2025-2026 Season — Page 140 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6951 | Chi City Elite 15-1 | 1675 | 24-37 | 39% | 15 | IL |
| 6952 | Club One AZ 13-Platinum | 1675 | 41-30 | 58% | 13 | AZ |
| 6953 | diggersz 14-Elite-chris | 1675 | 21-6 | 70% | 14 | IL |
| 6954 | EASTON VBC 15-1 | 1675 | 34-14 | 71% | 15 | PA |
| 6955 | Eastern Iowa Bulldogs 17 | 1675 | 13-2 | 81% | 17 | IA |
| 6956 | HP South 16 Diamond | 1675 | 34-21 | 60% | 16 | MO |
| 6957 | Left Coast 13-1 | 1675 | 26-16 | 62% | 13 | CA |
| 6958 | RVC 14 National | 1675 | 35-34 | 51% | 14 | VA |
| 6959 | R2R 16-1 | 1675 | 9-2 | 75% | 16 | CA |
| 6960 | Tsunami 14-1e shota | 1675 | 28-27 | 51% | 14 | GA |
| 6961 | 208 18-Elite | 1675 | 27-14 | 66% | 18 | WA |
| 6962 | WPVC 11-Armour black | 1675 | 26-43 | 38% | 11 | FL |
| 6963 | 414 17-Elite | 1675 | 42-28 | 60% | 17 | WI |
| 6964 | PREVA 16-Enrique | 1675 | 11-16 | 41% | 16 | PR |
| 6965 | PREVA 14-Carlos r | 1675 | 20-8 | 71% | 14 | PR |
| 6966 | VC United 17-2 elite | 1675 | 20-21 | 49% | 17 | IL |
| 6967 | Club V 12-Prodigy krista | 1675 | 16-27 | 35% | 12 | UT |
| 6968 | BVC 14-Black | 1675 | 49-29 | 60% | 14 | MN |
| 6969 | Metro 15-Black | 1675 | 15-13 | 54% | 15 | DC |
| 6970 | LEGACY 14-Elite bella | 1675 | 36-26 | 58% | 14 | FL |
| 6971 | Texas One 13-Royal | 1675 | 28-12 | 70% | 13 | TX |
| 6972 | Max Performance 14-Amanda | 1675 | 9-4 | 56% | 14 | MA |
| 6973 | London Elite 18-Blue | 1675 | 20-10 | 67% | 18 | OH |
| 6974 | Blaze 11-Cougars | 1675 | 10-5 | 67% | 11 | IA |
| 6975 | Cajun Elite 18-1 | 1675 | 6-2 | 75% | 18 | LA |
| 6976 | Midwest Elite 12 | 1675 | 8-0 | 100% | 12 | MO |
| 6977 | VCN 12-Elite | 1675 | 5-3 | 63% | 12 | NE |
| 6978 | Salty 18-S | 1675 | 19-13 | 59% | 18 | TX |
| 6979 | SVA 16-S black | 1675 | 6-0 | 100% | 16 | AZ |
| 6980 | HVA 16-1 | 1675 | 8-3 | 73% | 16 | FL |
| 6981 | WVC 15 Gold | 1675 | 45-13 | 78% | 15 | VA |
| 6982 | Utah Ice 17-1 | 1675 | 5-3 | 63% | 17 | UT |
| 6983 | Aleta 12-3 | 1675 | 6-0 | 100% | 12 | OH |
| 6984 | StarTouch 13 | 1675 | 21-2 | 91% | 13 | |
| 6985 | Pipeline SCVBC 14-Adidas | 1675 | 7-2 | 78% | 14 | |
| 6986 | TAV 15-Black | 1675 | 45-19 | 70% | 15 | IL |
| 6987 | Performance Juniors 17-1 | 1675 | 48-25 | 66% | 17 | NY |
| 6988 | Ridgecrest Starlings 15 | 1675 | 8-1 | 89% | 15 | CA |
| 6989 | Impact vball club 16 | 1674 | 29-14 | 64% | 16 | |
| 6990 | EMT 18-1 | 1674 | 18-6 | 75% | 18 | |
| 6991 | CHAMP 18-Col | 1674 | 5-0 | 100% | 18 | |
| 6992 | Fight Club VB 18-1 | 1674 | 9-7 | 56% | 18 | |
| 6993 | Chadron Elite 14-Black | 1674 | 5-5 | 50% | 14 | |
| 6994 | Netforce 16-Macy | 1674 | 36-14 | 72% | 16 | |
| 6995 | SynergyForce 14-2 natl | 1674 | 21-26 | 45% | 14 | CA |
| 6996 | DYNASTY 10-Black | 1674 | 15-12 | 54% | 10 | KS |
| 6997 | IMGA Ascender Elite 16-1 | 1674 | 26-29 | 47% | 16 | FL |
| 6998 | Columbia 14-Black | 1674 | 46-42 | 51% | 14 | MD |
| 6999 | Invasion 15-Blue | 1674 | 17-10 | 63% | 15 | MO |
| 7000 | Carolina Rogue 14-Black | 1674 | 29-26 | 53% | 14 | SC |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.