Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 139 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
6901 AZ Storm Elite VBC 15-Boltz 1677 6-3 67% 15
6902 SF Elite 16-Nono 1677 28-20 58% 16 CA
6903 Chewblocka 14-1 1677 10-1 91% 14 NV
6904 Club 281 14-1 1676 13-4 72% 14
6905 SCVC 16-Sarah/jarrett 1676 12-4 75% 16
6906 Adira 14-Blackburn 1676 34-9 77% 14 TN
6907 ID Crush 18 Engelson 1676 25-26 49% 18 ID
6908 HRVC 18-National green 1676 27-21 56% 18 NC
6909 Atomic! 18-Short 1676 16-3 84% 18 MI
6910 All Set 16 Ana 1676 9-6 60% 16 AK
6911 SOL 11-1 1676 17-4 81% 11 TX
6912 CINCY EAST 16-1 black 1676 30-31 49% 16 OH
6913 Black Bears 14-Black 1676 17-9 65% 14 NC
6914 COLAVOL 14-Black 1676 25-10 71% 14 AL
6915 Gators VBC 15 Premier 1676 36-16 69% 15 OH
6916 Excel NW 14-1 lux 1676 33-34 49% 14 WA
6917 Game Day 18-1 1676 21-18 54% 18 OR
6918 OT 14-J john 1676 18-39 32% 14 FL
6919 Rose City 14-1 1676 24-18 52% 14 OR
6920 Shock 17-Ua storm 1676 21-16 57% 17 IL
6921 SDVBC 15-Drea 1676 36-26 58% 15 CA
6922 TNT 12-Fuse 1676 34-15 69% 12 PA
6923 Victory 17-National black 1676 24-24 50% 17 TX
6924 UNION 16-Purple 1676 49-25 66% 16 CA
6925 310VBC 15-N chase 1676 27-15 64% 15 CA
6926 AJ 13-Gold 1676 28-17 62% 13 LA
6927 ID Crush 14-Marcus 1676 34-23 60% 14 ID
6928 Panda 14-2 1676 23-21 52% 14 CA
6929 MiElite 14-Ns west 1676 30-10 75% 14 MI
6930 Boston United 13-National 1676 33-21 61% 13 MA
6931 SMASH Raiders 18-2 1676 5-3 63% 18 ON
6932 Maks 13 1676 7-1 88% 13 ID
6933 TEJAS 13-Black erik 1676 27-16 57% 13 TX
6934 HEAT 14-National khanh 1676 5-3 63% 14 OK
6935 Ta’ahine AZ 12-Tu’ipulotu 1676 6-1 86% 12 AZ
6936 Metro 14-Black 1676 21-15 58% 14 DC
6937 Slam VBC 16-National 1676 24-4 86% 16 MA
6938 H Hawks HHVBC Stingers 13 1676 6-0 100% 13
6939 Nitro Heat 16-S 1676 13-1 81% 16
6940 Stormbreaker 12-Valkyrie 1676 39-25 61% 12 CA
6941 Waco Lightning 12-Black 1676 17-5 71% 12 TX
6942 BVB 12 1675 8-0 100% 12
6943 TPV 16-Paragon 1675 32-37 46% 16
6944 Arkansas Elite 10 1675 19-6 73% 10 AR
6945 Invasion 15-Black 1675 16-14 53% 15 MO
6946 LVL 15 VICTORIA 1675 24-13 65% 15 LA
6947 KC Power 14-3 1675 24-14 60% 14 KS
6948 AZ EVJ 13-Black 1675 32-13 71% 13 AZ
6949 Aspire NW 12-2 beaverton 1675 26-6 81% 12 WA
6950 AZ EVJ 16 Select 1675 32-31 51% 16 AZ
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.