Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 135 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
6701 Invasion 15-Black 1681 16-14 53% 15 MO
6702 MJVA 18-Elite black 1681 23-14 62% 18 TN
6703 ATHENA VB 18-2 black national 1681 29-30 49% 18 OR
6704 Elevation 15-Timberline red 1681 33-31 52% 15 CO
6705 TeamLVC Girls 15-Black 1681 41-29 58% 15 NY
6706 A5 12-Jose 1681 48-22 69% 12 GA
6707 Rhythm 16 Rocky 1681 34-28 55% 16 TN
6708 BCS Skyline H 15-Black 1681 35-22 61% 15 TX
6709 Buffalo Stampeders 16-1 1681 49-22 69% 16 FL
6710 Lady Legends 13 1681 14-6 67% 13 PA
6711 WAVE 12-Brianna 1681 29-15 66% 12 CA
6712 LI Fury 16-Don/laura 1681 10-8 56% 16 NY
6713 New WAVE 17 Tsunami 1681 34-19 64% 17 IL
6714 Hometown Heat 12-Kindle 1681 21-5 81% 12 WI
6715 STVA 17-Navy-1 1681 35-29 55% 17 TX
6716 Idaho Peak Bryant 16-S 1681 21-31 40% 16 ID
6717 TIV 13-Black 1681 10-5 67% 13 TX
6718 South Central NE 11-Black 1681 11-8 58% 11 NE
6719 USANY FORTITUDE 18 1681 4-3 57% 18 MN
6720 NWAJS 15-Adidas 1681 7-2 78% 15 NE
6721 COAST 15-4 karli 1681 34-16 68% 15 CA
6722 CWVC 16-Black 1681 8-2 80% 16 WI
6723 FTLUTD Fusion 15-Sidney 1681 6-8 43% 15 FL
6724 Four1Nine Xtreme 16 16 Moran 1681 11-3 79% 16 OH
6725 Altitude 18-Black 1681 49-28 64% 18 AZ
6726 Pipeline VC 17-Empire 1681 3-4 43% 17 IL
6727 CINCY EAST 16-1 black 1681 30-31 49% 16 OH
6728 OT 13-J rico 1681 16-24 40% 13 FL
6729 FH 16-2 ikaika mady/pearl 1681 12-6 63% 16 TX
6730 VQ 11-2 1681 7-5 58% 11 PR
6731 Barr-Reeve Volleyball Club 14 BRVBC White (Jen) 1680 12-1 92% 14
6732 Shasta Elite Volleyball Club 14 Shasta Elite - Chai X 1680 18-6 75% 14 CA
6733 SPVA 14-1 1680 16-4 80% 14 MN
6734 Spirit VBC 16-1 black 1680 2-7 22% 16 IA
6735 LAVA Shack 14-Molten 1680 25-14 64% 14 CA
6736 Winks 15 1680 20-5 80% 15 FL
6737 No Limits VBC 15-National 1680 47-12 78% 15 IA
6738 Dig This! VB Ohana 15-Pink 1680 8-2 80% 15 NV
6739 Eagles VBC 13 1680 7-0 78% 13 MI
6740 Capital Volleyball Club 17 Eclipse HS Purple 1680 5-0 100% 17 WA
6741 805 Elite 14-National 1680 18-11 62% 14 CA
6742 PVA 11-1 1680 6-1 86% 11 MO
6743 De Pere Diggers 13-S 1680 8-2 80% 13 WI
6744 The House 16-Premier 1680 61-36 63% 16 MI
6745 EP Ohana 12 1680 28-19 57% 12 TX
6746 NDVBC Lightning 11 1680 14-4 70% 11 MO
6747 SUSA 16-Red 1680 12-1 75% 16 UT
6748 Southside 16 1680 33-11 75% 16 ND
6749 HOV 15 Navy 1680 18-5 78% 15 VA
6750 BLVC 17 1680 15-6 71% 17 UT
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.