2025-2026 Season — Page 138 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6851 | MCE 16-1 | 1678 | 15-4 | 79% | 16 | MN |
| 6852 | PTVBC 14-1 | 1678 | 12-5 | 71% | 14 | IL |
| 6853 | Metro 15-Black | 1678 | 15-13 | 54% | 15 | GA |
| 6854 | BVC 14-1 boom | 1678 | 7-3 | 70% | 14 | DE |
| 6855 | Club Ace 14 | 1678 | 30-13 | 70% | 14 | OK |
| 6856 | Red Rock 16-Ruth - walnut creek | 1678 | 34-18 | 65% | 16 | CA |
| 6857 | Mater Dei Jr Cats 12-Willett | 1678 | 13-5 | 72% | 12 | IN |
| 6858 | Atlantic Volleyball Academy 13-Premier 2 | 1678 | 25-5 | 83% | 13 | NY |
| 6859 | MAVS KC 16-Premier | 1678 | 19-10 | 66% | 16 | KS |
| 6860 | ATOMIC 13-Smack elite | 1678 | 50-26 | 66% | 13 | AZ |
| 6861 | K2 14 Edge | 1678 | 28-28 | 50% | 14 | TN |
| 6862 | Spa City 15 Aqua | 1678 | 28-34 | 45% | 15 | NY |
| 6863 | Farmington Volleyball Club 14-1 | 1678 | 10-3 | 77% | 14 | MN |
| 6864 | JET 11 SELLERS | 1678 | 15-4 | 79% | 11 | TX |
| 6865 | CJHEAT 13-1 | 1678 | 15-3 | 83% | 13 | NJ |
| 6866 | AZ EVJ 13-Black | 1678 | 32-13 | 71% | 13 | AZ |
| 6867 | H Skyline TW 15-Royal | 1678 | 3-5 | 38% | 15 | NV |
| 6868 | Beach South 14-1 | 1678 | 5-3 | 63% | 14 | GA |
| 6869 | Juggernaut 12-Regional1 | 1678 | 35-20 | 64% | 12 | CO |
| 6870 | HRVC Hurricanes 14-2 | 1678 | 3-2 | 60% | 14 | ON |
| 6871 | ForceVC 12-1 | 1678 | 30-16 | 65% | 12 | OH |
| 6872 | Aspire 16-1 black | 1677 | 28-26 | 52% | 16 | AB |
| 6873 | Dunes 12-Lakeshore | 1677 | 22-14 | 61% | 12 | IN |
| 6874 | CHAMP 14-1 | 1677 | 11-4 | 61% | 14 | AL |
| 6875 | Stormbreaker Volleyball Club 12-Valkyrie | 1677 | 39-25 | 61% | 12 | CA |
| 6876 | EXCEL 12-Gold | 1677 | 15-13 | 54% | 12 | TX |
| 6877 | 913Athletics 15-National-d | 1677 | 27-23 | 54% | 15 | KS |
| 6878 | BVC 12-Kim | 1677 | 23-16 | 59% | 12 | CA |
| 6879 | MAVS KC 14 Regional | 1677 | 22-16 | 58% | 14 | KS |
| 6880 | TX STORM 12 SMACK | 1677 | 24-19 | 55% | 12 | TX |
| 6881 | 208 18-Elite | 1677 | 27-14 | 66% | 18 | ID |
| 6882 | Juggernaut 18-National1 | 1677 | 24-18 | 57% | 18 | CO |
| 6883 | Wisconsin Ice 13 National | 1677 | 33-16 | 67% | 13 | WI |
| 6884 | HYPE Volleyball Club 18-1 | 1677 | 7-2 | 78% | 18 | MO |
| 6885 | CWAVE Basilisco 13 | 1677 | 34-13 | 72% | 13 | OH |
| 6886 | Blue Heat 13 Elite | 1677 | 14-4 | 78% | 13 | MO |
| 6887 | PowerPlex 13-Wilson | 1677 | 31-12 | 72% | 13 | IA |
| 6888 | Flyers 13-Usa-greta | 1677 | 33-25 | 52% | 13 | TX |
| 6889 | NIVA 13-WHITE | 1677 | 28-14 | 67% | 13 | IN |
| 6890 | WF Elite Black 18 | 1677 | 6-1 | 86% | 18 | WA |
| 6891 | 1st Alliance 18-White | 1677 | 23-9 | 72% | 18 | IL |
| 6892 | Corpus Christi Storm 18-1 | 1677 | 25-14 | 64% | 18 | TX |
| 6893 | Chadron Elite 14-Black | 1677 | 5-5 | 50% | 14 | WY |
| 6894 | Triangle 14-White | 1677 | 35-31 | 53% | 14 | NC |
| 6895 | H Hawks HHVBC Stingers 13 | 1677 | 6-0 | 100% | 13 | IA |
| 6896 | Dolphin VBC 13-Green | 1677 | 41-22 | 65% | 13 | AL |
| 6897 | AJAXVB 16-1 gold | 1677 | 9-1 | 90% | 16 | OR |
| 6898 | APVB 18-Elite | 1677 | 19-20 | 49% | 18 | GA |
| 6899 | WYORVC-DMTYS 16 WYORVC-DMTYS White | 1677 | 8-2 | 80% | 16 | WY |
| 6900 | BVA 16-Elite | 1677 | 28-10 | 74% | 16 | NC |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.