2025-2026 Season — Page 135 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6701 | Invasion 15-Black | 1681 | 16-14 | 53% | 15 | MO |
| 6702 | MJVA 18-Elite black | 1681 | 23-14 | 62% | 18 | TN |
| 6703 | ATHENA VB 18-2 black national | 1681 | 29-30 | 49% | 18 | OR |
| 6704 | Elevation 15-Timberline red | 1681 | 33-31 | 52% | 15 | CO |
| 6705 | TeamLVC Girls 15-Black | 1681 | 41-29 | 58% | 15 | NY |
| 6706 | A5 12-Jose | 1681 | 48-22 | 69% | 12 | GA |
| 6707 | Rhythm 16 Rocky | 1681 | 34-28 | 55% | 16 | TN |
| 6708 | BCS Skyline H 15-Black | 1681 | 35-22 | 61% | 15 | TX |
| 6709 | Buffalo Stampeders 16-1 | 1681 | 49-22 | 69% | 16 | FL |
| 6710 | Lady Legends 13 | 1681 | 14-6 | 67% | 13 | PA |
| 6711 | WAVE 12-Brianna | 1681 | 29-15 | 66% | 12 | CA |
| 6712 | LI Fury 16-Don/laura | 1681 | 10-8 | 56% | 16 | NY |
| 6713 | New WAVE 17 Tsunami | 1681 | 34-19 | 64% | 17 | IL |
| 6714 | Hometown Heat 12-Kindle | 1681 | 21-5 | 81% | 12 | WI |
| 6715 | STVA 17-Navy-1 | 1681 | 35-29 | 55% | 17 | TX |
| 6716 | Idaho Peak Bryant 16-S | 1681 | 21-31 | 40% | 16 | ID |
| 6717 | TIV 13-Black | 1681 | 10-5 | 67% | 13 | TX |
| 6718 | South Central NE 11-Black | 1681 | 11-8 | 58% | 11 | NE |
| 6719 | USANY FORTITUDE 18 | 1681 | 4-3 | 57% | 18 | MN |
| 6720 | NWAJS 15-Adidas | 1681 | 7-2 | 78% | 15 | NE |
| 6721 | COAST 15-4 karli | 1681 | 34-16 | 68% | 15 | CA |
| 6722 | CWVC 16-Black | 1681 | 8-2 | 80% | 16 | WI |
| 6723 | FTLUTD Fusion 15-Sidney | 1681 | 6-8 | 43% | 15 | FL |
| 6724 | Four1Nine Xtreme 16 16 Moran | 1681 | 11-3 | 79% | 16 | OH |
| 6725 | Altitude 18-Black | 1681 | 49-28 | 64% | 18 | AZ |
| 6726 | Pipeline VC 17-Empire | 1681 | 3-4 | 43% | 17 | IL |
| 6727 | CINCY EAST 16-1 black | 1681 | 30-31 | 49% | 16 | OH |
| 6728 | OT 13-J rico | 1681 | 16-24 | 40% | 13 | FL |
| 6729 | FH 16-2 ikaika mady/pearl | 1681 | 12-6 | 63% | 16 | TX |
| 6730 | VQ 11-2 | 1681 | 7-5 | 58% | 11 | PR |
| 6731 | Barr-Reeve Volleyball Club 14 BRVBC White (Jen) | 1680 | 12-1 | 92% | 14 | |
| 6732 | Shasta Elite Volleyball Club 14 Shasta Elite - Chai X | 1680 | 18-6 | 75% | 14 | CA |
| 6733 | SPVA 14-1 | 1680 | 16-4 | 80% | 14 | MN |
| 6734 | Spirit VBC 16-1 black | 1680 | 2-7 | 22% | 16 | IA |
| 6735 | LAVA Shack 14-Molten | 1680 | 25-14 | 64% | 14 | CA |
| 6736 | Winks 15 | 1680 | 20-5 | 80% | 15 | FL |
| 6737 | No Limits VBC 15-National | 1680 | 47-12 | 78% | 15 | IA |
| 6738 | Dig This! VB Ohana 15-Pink | 1680 | 8-2 | 80% | 15 | NV |
| 6739 | Eagles VBC 13 | 1680 | 7-0 | 78% | 13 | MI |
| 6740 | Capital Volleyball Club 17 Eclipse HS Purple | 1680 | 5-0 | 100% | 17 | WA |
| 6741 | 805 Elite 14-National | 1680 | 18-11 | 62% | 14 | CA |
| 6742 | PVA 11-1 | 1680 | 6-1 | 86% | 11 | MO |
| 6743 | De Pere Diggers 13-S | 1680 | 8-2 | 80% | 13 | WI |
| 6744 | The House 16-Premier | 1680 | 61-36 | 63% | 16 | MI |
| 6745 | EP Ohana 12 | 1680 | 28-19 | 57% | 12 | TX |
| 6746 | NDVBC Lightning 11 | 1680 | 14-4 | 70% | 11 | MO |
| 6747 | SUSA 16-Red | 1680 | 12-1 | 75% | 16 | UT |
| 6748 | Southside 16 | 1680 | 33-11 | 75% | 16 | ND |
| 6749 | HOV 15 Navy | 1680 | 18-5 | 78% | 15 | VA |
| 6750 | BLVC 17 | 1680 | 15-6 | 71% | 17 | UT |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.