Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 138 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
6851 MCE 16-1 1678 15-4 79% 16 MN
6852 PTVBC 14-1 1678 12-5 71% 14 IL
6853 Metro 15-Black 1678 15-13 54% 15 GA
6854 BVC 14-1 boom 1678 7-3 70% 14 DE
6855 Club Ace 14 1678 30-13 70% 14 OK
6856 Red Rock 16-Ruth - walnut creek 1678 34-18 65% 16 CA
6857 Mater Dei Jr Cats 12-Willett 1678 13-5 72% 12 IN
6858 Atlantic Volleyball Academy 13-Premier 2 1678 25-5 83% 13 NY
6859 MAVS KC 16-Premier 1678 19-10 66% 16 KS
6860 ATOMIC 13-Smack elite 1678 50-26 66% 13 AZ
6861 K2 14 Edge 1678 28-28 50% 14 TN
6862 Spa City 15 Aqua 1678 28-34 45% 15 NY
6863 Farmington Volleyball Club 14-1 1678 10-3 77% 14 MN
6864 JET 11 SELLERS 1678 15-4 79% 11 TX
6865 CJHEAT 13-1 1678 15-3 83% 13 NJ
6866 AZ EVJ 13-Black 1678 32-13 71% 13 AZ
6867 H Skyline TW 15-Royal 1678 3-5 38% 15 NV
6868 Beach South 14-1 1678 5-3 63% 14 GA
6869 Juggernaut 12-Regional1 1678 35-20 64% 12 CO
6870 HRVC Hurricanes 14-2 1678 3-2 60% 14 ON
6871 ForceVC 12-1 1678 30-16 65% 12 OH
6872 Aspire 16-1 black 1677 28-26 52% 16 AB
6873 Dunes 12-Lakeshore 1677 22-14 61% 12 IN
6874 CHAMP 14-1 1677 11-4 61% 14 AL
6875 Stormbreaker Volleyball Club 12-Valkyrie 1677 39-25 61% 12 CA
6876 EXCEL 12-Gold 1677 15-13 54% 12 TX
6877 913Athletics 15-National-d 1677 27-23 54% 15 KS
6878 BVC 12-Kim 1677 23-16 59% 12 CA
6879 MAVS KC 14 Regional 1677 22-16 58% 14 KS
6880 TX STORM 12 SMACK 1677 24-19 55% 12 TX
6881 208 18-Elite 1677 27-14 66% 18 ID
6882 Juggernaut 18-National1 1677 24-18 57% 18 CO
6883 Wisconsin Ice 13 National 1677 33-16 67% 13 WI
6884 HYPE Volleyball Club 18-1 1677 7-2 78% 18 MO
6885 CWAVE Basilisco 13 1677 34-13 72% 13 OH
6886 Blue Heat 13 Elite 1677 14-4 78% 13 MO
6887 PowerPlex 13-Wilson 1677 31-12 72% 13 IA
6888 Flyers 13-Usa-greta 1677 33-25 52% 13 TX
6889 NIVA 13-WHITE 1677 28-14 67% 13 IN
6890 WF Elite Black 18 1677 6-1 86% 18 WA
6891 1st Alliance 18-White 1677 23-9 72% 18 IL
6892 Corpus Christi Storm 18-1 1677 25-14 64% 18 TX
6893 Chadron Elite 14-Black 1677 5-5 50% 14 WY
6894 Triangle 14-White 1677 35-31 53% 14 NC
6895 H Hawks HHVBC Stingers 13 1677 6-0 100% 13 IA
6896 Dolphin VBC 13-Green 1677 41-22 65% 13 AL
6897 AJAXVB 16-1 gold 1677 9-1 90% 16 OR
6898 APVB 18-Elite 1677 19-20 49% 18 GA
6899 WYORVC-DMTYS 16 WYORVC-DMTYS White 1677 8-2 80% 16 WY
6900 BVA 16-Elite 1677 28-10 74% 16 NC
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.