Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 140 · Ranked by Elo rating

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is TAV 16-Black yun with a 2271 Elo rating and 48-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
6951 Top Flight SC 14 Phoenix 1617 15-4 79% 14 IL
6952 West Edge 16 Dawn 1617 31-16 66% 16 CA
6953 WD Nation 16-White 1617 18-8 69% 16 LA
6954 HDVC 18-Savannah 1617 25-8 76% 18 CA
6955 WE 16-1 1617 16-4 80% 16
6956 KC Thunder U16-Blue 1617 15-4 79% 16
6957 NL 16-Gold 1617 19-5 79% 16
6958 EPUERTO 16-1 1617 20-10 67% 16
6959 Cheetah West 16 1617 10-1 91% 16 NY
6960 Platinum 14-Apex 1617 9-9 50% 14 UT
6961 Idaho LUV 17-Morgan 1617 11-11 50% 17 ID
6962 BAE 15-Mariah 1617 11-10 52% 15 CA
6963 Windthorst 13-Dna 1617 10-5 67% 13
6964 Sideout 17-T savannah 1617 27-10 73% 17 NJ
6965 TFVBC 14-1 1617 13-6 68% 14 IL
6966 H. Prep 14-White 1617 20-8 71% 14 TX
6967 CINCY EAST 18-1 black 1617 19-25 43% 18 OH
6968 Colorado Juniors 18-Trevor 1617 20-12 63% 18 CO
6969 Dig Deep 18-Ginger 1617 21-28 43% 18 NH
6970 United 15-Black 1617 57-23 71% 15 VA
6971 Apex VBC 16-1 1617 3-4 43% 16 MO
6972 Sandhills 14-Monique 1617 15-7 68% 14 NC
6973 EAVC 18-1 1617 4-3 57% 18 UT
6974 Aspire NW Aspire 14-1 vancouver 1616 7-1 88% 14
6975 DCVA 14-N1 katie 1616 6-1 86% 14
6976 Eleu 14-1 1616 11-4 73% 14
6977 MSVB 15-R bethany/marett 1616 10-5 67% 15 AK
6978 Outbreak 16-Black 1616 20-10 67% 16 VA
6979 AZ SKY 17-Blue 1616 6-2 75% 17 AZ
6980 APV 13-National black 1616 6-1 86% 13 TX
6981 FVA 14-Ember - m1 1616 10-4 71% 14 AK
6982 HJV 16-National 1616 24-13 65% 16 TX
6983 COVC 16-S regionals gold 1616 14-4 78% 16 OR
6984 CSF 14-Black 1616 15-4 79% 14 NC
6985 Buckeyefire 14-1 1616 34-19 64% 14 OH
6986 COASTLINE 14-BLACK 1616 19-7 73% 14 NC
6987 Columbia 14-Black 1616 37-39 47% 14 SC
6988 CoJrs 14-Steve 1616 11-5 69% 14 CO
6989 EAA 14-BLUE 1616 29-15 66% 14 MN
6990 EC Power KOP 16-Black 1616 16-29 36% 16 PA
6991 ENCORE 14-Navy kimmy 1616 30-13 70% 14 CA
6992 GP 14-State gold 1616 39-16 71% 14 FL
6993 MVVC G 12-Pink 1616 24-6 80% 12 CA
6994 Midwest Intensity VBC 12U 1616 19-10 51% 12 IL
6995 MoCo MAVS 16-Red 1616 19-23 45% 16 TX
6996 NORCO 15-Black 1616 17-10 63% 15 CO
6997 TDV 18-Elite 1616 25-13 66% 18 OH
6998 OPVBC 16 National 1616 33-14 70% 16 WA
6999 Revolution CBURG 16-White 1616 19-14 58% 16 PA
7000 RVBC 16U Blue 1616 20-9 67% 16 PA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings increase when teams win and decrease when they lose. The amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team.

Rating Calculation

New Rating = Old Rating + K × (Actual Score - Expected Score). K-factor: 32. Actual Score: 1 for win, 0.5 for tie, 0 for loss. Expected Score is calculated based on rating difference. The system processes all matches chronologically to ensure accurate historical progression.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for ranking. Aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Applies filters to show relevant divisions and gender categories.