Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 136 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
6751 Performance Juniors 17-1 1680 48-25 66% 17 VA
6752 KC Power 17-3 1680 23-15 61% 17 KS
6753 BSVBC 16-White 1680 33-17 62% 16 IL
6754 WSRVC 12-Short 1680 11-6 65% 12 WY
6755 NC 16-1 1680 10-1 91% 16 ND
6756 NHouston Elite 13-Premier 1680 31-33 48% 13 TX
6757 Panda 14-2 1680 23-21 52% 14 CA
6758 OPVC 11-Nadler 1680 27-22 55% 11 OH
6759 Greater Cincinnati Volleyball Club 13 13-Hall/Frazier 1680 30-15 67% 13 OH
6760 LEVBC 17-National 1680 25-46 34% 17 MD
6761 Adrenaline 16-Jenna 1680 28-8 72% 16 IA
6762 COAST 16-Izze 1680 6-1 86% 16 CA
6763 Madfrog East 15-Diamond 1680 24-5 80% 15
6764 CCVB 16-3 1679 9-4 69% 16 IL
6765 NETFORCE 14-Kelly/dayion 1679 9-3 75% 14 AL
6766 BRVBA Blue Royals 16-Amber 1679 6-2 75% 16 NV
6767 AZ REV 18 Elite 1679 20-40 33% 18 AZ
6768 ID Crush 14-Marcus 1679 34-23 60% 14 ID
6769 Wilton 16 1679 8-0 89% 16 IA
6770 Stars 14 Chastain 1679 43-20 68% 14 SC
6771 BCS Skyline H 16-Black 1679 33-18 65% 16 TX
6772 Krush VBC 16 National 1679 43-22 66% 16 MI
6773 CVC 13 ROYAL 1679 18-11 62% 13 OH
6774 BSVBC 13-Blue 1679 30-17 63% 13 IL
6775 Sky High Adidas 12-Elite 1679 22-30 42% 12 IL
6776 HVA 16-1 1679 8-3 73% 16 NV
6777 APVA 15 Capybara 1679 23-13 64% 15 TN
6778 Aces 17 1679 4-1 80% 17 OK
6779 Platinum 15 Power 1679 31-27 53% 15 UT
6780 Red Rock 14-Destiny - martinez 1679 20-9 69% 14 CA
6781 OPVC 11-Bedrick 1679 6-0 100% 11 OH
6782 Lady Legends 12-Teal 1679 6-0 100% 12 PA
6783 CCVA 16-Kubo 1679 9-5 64% 16 CA
6784 Cleveland Chaos 16-Ue 1679 38-17 69% 16 NC
6785 Game Day 18-1 1679 21-18 54% 18 OR
6786 LIV 13-Royal 1679 6-1 86% 13 CA
6787 RISE Black 15 1679 11-4 69% 15 UT
6788 BAVA 16 Breakers 1679 31-28 51% 16 MD
6789 CLVC 14-Red 1679 35-15 70% 14 NC
6790 TAV 12-Black (NT) 1679 16-16 46% 12 TX
6791 Ignite 16 Premier (SC) 1679 39-17 70% 16 CA
6792 Warren Sixpack 17-red 1679 27-20 57% 17 NJ
6793 WAJ 17-Purple storm white 1679 11-4 73% 17 AL
6794 Mid City VBC 17-Black 1679 30-15 67% 17 CA
6795 LES 15-Traci 1679 25-10 69% 15 AL
6796 SC Midlands 17-National r 1679 21-30 41% 17 SC
6797 SCENIC CITY 14-National 1679 36-22 62% 14 TN
6798 Elkhart 12-Lions 1679 5-0 100% 12 IN
6799 Spikers 16-1 1679 23-6 79% 16 KS
6800 PROZONE FL 14-White 1679 23-9 72% 14 FL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.