2025-2026 Season — Page 141 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7001 | LBK 14-2 | 1674 | 17-7 | 71% | 14 | OH |
| 7002 | Local Girl 16-S | 1674 | 25-16 | 61% | 16 | SC |
| 7003 | UP North Jr's DSN 16-Sel | 1674 | 19-9 | 68% | 16 | WI |
| 7004 | Angelo Rise 15-2 | 1674 | 34-13 | 71% | 15 | TX |
| 7005 | CHAOS 14-1 national | 1674 | 35-12 | 74% | 14 | OR |
| 7006 | DCVA 17-Hong | 1674 | 19-20 | 49% | 17 | NM |
| 7007 | Dolphin VBC 13-Green | 1674 | 41-22 | 65% | 13 | AL |
| 7008 | Galaxy 12 Kayla | 1674 | 17-5 | 77% | 12 | NC |
| 7009 | GJ 17 PREMIER | 1674 | 39-21 | 65% | 17 | FL |
| 7010 | GSJ 16 National | 1674 | 36-16 | 69% | 16 | SC |
| 7011 | Goldenwest 16-Tower zero | 1674 | 34-13 | 72% | 16 | CA |
| 7012 | Midwest Penguins 16-1 | 1674 | 33-27 | 55% | 16 | WI |
| 7013 | Platinum 15 Power | 1674 | 31-27 | 53% | 15 | UT |
| 7014 | Premier 18-Black | 1674 | 35-30 | 53% | 18 | TX |
| 7015 | The Edge 17-Elite | 1674 | 45-14 | 76% | 17 | IL |
| 7016 | Stingray VBA 16 Adidas | 1674 | 46-20 | 69% | 16 | OK |
| 7017 | South County 17 Erica | 1674 | 11-18 | 38% | 17 | RI |
| 7018 | VolleyFX 13 Luck | 1674 | 27-12 | 68% | 13 | NY |
| 7019 | VC United 14-1 elite | 1674 | 15-21 | 42% | 14 | IL |
| 7020 | FRVBC 15-White | 1674 | 31-16 | 66% | 15 | CO |
| 7021 | Rockwood Thunder 14-Navy | 1674 | 24-24 | 50% | 14 | MO |
| 7022 | Kulia 12-Ku'ualoha | 1674 | 9-1 | 90% | 12 | HI |
| 7023 | Avoli 16-F feño | 1674 | 17-6 | 74% | 16 | PR |
| 7024 | Idaho ONE 13-White | 1674 | 33-23 | 54% | 13 | ID |
| 7025 | Net Force 16-1 elite | 1674 | 26-14 | 63% | 16 | IL |
| 7026 | Core 18-F national | 1674 | 16-10 | 62% | 18 | NJ |
| 7027 | Rancho 17-Premier | 1674 | 24-21 | 53% | 17 | CA |
| 7028 | 603 United 18-Seacoast black | 1674 | 20-21 | 49% | 18 | NH |
| 7029 | RVT 13-1 surf | 1674 | 21-16 | 57% | 13 | NY |
| 7030 | Cajun Elite 13-1 | 1674 | 5-3 | 63% | 13 | LA |
| 7031 | SIVBC 16-Tornado | 1674 | 24-24 | 50% | 16 | WA |
| 7032 | AJV 14-Brandon | 1674 | 41-23 | 64% | 14 | GA |
| 7033 | RVC Redeem 16-1 | 1674 | 16-12 | 57% | 16 | OH |
| 7034 | Aggression 13-2 premier | 1674 | 10-1 | 91% | 13 | IL |
| 7035 | Victory 11-Elite green | 1674 | 17-8 | 65% | 11 | TX |
| 7036 | CADO 18-1 | 1674 | 5-1 | 83% | 18 | NY |
| 7037 | Hometown Heat 12-Kindle | 1674 | 21-5 | 81% | 12 | WI |
| 7038 | FTLUTD Fusion 15-Sidney | 1674 | 6-8 | 43% | 15 | FL |
| 7039 | Crosscourt 13-Black | 1674 | 17-7 | 71% | 13 | PA |
| 7040 | Drive Nation 14-Black | 1674 | 11-9 | 55% | 14 | TX |
| 7041 | SynergyForce 15-Gold | 1674 | 33-21 | 61% | 15 | CA |
| 7042 | LES 14 Norman | 1674 | 15-2 | 79% | 14 | |
| 7043 | Ho'opa 14-2 | 1674 | 6-2 | 75% | 14 | |
| 7044 | EVP Ignite 15-1 | 1674 | 12-3 | 80% | 15 | |
| 7045 | Northstar 14 | 1674 | 22-6 | 79% | 14 | |
| 7046 | HNLV 15-1 | 1674 | 15-9 | 63% | 15 | |
| 7047 | OP2 14-1 elite | 1674 | 3-1 | 60% | 14 | |
| 7048 | NSSC 14 Nike | 1674 | 45-21 | 68% | 14 | MO |
| 7049 | MoCo Jrs 14-Adidas | 1674 | 28-17 | 61% | 14 | TX |
| 7050 | Chaos Central 13-5 | 1673 | 5-0 | 100% | 13 |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.