Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 140 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
6951 Chi City Elite 15-1 1675 24-37 39% 15 IL
6952 Club One AZ 13-Platinum 1675 41-30 58% 13 AZ
6953 diggersz 14-Elite-chris 1675 21-6 70% 14 IL
6954 EASTON VBC 15-1 1675 34-14 71% 15 PA
6955 Eastern Iowa Bulldogs 17 1675 13-2 81% 17 IA
6956 HP South 16 Diamond 1675 34-21 60% 16 MO
6957 Left Coast 13-1 1675 26-16 62% 13 CA
6958 RVC 14 National 1675 35-34 51% 14 VA
6959 R2R 16-1 1675 9-2 75% 16 CA
6960 Tsunami 14-1e shota 1675 28-27 51% 14 GA
6961 208 18-Elite 1675 27-14 66% 18 WA
6962 WPVC 11-Armour black 1675 26-43 38% 11 FL
6963 414 17-Elite 1675 42-28 60% 17 WI
6964 PREVA 16-Enrique 1675 11-16 41% 16 PR
6965 PREVA 14-Carlos r 1675 20-8 71% 14 PR
6966 VC United 17-2 elite 1675 20-21 49% 17 IL
6967 Club V 12-Prodigy krista 1675 16-27 35% 12 UT
6968 BVC 14-Black 1675 49-29 60% 14 MN
6969 Metro 15-Black 1675 15-13 54% 15 DC
6970 LEGACY 14-Elite bella 1675 36-26 58% 14 FL
6971 Texas One 13-Royal 1675 28-12 70% 13 TX
6972 Max Performance 14-Amanda 1675 9-4 56% 14 MA
6973 London Elite 18-Blue 1675 20-10 67% 18 OH
6974 Blaze 11-Cougars 1675 10-5 67% 11 IA
6975 Cajun Elite 18-1 1675 6-2 75% 18 LA
6976 Midwest Elite 12 1675 8-0 100% 12 MO
6977 VCN 12-Elite 1675 5-3 63% 12 NE
6978 Salty 18-S 1675 19-13 59% 18 TX
6979 SVA 16-S black 1675 6-0 100% 16 AZ
6980 HVA 16-1 1675 8-3 73% 16 FL
6981 WVC 15 Gold 1675 45-13 78% 15 VA
6982 Utah Ice 17-1 1675 5-3 63% 17 UT
6983 Aleta 12-3 1675 6-0 100% 12 OH
6984 StarTouch 13 1675 21-2 91% 13
6985 Pipeline SCVBC 14-Adidas 1675 7-2 78% 14
6986 TAV 15-Black 1675 45-19 70% 15 IL
6987 Performance Juniors 17-1 1675 48-25 66% 17 NY
6988 Ridgecrest Starlings 15 1675 8-1 89% 15 CA
6989 Impact vball club 16 1674 29-14 64% 16
6990 EMT 18-1 1674 18-6 75% 18
6991 CHAMP 18-Col 1674 5-0 100% 18
6992 Fight Club VB 18-1 1674 9-7 56% 18
6993 Chadron Elite 14-Black 1674 5-5 50% 14
6994 Netforce 16-Macy 1674 36-14 72% 16
6995 SynergyForce 14-2 natl 1674 21-26 45% 14 CA
6996 DYNASTY 10-Black 1674 15-12 54% 10 KS
6997 IMGA Ascender Elite 16-1 1674 26-29 47% 16 FL
6998 Columbia 14-Black 1674 46-42 51% 14 MD
6999 Invasion 15-Blue 1674 17-10 63% 15 MO
7000 Carolina Rogue 14-Black 1674 29-26 53% 14 SC
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.