Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 135 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
6701 Top Flight Volleyball Academy 13-National black 1680 11-12 48% 13 NV
6702 TX STORM 12 SMACK 1680 24-19 55% 12 TX
6703 VolleyFX 15 Chant 1680 34-25 57% 15 NY
6704 UCVC-SC 18-1 a&l 1680 23-9 72% 18 SC
6705 WI Flight 14-Black 1680 27-13 68% 14 WI
6706 WI Juniors 15-1 1680 24-46 34% 15 WI
6707 WBLVC 13-1 1680 20-6 71% 13 MN
6708 Adrenaline 16-Jenna 1680 28-8 72% 16 IA
6709 Empower VB 15-1 1680 6-2 67% 15 PA
6710 Northern Tier 14-Blue 1680 13-3 65% 14 PA
6711 BVC 18-1 1680 44-30 58% 18 DE
6712 Jax Skyline 11-Royal 1680 38-21 64% 11 FL
6713 Legacy 15-Elite east 1680 38-12 76% 15 MI
6714 CMASS EDGE 17-White 1680 34-13 72% 17 MA
6715 Solon Spartans 13-Black 1680 9-3 56% 13 IA
6716 Northeast 15-Orange 1680 29-6 83% 15 CT
6717 LI Fury 16-Don/laura 1680 10-8 56% 16 NY
6718 TNT 16-Thunder 1680 4-1 80% 16 PA
6719 Apex 13-1 1680 7-7 50% 13 SC
6720 HRVC Hurricanes 14-2 1680 3-2 60% 14 ON
6721 FPVC 15-Ren girls 1680 12-6 67% 15 CA
6722 Winona Destruction 16-M 1680 8-1 80% 16 MO
6723 PVA 11-1 1680 6-1 86% 11 MO
6724 417 Juniors 14-2 1680 7-0 88% 14 MO
6725 NE D-League 16 1680 8-3 73% 16 NE
6726 SUVA 12-2 1680 6-0 100% 12 OH
6727 PSVBA 16-Legacy 2 1680 37-28 57% 16 WA
6728 AJAXVB 16-1 gold 1680 9-1 90% 16
6729 Madfrog East 15-Diamond 1680 24-5 80% 15
6730 VVC 16 1680 16-5 76% 16
6731 South Central NE 11-Black 1679 11-8 58% 11
6732 WyoBraska Sky 16-1 1679 7-3 70% 16
6733 NC 16-1 1679 10-1 91% 16
6734 SCVC 17-Erica 1679 10-4 71% 17
6735 Lightning 17-1 1679 5-0 100% 17
6736 ACT 13-Quon 1679 20-24 45% 13 CA
6737 Chaos 14-S pink 1679 8-2 80% 14 MN
6738 BSVBC 13-Blue 1679 30-17 63% 13 IL
6739 LBK 15-1 1679 19-10 66% 15 OH
6740 KCV 12 NATIONAL 1679 35-19 65% 12 TX
6741 C2 17-1 regional blue m&m 1679 10-5 67% 17 TN
6742 BBVCL 15 Kyle 1679 30-23 57% 15 NV
6743 AZ REV 13-Elite 1679 38-32 54% 13 AZ
6744 AppVC 15 Elite 1679 38-17 69% 15 NC
6745 LA6 15-Teri 1679 22-6 79% 15 LA
6746 Aspire 16-1 black 1679 28-26 52% 16 AB
6747 Mater Dei Jr Cats 12-Willett 1679 13-5 72% 12 IN
6748 Harlingen Area VBC 15-1 1679 27-9 75% 15 TX
6749 Millennium 16-Ew 1679 37-23 62% 16 OH
6750 MOVA 14-M 1679 38-15 72% 14 OH
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.