2025-2026 Season — Page 139 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6901 | AZ Storm Elite VBC 15-Boltz | 1677 | 6-3 | 67% | 15 | |
| 6902 | SF Elite 16-Nono | 1677 | 28-20 | 58% | 16 | CA |
| 6903 | Chewblocka 14-1 | 1677 | 10-1 | 91% | 14 | NV |
| 6904 | Club 281 14-1 | 1676 | 13-4 | 72% | 14 | |
| 6905 | SCVC 16-Sarah/jarrett | 1676 | 12-4 | 75% | 16 | |
| 6906 | Adira 14-Blackburn | 1676 | 34-9 | 77% | 14 | TN |
| 6907 | ID Crush 18 Engelson | 1676 | 25-26 | 49% | 18 | ID |
| 6908 | HRVC 18-National green | 1676 | 27-21 | 56% | 18 | NC |
| 6909 | Atomic! 18-Short | 1676 | 16-3 | 84% | 18 | MI |
| 6910 | All Set 16 Ana | 1676 | 9-6 | 60% | 16 | AK |
| 6911 | SOL 11-1 | 1676 | 17-4 | 81% | 11 | TX |
| 6912 | CINCY EAST 16-1 black | 1676 | 30-31 | 49% | 16 | OH |
| 6913 | Black Bears 14-Black | 1676 | 17-9 | 65% | 14 | NC |
| 6914 | COLAVOL 14-Black | 1676 | 25-10 | 71% | 14 | AL |
| 6915 | Gators VBC 15 Premier | 1676 | 36-16 | 69% | 15 | OH |
| 6916 | Excel NW 14-1 lux | 1676 | 33-34 | 49% | 14 | WA |
| 6917 | Game Day 18-1 | 1676 | 21-18 | 54% | 18 | OR |
| 6918 | OT 14-J john | 1676 | 18-39 | 32% | 14 | FL |
| 6919 | Rose City 14-1 | 1676 | 24-18 | 52% | 14 | OR |
| 6920 | Shock 17-Ua storm | 1676 | 21-16 | 57% | 17 | IL |
| 6921 | SDVBC 15-Drea | 1676 | 36-26 | 58% | 15 | CA |
| 6922 | TNT 12-Fuse | 1676 | 34-15 | 69% | 12 | PA |
| 6923 | Victory 17-National black | 1676 | 24-24 | 50% | 17 | TX |
| 6924 | UNION 16-Purple | 1676 | 49-25 | 66% | 16 | CA |
| 6925 | 310VBC 15-N chase | 1676 | 27-15 | 64% | 15 | CA |
| 6926 | AJ 13-Gold | 1676 | 28-17 | 62% | 13 | LA |
| 6927 | ID Crush 14-Marcus | 1676 | 34-23 | 60% | 14 | ID |
| 6928 | Panda 14-2 | 1676 | 23-21 | 52% | 14 | CA |
| 6929 | MiElite 14-Ns west | 1676 | 30-10 | 75% | 14 | MI |
| 6930 | Boston United 13-National | 1676 | 33-21 | 61% | 13 | MA |
| 6931 | SMASH Raiders 18-2 | 1676 | 5-3 | 63% | 18 | ON |
| 6932 | Maks 13 | 1676 | 7-1 | 88% | 13 | ID |
| 6933 | TEJAS 13-Black erik | 1676 | 27-16 | 57% | 13 | TX |
| 6934 | HEAT 14-National khanh | 1676 | 5-3 | 63% | 14 | OK |
| 6935 | Ta’ahine AZ 12-Tu’ipulotu | 1676 | 6-1 | 86% | 12 | AZ |
| 6936 | Metro 14-Black | 1676 | 21-15 | 58% | 14 | DC |
| 6937 | Slam VBC 16-National | 1676 | 24-4 | 86% | 16 | MA |
| 6938 | H Hawks HHVBC Stingers 13 | 1676 | 6-0 | 100% | 13 | |
| 6939 | Nitro Heat 16-S | 1676 | 13-1 | 81% | 16 | |
| 6940 | Stormbreaker 12-Valkyrie | 1676 | 39-25 | 61% | 12 | CA |
| 6941 | Waco Lightning 12-Black | 1676 | 17-5 | 71% | 12 | TX |
| 6942 | BVB 12 | 1675 | 8-0 | 100% | 12 | |
| 6943 | TPV 16-Paragon | 1675 | 32-37 | 46% | 16 | |
| 6944 | Arkansas Elite 10 | 1675 | 19-6 | 73% | 10 | AR |
| 6945 | Invasion 15-Black | 1675 | 16-14 | 53% | 15 | MO |
| 6946 | LVL 15 VICTORIA | 1675 | 24-13 | 65% | 15 | LA |
| 6947 | KC Power 14-3 | 1675 | 24-14 | 60% | 14 | KS |
| 6948 | AZ EVJ 13-Black | 1675 | 32-13 | 71% | 13 | AZ |
| 6949 | Aspire NW 12-2 beaverton | 1675 | 26-6 | 81% | 12 | WA |
| 6950 | AZ EVJ 16 Select | 1675 | 32-31 | 51% | 16 | AZ |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.