Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 138 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
6851 RISE Black 15 1678 11-4 69% 15
6852 Rapid Fire 18-Black 1678 14-11 56% 18 IL
6853 Stormbreaker 15 Valkyrie 1678 38-14 73% 15 CA
6854 CCVB 16-3 1678 9-4 69% 16 CA
6855 TKVBC 15-Aces elite 1678 44-29 60% 15 GA
6856 Iron VC 15-1 1677 13-2 87% 15
6857 Shockwave VB Academy 18-2 1677 11-3 65% 18
6858 Blue Heat 13 Elite 1677 14-4 78% 13 MO
6859 Legacy 16-1 1677 19-9 68% 16 OH
6860 Vital 15-1 gold 1677 27-42 39% 15 MN
6861 JET 11 SELLERS 1677 15-4 79% 11 TX
6862 AVC 17-Rashad 1677 28-22 56% 17 FL
6863 BVA 16-Elite 1677 28-10 74% 16 NC
6864 IVC 14 Nationals 1677 25-15 63% 14 AK
6865 Mem Metro 12-Elite red 1677 33-12 73% 12 TN
6866 Arkansas Elite 15 1677 26-8 76% 15 AR
6867 ATOMIC 14-Smack elite 1677 46-28 62% 14 MI
6868 Direction 15 Royal 1677 42-10 81% 15 NC
6869 ATHENAVB Bend 16-1 gold 1677 35-38 48% 16 OR
6870 City Juniors 12 Nike 1677 32-12 71% 12 TX
6871 Cajun Elite 16 Sara 1677 22-18 55% 16 LA
6872 Horseshoe VBC 15-Red 1677 21-11 64% 15 PA
6873 M2 Volleyball 12-E1 1677 46-27 63% 12 GA
6874 MAVS KC 14 Regional 1677 22-16 58% 14 KS
6875 GCVA 15-1 coast 1677 21-13 62% 15 TX
6876 NBVBC 17 1677 38-9 81% 17 MI
6877 MOJO Elite 16-Black 1677 32-33 47% 16 VA
6878 NHouston Elite 16 Premier 1677 30-17 64% 16 TX
6879 Platform 13-Adidas 1677 37-26 59% 13 IA
6880 LevelUp 16-Black 1677 26-12 68% 16 MI
6881 White Cross Elite 14 Dave 1677 18-7 72% 14 NC
6882 Wildfire 15-N anissa 1677 27-32 46% 15 FL
6883 AJV 13-Cedar park 1677 31-16 66% 13 TX
6884 Lions 14 Indigo 1677 31-9 78% 14 IL
6885 UVA 15-Jonah 1677 29-26 53% 15 LA
6886 Elevation 15-Timberline red 1677 33-31 52% 15 CO
6887 Roanoke United 16-Red 1677 29-11 73% 16 VA
6888 Temecula Viper 12-1 kehau/ashlyn 1677 21-15 58% 12 CA
6889 Boston United 14-National 1677 19-31 38% 14 MA
6890 Ark Jrs 14-National 1677 18-15 55% 14 AR
6891 AAVC 17-1 1677 34-14 71% 17 WV
6892 BVC 12-Kim 1677 23-16 59% 12 CA
6893 Arete 14-Navy 1677 21-15 51% 14 TX
6894 MOJO 13-Red 1677 22-4 81% 13 TX
6895 CALI 14-Blue 1677 30-24 56% 14 NY
6896 A5 17-Kortney 1677 60-25 71% 17 GA
6897 LAVA Shack 14-Molten 1677 25-14 64% 14 CA
6898 Momemtum 15-Black 1677 5-0 100% 15
6899 Santa Barbara 14-Premier 1677 8-1 89% 14
6900 CTX JR 14-1 1677 6-2 75% 14
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.