-3 73% 16 IA
7006 Local Girl 16-S 1675 25-16 61% 16 SC
7007 MWM 12 1675 21-8 72% 12 IL
7008 New Prague JO 15-Black 1675 9-2 82% 15 MN
7009 AppVC 15 Elite 1675 38-17 69% 15 NC
7010 River City 18-Blue 1675 36-8 82% 18 WI
7011 Chi City Elite 15-1 1675 24-37 39% 15 IL
7012 CCVBC 15-Eric 1675 28-22 56% 15 CA
7013 SynergyForce 14-2 natl 1675 21-26 45% 14 CA
7014 Anthem United 15-Agape 1675 37-9 80% 15 GA
7015 XP 17-Elite 1 1675 35-20 64% 17 IL
7016 WAVE 15-Sarah 1675 21-6 78% 15 CA
7017 Prime Performance 13-Teal 1675 40-18 69% 13 AZ
7018 IMUA 13-Justin 1675 31-16 66% 13 CA
7019 SynergyForce 15-Gold 1675 33-21 61% 15 CA
7020 DYNASTY 10-Black 1675 15-12 54% 10 KS
7021 Tsunami 16-1n shota 1675 13-12 52% 16 GA
7022 Carolina CHAOS 18 Royal 1675 26-9 74% 18 NC
7023 UNION 16-Purple 1675 49-25 66% 16 IN
7024 Sonora DRG 14 1675 7-3 70% 14 MX
7025 NORCO 16-White 1675 29-14 67% 16 CO
7026 Countdown 16-Elite 1675 40-20 67% 16 FL
7027 EXCELL 15-1 paul navy 1674 45-16 74% 15 SC
7028 EPIC - Corry 17-S 1674 22-8 73% 17 OH
7029 oe 11-2 1674 10-2 83% 11 OH
7030 Ridgecrest Starlings 15 1674 8-1 89% 15 CA
7031 TEV 16-Carley/brittany 1674 24-14 63% 16 TN
7032 Tri-State Elite 18-White 1674 22-22 50% 18 KY
7033 AVA 11-N lite schutte 1674 21-8 72% 11 OH
7034 Austin Skyline Junio 16-Black-kilee 1674 2-5 29% 16 TX
7035 Green Wave 16 1674 23-11 57% 16 ND
7036 Metro Volleyball Club 15-North 1674 45-23 64% 15 DC
7037 STL Crossfire 16 SR1 1674 43-12 77% 16 MO
7038 Augusta Juniors Volleyball Club 14-Brandon 1674 41-23 64% 14 GA
7039 Crosscourt 13-Black 1674 17-7 71% 13 PA
7040 TX LEGACY 11-Purple 1674 13-3 76% 11 TX
7041 Loudoun Elite Volleyball Club 17-Tony 1674 33-27 54% 17 VA
7042 Colorado Elite 16 Grizzly 1674 32-31 51% 16 CO
7043 BVB 12 1674 8-0 100% 12 MN
7044 AJV 13-Cedar park 1674 31-16 66% 13 TX
7045 Sanford Sports 15-Black 1674 48-24 67% 15 SD
7046 1United 17-N black 1674 28-19 58% 17 TX
7047 LVL UP 18 Mana Wahine Koa 1674 44-23 66% 18 AZ
7048 Stingray VBA 16 Adidas 1674 46-20 69% 16 OK
7049 Net Force 16-1 elite 1674 26-14 63% 16 IA
7050 Utah Ice 17-1 1674 5-3 63% 17 UT
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.