Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 136 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
6751 NHouston Elite 13-Premier 1679 31-33 48% 13 TX
6752 Pulse 16 Chavez 1679 29-21 58% 16 CA
6753 Rancho 13 Premier 1679 19-15 56% 13 CA
6754 RoVo 15 1679 19-11 63% 15 VA
6755 SOUTH SHORE 16-Mizuno 1679 17-15 53% 16 MA
6756 VolleyFX 14 Spell 1679 40-9 78% 14 NY
6757 Winks 15 1679 20-5 80% 15 FL
6758 A3 12-X 1679 42-16 72% 12 TN
6759 Krush VBC 16 National 1679 43-22 66% 16 MI
6760 NEVA 16-Black lexi 1679 28-9 74% 16 UT
6761 HP Illinois 15-Select 1679 26-16 62% 15 IL
6762 SUSA 14-Navy 1679 11-9 50% 14 UT
6763 Ga Fusion 12-1 1679 30-7 81% 12 GA
6764 MINOI 14-Grey 1679 31-16 65% 14 UT
6765 Surfside 12-Pv elite 1679 33-24 58% 12 CA
6766 DaKine 15-National navy 1679 44-21 68% 15 WA
6767 SVC 18-National 1679 19-16 54% 18 MO
6768 PVC 18-1 1679 27-23 54% 18 OH
6769 APVB 18-Elite 1679 19-20 49% 18 GA
6770 NE Shock 14-1 1679 20-10 67% 14 CT
6771 Temecula Viper 14-1 jo/kelly 1679 13-8 62% 14 CA
6772 Countdown 16-Elite 1679 40-20 67% 16 FL
6773 Florida's Sports Coast Elite 12-Blue 1679 32-13 71% 12 FL
6774 Unified 17-1 1679 34-36 49% 17 MI
6775 LAVA Mission 17-Molten 1679 32-17 65% 17 CA
6776 CWAVE Coreno 14 1679 24-9 73% 14 OH
6777 Flyers 13-Usa-greta 1679 33-25 52% 13 TX
6778 Attack 13-Select 1679 12-12 50% 13 IL
6779 BVC 14-1 boom 1679 7-3 70% 14 DE
6780 PVA 15-2 1679 5-1 83% 15 MO
6781 Spirit VBC 16-1 black 1679 2-7 22% 16 OH
6782 COAST 16-Izze 1679 6-1 86% 16 CA
6783 OPVC 11-Bedrick 1679 6-0 100% 11 OH
6784 Summit VC 15-Black 1679 19-8 70% 15 MO
6785 Empowered 17-Elite black 1679 24-30 44% 17 IN
6786 PAEVA 15-Maroon 1679 43-24 64% 15 CA
6787 Zona 15-Black 1679 4-4 50% 15 AZ
6788 Elkhart 12-Lions 1679 5-0 100% 12
6789 Wilton 16 1679 8-0 89% 16
6790 BRVBA Blue Royals 16-Amber 1679 6-2 75% 16
6791 BLVC 17 1679 15-6 71% 17
6792 National 17-1 1679 5-3 63% 17
6793 SPVA 14-1 1679 16-4 80% 14 MN
6794 LES 15-Traci 1678 25-10 69% 15
6795 SWI3D 15-Black 1678 16-3 84% 15
6796 WSRVC 12-Short 1678 11-6 65% 12
6797 Viper 15-1 michael/luci 1678 9-1 90% 15 CA
6798 Iowa PowerPlex 10-Sieck 1678 5-0 100% 10 IA
6799 Juggernaut 12-Regional1 1678 35-20 64% 12 CO
6800 RockCity 15-N3 1678 43-14 75% 15 OH
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.