2025-2026 Season — Page 139 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6901 | STL Crossfire 14 R2 | 1677 | 32-11 | 73% | 14 | MO |
| 6902 | GJ 17 PREMIER | 1677 | 39-21 | 65% | 17 | FL |
| 6903 | Ozark Juniors 14-Reg plus | 1677 | 39-11 | 78% | 14 | AR |
| 6904 | UVA 15-Jonah | 1677 | 29-26 | 53% | 15 | CA |
| 6905 | Spa City 18 Aqua | 1677 | 28-27 | 51% | 18 | NY |
| 6906 | Direction 15 Royal | 1677 | 42-10 | 81% | 15 | NC |
| 6907 | STVA 17-3 | 1677 | 6-2 | 75% | 17 | MA |
| 6908 | Excel NW 14-1 lux | 1677 | 33-34 | 49% | 14 | WA |
| 6909 | I AM VBC 11-Red | 1677 | 27-11 | 71% | 11 | WI |
| 6910 | HNLV 15-1 | 1677 | 15-9 | 63% | 15 | HI |
| 6911 | AZ Storm Elite VBC 15-Boltz | 1677 | 6-3 | 67% | 15 | NV |
| 6912 | TVC 14-A-p kahlil | 1677 | 43-12 | 78% | 14 | FL |
| 6913 | RVT 14-3 sail | 1677 | 29-14 | 67% | 14 | NY |
| 6914 | City Juniors 12 Nike | 1677 | 32-12 | 71% | 12 | TX |
| 6915 | Aspire NW 12-2 beaverton | 1677 | 26-6 | 81% | 12 | OR |
| 6916 | Netforce 16-Macy | 1677 | 36-14 | 72% | 16 | AL |
| 6917 | Ignite AZ 15-National 1 | 1677 | 34-30 | 53% | 15 | AZ |
| 6918 | HIC 14-Keano | 1677 | 6-8 | 43% | 14 | UT |
| 6919 | Blue Ridge 12-Blue | 1677 | 29-16 | 64% | 12 | VA |
| 6920 | EP Elite 12-Smack | 1677 | 18-13 | 53% | 12 | TX |
| 6921 | Locked In Volleyball Club 17 18U National Locked In | 1677 | 25-9 | 74% | 17 | AL |
| 6922 | Hobcab VBC 12-1 | 1677 | 5-0 | 100% | 12 | KY |
| 6923 | TPV 12-Red | 1677 | 28-11 | 72% | 12 | TN |
| 6924 | Lightning 17-1 | 1677 | 5-0 | 100% | 17 | NE |
| 6925 | HEAT 14-National khanh | 1677 | 5-3 | 63% | 14 | NV |
| 6926 | Chewblocka 14-1 | 1677 | 10-1 | 91% | 14 | NV |
| 6927 | KC Power 16-3 | 1677 | 25-10 | 71% | 16 | KS |
| 6928 | C2 17-1 regional blue m&m | 1677 | 10-5 | 67% | 17 | TN |
| 6929 | Chaos El Paso 15 Chaos Attitude | 1677 | 38-8 | 83% | 15 | TX |
| 6930 | OMNI 17 Elite | 1677 | 28-28 | 50% | 17 | CA |
| 6931 | Oasis OVA 13-G elite | 1677 | 5-3 | 63% | 13 | NV |
| 6932 | TAMPA UNITED VBA 14-Red | 1677 | 46-26 | 64% | 14 | FL |
| 6933 | East TX Jrs 14-Green | 1677 | 18-6 | 75% | 14 | |
| 6934 | Amarillo Xtreme 13 T4G | 1676 | 20-8 | 71% | 13 | TX |
| 6935 | H2 13-2 longhorns_steph | 1676 | 8-1 | 80% | 13 | MO |
| 6936 | Locked In Volleyball Club 17 17U National Locked In | 1676 | 14-6 | 70% | 17 | AL |
| 6937 | WI Flight 14-Black | 1676 | 27-13 | 68% | 14 | WI |
| 6938 | Texas Elite 14-Gold | 1676 | 23-14 | 62% | 14 | TX |
| 6939 | Tenacity Volleyball Club 14-1 | 1676 | 19-10 | 66% | 14 | WI |
| 6940 | SEIVB 17 Elite | 1676 | 25-6 | 81% | 17 | IN |
| 6941 | Vibe VBC 16-1 | 1676 | 37-37 | 50% | 16 | CA |
| 6942 | MOVA 14-M | 1676 | 38-15 | 72% | 14 | OH |
| 6943 | LAV 13-National black | 1676 | 35-31 | 53% | 13 | AL |
| 6944 | UCVC-SC 18-1 a&l | 1676 | 23-9 | 72% | 18 | SC |
| 6945 | GVA 16-Pink | 1676 | 4-6 | 40% | 16 | PR |
| 6946 | AVBC 15-R - yates | 1676 | 10-2 | 83% | 15 | OH |
| 6947 | MiElite 14-Ns west | 1676 | 30-10 | 75% | 14 | MI |
| 6948 | CINCY EAST 14-1 black | 1676 | 31-29 | 52% | 14 | OH |
| 6949 | TVS 12 Jayla | 1676 | 13-3 | 76% | 12 | TX |
| 6950 | CALI 14-Blue | 1676 | 30-24 | 56% | 14 | NY |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.