Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 137 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
6801 Club Ace 14 1678 30-13 70% 14 MD
6802 ATOMIC 13-Smack elite 1678 50-26 66% 13 MI
6803 Alpha Select 15-S 1678 26-9 74% 15 AR
6804 AVA 11-N lite schutte 1678 21-8 72% 11 OH
6805 BRUSA 16 William 1678 16-11 59% 16 CA
6806 Cajun Elite 12-Crystal / rhyan 1678 35-15 70% 12 LA
6807 CAVC 14-Power black 1678 30-7 81% 14 VA
6808 CUVC 17-National 1678 40-25 62% 17 NC
6809 GG 16-1 monster 1678 13-7 65% 16 NY
6810 New WAVE 17 Tsunami 1678 34-19 64% 17 IL
6811 MN North 12-1 navy 1678 35-14 71% 12 MN
6812 OPU 18-1 1678 27-26 51% 18 FL
6813 OMNI 17 Elite 1678 28-28 50% 17 CA
6814 PTVBC 14-1 1678 12-5 71% 14 IL
6815 Rhythm 16 Rocky 1678 34-28 55% 16 TN
6816 River City 18-Blue 1678 36-8 82% 18 WI
6817 Shoebox Volleyball 17-1 1678 23-9 72% 17 MI
6818 Texas Fury 11 Legacy 1678 28-7 80% 11 TX
6819 Stockdale RVC 15-Adidas 1678 41-26 61% 15 TX
6820 STL Crossfire 16 SR1 1678 43-12 77% 16 MO
6821 TNT 15 Viper 1678 27-5 84% 15 PA
6822 UNION 15-Purple 1678 49-27 64% 15 CA
6823 WAVE 15-Sarah 1678 21-6 78% 15 CA
6824 Attack VBC 13-Elite 1678 34-11 76% 13 TX
6825 305VBC 15-N cesar 1678 28-37 43% 15 FL
6826 LTX SELECT 18-Yellow 1678 25-10 71% 18 TX
6827 Catalyst 15-Green 1678 33-19 63% 15 TX
6828 Elevate Athletics 14-Nike brynnly 1678 11-19 37% 14 UT
6829 SC Rockstar 12-Lyanna 1678 37-22 63% 12 CA
6830 Mid City VBC 17-Black 1678 30-15 67% 17 CA
6831 WAVE 12-Brianna 1678 29-15 66% 12 CA
6832 Lockdown VBC 16-Thunder birds 1678 28-11 72% 16 MA
6833 JAG VBC 16-1 national 1678 51-19 73% 16 WI
6834 TC ELITE 17-Bt 1678 28-16 62% 17 LA
6835 Xcel Volleyball Club 17-1 adidas 1678 5-3 63% 17 TX
6836 Capital Ice 15 1678 31-30 51% 15 WA
6837 805 Elite 13-National 1678 22-13 63% 13 CA
6838 TIV 13-Black 1678 10-5 67% 13 TX
6839 LVA 15-Elite red 1678 24-18 52% 15 TX
6840 Diablo 17-1 gold 1678 14-8 64% 17 CA
6841 AVA 14-Premier 1 1678 20-16 56% 14 NY
6842 CVC 15-Navy 1678 26-13 65% 15 ND
6843 Blue Ridge 12-Blue 1678 29-16 64% 12 VA
6844 Club Legacy 17-Bravo 1678 24-13 65% 17 NE
6845 EXCEL 12-Gold 1678 15-13 54% 12 TX
6846 FWFIRE 17-1p 1678 10-8 50% 17 TX
6847 KC Power 18-2 1678 18-9 67% 18 KS
6848 LHVA 13-Purple travel 1678 29-7 81% 13 NY
6849 Ignite 16 Premier (SC) 1678 39-17 70% 16 CA
6850 East TX Jrs 14-Green 1678 18-6 75% 14
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.