Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 140 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
6951 Momemtum 15-Black 1676 5-0 100% 15 MN
6952 UtahIce 15-Brad 1676 6-1 86% 15 UT
6953 Metro 14-Black 1676 21-15 58% 14 GA
6954 SGV 12-Flames 1676 8-1 89% 12 GA
6955 Idaho ONE 12-Im stegeman 1676 37-17 67% 12 ID
6956 SOL 11-1 1676 17-4 81% 11 TX
6957 Rhythm 13 MC 1676 43-23 65% 13 TN
6958 UVA 15-Elite 1676 3-0 100% 15 LA
6959 Yorktowne VB 16-Blue 1676 41-36 53% 16 PA
6960 Summit VC 15-Black 1676 19-8 70% 15 MO
6961 FSVC 16-Red april 1676 7-4 64% 16 NV
6962 TC ELITE 17-Bt 1676 28-16 62% 17 LA
6963 Surge 15-Black 1676 18-19 49% 15 PA
6964 TopFlight 16-National red 1676 26-31 46% 16 NV
6965 Angelo Rise 15-2 1676 34-13 71% 15 TX
6966 BRUSA 16 William 1676 16-11 59% 16 CA
6967 VC United 17-2 elite 1676 20-21 49% 17 IL
6968 Rockwood Thunder 14-Navy 1676 24-24 50% 14 MO
6969 The Edge 17-Elite 1676 45-14 76% 17 IL
6970 Eastside 15-Ae koehler 1676 30-10 75% 15 OH
6971 JET 18 CARR 1676 12-8 60% 18 TX
6972 RISE 13 MORGAN 1676 27-19 59% 13 LA
6973 Elevate 14-1 1676 10-2 83% 14 TX
6974 Rapid Fire 18-Black 1676 14-11 56% 18 IL
6975 Tri-Star 18-Navy 1676 28-6 82% 18 TN
6976 Sky High 18-Vilsoet 1676 27-9 71% 18 IL
6977 SSVC Sunukjian 14-1 1676 25-4 86% 14 AZ
6978 Nitro Heat 16-S 1676 13-1 81% 16
6979 EVP Ignite 15-1 1676 12-3 80% 15 ON
6980 Maverick Volleyball Club 15 Maverick Ambush 1676 3-4 43% 15 ON
6981 Mem Metro 12-Elite red 1675 33-12 73% 12 TN
6982 NVPUR 15 1675 14-12 54% 15 PR
6983 AVA 12-Coral 1675 37-22 63% 12 FL
6984 HIC 12-Lisi 1675 7-12 37% 12 UT
6985 Midwest Elite 12 1675 8-0 100% 12 IA
6986 GG 16-1 monster 1675 13-7 65% 16 NJ
6987 Madtown 16-1 select 1675 31-17 65% 16 WI
6988 AVA 14-Premier 1 1675 20-16 56% 14 NY
6989 Chaos 14-S pink 1675 8-2 80% 14 ND
6990 Idaho ONE 13-White 1675 33-23 54% 13 ID
6991 Boss CLE 17-1 1675 34-23 60% 17 OH
6992 Arkansas Elite 15 1675 26-8 76% 15 AR
6993 MARIN 16-Green 1675 35-24 59% 16 CA
6994 ATHENAVB Bend 16-1 gold 1675 30-29 51% 16 OR
6995 TEMPO 11-1 1675 18-5 78% 11 WI
6996 CHAMP 18-Col 1675 5-0 100% 18 AL
6997 RVT 13-1 surf 1675 21-16 57% 13 NY
6998 Digs 15-Red 1675 26-34 43% 15 NJ
6999 Arkansas Elite 10 1675 19-6 73% 10 AR
7000 TEJAS 13-Black erik 1675 27-16 57% 13 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.